JLCNY Out to Thwart Moratorium on Hydrofracking

From the Joint Landowner’s Coalition of NY Website 

 

STOP THE MORATORIUM NOW!!  http://www.jlcny.org/site/index.php

Dear Natural Gas Supporters Everywhere!

Yesterday Governor Paterson called for an Extraordinary Session of the Legislature on Monday November 29th, 2010 to resolve a number of issues. As a result there is a significant threat to our interest in seeing natural gas developed.

Anti-gas legislators and groups are applying tremendous pressure to have the Assembly and Governor enact a moratorium bill. Their plan is to ban gas development completely, and they will start that plan by delaying efforts until May. They will use that delay to have the dSGEIS discarded and started over. Rewriting the dSGEIS with their input would take 5 to 10 YEARS! But completing it is not in their plan. While it is being rewritten they plan to have all gas drilling OUTLAWED! Already they are recruiting college students and urban residents to form an army of anti-gas protestors! The moratorium that would be voted on next week is the first step in this plan and we must stop them right here, right now!!!

Anti-gas forces have taken the lead, so we must come out with a louder and stronger message to stop them. The stronger message is…

“Further delays and moratoriums are not in New York State’s best environmental and economic interests.  Producing gas can be done safely and responsibly under the NYS DEC’s dSGEIS. Doing so will provide the jobs and revenues that the state desperately needs and will reduce CO2 emissions and other pollutants that are created by burning coal and oil. Furthermore developing and using natural gas will be conducive to implementing more wind and solar electric generating capacity in NYS. Please oppose enacting bill S.8129-B(Thompson)/A.11443-B(Sweeney).”

Here’s how to send that strong message loud and clear…

First, please call each of the following elected officials at each number listed and tell them the message above. Please try to call on Friday November 26th (although the offices might be closed for the holiday) and on Monday November 29th (when the offices will definitely be open again – call first thing in the morning and keep trying throughout the day).

Governor Paterson                              518-474-8390 and 518-474-4246
Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver       518-455-3791 and 212-312-1420
Assemblyman Kevin Cahill                  518-455-4436 and 845-338-9610
Assemblyman Herman Farrell              518-455-5491, 212-234-1430, and 212-568-2828
Assemblyman Joseph Lentol               518-455-4477 and 718-383-7474
Assemblywoman Donna Lupardo       607-723-9047 and 518-455-5431
Assemblyman Bill Magee                   607-432-1484, 315-361-4125, and 518-455-4807
Assemblyman Joe Morelle                 585-467-0410 and 518-455-5373
Assemblyman Robert Sweeney          518-455-5787 and 631-957-2087

Second, please send each of the same officials an email. To do this click on the “SEND AN EMAIL NOW” link at the end of this article. You will need to send one email to the Assembly Members and one to Governor Paterson. Please be sure complete one, return to the webpage, and then complete the second.

Third, because the phone calls are more noticeable to the officials, please keep calling to let them hear from you! Please don’t give up until the extraordinary session ends.

Fourth, please make sure every supporter you know calls each number at least once!

Every single gas supporter needs to respond forcefully to prevent the bill from being voted on and signed into law. This is a decisive moment and it will take effort from everybody for us to win!

Thank you for your support and effort!

Sincerely,
Dan Fitzsimmons, President
Joint Landowners Coalition of New York, Inc.

In the Know on H20

 

   

Latest Forum Discussions
More…

 

 

//

Open Valve Leaks 13,000 gallons of Fracking Waste in Lycoming County PA

Read in conjunction with the Guiding Principles of the Marcellus Shale Coalition representing the companies drilling in the Marcellus region.

November 24, 2010

Exxon Mobil updates info on polluting spill from XTO gas well siteExxon Mobil Corp. said today that 4,200 gallons of “produced water” were spilled from a Pennsylvania natural gas well site of company subsidiary XTO Energy in Pennsylvania as a result of a valve being left open on a storage tank. The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) said the dirty water polluted a nearby stream and a spring.Rachael Moore, a spokeswoman for Irving-based Exxon Mobil, said in an e-mail response to Star-Telegram questions that Fort Worth-based XTO “is taking steps to avoid this…happening again in the future.”Produced water is coughed up from deep underground along with gas produced from a well. The spill was of produced water, rather than from “hydraulic fracturing fluid” used in fracturing wells, as stated in a prior DEP news release, Moore said. Produced water is typically polluted, salty water that isn’t safe to drink and may contain potentially toxic chemicals and metals.DEP spokesman Daniel Spadoni told the Star-Telegram today that XTO originally estimated the spill at more than 13,000 gallons and also previously told the agency that the spilled water was “frack flowback fluid,” the mix of water, sand and chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing of wells.

Moore said XTO determined the spill was 4,200 gallons after “a thorough review of inventory records” and that the 13,000-plus figure was an earlier “worst-case estimate” that proved inaccurate.

Spadoni said XTO probably will be sent a notice early next week, outlining what regulations it violated and the potential penalties.

The spill occurred at XTO’s “Marquardt site” in Lycoming County in north central Pennsylvania (not southwest Pennsylvania, as the Barnett Shale Blog said in a prior post).

–Jack Z. Smith

See the full story in Thursday’s Star-Telegram.

Exxon Subsidiary Investigated for 13,000 Gallon Fracking Fluid Spill Into Pennsylvania Waterways
Read More: Dick Cheney , Dimock , Epa , Exxon Mobil , Fracking , Fracking Fluid , Halliburton Loophole , Hydraulic Fracturing , Natural Gas , PA DEP , Pennsylvania , Water Contamination , Xto Energy , Green News
XTO Energy, a subsidiary of Exxon Mobil, is under investigation by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) after a 13,000 gallon hydraulic fracturing fluid spill at XTO Energy’s natural gas drilling site in Penn Township, Lycoming County, PA.

The spill was first discovered last week by a DEP inspector who found a valve had been left open on a 21,000-gallon fracking fluid tank, discharging fluid off the well pad into local waterways, threatening a nearby cattle herd that had to be fenced off from the contaminated pasture.  Exxon/XTO has not provided an explanation on why the valve was left open.

“This spill was initially estimated at more than 13,000 gallons by the company and has polluted an unnamed tributary to Sugar Run and a spring,” said DEP Northcentral Regional Director Nels Taber. “There are also two private drinking water wells in the vicinity that will be sampled for possible impacts.”

DEP’s sampling confirmed elevated levels of conductivity and salinity in the spring and unnamed tributary, clear indications that the fracking fluid was present in the waterways.

Exxon paid $30 billion in its June 2010 merger with Texas-based XTO Energy, making Exxon/XTO the largest natural gas producer in the United States, with extensive holdings of “unconventional resources” throughout the Marcellus Shale and elsewhere.

Concerns over natural gas fracking are widespread through the Marcellus Shale region and in several Western U.S. states where a boom in natural gas development is underway thanks to the controversial hydraulic fracturing technique.  Residents living near fracking operations are on the front lines as their drinking water supplies and health are threatened by the fracking process, which involves injecting a mixture of sand, water and undisclosed toxic chemicals into the shale rock to free up the trapped gas.

Pennsylvania is no stranger to fracking disasters, notably the high-profile contamination in the town of Dimock, where resident Norma Fiorentino’s water well famously blew up on New Year’s Day 2009, and at least 15 families have had their drinking water ruined by fracking, leading to illness, livestock deaths and other maladies.

Last week, the Pittsburgh City Council banned natural gas fracking within city limits due to concerns over the threat of water contamination and public health risks.

But Pennsylvania is hardly alone in the fracking fight. Fracking operations have contaminated water supplies across America from New York, to Wyoming, to New Mexico, to Ohio, to Virginia, to Arkansas, to Colorado and beyond.
The Environmental Protection Agency currently has no power to regulate hydraulic fracturing thanks to the Halliburton Loophole inserted into the 2005 enegy bill at the behest of former Vice President Dick Cheney, the former head of Halliburton.

Mounting evidence of the fracking threat nationwide has yet to convince lawmakers to close the loophole and hold the natural gas industry accountable for its fracking messes. As the New York Times asked in a November 2009 editorial, “if hydraulic fracturing is as safe as the industry says it is, why should it fear regulation?”
Follow Brendan DeMelle on Twitter: www.twitter.com/bdemelle

Paterson Not Risking Safety or Water Quality

Here’s a little holiday good news from Governor Paterson, for those who live in NY!

“This is a very good example of public participation. Our DEC (one of the stongest in the country) originally ruled that hydrofracking would not affect the water quality in the area but we’ve received additional information and have not been able  to come to a conclusion as to whether or not this is a good idea.  Even with the tremendous revenues that will come in at this time — over a billion dollars a year– we’re not going to risk public safety or water quality, which will be the next emerging global problem after the energy shortage. At this point, I would say that the hydrofracking opponents have raised enough of an argument to thwart us going  forward at this time.“ — NY Gov. David Paterson, WAMC, 24 Nov 2010

http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wamc/news.newsmain/article/0/2706/1729657/W …or…http://changetheframe.com/audio/WAMC_Governor_Paterson_Visits_WAMC_(2010-11-24).mp3
Besides this, this is a really interesting interview of Patterson…Talks about Pete Grannis…

Coverage from Catskill Mountainkeeper

Brewery Opposes Hydrofracking

BREWERY OMMEGANG NEWS FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Jan. 18, 2011

Brewery Ommegang Statement on Hydrofracking for Shale Gas.
Serious threat of water pollution and other environmental risks for Otsego County.
Revised: Jan 18, 2011
Contact: Larry Bennett, 607-544-1800, or larry@ommegang.com Executive Order
NOTE: This is an update of the Brewery Ommegang statement originally released on Nov 19, 2010.This update
follows then-Governor Paterson’s December 13, 2010 veto of the moratorium proposed by the NY State Assembly
and Senate, and his issuing of Executive Order No. 41. On Jan 1, 2011 incoming New York State Governor Cuomo
continued Executive Order No. 41without change. The Executive Order is attached.
Brewery Ommegang has completed a close examination of the development of hydrofracking for natural gas in Otsego
County. We reviewed extensive information provided by gas industry professionals, publications and supporters of
hydrofracking who propose that drilling is safe, necessary, and will be an economic boost to Otsego County. We also
reviewed information from gas industry professionals who are opponents of hydrofracking, as well as environmental and
historic groups who contend that the permitting procedure is flawed; drilling is not safe; our water is endangered; and
economic benefits will not be realized. We have endeavored to be objective in our analysis and we will make available the
information we have gathered to anyone who is interested in understanding both sides of the argument.
We have concluded that:
1. The gas industry has secured broad exemptions from federal regulation under the Clean Water Act and the Safe
Drinking Water Act in 2005 (also known as the “Halliburton exemption”). However, the EPA has recently begun a
study which is scheduled for completion sometime in 2012.
2. Under New York State law, horizontal drilling remains halted (under Exec .Order 41) while the pending Supplemental
Generic Impact Statement (sGEIS) is reviewed. The review is to be completed by June 1, 2011, and then put up for
public comment for at least 30 days. In the interim, drilling of vertical wells with hydro fracking is proceeding in our
county under the 18-year-old 1992 Generic Environmental Impact Statement. Thus, gas companies are now drilling
and fracking in our county without local review, while both state and federal regulatory investigations into the risks and
regulation of the process are delayed.
Land-lease development and proposed drilling in the region has already reached a high level with very limited public
awareness of the issues any without meaningful regulatory control. Over 60,000 acres in Otsego County are known to
have been leased by drilling companies or their land agents, and drilling projects have already started .
The relative contribution of natural gas from hydrofracking to either the economy or the energy needs of the region may be
minimal, and development does not materially contribute to a larger national or regional energy policy.
The number of documented spills, blowouts, leaking wells and other environmental accidents is significant and the
environmental and human consequences have been serious in a number of states, including TX, PA, WY, and WV.
From our perspective, the critical threat is contamination of the aquifers occurring directly above the Marcellus
shale.5.
6. The withdrawal of huge quantities of fresh water estimated at 2-5 million gallons of water per frack cycle and the
heavy impact of thousands of truck trips per well hauling water and chemicals to and from the drill pads cannot be
sustained in Otsego County. Effective treatments of the millions of gallons of polluted processing waste do not exist
and there are no locations for waste disposal in New York capable of supporting the proposed scale of drilling.
Drilling presents a strategic risk to the entire Otsego County water supply and the Susquehanna watershed. Meanwhile,
the NY City watershed (in adjacent counties) is under special coverage by the DEC, effectively creating a protected
zone. This reflects awareness by DEC and NYC officials of potential risks. The protection requires site-specific review
and permitting and has effectively stopped gas exploration inside the NYC watershed. Our region of upstate NY is not
covered by the agreement and it’s now much cheaper to work in counties like ours, where there is no local regulation.
The plans for drilling also pose a direct and material threat to the Ommegang Brewery. We draw water for our beer from
aquifers beneath our 140-acre farmstead located close to Cooperstown, NY, at the head of the Susquehanna
watershed. Contamination of our water supply would end our brewery business and even the threat of potential
contamination could be sufficient for the future of our company to be at risk.
We also join others in concluding that industrial-scale hydrofracking in the beautiful rural upstate region will irreparably
damage the essential qualities that make Otsego County an excellent place to live, raise families, farm and brew beer.
We consider highly visible, potentially dangerous, industrial development as directly opposed to what our rural
location offers the people who have chosen to make their lives here and the millions who choose to visit the region
every year.
We therefore:
Call for an immediate moratorium and for an eventual ban on both vertical and horizontal hydrofracking in Otsego County
and NY State. It is not enough to protect only New York City residents’ land, water and health. All upstate residents
and their water, land, health and heritage deserve equal protection under law.
Call for complete reconsideration, rewriting and review of the NY State Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact
Statement (sGEIS) by the Cuomo administration. The current sGEIS is based on outdated and inadequate data.
Support the transfer of control over local hydrofracking from NY State to Otsego County. And for the same all across New
York allowing local communities to determine if they wish to accept the impact on their lives.
Brewery Ommegang will:
Seek to defend the interests of our business, our employees and our community by actively campaigning for the
prevention of hydrofracking in Otsego county and NY state by every available means, including legal action.
Provide practical support for Otsego2000 as the principal focus for a coalition of many environmental and other citizen
groups working to prevent development of hydrofracking in the region. Otsego 2000 is coordinating the coalition of
groups opposing hydrofracking.
Bring together a coalition of other concerned upstate businesses in support of the Otsego2000 campaign.
Petition Otsego County and Otsego County town officials to support a local moratorium and a ban on hydrofracking, and
petition our state government leaders, regulators and other agencies for the same at a statewide level.
Simon Thorpe, President/CEO of Brewery Ommegang said: “Ommegang believes that opposing development of
hydrofracking is critical to the interests of our community, our people and our business. We are proud of our
accomplishment in building a thriving, sustainable and environmentally conscious business in upstate New York. We are
deeply concerned at the threat posed by development of drilling in the region and the risk to the purity of the water on
which we depend, and which is a key reason we are located here. We are a company that enjoys a national reputation for
super-premium quality beers produced in upstate New York and we hope that the state and local regulators attach value
to what we do for the region in terms of employment and our representation of upstate New York in restaurants and
grocery stores across the nation. We do not want the futures of our business, our employees, and our communities
damaged or destroyed by water pollution, or compromised by the industrialization associated with hydrofracking for shale
gas.”
For further information please contact:
Larry Bennett
Communications Director
Duvel Moortgat USA / Brewery Ommegang
363, County Highway 33
Cooperstown, NY 13326
Tel: 607-544-1800
Email: larry@ommegang.com
Brewery Ommegang is part of the Duvel Moortgat Group of breweries, which were founded in Belgium. It is the group’s
principal brewery in the United States and produces a super-premium range of beers that are distributed across the
country together with the other Duvel Moortgat beers including Duvel, Maredsous, Liefmans, Achouffe and De Koninck.
Issued Dec. 13, 2010 by NY State Governor Paterson:
Executive Order No 41
WHEREAS, the 2009 New York State Energy Plan supports the development of in-State energy resources, including
natural gas, to achieve the Plan’s multiple public policy objectives; and
WHEREAS, low-volume hydraulic fracturing, or conventional fracking, has been used successfully and safely in New York
State for many years to extract natural gas consistent with the Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) for Oil,
Gas and Solution Mining Regulatory Program promulgated by the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation (Department) in 1992; and
WHEREAS, new technologies have emerged, and are being deployed in other states, to extract natural gas more
efficiently through a process known as high-volume hydraulic fracturing combined with horizontal drilling; and
WHEREAS, there is a need for further study of this new technology prior to deployment in New York State; and
WHEREAS, in 2008, I directed the Commissioner of Environmental Conservation to initiate a formal public process to
update the 1992 GEIS to ensure that any new technologies deployed in New York State are first thoroughly analyzed and
regulated to ensure that all environmental and public health impacts are mitigated or avoided; and
WHEREAS, the Department issued a draft scope for an updated GEIS on October 6, 2008, held public meetings in the
Marcellus shale region, received more than 3,000 written comments, and issued a final scope for the Supplemental
Generic Environmental Impact Statement (SGEIS) on February 6, 2009. The Department released the Draft SGEIS for
public review and comment on September 30, 2009, held four public hearings in the region and New York City, and
received more than 13,000 written comments during a public comment period that closed December 31, 2009; and
WHEREAS, tens of thousands of citizens, landowners, local governments, large and small businesses, non-governmental
organizations, and other stakeholders have expressed their heartfelt support for or opposition to the new technology, but
most agree that an objective, science-based analysis is the best approach to setting new policy.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, David A. Paterson, Governor of the State of New York, by virtue of the authority vested in me by
the Constitution and laws of the State of New York, do hereby order as follows:
1. The Department shall complete its review of the public comments, make such revisions to the Draft SGEIS that
are necessary to analyze comprehensively the environmental impacts associated with high-volume hydraulic
fracturing combined with horizontal drilling, ensure that such impacts are appropriately avoided or mitigated
consistent with the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), other provisions of the Environmental
Conservation Law and other laws, and ensures that adequate regulatory measures are identified to protect public
health and the environment; and
2. On or about June 1, 2011, the Department shall publish a Revised Draft SGEIS, accept public comment on the
revisions for a period of not less than thirty days, and may schedule public hearings on such revisions to be
conducted in the Marcellus shale region and New York City; and
3. Recognizing that, pursuant to SEQRA, no permits may be issued prior to the completion of a Final SGEIS, the
Department, subsequent to the conclusion of the public comment period, shall report to the Governor on the
status of the Final SGEIS and the regulatory conditions that are necessary to include in oil and gas well permits
to protect public health and the environment.
G I V E N under my hand and the Privy Seal of the State in the City of Albany this thirteenth day of December in the year
two thousand ten.
BY THE GOVERNOR
Secretary to the Governor

 

comments:

Hello all,

This is a powerful statement on the part of Brewery Omegang.

My prediction is that there will be more of such statements from food and
beverage companies.

From my discussions with wholesale buyers of beef, hydrofracking is a big
concern, which is already impacting on purchasing decisions. I’d like to
offer my recent experience.

During a recent meeting with a nutritionist with a large regional
supermarket chain, she mentioned out of the blue that she was avoiding
purchases of meat from northern PA where there is hydrofracking. (I had not
brought up gas drilling, as that was not the original topic of the meeting.)

And from my conversations with my wholesale buyers in NYC and locally (who
are buying whole steers on a regular basis) they are very aware of
hydrofracking. They have expressed deep concern about chemical contamination
of the food they are purchasing and the regional foodshed. They are also
quite clear that they will try to lower the risk of purchasing contaminated
food by avoiding purchases from farms near active gas drilling.

Given what I am hearing from wholesale buyers, it’s hard for me to visualize
my business surviving with gas drilling nearby. As is true of many
sustainable agriculture enterprises, 100% of my overhead, and 100% of my
sales are local, with both upstream and downstream economic multipliers
benefiting other regional business. With the elimination of businesses like
mine, these other enterprises will be harmed as well.

Ken

Ken Jaffe
Slope Farms
Meredith, NY
607-746-2294
917-543-0169  cell
www.slopefarms.com

Pa. farmer: Natural gas drilling ‘a nightmare’ Nov. 16, 2010

Pa. farmer: Natural gas drilling ‘a nightmare’

By Derrick Ek
Posted Nov 16, 2010 @ 11:44 PM

Elmira, N.Y. —

Ron Gulla, a farmer from Hickory, Pa., says he had no idea what he was getting into when he leased his land for gas drilling.

“When I saw what was happening on my property, I couldn’t believe it,” Gulla said. “They totally misinformed us and misrepresented the lease.”

Over the past few years, he saw his farm – in a rural area just south of Pittsburgh – become a large industrial site over which he had no control, and had his water supply tainted by high levels of toxic chemicals, he said.

Gulla – who also sells construction and forestry equipment and once spent six years working in the oil and gas industry – tried to take out a mortgage loan to finance a lawsuit against the well operator, Range Resources, but was told by the bank that his land was basically worthless because of the drilling activity there.

Gulla told gutwrenching stories of other farmers in Washington County whose property was virtually ruined by drilling. Many of their calves have been born with strange deformities, he said. Cows and horses – even dogs – have been sickened or killed from drinking the water from streams and ponds near the well pads. Folks living near compressor stations have had serious health issues from air pollution, he added.

The farmers affected in his area have received nothing in compensation, he said.

“It’s been a nightmare for a lot of people,” Gulla said. “You’re going to hear some people say this is the best thing that’s happened to them, that it’s the best thing since sliced bread. And they’re making money, granted, but at what price, and what risk?”

Gulla was one of a half-dozen speakers to tell cautionary tales about the gas rush under way in Pennsylvania – and on the horizon in New York – at a public forum Tuesday night in a crowded parish hall at Trinity Episcopal Church in downtown Elmira.

The event was organized by area environmental groups People for a Healthy Environment, Coalition to Protect New York, Committee to Preserve the Finger Lakes, and Pax Christi Upstate New York. It was clearly not a balanced panel on the issue, although recent chamber of commerce forums touting the economic benefits of gas exploration haven’t been either: those have mostly featured speakers from the gas industry and pro-drilling elected officials.

Not all of Tuesday’s speakers spoke directly against drilling.

One of them, Lou Allstadt, is a retired Mobil Oil Corp. executive vice president and a past director of the U.S. Oil and Gas Association. A Cooperstown resident, he has extensively reviewed the state Department of Environmental Conservation’s proposed permitting guidelines – now being finalized – for high volume, horizontal hydraulic fracturing, and believes they are insufficient.

In his remarks, Allstadt gave a list of suggestions on how gas drilling might proceed safely in New York, some of which are being developed but are not yet widely implemented, he said.

Among them:

Developing a “green” fracking fluid, and ending government exemptions that allow the industry to use the fracking fluid it currently does. In the meantime, identifying markers should be added to fracking fluid, so if there is a case of suspected water contamination, it can be traced to the source, he said.

Using a closed loop system for drilling wastewater, rather than storing it in open, lined ponds where toxins can evaporate into the atmosphere. “It’s a bad system, and it doesn’t have to be that way,” said Allstadt, who also called for greater recycling of fracking fluid at well sites.

Allstadt also called for seismic testing prior to each time a well is fracked, to identify underground cracks and fissures that could lead to toxins migrating to aquifers, he said.

Better standards are needed for the casings that line well bores near the surface and protect aquifers, he claimed.

There should also be greater setback distances for well pads from drinking water sources and residential areas. Also, the state should give local governments a say in regulating drilling locations, Allstadt said.

Saying human error contributes to most drilling accidents, he called for more stringent training for drilling crews, which often have a high turnover, he said. He also called for making gas companies post multi-million dollar “performance bonds” to fund cleanups should any incidents occur.

Allstadt also said the DEC needs to greatly increase its mineral resources staffing levels, saying it would be “impossible” to properly monitor a shale drilling boom with its current staffing levels. He also called for the state to form a separate agency to issue permits and collect revenues, so the DEC can focus solely on protecting the environment.

Organizer Susan Multer of People for a Healthy Environment said she counted approximately 240 people at Tuesday’s forum.


Economic Impact of Gas Extraction in Marcellus Shale.

Susan Christopherson from Cornell presented preliminary results of Cornell study at a Legislative Briefing in Albany on  11/18/10

I. There will be a briefing/news conference Thursday, November 18, 9:00-10:30 AM, Room 711A, Legislative Office Building, Albany, N.Y.,  to present early results from this study.

II.  Based on the research New Yorkers for Sustainable Energy Solutions Statewide (NYSESS) has done on this issue, we expect central highlights to include:

1. The two extant economic impact studies extensively referred to as supporting shale gas development in the dSGEIS for Marcellus (Broome County study and Penn State study), are essentially fatally flawed as as documents for  public policy guidance; they do not address both positive and negative impacts. A number of analysts have previously come to this conclusion.

2,  When regions/counties with and without natural gas production are compared on a variety of socio-economic dimensions, the gas counties do not show any overall advantage and may be at a long-term socio-economic disadvantage. Again, several other analysts have reached this conclusion

3.  Energy costs to residents of gas producing states do not decrease with increases in production: no local energy advantage. This matter also was addressed by Senator A. Thompson a year ago with industry representatives and they could not confirm any local advantage.

4. Taking these together, one could conclude that New York has considerable planning and policy development yet to do before any shale gas drilling starts.

Stanley R Scobie, Ph.D., Principal, NYSESS, 607.669.4683  [NYSESS is not organizing or sponsoring this briefing, and is providing information solely for the benefit of the community]
==================================================================
III. Following the briefing , at 11:00, Professor Christopherson and other individuals involved with energy policy will appear on the Capitol Pressroom radio show (announcement follows).

The Capitol Pressroom rundown for Thursday 11/18/10

On Thursday a briefing is scheduled on the economic impact on shale gas drilling; it will be immediately followed by an Assembly hearing on staff losses at the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation.  In other words, conservationists, drilling company representatives, academics, farmers and a whole host of other gas drilling stake-holders will be converging up on the Capitol.   Being opportunists, we plan to take advantage of this bounty.  Our guests include:

– Petroleum engineer John Holko, president of Lenape Resources (studio), who is scheduled to testify before the Assembly Standing Committee on Environmental Conservation on behalf of the Independent Oil & Gas Association of New York.

– Southern tier Democrat, Assemblywoman Donna Lupardo, D-Binghamton (studio).
– Dr. Susan Christopherson of Cornell who will discuss both short and long term economic impacts of horizontal natural gas drilling.

– Wes Gillingham of the Catskill Mountainkeeper (studio).

 

 

Jannette Barth, Ph.D. comments on Broome Co. Economic Impact Study.

Economic study on gas drilling is full of holes

————————————————————————-

By Jannette M. Barth • November 18, 2010, 12:00 am

In her opinion piece “County gas lease deal is good for taxpayers,” Broome County Executive Barbara Fiala states that “regardless of the number of wells, there will be a positive local economic impact.”

Fiala bases her conclusion on an economic study that is severely flawed. It neglects a number of crucial factors that must be taken into account if Broome County is to make sound decisions based on an accurate assessment of the facts.

* It is not clear that jobs will go to Broome County (or even New York) residents. Reports from Pennsylvania indicate that 70 percent of gas-rig jobs are going to people from out of state who are often transient, non- permanent workers, sending their earnings to their families to spend in their home states.

* There is no mention of the enormous cost of repairing roads and bridges that will be damaged by heavy equipment and the hundreds of tanker trucks that are required to haul water and wastewater to and from every well site.

* The analysis does not address the cost of mitigating environmental damage, such as drinking water contamination and fish kill. There is evidence of both in Pennsylvania.

* The study fails to consider that communities will probably be forced to increase their spending on emergency medical care, first responders and law enforcement. Local hospitals and fire departments may be ill-equipped to handle industrial accidents involving heavy machinery and toxic chemicals. Drilling operations typically involve large numbers of transient workers, who may not have proper regard for the protection or betterment of the community.

* The study makes no mention of the economic costs of potentially severe health impacts such as cancer, brain damage, respiratory disease and endocrine disruption that have been connected to chemicals used in the hydraulic fracturing process.

* The study seems to assume that property values will increase; in fact they may decrease. In Wise County, Texas, in the Barnett Shale, it has been reported that real estate appraisers have discounted valuations by 75 percent if a property has a gas well.

* Declines in other industries are not reflected in the economic study. The negative effect on natural beauty and the environment will be sure to hurt the tourism industry; fishermen and hunters will be much less likely to settle on Broome County as a destination.

* The study focuses on just a 10-year period. But what happens after those 10 years? Will all the gas and the gas money be gone? Will the land and water be left polluted? Will the population be ill?

* Other studies have concluded that regions that have encouraged extractive industries experience relatively high poverty and unemployment rates in the long term.

I encourage Fiala to protect the people, the environment and the economy of Broome County by being sure to consider all potential effects prior to supporting a county gas lease.

Barth, a resident of the Town of Hancock in Delaware County, has a doctorate in economics.

Pittsburgh Bans Fracking in the City

Today the Pittsburgh City Council made a final unanimous vote (9-0) to
ban fracking in the city of Pittsburgh. 11/16/2010

http://marcellusprotest.org/yes-to-pgh-ban

For  towns and villages hoping to control the threat, there are people who will help you.

The Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund
Pennsylvania Community Rights Network
P.O. Box 2016 Chambersburg, Pennsylvania 17201
www.celdf.org

http://www.celdf.org/open-letter-to-communities-working-to-stop-fracking

Pittsburgh Bans Natural Gas Drilling
Adopts first-in-the-nation ordinance –
elevates the right of the community to decide, not corporations

Text of Ordinance
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
November 16, 2010

CONTACT: Ben Price, (717) 254-3233
benprice@celdf.org

PITTSBURGH:  Today, the Pittsburgh City Council unanimously adopted an ordinance banning corporations from conducting natural gas drilling in the city.
The ordinance was drafted by the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF) at the invitation of Councilman Bill Peduto, and was introduced by Councilman Doug Shields.
Pittsburgh’s first-in-the-nation ordinance confronts the threat of Marcellus Shale drilling – an activity permitted by the state which allows corporations to site drilling activities over the wishes of a community.
Energy corporations are setting up shop in communities across Pennsylvania, to drill for natural gas in the Marcellus Shale formation.  The gas extraction technique known as “fracking” has been cited as a threat to surface and groundwater, and has been blamed for fatal explosions, the contamination of drinking water, local rivers, and streams.  Collateral damage includes lost property value, ingestion of toxins by livestock, drying up of mortgage loans for prospective home buyers, and threatened loss of organic certification for farmers in affected communities. Councilman Shields stated, “This ordinance recognizes and secures expanded civil rights for the people of Pittsburgh, and it prohibits activities which would violate those rights.  It protects the authority of the people of Pittsburgh to pass this ordinance by undoing corporate privileges that place the rights of the people of Pittsburgh at the mercy of gas corporations.”
Shields added, “With this vote we are asserting the right of the city to make critical decisions to protect our health, safety, and welfare.  We are not a colony of the state and will not sit quietly by as our city gets drilled.  We encourage communities across the region to take this step and join with us to elevate the rights of communities and people over corporations.” CELDF’s Ben Price, who is engaging with communities across the state seeking to protect themselves from drilling, said, “Communities are coming to recognize that our state laws and government are not in place to protect their interests, but rather the interests of private corporations.” Price applauded the city for taking a stand on behalf of community rights. “Some will say that the municipality doesn’t have the authority to ban this noxious practice associated with gas drilling.  The only way that’s true is if the state has the authority to strip the residents of their rights, and it doesn’t.”
Under the ordinance, corporations that violate the ordinance or that seek to drill in the city will not be afforded “personhood” rights under the U.S. or Pennsylvania Constitution, nor will they be afforded protections under the Commerce Clause or Contracts Clause under the federal or state constitution. In addition, the ordinance recognizes the legally enforceable Rights of Nature to exist and flourish.  Residents of the city shall possess legal standing to enforce those rights on behalf of natural communities and ecosystems.
The Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund, located in Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, has been working with people in Pennsylvania since 1995 to assert their fundamental rights to democratic local self-governance, and to enact laws which end destructive and rights-denying corporate action aided and abetted by state and federal governments.
Mari Margil
Associate Director
Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund
503-381-1755
Skype: mari.margil
mmargil@celdf.org
www.celdf.org
Find us on Facebook

Pittsburgh Bans Fracking (and Corporate Personhood) A historic new ordinance bans natural gas drilling while elevating community decision making and the rights of nature over the “rights” associated with corporate personhood. Nov. 16, 2010

Pittsburgh Bans Fracking (and Corporate Personhood)

A historic new ordinance bans natural gas drilling while elevating community decision making and the rights of nature over the “rights” associated with corporate personhood. Nov. 16, 2010. http://www.alternet.org/water/148881/pittsburgh_bans_fracking_(and_corporate_personhood)_

—
Sign the Petition to Ban Drilling in New York State
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/NY-Statewide-Ban-On-Natural-Gas-Drilling

__._,_.___

CBS “60 Minutes” Fracking Segment “Shaleionaires”

View the CBS “60 Minutes” Segment on Hydro-fracking 

Initial Comments on the interview:

On the Positive Side:

  • Millions of viewers who may not have been paying attention to this issue were able to see the imposition of huge, industrial drilling pads, compressors, pipelines  upon peaceful rural landscapes and overwhelming homes, farms and even cities and towns.  These images showed that: the well pads are huge and highly industrialized; the gas industry sites well pads right next to homes; there are real people living near these gas wells and these people are deeply concerned about adverse health effects; there are real people who used to have good water but who don’t any more thanks to nearby gas drilling; cows who drink fracking fluid fall over dead in their pasture–not just one or two cows who maybe drank a lot or were sickly to begin with, but ALL of the cows. Imagine that you knew very little about gas drilling and you were presented with all of these images. What would your general impression be? Would you be inclined, after seeing these images, to trust good old Aubrey, who sits at his nice, safe desk and callously admits that accidents will happen? My guess is that there were a fair number of viewers who were absolutely horrified, particularly if they also happened to watch the CSI episode on fracking.  Maybe they will question whether they would be able to live with this industry in their area since it was pointed out that shale formations are found in 34 states.
  •  Two farmers from LA boasting of their “god-given” wealth, new Cadillacs, new jobs in the area.  No mention of the effect on their neighbors who suffer from contaminated water, air and loss of the use of their land, damage to local infrastructure like roads and bridges.

 On the Negative Side

  •  Too many of Aubrey McClendon’s (Chesapeake CEO) statements were not challenged such as his assertion that because the fracking takes place at 2-5 miles below the water table there would be no effect on water sources. 
  • No mention of surface spills, problems with cementing the well to seal it from aquifers as they drill through the aquifer, numerous natural fractures that can open under pressure, tens of thousands of abandoned wells that can provide a conduit from the shale formations to the aquifers.
  • Sixty Lame Minutes.   By James Howard Kunstler on November 15, 2010 9:13 AM

      So, last night CBS hauled Aubrey McClendon, CEO of Chesapeake Energy, on board their flagship Sunday infotainment vehicle, 60 Minutes, to blow a mighty wind up America’s ass (as they say in professional PR circles). America is lately addicted to lying to itself, and 60 Minutes has become the “go-to” patsy for funneling disinformation into an already hopelessly confused, wishful, delusional, US public.

         McClendon told the credulous Leslie Stahl and the huge viewing audience that America “has two Saudi Arabia’s of gas.” Now, you know immediately that at least half the viewers misconstrued this statement to mean that we have two Saudi Arabia’s of gasoline. Translation: don’t worry none about driving anywhere you like, or having to get some tiny little pansy-ass hybrid whatchamacallit car to do it in, and especially don’t pay no attention to them “green” sumbitches on the sidelines trying to sell you some kind of peak oil story…. It also prepared the public to support whatever Mr. McClendon’s company wants to do, because he says his company will free America from its slavery to OPEC. By the way, CBS never clarified these parts of the story by the end of the show.  Read the whole story

     

     

Sierra Club Petition to Pass FRAC Act to Protect Water Supplies   https://secure2.convio.net/sierra/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&page=UserAction&id=4515&autologin=true&s_http://wp.me/pJm45-AWsrc=210LZZAN01&JServSessionIdr004=p1ggqt2ol4.app223a


  •  

     

 

Utica Shale Exploration

http://online.wsj.com/article/AP76827f5c7ea547bba18a9b68d20a50e5.html#articleTabs%3Darticle

CSI Features Fracking

Fracking in popular culture….

Two men are murdered right before exposing a natural gas company for
poisoning residents in a farming town, and the CSIs must discover who
is responsible for their deaths.

http://www.cbs.com/primetime/csi/video/?play=true&pid=nqUdQS0Qgadycg72FsR_QiAUh8x3KfZB

or http://www.tv.com/fracked/episode/1359337/summary.html?tag=search_results;title;1

For those with cable, CSI for Nov. 11 can be found on Primetime on Demand