Deep Drilling Deep Pockets – Fracking Report – Common Cause

Deep Drilling Deep Pockets – Fracking Report – Common Cause.

 

Money in Politics

Deep Drilling, Deep Pockets

A faction of the natural gas industry has invested more than $747 million as part of a 10-year lobbying and political spending campaign to persuade federal authorities to ignore the dangers of hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” a rapidly expanding but poorly regulated method of tapping gas reserves.

 

Fracking involves injecting a mix of sand, chemicals, and water into a well at high pressure in order to break up underground rock formations and free up natural gas. Pollution may occur underground, with fracking chemicals or methane directly contaminating aquifers and drinking wells, or above ground, as streams or tributaries are polluted by spills or improper wastewater disposal.

 

Despite the pollution risks, the industry has argued that regulatory exemptions for fracking are needed to give America the opportunity to tap vast reserves of natural gas that have been previously unobtainable.

 

The Environmental Protection Agency is scheduled to publish new, preliminary findings about the potential dangers of fracking in 2012. That gives the natural gas industry a powerful incentive to increase its political spending now in an attempt to shape public opinion and the debate over fracking in Congress, as well as affect the outcome of the 2012 Congressional elections. Doing so will be much easier after last year’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United. This ruling threw out a century-old ban on corporate spending around elections and empowered corporations to exert even more influence over the political process. Now money spent on campaign contributions, lobbying, and through other avenues of influence such as the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) can be backed by millions spent on electioneering. Read the press release.

 

 

Download the Report

 

 

 

 

 

Ohio

Ohio Fracking Report (PDF)

Fracking money spreadsheet (Excel)

Michigan

Michigan Fracking Report (PDF)

Press Release
Fracking money spreadsheet (Excel)

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Fracking Report (PDF)
Press Release

 

 

Task force suggests testing air from well drill pads

Task force suggests testing air from well drill pads.

Pennsylvania farmers who signed drilling leases to speak in Skaneateles | syracuse.com

Pennsylvania farmers who signed drilling leases to speak in Skaneateles | syracuse.com.

 

Pennsylvania farmers who signed drilling leases to speak in Skaneateles

Published: Friday, November 11, 2011, 11:16 PM     Updated: Friday, November 11, 2011, 11:19 PM

Skaneateles, NY — Two Pennsylvania dairy farmers will speak Wednesday night about their experiences after signing leases for natural gas drilling by hydraulic fracturing.

Dairy farmers Carol French and Carolyn Knapp will present “Hydrofracking: The Good, the Bad and the Very Ugly” at 7 p.m. at the Skaneateles First Presbyterian Church, 97 E. Genesee St., Skaneateles. French and Knapp will discuss their observations of hydrofracking in their community.

“They will address the benefits, the negatives, lease negotiations and the effects of intensive fracking on the air, water, roads, quality of life, health of people and livestock, and land values in Bradford County,” according to a news release.

Bradford County is the second “most fracked” county in Pennsylvania. The county is in northeastern Pennsylvania’s Endless Mountains region. French and Knapp will answer questions. The public is invited to attend.

The presentation is sponsored by the Skaneateles branch of the American Association of University Women. For more information, contact Skaneateles AAUW President Kathy Gorr at gorrlaw@yahoo.com or 685-6545.

Contact Catie O’Toole cotoole@syracuse.com or 470-2134.


Sponsored Links


Too Much Natural Gas? Let’s Give it to China! | EARTHblog

Too Much Natural Gas? Let’s Give it to China! | EARTHblog.

Shale Gas Exploitation is Unacceptable Due to the Existence of a Cancer Epidemic in the United States

Shale Gas Exploitation is Unacceptable Due to the Existence of a Cancer Epidemic in the United States

Shale Gas Exploitation is Unacceptable Due to the Existence of a
Cancer Epidemic in the United States-
Donald L. Hassig, November 4,2011

I have recently spoken with New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation (DEC) Deputy Commissioner Eugene Leff concerning the
health risks of high volume hydraulic fracturing (HVHF).  We discussed
the possibility of the production of a health risk assessment.  He
explained that the decision was made not to produce a health risk
assessment due to the difficulty of estimating quantities of exposure
to various pollutant releases associated with HVHF.  I believe that a
health risk assessment should nevertheless be produced because it
would be the proper document for portrayal of the complex and
impossible to quantify exposures to pollutant carcinogens associated
with HVHF.

Deputy Commissioner Leff takes the position that the best way to
proceed with HVHF in New York State is to make a firm commitment to
minimizing all exposures to harmful chemical substances released into
the environment by shale gas exploitation.  I argued that considering
the history of shale gas exploitation throughout the United States and
the limited ability of the DEC to enforce laws and regulations already
in existence it would not be possible for DEC to act in a sufficiently
substantial manner upon any commitment to minimization of exposures.
There are many pollutant carcinogen exposures associated with shale
gas exploitation that have not been addressed in those areas where
this activity exists, including:  (1) benzene, formaldehyde,
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and soot particulates
emissions of diesel trucks and compressors; (2) chemical carcinogens
present in fracturing fluid and disposed of so as to contaminate
surface and ground waters; (3) chemical carcinogens evaporating into
the outdoor atmosphere from holding tanks utilized at gas well sites;
(4) chemical carcinogens evaporating from HVHF waste water and
entering the outdoor atmosphere; and (5) radioactive nuclides brought
to the surface of the Earth in HVHF waste water.

Shale gas exploitation is not currently possible without imposing a
relatively large quantity of exposure to pollutant carcinogens upon
New York State residents.  At a time when cancer incidence is already
far above an acceptable level as a result of exposures to pollutant
carcinogens released into the environment by past and current
polluting activities, shale gas exploitation is not acceptable.  Our
organization advocates for a ban on shale gas exploitation throughout
the United States.

Cancer Action NY is a member organization of the New York State Cancer
Consortium (CC).  The CC is currently producing an environmental
exposure section for the 2011-2016 New York State Comprehensive Cancer
Control Plan (CCCP).  Cancer Action NY advocates for the inclusion of a
prohibition against HVHF in the CCCP.  Organizations with an interest in
expressing support for the inclusion of such a prohibition in the CCCP can
contact the CC via email at:  <nycccp@cancer.org>.

Donald L. Hassig, Director
Cancer Action NY
Cancer Action News Network
P O Box 340
Colton, NY USA 13625
315.262.2456
www.canceractionny.org

Letter: Drilling in residential areas may be possible | Press & Sun-Bulletin | pressconnects.com

Letter: Drilling in residential areas may be possible | Press & Sun-Bulletin | pressconnects.com.

Letter: Drilling in residential areas may be possible

12 Comments

Recent Guest Viewpoints by Binghamton Mayor Matthew T. Ryan and Victor Furman spoke about gas drilling in city or residential areas.

It appears to me that drilling under residential areas could readily occur without permission of residents. Here is how:

A typical Marcellus drilling unit will be two miles long and one-half mile wide.

Drilling from a leased well pad outside a residential area and going more than three-quarters of a mile under residences could easily occur without permission of those landowners using the eminent domain-like legal procedure of Compulsory Integration.

It would only be necessary for the driller to have leased 60 percent of the land outside the residential area.

According to New York environmental conservation law, permission for the rest of the drilling unit can be acquired simply on the request of the driller.

Stanley R. Scobie

Binghamton

Would Jesus Frack?

ENYFAll2011lo Res Final.

Justice: The Way to the Peace That Has Its Heart in God
By the Rt. Rev. Mark S. Sisk
The Rt. Rev. Mark S. Sisk
(continuado en la paginacion 31)
ENY 9-11.e$S_ENY 9&10-08 10/4/11 11:26 AM Page 3

Episcopalians ask: Would Jesus frack? | Politics on the Hudson

Episcopalians ask: Would Jesus frack? | Politics on the Hudson.

DEC SGEIS Hearings

DEC SGEIS Hearings.  Jim Northrup comments

Last night’s other big winner: Opposition to hydrofracking | The Empire

Last night’s other big winner: Opposition to hydrofracking | The Empire.