Pennsylvania Hunting and Fracking Vie for State Lands – NYTimes.com
November 12, 2011
Pennsylvania Hunting and Fracking Vie for State Lands – NYTimes.com.
Gas Drilling Awareness for Cortland County
June 4, 2011
BP, Colorado wildlife officials reach agreement | The Associated Press | News | Washington Examiner.
The Colorado Division of Wildlife and BP America Production Co. have reached an agreement on lessening the impacts of natural-gas drilling on wildlife.
Under the agreement announced Thursday, BP will purchase private holdings suitable as wildlife habitat in exchange for drilling rights elsewhere.
Division of Wildlife spokesman Joe Lewandowski tells The Durango Herald that only willing sellers will be sought. He says the agreement applies largely to La Plata and Archuleta counties in southwest Colorado.
The agreement streamlines the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission permitting process by allowing energy companies to sign agreements with the wildlife division to address many drilling sites at one time instead of piecemeal.
BP will contribute $475,000 over the next six years for studies evaluating the effects of natural gas development on wildlife.
___
Information from: Durango Herald, http://www.durangoherald.com
January 16, 2011
You might want to come early to snowshoe or ski the beautiful trails in nearby Bear Swamp State Forest. Then buy some of Al’s soup or chili to warm you up back at the Lake Como Inn.
Sponsored by the Tri-County Skaneateles Lake Pure Water Association
For more info and future events in the Skaneateles Lake watershed fivetownwatershed.wordpress.com
Questions? msmenapace@gmail.com
*Chris Burger owns Horizon Enterprises; is Co-founder and Chair of the Binghamton Regional Sustainability Coalition; and is a member of: the Broome County Government Gas Drilling Education Committee, the Center for Civic Engagement , the NYS Sierra Club Gas Task Force, NYS Council of Churches Public Policy Commission, and the Southern Tier East Regional Development Strategy Committee.
November 28, 2010
Lake Como Inn()
1307 East Lake Road Map
Cortland, NY 13045 (315) 496-2149
Join Chris for a presentation on the Marcellus Shale Gas Play covering history of how gas is formed and extracted, impacts, ways industry strive to protect the environment and problems they experience, and how people react .
Chris Burger owns Horizon Enterprises: Resource Management Consultant Co.
Degrees in Chemical Engineering, Social Psychology, and Economics
Binghamton Regional Sustainability Coalition, Co-founder and Chair
Broome County Government Gas Drilling Education Committee
Center for Civic Engagement
NYS Sierra Club Gas Task Force
NYS Council of Churches Public Policy Commission
Southern Tier East Regional Development Strategy Committee
Food available at the Lake Como Inn, call Al for prices and menu by Monday December 6th if you wish to buy dinner.
Sponsor: Tri-County Skaneateles Lake Pure Water Association.
For more info and future events in the Skaneateles Lake watershed – fivetownwatershed.wordpress.com
Questions? msmenapace@gmail.com
November 4, 2010
This plan and generic environmental impact statement (GEIS) will guide the future management of the state’s 786,329-acre State Forest holdings. Key goals focus on ecosystem health and diversity, economic benefits, recreational opportunities, forest conservation and sustainable management.
The plan was presented in draft form on September 1, 2010. The draft plan was available for public comment until October 29th. Comments were also received and considered after the deadline. Over 3,000 written comments were received. Nine public hearings were held throughout the state from September 14th – 30th.
The plan has been edited based on public input and is now considered final DEC Office of Natural Resources policy for the development of State Forest Unit Management Plans. A responsiveness document will be posted on this website, and will include DEC’s responses to the many comments received.*** Revision of the plan is scheduled to occur every 10 years. it is not up as of this writing
Notice of Acceptance of Final GEIS
The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYS DEC), as lead agency, has accepted a Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement on the proposed Final Strategic Plan for State Forest Management. Electronic copies of the Final Strategic Plan and Final GEIS are available online at: www.dec.ny.gov/lands/64567.html or by requesting a CD by e-mail at stateforestplan@gw.dec.state.ny.us or by calling NYS DEC regional offices.
NYS DEC announces the completion of the Final Strategic Plan for State Forest Management (Plan) and Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS). This notice has been prepared in accordance with Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law. NYS DEC held public hearings in each NYS DEC administrative region on the Draft Plan, released September 1, 2010 and accepted public comments until October 29, 2010. These hearings also served as public hearings on the Draft GEIS pursuant to the applicable SEQR Act (6NYCRR §617.9(a)(4)).
The final Plan is an update and revision of the Draft Strategic Plan for State Forest Management which includes identifications of future management goals for NYS DEC administered State Forests. It establishes statewide management guidelines for NYS DEC staff through a process of public involvement and review. The plan provides a foundation for the development of Unit Management Plans (UMPs), which set forth the specific actions to be undertaken by NYS DEC on individual State Forests. As individual UMPs are developed, this plan will serve as a guide and will be included by reference. This plan will be revised at least once every ten years.
This Plan describes how State Forests will be managed in a sustainable manner by promoting ecosystem health, enhancing landscape biodiversity, protecting soil productivity and water quality. In addition, State Forests will continue to provide the many recreational, social and economic benefits valued so highly by the people of New York State. NYS DEC will continue the legacy which started 80 years ago, leaving these lands to the next generation in better condition than they are today.
Five goals were developed for the management of State Forests. These goals were based on the criteria developed in the Montreal Process and are as follows:
Activities that have the potential to cause significant adverse impacts were addressed and include: increased public recreational use, facility development, prescribed fire, silvicultural activities, oil and gas drilling and control of competing vegetation and invasive species. Potential impacts were further discussed in the Draft GEIS including soil erosion, damage to vegetation, increased smoke and associated odors, surface and groundwater effects and effects of pesticides on the environment, including non-target species. The final Plan discusses all of these potential impacts and describes recommended management activities and mitigation measures to minimize potential impacts.
Contact: Justin Perry, NYS DEC – Division of Lands and Forests, 625 Broadway, Albany, NY 12233-4255, Phone: (518) 402-9436 begin_of_the_skype_
highlighting (518) 402-9436 end_of_the_skype_highlighting, E-mail: japerry@gw.dec.state.ny.us.
Comparison of draft and final Strategic Plans for forest Management–Jim Weiss
The Strategic Plan for State Forest Management has been released by NYSDEC.
From the executive summary: Mineral Resources
Starting on page 226 of Chapter 5 you will find the portion relating to hydrofracking. The concerns raised by the public seem to have at least been considered on page 331 which the following link will take you to: Click here: Chapters 5-7 + Appendices Starting on page 226 of Chapter 5 you will find the portion relating to hydrofracking. The concerns raised by the public seem to have at least been considered on page 231 which the following link will take you to: Click here: http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/lands_forests_pdf/spsfmfinal3.pdf . Text of Mineral Resources section: https://gdacc.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/final-plan-mineral-resources.pdf
Pipelines:
The document appears to have sidestepped an important pipeline issue: The DEC correctly points to the PSC (Public Service Commission ) as the controlling authority for lines that are outside the wellpad.
However, the plan sidesteps when it come to handling the pipeline ROW (right of way). On non-state forest land this is handled in one of two ways: a) by a formal easement with the landholder or, b) thru an eminent domain (condemnation) procedure (whereby the ROW is “taken”, presumeaby against the owner’s wishes and the owner is compensated.
Eminent domain applies in two cases: a) the pipeline is between states and the authority is federal (by Federal Energy Regulatory Commission , FERC), lines permitted by FERC carry emminent domain authority. b) within state lines, these carry eminent domain authority IF the Co. has Public Utility status.
Now, what’s the pipeline deal in the forests? will the state negotiate for ROWs, or will it require eminent domain authority in which case the Co will, in conjunction with the PSC or FERC, determine the routing (in this case DEC will NOT be a controlling entity, but presumeably consulted)?
Remember, no wells without pipelines.
This draft plan and generic environmental impact statement (GEIS) will guide the future management of the state’s 786,329-acre State Forest holdings and is being made available for public review and comment. Key goals focus on ecosystem health and diversity, economic benefits, recreational opportunities, forest conservation and sustainable management.
Press Release
——————
In Schuyler County alone, this could affect — or decimate — more than 10,000 acres in five state forests: Sugar Hill, Coon Hollow, Cinnamon Lake, Beaver Dam and Goundry Hill.
Most of this land was acquired about 80 years ago for about $4 an acre. The forests are used by hikers, hunters, horseback riders, snowmobilers and others.
The idea of industrializing any portion of them would appear to violate both the spirit and the letter of the Depression-era laws passed to assemble and protect them. Those special woodlands, the laws said, shall be “forever devoted to reforestation and the establishment and maintenance thereon of forests for watershed protection, the production of timber and for recreation and kindred purposes.”
The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation apparently isn’t worried about every fine point in dusty old statutes.
Applying an extraordinarily broad legal interpretation, the agency is prepared to expand the list of legal “kindred purposes” to include so called high-volume hydraulic fracturing, toxic wastewater storage in ponds, underground natural gas storage, heavy trucking and widespread road and pipeline construction.
This comes from the same agency that warns state forest hikers: “Don’t litter! Stay on designated trails. Do not cause damage by heedlessly trampling trail side vegetation.”
So littering is bad, but hydrofracking is OK? Surely, this agency is lost in the woods. Read more of this post