Cortland Legislature to Form Gas Taskforce

http://www.cortlandstandard.net/articles/11052010n.html

Panels will explore gas drilling impacts County subcommittees will focus on roads, public safety, housing, environment, economy

By CATHERINE WILDE
Staff Reporter
cwilde@cortlandstandard.net
A number of subcommittees will be formed over the next two weeks to study the impacts that gas drilling could have locally if the state allows hydraulic fracturing to proceed.
The county Agriculture, Planning and Environment Committee Thursday endorsed forming a steering committee which will select members to sit on five subcommittees that will analyze different areas that could be affected by the gas drilling industry.
Hydrofracking, the process of injecting large quantities of chemically-treated water into the shale deep underground to extract gas, is being reviewed by the state Department of Environmental Conservation. Until the review is complete, there is a de facto moratorium on the process statewide.
But the technology is expected to proceed and Cortland County lawmakers want to be prepared when it does.
Agriculture Planning and Environment Committee Chair Danny Ross (R-Cortlandville) spearheaded the idea of forming the natural gas drilling task force.
Committees will be formed to examine the public safety impacts, the ways roads and infrastructure could be affected by truck traffic, the potential need for more housing for gas company crews, and the environmental and economic impacts of the industry.
Ross said the committees should be up and running within two months. Each committee will consist of about eight people who have expertise in the areas their committee is exploring, he said. The committees will meet monthly and report their findings to the Agriculture, Planning and Environment Committee.
Steering committee members will be Legislators Jack Williams (D-8th Ward), Ross, Newell Willcox (R-Homer), Larry Cornell (R-Marathon and Lapeer), Jennifer Gofkowski (D-Homer), John Steger (R-Preble and Scott) and Ray Parker (D-2nd Ward).
According to Ross, the purpose of the natural gas drilling task force is to study all the impacts natural gas development could have on the county and help local governments make the best use of those opportunities.
For example, the subcommittee that will examine the impact to roads and infrastructure, will investigate what can be done beforehand, such as documenting existing conditions of roads that could in turn be used to show how much a road has been damaged by drilling activity, he said.
The subcommittee that will examine the housing situation will research whether there is enough housing to accommodate the gas crews that will come into the community.
The public safety committee will investigate how prepared emergency crews will be in the event of a spill and the environmental subcommittee could consist of geologists and scientists who can help the county understand the potential environmental impacts of gas drilling.
Ross said he will not have anyone with existing gas leases sit on the subcommittees.
Parker said he will look for members who are not biased in one direction or another.
“I’m going to be looking for someone who’s going to look at the pluses and minuses and try to find out if there’s some way any of the negatives can be taken care of and looked at in a positive nature,” Parker said.
Parker said he does not want the potential economic benefits to be ignored and also does not want the possible adverse environmental impacts to be discounted. He said he has someone in mind to recommend for the subcommittee because the person is a scientist with knowledge of the industry.
Parker would not say who the person was until he asked him if he wants to serve.

Links to Gas Committees/Taskforces from Other Counties

 

Cortland Standard Editorial on Gas Issues Nov. 5, 2010

Nov 16, Elmira–“The Rest of the Story: The Real Impacts of Gas Drilling”,

Remember, the Citizens for Protection of Health and Environment (CPHE) sponsored Public Forum, “The Rest of the Story: The Real Impacts of Gas Drilling”, Tuesday, November 16th, 6:30 PM, Trinity Episcopal Church Parish Hall at the corner of Church St and Main St., in the middle of Elmira, N.Y.
There is lots of parking off of 1st Street, which is parallel to Church (1 block) and perpendicular to Main St. The 1st St. entrance comes directly into the Parish Hall.
Speakers: 
Louis Allstadt: Former Exec VP of Mobil Oil Corp
Chris Burger: Chair of Binghamton Regional Sustainability Coalition
Ron Gulla: An affected farmer from Hickory Co, PA
Bret Jennings: Director Hallstead Great Bend Sewage Authority
Jack Ossont: Community Organizer and Regional Activist
Dr. John F. Stolz: Director Center for Environmental Research & Education, Duquesne University
Panel Discussion with Q & A Session Following

NYS State Forest Management Plan Finalized

NYS State Forest Management Plan Finalized

This plan and generic environmental impact statement (GEIS) will guide the future management of the state’s 786,329-acre State Forest holdings. Key goals focus on ecosystem health and diversity, economic benefits, recreational opportunities, forest conservation and sustainable management.

The plan was presented in draft form on September 1, 2010. The draft plan was available for public comment until October 29th. Comments were also received and considered after the deadline. Over 3,000 written comments were received. Nine public hearings were held throughout the state from September 14th – 30th.

The plan has been edited based on public input and is now considered final DEC Office of Natural Resources policy for the development of State Forest Unit Management Plans. A responsiveness document will be posted on this website, and will include DEC’s responses to the many comments received.*** Revision of the plan is scheduled to occur every 10 years.  it is not up as of this writing

Notice of Acceptance of Final GEIS

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYS DEC), as lead agency, has accepted a Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement on the proposed Final Strategic Plan for State Forest Management. Electronic copies of the Final Strategic Plan and Final GEIS are available online at: www.dec.ny.gov/lands/64567.html or by requesting a CD by e-mail at stateforestplan@gw.dec.state.ny.us or by calling NYS DEC regional offices.

NYS DEC announces the completion of the Final Strategic Plan for State Forest Management (Plan) and Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS). This notice has been prepared in accordance with Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law. NYS DEC held public hearings in each NYS DEC administrative region on the Draft Plan, released September 1, 2010 and accepted public comments until October 29, 2010. These hearings also served as public hearings on the Draft GEIS pursuant to the applicable SEQR Act (6NYCRR §617.9(a)(4)).

The final Plan is an update and revision of the Draft Strategic Plan for State Forest Management which includes identifications of future management goals for NYS DEC administered State Forests. It establishes statewide management guidelines for NYS DEC staff through a process of public involvement and review. The plan provides a foundation for the development of Unit Management Plans (UMPs), which set forth the specific actions to be undertaken by NYS DEC on individual State Forests. As individual UMPs are developed, this plan will serve as a guide and will be included by reference. This plan will be revised at least once every ten years.

This Plan describes how State Forests will be managed in a sustainable manner by promoting ecosystem health, enhancing landscape biodiversity, protecting soil productivity and water quality. In addition, State Forests will continue to provide the many recreational, social and economic benefits valued so highly by the people of New York State. NYS DEC will continue the legacy which started 80 years ago, leaving these lands to the next generation in better condition than they are today.

Five goals were developed for the management of State Forests. These goals were based on the criteria developed in the Montreal Process and are as follows:

  • Goal 1, to provide healthy and biologically diverse ecosystems;
  • Goal 2, to maintain human-made State Forest assets;
  • Goal 3, to provide recreational opportunities for people of all ages and abilities;
  • Goal 4, to provide economic benefits to the people of the State; and
  • Goal 5, to provide a legal framework for forest conservation and sustainable management of State Forests.

Activities that have the potential to cause significant adverse impacts were addressed and include: increased public recreational use, facility development, prescribed fire, silvicultural activities, oil and gas drilling and control of competing vegetation and invasive species. Potential impacts were further discussed in the Draft GEIS including soil erosion, damage to vegetation, increased smoke and associated odors, surface and groundwater effects and effects of pesticides on the environment, including non-target species. The final Plan discusses all of these potential impacts and describes recommended management activities and mitigation measures to minimize potential impacts.

Contact: Justin Perry, NYS DEC – Division of Lands and Forests, 625 Broadway, Albany, NY 12233-4255, Phone: (518) 402-9436 begin_of_the_skype_

highlighting              (518) 402-9436      end_of_the_skype_highlighting, E-mail: japerry@gw.dec.state.ny.us.

Comments on:Final DEC Strategic Plan for Forest Management

Comparison of draft and final Strategic Plans for forest Management–Jim Weiss

The Strategic Plan for State Forest Management has been released by NYSDEC.
From the executive summary: Mineral Resources

  • The leasing and development of natural gas and oil resources can provide jobs and income to
  • the State while increasing domestic energy supplies. Oil and natural gas are valuable resources
  • which can provide energy and revenue, as well as the opportunity for improvements to the
  • existing infrastructure of the State Forests (such as improving access through upgrading existing
  • roads, culverts and gates).
  • As with any other human activity on State lands, oil and natural gas exploration and
  • development can impact the environment. The biggest risks from natural gas exploration and
  • development are potential impacts on underground aquifers and residential water wells in the
  • immediate area of drilling. While techniques used today are far more advanced and protective
  • of ground water, there are still risks   as with almost any construction or development project.
  • The Department will incorporate all available technologies and methods to reduce these risks.
  • Emerging issues include disposal by injection and carbon capture.  Neither of these activities is
  • currently taking place on State Forest lands.
  • Recommended actions include:
  • • Apply a hierarchical approach that classifies areas of each State Forest into specific
  • categories.
  • • Adapt the draft guidance for pipelines on State Forests to the DEC policy system and
  • expanding it to include guidance on strategies for dealing with existing pipeline corridors
  • and establishment of new pipeline corridors.  If the issue of existing unauthorized
  • pipelines cannot be sufficiently addressed at the policy level, propose legislation to
  • resolve the issue.
  • • Finalize and adopt the current draft policy on seismic exploration.
  • • Adopt policies addressing disposal by injection and carbon capture and sequestration.
  • • Adopt a policy on tract assessments for oil and gas leasing, based on mineral character
  • and expected mineral activity, site condition, and public use.
  • • Adopt a policy on water use for oil and gas extraction, based on information in theDivision of Mineral Resources GEIS
  • Starting on page 226 of Chapter 5 you will find the portion relating to hydrofracking.  The concerns raised by the public seem to have at least been considered on page 331 which the following link will take you to: Click here: Chapters 5-7 + Appendices Starting on page 226 of Chapter 5 you will find the portion relating to hydrofracking.  The concerns raised by the public seem to have at least been considered on page 231 which the following link will take you to: Click here: http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/lands_forests_pdf/spsfmfinal3.pdf . Text of Mineral Resources section: https://gdacc.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/final-plan-mineral-resources.pdf

    Pipelines:

    The document appears to have sidestepped an important pipeline issue:  The DEC correctly points to the PSC (Public Service Commission ) as the controlling authority for lines that are outside the wellpad.

    However, the plan sidesteps when it come to handling the pipeline ROW (right of way). On non-state forest land this is handled in one of two ways: a) by a formal easement with the landholder or, b) thru an eminent domain (condemnation) procedure (whereby the ROW is “taken”, presumeaby against the owner’s wishes and the owner is compensated.

    Eminent domain applies in two cases: a) the pipeline is between states and the authority is federal (by Federal Energy Regulatory Commission , FERC), lines permitted by FERC carry emminent domain authority. b) within state lines, these carry eminent domain authority IF the Co. has Public Utility status.

    Now, what’s the pipeline deal in the forests?  will the state negotiate for ROWs, or will it require eminent domain authority in which case the Co will, in conjunction with the PSC or FERC, determine the routing (in this case DEC will NOT be a controlling entity, but presumeably consulted)?

    Remember, no wells without pipelines.


     

    DEC Strategic Plan for State Forest Management (DRAFT)

    This draft plan and generic environmental impact statement (GEIS) will guide the future management of the state’s 786,329-acre State Forest holdings and is being made available for public review and comment. Key goals focus on ecosystem health and diversity, economic benefits, recreational opportunities, forest conservation and sustainable management.

    Press Release

    Guides to understanding the Strategic Plan:

    ——————

    Essay on Impact of Industrial Drilling in State Forests

    Lost in the Woods By Peter Mantius

    BURDETT, Oct. 25 — It’s open season on New York’s state forests.

    State regulators are asking for public comment by Oct. 29 on a proposal to let gas drillers hydrofrack the forests and criss-cross them with construction roads and natural gas gathering lines.

    In Schuyler County alone, this could affect — or decimate — more than 10,000 acres in five state forests: Sugar Hill, Coon Hollow, Cinnamon Lake, Beaver Dam and Goundry Hill.

    Most of this land was acquired about 80 years ago for about $4 an acre. The forests are used by hikers, hunters, horseback riders, snowmobilers and others.

    The idea of industrializing any portion of them would appear to violate both the spirit and the letter of the Depression-era laws passed to assemble and protect them. Those special woodlands, the laws said, shall be “forever devoted to reforestation and the establishment and maintenance thereon of forests for watershed protection, the production of timber and for recreation and kindred purposes.”

    The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation apparently isn’t worried about every fine point in dusty old statutes.

    Applying an extraordinarily broad legal interpretation, the agency is prepared to expand the list of legal “kindred purposes” to include so called high-volume hydraulic fracturing, toxic wastewater storage in ponds, underground natural gas storage, heavy trucking and widespread road and pipeline construction.

    This comes from the same agency that warns state forest hikers: “Don’t litter! Stay on designated trails. Do not cause damage by heedlessly trampling trail side vegetation.”

    So littering is bad, but hydrofracking is OK? Surely, this agency is lost in the woods. Read more of this post

    Effects of Gas Extraction on Recreation. Lansing 7pm Nov. 1

    A Free, Public, Educational Forum on the Effects of Gas Extraction on Recreation, Hunting, Fishing, Hiking, etc.

    Link to Video of this Program

    Link to Download Video

    High volume, slick water, hydraulic fracturing (hydro-fracking) to take natural gas from the Marcellus Shale has been going on in Pennsylvania for the past three years. Hydro-fracking includes withdrawing millions of gallons of water from nearby rivers, lakes, and streams, mixing it with chemicals, and injecting the solution under high pressure into the shale to release the gas.

    What has been the effect of Marcellus gas development on the people who use the outdoors for recreation? What has been the effect on their hiking, fishing, biking, birding, hunting, camping, boating, family outings, sightseeing?

    Pennsylvanians and those who have studied the effects will share what they have learned, and they will take questions from the audience at this free, educational forum.
    Intended Audience:  People who enjoy the outdoors for recreation, hunting, fishing, hiking, biking, birding, hunting, camping, boating, family outings, and sightseeing.  In addition, anyone who seeks more information about the effects of Marcellus gas development in Pennsylvania on their natural environment should attend.
    Speakers:

    Katy Dunlap, Trout Unlimited, Eastern Water Project Director.  Ms. Dunlap will talk about impacts on coldwater fisheries and their watersheds, ranging from small mountain streams to larger river systems like the Susquehanna.  Katy will also explain what Trout Unlimited and its members are doing to protect streams and rivers in the Marcellus Shale region.

    ·  Shellie Northrop, member and volunteer of several PA and NY hiking clubs and trail associations.  Through Ms. Northrop’s years of hiking and contact with other hikers, she is able to describe the impact of drilling activities for hikers in the Northern Tier of Pennsylvania.  She will also use examples in PA to offer suggestions of how those of us in NY can take action now that will help protect our wilderness areas.

    ·  Bill Belitskus, Allegheny Defense Project, Board President.  Mr. Belitskus lives adjacent to and has been hiking, camping and recreating in Pennsylvania’s Allegheny National Forest for over 35 years.  He has been monitoring forest fragmentation, water degradation, air pollution, species decline and loss of recreation opportunities associated with oil and gas development from land clearing, well site and road construction, pipelines, tank batteries, generators, compressors, gas processing plants, truck traffic and construction equipment for the past 15 years.  He will discuss one of the critical issues of unconventional hydrocarbon, deep shale extraction: withdrawal of water from streams and rivers, and riparian rights of landowners to protect waterways.

    · Co-Sponsors: Social Ventures, ROUSE, Dryden Resource Awareness Coalition (DRAC), Cornell Outdoor Education, Cayuga Lake Watershed Network, Finger Lakes Sierra Club, Coalition to Protect New York, Tompkins County League of Women Voters, Ithaca Health Alliance, and others

    Contact information:   Sara Hess, 607-272-6394.

    Text of Summary on this Forum outdoor forum article.[1]

    Nov. 19 Pittsburgh Conf. on Fracking & Health

    The University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health cordially invites you to the following exclusive conference:

    HEALTH EFFECTS OF SHALE GAS EXTRACTION: WHAT IS KNOWN AND WHAT CAN WE PREDICT?

    This free conference will explore the science and methodological approaches behind understanding environmental health impacts associated with increasing development of natural gas extraction from shale deposits found under wide geographical areas of the United States.

    Event Information:
    University Club, Pittsburgh, PA
    November 19, 2010
    8 AM – 6 PM

    This conference is limited to 150 participants. Click on the link to learn more and register: http://www.eoh.pitt.edu/marcellus.asp.

    -Samantha Malone, MPH, CPH-

    Communications Specialist & Doctoral Student
    Center for Healthy Environments & Communities
    University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health
    slm75@pitt.edu | samanthamalone119@gmail.com | www.chec.pitt.edu <http://www.chec.pitt.edu>

    PA Charges Cabot with Tainting Water in Dimock

    DEP pledges public water for Dimock

    BY LAURA LEGERE (STAFF WRITER)
    Published: October 1, 2010
    DIMOCK TWP. – Pennsylvania’s head environmental regulator committed Thursday to installing an $11.8 million public water line for at least 18 families whose water supplies have been contaminated by methane from natural gas drilling.
    Department of Environmental Protection Secretary John Hanger said the state will sue Cabot Oil and Gas Corp., the Texas-based gas driller deemed responsible for the contamination, to recoup the cost of installing the approximately 12.5 miles of new pipe from Montrose if the company refuses to fund the project voluntarily.

    James Northrup Refutes Cabot Denials:

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: <jamesherman@gmail.com>
    Date: Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:07 AM
    Subject: [sustainableotsego] James Northrup on Cabot Violations and NYS regs
    To: sustainableotsego@lists.riseup.net

    1. The Cabot denial fails to address the majority of the Pa DEP complaints –
    most of which were surface problems – ie. spills.

    Over a third of Cabot’s 62 Dimock wells had spills. Cabot’s PR piece does not
    address any of them in detail.

    Spills are the most likely source of water pollution. So worthy of being
    addressed by Cabot as they were by the Pa DEP citations.

    Instead Cabot focuses on the gassing of the 10 local water wells – and it does
    this with “affidavits” from local residents and rhetorical denials.

    It goes into great length to deny that one of the water wells did not
    “fountain” or “explode” when the Cabot frack was put on nearby.

    2. Cabot has already plugged, capped and abandoned 3 of the 8 wells that
    allegedly gassed nearby water wells.

    This impairs Cabot’s ability to prove that they were not a problem.  It
    destroys the evidence.

    Leaving the Pa DEP report on the wells as the only independent source of
    information as to whether the wells failed to hold pressure.

    By plugging them, Cabot has effectively  admitted they were a problem –  before
    denying in ads that they had  any problems.

    3. Cabot does not offer any evidence that the wells didn’t fail.  The Pa DEP
    cited the Cabot wells for leaking  – Cabot does not prove they did not.

    The Pa DEP fine specifically cited the wells for elevated leak gauge pressures
    – the gauge that indicates a leak in the casing/ cement. . .

    Cabot offers nothing in its denials to prove that the wells were not leaking.
    No engineering report on the leak gauge pressure readings.

    It just denies it rhetorically – “They were real good wells. Honest. ”  Good
    luck with that with a jury.

    Some suggestions for NYS

    1. Test water wells before drilling begins – particularly for thermogenic
    methane

    2. Enforce well casing/ cementing standards that are in line with the frack
    pressures involved.  Spot check  leak gauges during fracks.

    3.  No wells permitted without first identifying the final disposition of the
    flowback wastewater.

    “Recycled” is not an answer – because that is not final disposition, that is
    just delaying disposal or treatment.

    If an operator says they are going to “recycle their flowback” they are dodging
    their responsibility to get rid of it safely – in a disposal well.

    4.  Scrap the dsGEIS and start over

    Pa. DEP Targets Texas Driller For Tainted Water

    by The Associated Press Sept. 30, 2010

    Pennsylvania’s top environmental regulator says the state will sue a Houston-based drilling company unless it agrees to pay nearly $12 million to extend a public water line to at least 18 residents whose water wells have been contaminated with methane gas.

    Environmental Secretary John Hanger accused Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. on Thursday of reneging on its promises to the residents of Dimock, a small town in Susquehanna County, where tainted wells have raised concerns nationwide about the environmental and health consequences of gas drilling.

    No Guarantee of Aquifer Safety:  On Thursday, DEP said it would spend about $10.5 million to provide safe water for the affected Dimock residents, connecting their homes to a municipal water supply in Montrose, about six miles away. The residents balked at an earlier fix that would have placed large, whole-house water treatment systems in each of the 14 affected homes.

    DEP chief John Hanger told The Associated Press that the connection to public water is “the best, and really only, solution” and that if Cabot balks at paying the tab, the state will pay for the work itself _ then go after Cabot for the money.

    Officials and residents had discussed another option _ drilling a well or wells and piping that water to the homes _ but Hanger said it was dropped because “we don’t believe that will ensure a permanent, safe supply of water.”

    A person who took part in the discussions said Hanger told residents the entire aquifer might be polluted by gas drilling operations.

    “He said, ‘I cannot guarantee that there is any water in the aquifer that is clean today, that will be clean next week, that will be clean six months after the whole system is put in, because of the drilling activity and the damage to the aquifer.’ It was repeated twice,” said the person, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss a private meeting.

    Later Tuesday, Hanger denied through a spokeswoman making the statement. DEP spokeswoman Helen Humphries said Hanger believes the threat of stray gas migration is the chief problem with drilling new water wells.

    “We want to ensure there’s not a chance for methane gas to migrate into the water wells. The best way of doing that is to install a water line to provide public water,” she said.

    Other state and national coverage:
    http://www.startribune.com/business/103048049.html?elr=KArks:DCiU1OiP:DiiUiacyKUzyaP37D_MDua_eyD5PcOiUr (This one attributes to DEP the horrifying possibility of whole-acquifer contamination).

    Public Hearing on Cortland Co. Landfill Dec. 6 at 6 pm

    The public will have a chance to review the pros and cons of selling, leasing or expanding the Cortland County landfill at a public hearing set for 6 pm Dec. 6 at the County Office Building auditorium.   A Cortland Standard editorial (Oct. 25, 2010, p.5)  lists some of the things the citizens and the county government should consider in making this decision including control, truck traffic, liability and cost containment.   A further consideration is what materials might be brought to the landfill now that industrial gas drilling is a reality in PA and possibly in NY.

    The Ensol Report on Alternatives is on the County Website at http://www.cortland-co.org/Legislature/CORTLAND%20COUNTY%20LANDFILL%20ALTERNATIVES%20ANALYSIS%20-%20FINAL%20REPORT%2010-15-10.pdf

    See https://gdacc.wordpress.com/resources/waste-disposal/ for documents and news of radioactive fracking waste being disposed of in nearby landfills.

    ‘Fracking’ Mobilizes Uranium in Marcellus Shale-UB study-

    News Release

    ‘Fracking’ Mobilizes Uranium in Marcellus Shale, UB Research Finds

    Findings raise new concern: could uranium show up in groundwater?

  • ShareThis
  • [ photograph ]UB geologist Tracy Bank and colleagues found that uranium and hydrocarbons in Marcellus shale are not just physically, but also chemically, bound.

    Download JPEG

    Contact

    Ellen Goldbaum

    goldbaum@buffalo.edu

    716-645-4605

    Release Date: October 25, 2010

    BUFFALO, N.Y. — Scientific and political disputes over drilling Marcellus shale for natural gas have focused primarily on the environmental effects of pumping millions of gallons of water and chemicals deep underground to blast through rocks to release the natural gas.

    But University at Buffalo researchers have now found that that process — called hydraulic fracturing or “fracking”– also causes uranium that is naturally trapped inside Marcellus shale to be released, raising additional environmental concerns.

    The research will be presented at the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America in Denver on Nov. 2.

    Marcellus shale is a massive rock formation that stretches from New York through Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia, and which is often described as the nation’s largest source of natural gas.

    “Marcellus shale naturally traps metals such as uranium and at levels higher than usually found naturally, but lower than manmade contamination levels,” says Tracy Bank, PhD, assistant professor of geology in UB’s College of Arts and Sciences and lead researcher. “My question was, if they start drilling and pumping millions of gallons of water into these underground rocks, will that force the uranium into the soluble phase and mobilize it? Will uranium then show up in groundwater?”

    To find out, Bank and her colleagues at UB scanned the surfaces of Marcellus shale samples from Western New York and Pennsylvania. Using sensitive chemical instruments, they created a chemical map of the surfaces to determine the precise location in the shale of the hydrocarbons, the organic compounds containing natural gas.

    “We found that the uranium and the hydrocarbons are in the same physical space,” says Bank. “We found that they are not just physically — but also chemically — bound.

    “That led me to believe that uranium in solution could be more of an issue because the process of drilling to extract the hydrocarbons could start mobilizing the metals as well, forcing them into the soluble phase and causing them to move around.”

    When Bank and her colleagues reacted samples in the lab with surrogate drilling fluids, they found that the uranium was indeed, being solubilized.

    In addition, she says, when the millions of gallons of water used in hydraulic fracturing come back to the surface, it could contain uranium contaminants, potentially polluting streams and other ecosystems and generating hazardous waste.

    The research required the use of very sophisticated methods of analysis, including one called Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry, or ToF-SIMS, in the laboratory of Joseph A. Gardella Jr., Larkin Professor of Chemistry at UB.

    The UB research is the first to map samples using this technique, which identified the precise location of the uranium.

    “Even though at these levels, uranium is not a radioactive risk, it is still a toxic, deadly metal,” Bank concludes. “We need a fundamental understanding of how uranium exists in shale. The more we understand about how it exists, the more we can better predict how it will react to ‘fracking.'”

    Bank conducted the experiments with UB Department of Geology graduate students Thomas Malizia and Lauren Fortson, and Lisa Andresky, an undergraduate student from Slippery Rock University in Pennsylvania. Andresky worked in Bank’s lab during the summer while on a National Science Foundation-funded Research Experience for Undergraduates in UB’s Ecosystem Restoration through Interdisciplinary Exchange (ERIE) program.

    The University at Buffalo is a premier research-intensive public university, a flagship institution in the State University of New York system and its largest and most comprehensive campus. UB’s more than 28,000 students pursue their academic interests through more than 300 undergraduate, graduate and professional degree programs. Founded in 1846, the University at Buffalo is a member of the Association of American Universities.

    Copyright University at Buffalo

    What’s all this about Fracking? Ithaca College Nov. 3, 6:30PM

     “What’s All This About Fracking?” forum at Ithaca College Wed. Nov. 3, 6:30 p.m.

    —————————– 
    The subject of fracking crosses a multitude of fields — the sciences, agriculture, business, citizenship, economics, employment, health, philosophy, politics, psychology, media, recreation, sociology, tourism, and more.

    Ithaca College is hosting an educational forum that will touch on some of these multidisciplinary aspects.

    “What’s All This about Fracking?” will be held in Emerson Suites, Phillips Hall, starting at 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday, November 3.

    Moderated by Crystal Sarakas of the Binghamton NPR affiliate WSKG, it will feature noted experts from various fields as well as an industry professional and a representative of a pro-drilling landowners’ coalition.

    Tony Ingraffea, Ph.D., P.E. (NYS), the D.C. Baum Professor of Engineering at Cornell University, will lead the forum with a look at the physics of the gas extraction process via fracking. Ingraffea’s research concentrates on complex fracturing processes, and he has been a principal investigator on research and development projects from the National Science Foundation, NASA, the Gas Research Institute, and Schlumberger, among many others. His numerous awards include two Research in Rock Mechanics Awards from the U.S. National Committee for Rock Mechanics and awards for outstanding teaching at Cornell. He organized and was the first director of the Synthesis National Engineering Education Coalition, a team of eight diverse engineering colleges.

    John Holko, president of Lenape Resources, Inc., and also representing the Independent Oil and Gas Association of New York, will share the industry perspective on jobs and economic benefits of drilling. Lenape Resources is the operating arm of Lenape Energy, Inc. Along with its sister companies Lenape Drilling, Inc. and Lenape Gathering Corp, Lenape Resources is involved in the exploration, development, gathering, and marketing of oil and gas in the Appalachian basin, with a primary focus in New York and Pennsylvania.

    Lorin Cooper, chair of the Political Action and Public Relations Committee of of the Steuben County Landowners Association, will discuss how this drilling education and advocacy group works to ensure the most favorable contract provisions for those who lease their land to drilling companies and the economic benefits the coalition expects. Cooper is retired from the Steuben Allegany BOCES, where he was the director of vocational education and alternative high schools. He had previously worked as a research analyst for the New York State Education Department.

    Jannette Barth, Ph.D., will discuss her findings about the deep and broad economic impacts of fracking in the Marcellus Shale. Barth is president of J. M. Barth and Associates, an economics research and consulting firm specializing in demand analysis and forecasting. In her study, which unlike others was not funded by industry, she looked at employment and demographic information in areas where drilling has taken place in Pennsylvania and western states. The report, titled “Unanswered Questions About the Economic Impact of Gas Drilling in the Marcellus Shale: Don’t Jump to Conclusions,” was released in March.

    Robert Howarth, Ph.D., will discuss his study on the greenhouse gas footprint of Marcellus shale. Howarth, who is the David R. Atkinson Professor of Ecology and Environmental Biology at Cornell University, aims in his research both to address fundamental ecological questions and to contribute to practical issues of environmental management. He is conducting a full life-cycle analysis of greenhouse-gas emissions from shale gas development relative to existing fossil fuel and alternative renewable energy sources.

    Helen Slottje, a public interest attorney with the nonprofit law firm Community Environmental Defense Council, Inc., will address legal challenges confronting residents and communities. She was lead attorney for citizens on the lawsuit challenging the Village of Horseheads’ finding that there would be no significant environmental impact from a new 88-acre drilling services facility operating right in the town. Slottje also works with landowners who are trying to understand their leases, students at Cornell’s Water and Land Clinic, and other community groups trying to protect themselves from the negative impacts of fracking and volume of wells slated for towns like Ithaca that lie above the Marcellus shale.

    Finally, New York State Assemblywoman Barbara Lifton will speak about fracking from her legislative point of view. Lifton is finishing her fourth term representing the 125th Assembly District, which includes all of Tompkins County, the City of Cortland, and the towns of Cortlandville and Virgil in Cortland County. She serves on six committees in the Assembly: Agriculture, Commerce & Industry, Election Law, Environmental Conservation, Higher Education, Job Creation, and Mental Health, and is vice chair of the Assembly Steering Committee.

    There will be a question-and-answer session after the forum. The public is invited and reminded that the Ithaca College culture is one of collegiality and respect for diverse opinions.

    The free forum is being hosted by the School of Business, the Commit to Change program, and Sustainability at Ithaca, with further support from the School of Communications, the School of Humanities and Sciences, and the Departments of Departments of Biology, Chemistry, Economics, Environmental Studies and Sciences, Philosophy & Religion, Physics, Politics, Psychology, and Sociology.

    For more information, or for individuals with disabilities requesting accommodations, contact Marian Brown at 607-274-3787 or mbrown@ithaca.edu. Those requesting accommodations are asked to do so as soon as possible.
    __._,_.___

    Drilling Begins Near NYC Watershed

    WATERSHED HEARING CANCELLED – INDUSTRY WALKS
    Last week the gas industry withdrew from an important
    hearing intended to challenge 14 “test wells” within
    the Upper Delaware Watershed region.

    The industry withdrew its multiple challenges to our
    assertions of the inherent dangers to public health
    posed by their drilling activities. At this time we
    are reviewing our legal options…
    http://www.damascuscitizens.org/DRBC.html

    READ EXPERT REPORTS – SEND COMMENTS TO DRBC
    Delaware RiverKeeper and Damascus Citizens
    have submitted comprehensive scientific reports
    to the Delaware River Basin Commission [DRBC].

    Please read the DRBC proposed regulations –
    and submit your comments online…
    http://www.damascuscitizens.org/DRBC-HEARING.html

    The Huffington Post
    SEPTEMBER 23, 2010
    Alison Rose Levy
    Health journalist, coach, and advocate, Friends of Health, www.healthjournalist.com
    Posted: September 23, 2010 12:18 PM
    Gas Drilling With Brain-Damaging Chemicals Begins Near NYC’s Water Source

    The Obama Administration declined a request to use its veto power to temporarily halt gas drilling in the Delaware River Basin, which supplies half of New York City’s water. Five percent of this country’s water supply, providing drinking, cleaning, and agricultural water to fifteen to seventeen million people, comes from the Delaware River, recently declared the 2010 “most endangered river” in the U.S. by American Rivers.
    Representative Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) asked the federal government to use its deciding vote to issue a temporary ban, pending a study of how “fracking” will impact the water upon which major populations rely. Fracking is a gas drilling process that appropriates public water and injects high volumes of undisclosed and unregulated toxic chemicals into the earth in order to mine gas. As depicted in the film, Gasland, and confirmed by many news reports, this process has contaminated water supplies throughout the U.S.
    Scientific research indicates that certain chemicals in large concentration in fracking fluid are carcinogens and neurotoxins that act on the hormones and brain even in extremely low concentrations.
    “We simply cannot continue to assume that very low levels of harmful chemicals are safe,” says the Endocrine Disruption Exchange (TEDX), a scientific research group founded by environmental health analyst Dr. Theo Colborn, in a statement issued this week. Their analysis of fracking chemicals and recent research indicates that chemicals act upon humans “in parts-per-billion or even parts-per-trillion, more comparable to what we encounter every day… to introduce a whole new set of damaging effects (including effects on the) central nervous system that could result in autism, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases; reproductive system effects such as infertility, male birth defects, endometriosis, cancers of the breast, prostate and testicles; and metabolic disorders such as diabetes and obesity.” Read more of this post