Cooperstown Chamber Opposes Hydrofracking

http://www.cooperstownchamber.org/pdfs/hydrofracking.pdf

Hydrofracking for Shale Gas in Otsego County
Feb 11, 2011 Statement by Cooperstown Chamber of Commerce

1. WHEREAS…The gas industry has secured broad exemptions from Federal regulation under the Clean Water Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act in 2005 (the “Halliburton exemption”). Under New York State law, horizontal drilling is now stalled pending completion of a Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement (dSGEIS), which could be finalized at any time. In the interim, drilling of vertical wells with hydrofracking is proceeding in our County under an outdated 1992 Generic Environmental Impact Statement. Thus, gas companies are now drilling and fracking in our County without substantive local review and both state and federal regulatory investigations into the risks of the process are mired in political delays.

2. WHEREAS…Land-lease development in the region has already reached a high level without any meaningful regulatory control and with limited public awareness of the issues. Over 60,000 acres have already been leased by gas-drilling companies or their land agents and active drilling projects have started in Otsego County (principally by Gastem, a Canadian lease/exploration company).

3. WHEREAS…The relative contribution of natural gas from hydrofracking to either the economy or the energy needs of the region is minimal and development does not materially contribute to a sustainable national or regional energy policy.

4. WHEREAS…The number of documented spills, blowouts, leaking wells and other environmental accidents is significant and the environmental and human consequences have been serious in a number of states, including TX, PA, WY, and WV.

5. WHEREAS…The withdrawal of huge quantities of fresh water estimated at 2-5 million gallons of water per frack cycle and the heavy impact of thousands of truck trips per well hauling water and chemicals to and from the drill pads on loca infrastructure cannot be sustained in Otsego County. Effective technologies for the treatment of the millions of gallons of polluted processing waste do not exist and there are no locations for waste disposal in New York capable of supporting the proposed scale of drilling.

6. WHEREAS…The most critical threat to the local area is contamination of the aquifers and surface water resources found directly above the Marcellus shale. Current plans for drilling present a strategic risk to the entire Otsego County water supply and the Susquehanna watershed. The New York City watershed has already been protected, which represents the clearest evidence that NY State already understands a potential risk.

7. WHEREAS…On Jan 1, 2011, NY State Governor Andrew Cuomo continued 2010 Executive order 41 (issued by past Governor David Paterson) directing the NY DEC to publish a revised draft SGEIS, accept public comment on the revisions, and schedule public hearings on the revisions. The order says no horizontal hydrofracking permits may be issued prior to the completion of a final SGEIS. This is in effect a moratorium on any new horizontal hydrofracking drilling, but does not stop vertical hydrofracking drilling, nor does it stop further land leasing, seismic testing, or other actions that may lead to future drilling.

WE CONCLUDE THEREFORE, THAT:
The plans for drilling pose a direct and material threat to the interests of the Chamber membership. Industrial-scale hydrofracking in the upstate region will irreparably damage the essential qualities that make the Cooperstown area an excellent place to live, raise families, farm and work. It puts at risk much of the local economy, ranging from hotel and tourism to restaurant and retail businesses, most of which are driven by the hundreds of thousands of tourists who choose to visit the region every year.

Fracking Fictions – PPT from Northrup on Industry

Fracking Fictions – PPT from   James Northrup on Industry .  Northrup is a former industry employee who now lives in NY part-time.

Robert Kennedy, Jr. interviews Josh Fox

RFK Jr.’s  interview with Josh Fox on industry claims and criticism of Gasland.

 

– Show quoted text –

Energy Tax Policy: Issues in the 111th Congress CRS Report

Energy Tax Policy: Issues in the 111th Congress
Molly F. Sherlock
Analyst in Economics
Donald J. Marples
Section Research Manager
September 20, 2010
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
R40999R40999.pdf (application/pdf Object)
.

Ingraffea – Siegel Debate Sun, Feb. 20 2pm SUNY Cortland

Two Scientists DEBATE The Pros & Cons of GAS DRILLING–

Video link:   http://shaleshockmedia.org/2011/04/11/professors-siegel-and-ingraffea-debate-on-hydrofracking/

Cortland Standard Coverage Feb. 21, 2011 pdf

 

Sunday
February 20, 2011
2 – 4pm
Brown Auditorium
Old Main, SUNY Cortland
Cortland, NY

Professor Anthony R. Ingraffea

(Engineer, FractureExpert, Cornell University)

 
Dr. Ingraffea opposes the large scale industrialization of the country-
side required for shale gas extraction. He has given many presenta-
tions around the Northeast explaining the harmful impacts the pro-
posed hydraulic fracturing technology will have.

Professor Donald Siegel
(Hydrogeologist, Syracuse University)

Dr. Siegel is a proponent of shale gas extraction and has appeared in
many industry television ads stating his support of this technology. He
categorizes the views of gas drilling opponents as “irrational fears.”Don’t miss this chanceto hear both sides on a topic that will affect us all!  

Organized by GDACC (Gas Drilling Awareness for Cortland County) and sponsored by SUNY Cortland: Office of the President, NYPIRG,
Philosophy Department, and Center for Gender and Intercultural Studies and co-sponsored by many area organizations.

NY Gas Development and Leasing Issues-Cortland SWCD Feb. 28 7pm

Cortland SWCD – Home Page.

New York Gas Development Update & Leasing Considerations (2/28/2011, Grange Auditorium, Free and Open to Public)

An educational seminar on natural gas exploration is scheduled for Monday February 28th, from 7pm to 9pm at the New York State Grange Headquarters in Cortland, NY.  The seminar will focus on future leasing considerations, how to ensure an expired lease is released by gas companies along with an update on gas development in NY.

As policy makers and stakeholders continue to debate the risks and benefits of natural gas development in New York, the outlook is still unclear.  Much of upstate New York contains significant natural gas reserves that will continue to attract the gas industry.  Therefore, rural landowners will still be faced with complicated decisions regarding drilling and related activities such as pipelines, compressor stations, water storage and access roads.

Brett Chedzoy, an expert from Cornell Cooperative Extension will be providing an update on the current status of gas development in NY and highlight key leasing recommendations for landowners.  Joe Heath, Esq. will be on hand explaining the process of getting an expired lease released by a gas company.   He will also share some of the tactics gas companies are using to attempt to extend existing leases, some of which are preventable.  The seminar will also take a glimpse at our neighbors in Pennsylvania, painting a picture of what our landscape may look like when exploration activities commence in NY.

This seminar is sponsored by the Cortland County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) and is free and open to the public.  If you have any questions about the seminar or any of the services or programs provided by the SWCD please call 607-756-5991

Joe Marten’s Testimony Joint Legislative Public Hearing Notice and Testimonies for Environmental Conservation.pdf (application/pdf Object)

Joint Legislative Public Hearing Notice and Testimonies for Environmental Conservation.pdf application/pdf Object).

Policy Brief on Gas Development in NY and PA

http://devsoc.cals.cornell.edu/cals/devsoc/outreach/cardi/publications/upload/Policy_Brief_Jan11-draft08.pdf

Research & Policy Brief Series. ISSUE NUMBER 39/JANUARY 2011

Natural Gas Development:

Views of New York and Pennsylvania Residents in the Marcellus Shale Region

By

Richard Stedman, Cornell University, Fern Willits, Kathryn Brasier, Matthew Filteau, and Diane McLaughlin, The Pennsylvania State University, andJeffrey Jacquet

, Cornell University.

 

 

How much do residents feel they know about the potential impacts?

Department of Development Sociology

Cornell University

 

 

Josh Fox Responds to Industry Attacks on Gasland

AN OPEN LETTER TO JOURNALISTS FROM GASLAND DIRECTOR JOSH FOX IN RESPONSE TO ATTACKS BY GAS INDUSTRY

February 7, 2011 — With the recent Oscar nomination of my documentary
film GASLAND, Big Gas and their PR attack machine hit a new low in its
blatant disregard for the truth.
In an unprecedented move, an oil and gas industry front group sent a
letter to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences saying that
the film should be ineligible for best documentary feature.
We are honored and encouraged by the Academy’s nomination.  It is
terrific to be acknowledged as filmmakers by the film world’s most
prestigious honor.  But perhaps more than that, I believe that the
nomination has provided hope, inspiration and affirmation for the
thousands of families out there who are suffering because of the natural
gas drilling.  The Oscars are about dreams, and I know that for all of
us living with the nightmare of gas drilling the nomination provides
further proof that someone out there cares.
Now Big Gas wants to take that away, as they have shattered the American
dream for so many.
GASLAND exposes the disaster being caused across the U.S. by the largest
domestic natural gas drilling campaign history and how the contentious
Halliburton-developed drilling technology called hydraulic fracturing,
or fracking threatens the water supply of millions.
Fracking is a whole-scale industrialization process that pumps millions
of gallons of toxic material directly into the ground. Thousands of
documented contamination cases show the harmful chemicals used have been
turning up in people’s water supplies in fracking areas all over the
map.
We stand behind the testimonials, facts, science and investigative
journalism in the film 100 percent.  We have issued a point-by-point
rebuttal of the group’s claims (“Affirming Gasland”), posted on our
It’s not just us they’re after.  The gas industry goes after anyone who
tries to punch a hole in their lie. Last week the same pro-drilling
group, Energy in Depth (EID), attacked an investigative piece on
drilling pollution by ProPublica, the highly credible public interest
journalism organization.
And just last week, T. Boone Pickens, the most visible promoter of gas
fracking, went on The Daily Show claiming that he personally has fracked
over 3,000 wells and never witnessed any contamination cases, even when
Jon Stewart asked him about GASLAND point blank.  He simply stated over
and over again the industry lie, that fracking is safe.  Not a single
word of acknowledgement, or responsibility for the claims of thousands
and the threat posed to millions.
The gas industry believes it can create a new reality in which their
nationwide onshore drilling campaign isn’t a disaster.  But no amount of
PR money or slick ads can keep the stories of contamination coming from
thousands of Americans from being any less true.
On Monday, Congressional investigators called out frackers for pumping
millions of gallons of diesel fuel directly into the ground, exposing
drinking water sources to benzene and other carcinogens. This makes
EID’s specious and misleading attack on the science and data in GASLAND
especially ironic since Halliburton stonewalled Congressman Henry
Waxman’s investigation into fracking, refusing to provide data on their
use of diesel and other harmful chemicals injected in the fracking
process.
There are major watershed areas providing water to millions of Americans
that are at risk here, including the watershed areas for New York City
and Philadelphia. The catastrophe has been widely covered not only in
GASLAND, but also by hundreds of news stories, films and TV segments.
This is a moment of crisis that cannot be understated.
Even before its release, the power of the film was not lost on the
industry. In the March 24th edition of the Oil and Gas Journal, Skip
Horvath, the president of the Natural Gas Supply Association said that
GASLAND is “well done. It holds people’s attention. And it could block
our industry.”
GASLAND was seen by millions and I personally toured with the film to
over 100 cities. In affected areas, people came to the screenings with
their contaminated water samples in tow. They came to have the truth
they know shared and confirmed
As Maurice D. Hinchey, U.S. Representative (NY-22) recently said,
“Thanks to GASLAND and the millions of grassroots activists across the
country, we finally have a counterweight to the influence of the oil and
gas industry in our nation’s capital.”
Big Gas is blocking the truth in their pursuit of hundreds of billions
of dollars of profit. Their clear goal is to ensure our nation remains
addicted to fossil fuels for the rest of this century. They seek to
stifle the development of truly renewable energy.
They’re playing dirty in more ways than one, attacking the film and the
testimonials and science in it instead of taking responsibility and
addressing the contamination, destruction and harm that they are
creating. I now know how the people in my documentary feel, to have the
things they know to be true and the questions they are raising so
blatantly discounted and smeared. It is truly unfortunate that the
gas-drilling industry continues to deny what is so obvious to Americans
living in gaslands across the nation.
Josh Fox
Director, GASLAND
Media Contact:  Josh Baran – jcbaran@gmail.com917-797-1799
Josh Fox is based in New York City and will be in Washington, D.C. on
February 17.  He is available for interviews.  DVD screeners for the
media are available.

————————————–