The Recorder – Pipeline lawsuit called ‘aggressive,’ precedent-setting

Source: The Recorder – Pipeline lawsuit called ‘aggressive,’ precedent-setting

By RICHIE DAVIS Recorder Staff
Sunday, March 20, 2016
1
With the state attorney general expected to weigh in on a pipeline lawsuit challenging the Massachusetts Constitution’s protection of conservation lands, area officials are calling for a vigorous defense of open space.

Pointing to Tennessee Gas. Pipeline Co.’s suit against the state over a proposed natural gas pipeline through state-protected forest in Sandisfield, state Rep. Stephen Kulik said Friday he plans to call for the Massachusetts House to file a “friend of the court” brief in the case. He said the constitutional provision, called Article 97, will also likely come into play in the controversial Northeast Energy Direct pipeline through eight Franklin County towns.

The pipeline company asserts that its Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approval for its Berkshire County route supercedes the state’s constitutional protection of conservation land there.

Kulik called TGP’s plans to override state constitutional protections of open space “probably the greatest overstepping of FERC’s bounds that I can imagine. I would be very pleased if our congressional delegation in its entirety would join with us aggressively weighing in.”

Kulik said Friday, “We have to assert our institutional and constitutional responsibility as a Legislature given to us by the citizens of Massachusetts. It’s a power people have given to the General Court. They certainly didn’t give it to FERC, to some unelected bureaucracy in Washington … I’m hoping for a really aggressive pushback by our attorney general.”
TGP had hoped the Legislature would grant a waiver from Article 97 to allow the 13.42-mile-long pipeline through Sandisfield, which was approved a week ago by FERC. The energy giant sued one day after a Massachusetts legislative committee put that Article 97 waiver request in a procedural graveyard.

Such a waiver requires a two-thirds vote by both legislative branches to re-designate protected public land for other use.

The TGP suit, filed in Berkshire County Superior Court, seeks eminent domain of 21.5 acres in Sandisfield, with easements in the affected part of Otis State Forest. The suit came even as Sandisfield residents formally appealed FERC’s approval for the project — pointing out that the state’s constitutional issue and federal water-quality permits had not yet been settled.

Kulik addressed a group Thursday night participating in a Sugar Shack Alliance protest walk against the pipeline, advising the group, trained in direct action to focus on the Sandisfield issue now, although he stopped short of calling for civil disobedience.

Although he said it’s probably good to have the question raised and resolved over the Sandisfield case rather than waiting for it to surface on the NED project, FERC is now reviewing the pipeline route through Plainfield, Ashfield, Conway, Shelburne, Montague, Deerfield, Erving, Montague, Northfield and Warwick.

Kulik said conservation land was established with money “raised by the people of Massachusetts. Everyone in the state who cares about natural resources protection needs to be concerned about this, especially because there is zero benefit from any energy or public policy perspective to the people of Massachusetts. That’s like really rubbing our noses in this.”

Senate President Stanley Rosenberg, D-Amherst, on Thursday called the lawsuit “the beginning of resolving the question” on federal preemption and the state constitutional provision. He, like other legislators, said he would expect the attorney general’s office to respond for the state and predicted the case “could go all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.”

Asked about the AG’s plans in the case, a spokesman said the attorney general will be defending the state and the Department of Conservation and Recreation in this matter and plans to file an opposition prior to the hearing.

Kathryn Eiseman of Pipeline Awareness Network of Massachusetts said, “This is where the rubber hits the road with respect to Article 97 … Many people are just waking up to the importance of this land in Otis State Forest. Not only is a forest with some of the last remaining old-growth hemlock stands in Berkshire County directly threatened, the whole framework under which land is protected in our commonwealth, under our Constitution, is potentially threatened.”

Rather than trying to circumvent the protected Spectacle Pond property donated by the Massachusetts Audubon Society, she said, TGP appeared to have “purposely targeted it and are digging in their heels, with the hope to establish authority to run roughshod through our protected lands across the commonwealth.”

Although it’s unclear exactly whether FERC’s federal preemption conflicts with Massachusetts’ unique constitutional provision giving the Legislature sole authority over conservation land, Boston attorney Richard Kanoff, who represents Pipeline Awareness Network of the Northeast as well as Montague and other municipalities in cases involving the NED pipeline project, said “This is a really significant issue, and there are a lot of important questions involved. I would be surprise if the attorney general doesn’t file. It raises significant concern about whether Article 97 means anything, or whether a 401 water quality certificate means anything.”

A hearing on TGP’s case seeking to exercise eminent domain over the land in question is scheduled for March 30. There is a March 31 cutoff under the federal Endangered Species Act to protect migratory birds that use the trees for spring nesting, although the company has asked the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for that deadline to be extended until May 1. In its court filing, it seeks authority for condemnation by April 15.

You can reach Richie Davis at: rdavis@recorder.com
or 413-772-0261, ext. 269

A federal jury found that Cabot Oil & Gas company was responsible for contaminating two couples’ wells in Dimock, Pennsylvania. We spoke with co-counsels for the plaintiffs Leslie Lewis and Elisabeth Radow about the Dimock, PA water contamination case.

A federal jury found that Cabot Oil & Gas company was responsible for contaminating two couples’ wells in Dimock, Pennsylvania. We spoke with co-counsels for the plaintiffs Leslie Lewis and Elisabeth Radow about the case.

 

Ashley Hupfl, a reporter with City & State, shared this week’s Winners and Losers. Bill Mahoney of Politico NY joined Susan and Ashley for a reporter

Source: March 11, 2016: Ashley Hupfl, Bill Mahoney, Michael Borges, Elisabeth Radow and Leslie Lewis, David Gibson | Member Supported Public Television, Radio |WCNY

NYC Comptroller-elect files in support of fracking bans | Capital New York

NYC Comptroller-elect files in support of fracking bans | Capital New York.

Unsealed Records in Contamination Case Claim Lax Oversight by DEP | StateImpact Pennsylvania

Unsealed Records in Contamination Case Claim Lax Oversight by DEP | StateImpact Pennsylvania.

MLADEN ANTONOV / AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Consol Energy drill rig explores the Marcellus Shale in Greene County.

A Washington County couple settled a high profile Marcellus Shale contamination case for $750,000 and signed affidavits that say no medical evidence ”definitively” connects their children’s health problems to drilling activity. Stephanie and Chris Hallowich also signed an affidavit that says their children were in good health. More than $155,000 will go to the plaintiff’s attorneys. Each Hallowich child receives $10,000 to be placed in a trust. Stephanie and Chris Hallowich receive $594,820.37. The settlement requires arbitration should the children suffer any future health impacts.

On Wednesday, 971 pages of court records were unsealed in a closely watched case where the mother, an outspoken critic of gas drilling, is now under a gag order. A formal complaint was never filed in Hallowich v. Range Resources, but a draft of a complaint was attached as part of the settlement agreement. StateImpact Pennsylvania has uploaded the documents, which can be accessed by clicking here.

The complaint describes how the Hallowich family bought land in rural Washington County to raise their children in a healthy environment. But they soon discovered that the mineral rights beneath their land were already leased to Range Resources by the previous owner. Once gas drilling activity began near their home, they describe foul odors, loud noise, and ill-health, which they connected to air emissions, and contaminated water supplies.

Washington County judge orders Marcellus Shale development settlement records unsealed

Washington County judge orders Marcellus Shale development settlement records unsealed.

Roundtable on Lenpape Resources Lawsuit & Gas Industry Intimidation tactics | Shaleshock Media

http://shaleshockmedia.org/2013/02/24/roundtable-on-lenpape-resources/

Ottawa sued over Quebec fracking ban – Business – CBC News

Ottawa sued over Quebec fracking ban – Business – CBC News.

Cabot and Dimock families near settlement – News – Citizens Voice

Cabot and Dimock families near settlement – News – Citizens Voice.

The Capitol Pressroom for May 25, 2012 | WCNY Blogs

The Capitol Pressroom for May 25, 2012 | WCNY Blogs.

You know the David and Goliath story – In the version you will hear on today’s show,  David is a 54 year old Canadian scientist by the name of Jessica Ernst .   An unlikely hero in that she worked with and for the petroleum industry for 30 years.  In this story, her Goliath is one of the largest natural gas producers in the world, EnCana.  With Ernst’s diligence, the Canadian Energy Resources Conservation Board has started to pursue EnCana for negligence and unlawful activities.  While the issue is still in court, and none of Ernst’s claims have been proven, she was asked to testify at the UN on the same issue.

Judge’s Ruling Complicates Hydrofracking Issue in New York – NYTimes.com

Judge’s Ruling Complicates Hydrofracking Issue in New York – NYTimes.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 266 other followers