Deep Drilling, Deep Pockets in NYS”: Pro-fracking interests spent $64.3 million from 2007 to 2013

Deep Drilling, Deep Pockets in NYS”: Pro-fracking interests spent $64.3 million from 2007 to 2013.

“Moreland Monday” Analysis of Pro-Fracking Contributions Raises Serious Questions for Commission to Investigate – Common Cause

“Moreland Monday” Analysis of Pro-Fracking Contributions Raises Serious Questions for Commission to Investigate – Common Cause.

DEEPDRILLINGDEEPPOCKET-3-CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURES.PDF (application/pdf Object)

DEEPDRILLINGDEEPPOCKET-3-CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURES.PDF (application/pdf Object).

Fracking for Support: Natural gas industry pumps cash into Congress – Common Cause

Fracking for Support: Natural gas industry pumps cash into Congress – Common Cause.

Fracking for Support: Natural gas industry pumps cash into Congress

New report details 10-year spending campaign by fracking interests to avoid regulation

 

 

 

 

Natural gas interests have spent more than $747 million during a 10-year campaign – stunningly successful so far – to avoid government regulation of hydraulic “fracking,” a fast-growing and environmentally risky method of tapping underground gas reserves, according to a new study by Common Cause.

A faction of the natural gas industry has directed more than $20 million to the campaigns of current members of Congress and put $726 million into lobbying aimed at shielding itself from oversight, according to the report, the third in a series of “Deep Drilling, Deep Pockets” reports produced by the non-profit government watchdog group.

“Players in this industry have pumped cash into Congress in the same way they pump toxic chemicals into underground rock formations to free trapped gas,” said Common Cause President Bob Edgar. “And as fracking for gas releases toxic chemicals into groundwater and streams, the industry’s political fracking for support is toxic to efforts for a cleaner environment and relief from our dependence on fossil fuels.”

The study – which includes inserts for the fracking-heavy states of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Michigan – found that the natural gas industry focuses its political spending on members of the Congressional committees charged with overseeing it. Current members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee have received an average of $70,342 from the industry; Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, the former committee chairman, has collected a whopping $514,945, more than any other lawmaker.

What’s more, the industry’s political giving also heavily favors lawmakers who supported the 2005 Energy Policy Act, which exempted fracking from regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Current members who voted for the bill received an average of $73,433, while those who voted against the bill received an average of $10,894.

The report comes as the Environmental Protection Agency is scheduled to publish new, preliminary findings about the potential dangers of fracking in 2012, giving the industry a powerful incentive to increase political spending now in an attempt to shape public opinion and the debate over fracking in Congress, as well as affect the outcome of the 2012 congressional elections.

“Thanks to the Supreme Court and its Citizens United decision, the natural gas industry will be free to spend whatever it likes next year to elect a Congress that will do its bidding,” Edgar said. “The industry’s political investments already have largely freed it from government oversight. Controlling the flow of that money and other corporate spending on our elections is critical to protecting our environment for this and future generations.”

Deep Drilling Deep Pockets – Fracking Report – Common Cause

Deep Drilling Deep Pockets – Fracking Report – Common Cause.

 

Money in Politics

Deep Drilling, Deep Pockets

A faction of the natural gas industry has invested more than $747 million as part of a 10-year lobbying and political spending campaign to persuade federal authorities to ignore the dangers of hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” a rapidly expanding but poorly regulated method of tapping gas reserves.

 

Fracking involves injecting a mix of sand, chemicals, and water into a well at high pressure in order to break up underground rock formations and free up natural gas. Pollution may occur underground, with fracking chemicals or methane directly contaminating aquifers and drinking wells, or above ground, as streams or tributaries are polluted by spills or improper wastewater disposal.

 

Despite the pollution risks, the industry has argued that regulatory exemptions for fracking are needed to give America the opportunity to tap vast reserves of natural gas that have been previously unobtainable.

 

The Environmental Protection Agency is scheduled to publish new, preliminary findings about the potential dangers of fracking in 2012. That gives the natural gas industry a powerful incentive to increase its political spending now in an attempt to shape public opinion and the debate over fracking in Congress, as well as affect the outcome of the 2012 Congressional elections. Doing so will be much easier after last year’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United. This ruling threw out a century-old ban on corporate spending around elections and empowered corporations to exert even more influence over the political process. Now money spent on campaign contributions, lobbying, and through other avenues of influence such as the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) can be backed by millions spent on electioneering. Read the press release.

 

 

Download the Report

 

 

 

 

 

Ohio

Ohio Fracking Report (PDF)

Fracking money spreadsheet (Excel)

Michigan

Michigan Fracking Report (PDF)

Press Release
Fracking money spreadsheet (Excel)

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Fracking Report (PDF)
Press Release