Protecting our Children – Sandra Steingraber May 13-Vestal

A FREE TALK BY DR. SANDRA STEINGRABER    Poster   Poster 2/page

Author whose book has been featured as an HBO movie “Living Downstream”

The audio for this event is here:
http://changetheframe.com/audio/sandra_steingraber_vestal_may13-2011/steingraber-audio.mp3

Friday, May 13, 2011 7:00 pm (doors open at 6:30 pm)

Clayton Ave Elementary School, 209 Clayton Ave, Vestal, NY

Dr. Sandra Steingraber is a mother, biologist, ecologist and cancer survivor who has won the Rachel Carson award for her writing about the connection between our health and the environment.  She looks at the toxic, ecologically fractured world our children now inhabit and invites all parents and those concerned to attend this event and learn about the increasing toxic load we all have to carry.  Toxins have been implicated in such problems as childhood cancers, asthma, autism, allergies, reproductive problems and autoimmune problems.  Dr. Steingraber will be available for a book signing of her new book, “Raising Elijah,” following the talk. 

*Sponsored by Binghamton Regional Sustainability Coalition

“Steingraber’s book is a deeply thoughtful, at times frightening, but ultimately hopeful book that describes in compelling and lyrical detail the two great, intertwined ecological crises of our time – the crisis of toxic chemical exposure and the crisis of global warming.  She argues that mastery of these crises will require heroic action, societal action on a scale as great as that which ended slavery in the United States, and is essential to save our planet and our children.”

-Philip J. Landrigan, M.D., MSc, Director, Children’s Environmental Health Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine

“This could be the most important and inspiring parenting book ever written.  With fierce love and hard science, Sandra Steingraber convinces us that protecting children from the poisons that surround them cannot be left to conscientious mothers and fathers alone.  It must instead become our society’s highes collective priority.”

–          Naomi Klein, author of The Shock Doctrine


Some Seekers of Rural Life Move Out of Pennsylvania as Gas Rigs Move In | Reuters

Some Seekers of Rural Life Move Out of Pennsylvania as Gas Rigs Move In | Reuters.

By Elizabeth McGowan at SolveClimate

Tue May 3, 2011 10:30am EDT

The Aubrees were the lone holdouts against a developer’s plan to tap gas in their small town. Now, living in the shadow of drilling rigs, they’re leaving

Elizabeth McGowan, SolveClimate News

Editor’s Note: SolveClimate News reporter Elizabeth McGowan traveled to Northeastern Pennsylvania in late March to find out how the gas drilling boom is affecting the landscape and the people who call it home. This is the fourth in a multi-part series. (Read parts one , two and three)

MONTROSE, Pa.—After three consecutive nights of tossing and turning, Anna Aubree was so desperate for sleep that she packed a pillow, a blanket and Jasmine the family golden retriever into her car early one March morning.

The 60-something retiree drove seven miles to the relative peace and quiet of the local high school parking lot just to try to refresh her exhausted self by catching a few winks.

All she sought was a brief respite from the constant barrage of pounding, banging, booming and grinding that penetrates the walls of the little yellow one-story house she shares with her husband, Maurice.

“This is my humble abode. But the truth is, I want out,” she told SolveClimate News in her thick Brooklyn accent while seated at a dining room table covered with stacks of research documents. “We’re surrounded. This noise is horrible. And it never stops. It’s all night long.”

Anna and Maurice AubreeThe Aubrees bought their 3.75-acre wedge of paradise off a dirt road in rural Pennsylvania in 1988, settling there permanently from Long Island four years later. They planted passels of Colorado spruces along its borders and sketched out plans for a retirement refuge that included a horse farm for their three sons and yet-to-arrive grandchildren.

Two decades ago, hardly anybody thought about their prefabricated house in the tiny Susquehanna County community of Forest Lake resting atop what geologists refer to as the “sweet spot” of Marcellus Shale. It’s considered the drilling nirvana of Northeastern Pennsylvania because the band of black sedimentary rock — remnants of an ancient sea bed now buried deep underground — is consistently 400 feet thick and saturated with treasured natural gas.

Holdouts in a Doughnut Hole

A year ago in May, on Mother’s Day, the Aubrees discovered that all of their farming neighbors had opted to take advantage of lucrative leasing offers from the Pittsburgh offices of Houston-based Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation.Rig behind the Aubrees’ property

The Aubrees, situated on a comparative sliver of land, were the lone holdouts.

Even though they didn’t sign a lease, they soon started to find out what it means to live in the midst of an energy boom. Last summer, Cabot began orchestrating a series of seismic tests involving helicopters, dynamite and “thumper trucks” that help companies determine where to situate their wells and accompanying infrastructure.

By October, Cabot orchestrated a heavy-duty equipment movement to clear the land just a stone’s throw from the Aubrees’ property line. Soon, a lengthy roadway led to a staging area designed to accommodate a spacious pad for a series of wells.

As autumn turned to winter, the company continued setting up a jarring and complex network of drilling architecture. Come February, Anna and Maurice were treated to the ominous view of 142-foot metal drilling rig when they peeked out their back windows. Now, one well is about complete and at least seven more are in the preparation stages.

“It’s eerie looking,” Anna said about the looming, lighted behemoth that resembles some sort of set-up from a NASA rocket launch. It’s especially otherworldly at night. “We couldn’t even open a window during the summer because all of that machinery was so loud.”

She spent the summer, fall and winter calling agency after agency, hoping to find somebody who could offer relief from the cacophony. But she couldn’t even find evidence of a municipal or county noise ordinance.

“Cabot told us that we’re in a doughnut hole,” Anna explained. “And all everybody else tells us is to take the money and sign the lease we were offered. But we’ve made it clear to Cabot that we’re not interested in a lease.”

Not Everybody Is a Petroleum Engineer

Upon hearing about the Aubrees’ plight from SolveClimate News, Chris Tucker, a spokesman for the natural gas advocacy group Energy in Depth, extended his sympathies from his Washington, D.C., office. He admitted that gas companies should be rethinking the way they reach out to the general public.

“Folks don’t know their stuff about Marcellus Shale drilling and quite frankly why do we expect them to?” Tucker asked in an interview. “It’s our job to educate them. They’re not petroleum engineers.”

No doubt, drilling for natural gas creates construction and industrial sites that are loud, dirty and inconvenient, he stressed, even though companies are constantly seeking to mitigate those drawbacks.

“For years, the industry has focused its communication efforts on engaging financial analysts, regulators and landowners with gas on their property,” he said. But this issue of Marcellus Shale drilling “has garnered so much attention that our audience needs to be expanded to include the general public. It makes sense to do that. A lot of producers are starting to do that.”

Gas companies’ greatest assets, he concluded, are informed landowners.

“We’re going to be there for at least 40 years,” he said. “Why do we want to start off on the wrong foot by trying to take advantage of people?”

Long, Loud Time Coming

While the Aubrees’ house might not be in the shadow of a drilling rig forever, harvesting gas from the Marcellus Shale isn’t a quick in-and-out venture either.

Drilling road and infrastructure next to the Aubrees’ houseIt can take up to eight months to create a functioning well, according to information Energy in Depth provided via a Pittsburgh Post-Gazette article.

Each stage is labor intensive and reliant on high-volume internal combustion engines. Crews are often working 24/7 because so much of the drilling equipment is so expensive to rent.

Site construction, which includes clearing and leveling acreage for the well site, the well pad, the accompanying roadway in and out, and short-term quarters for workers takes a minimum of two months.

Each vertical well, which can be 4,000 to 10,000 feet deep, takes at least two weeks to drill. Many pads can accommodate up to 10 wells. Horizontal drilling, which can extend about a mile but is about 3,000 feet on average, adds another two weeks per well to the timeline. Trucks use the newly carved roadway to haul away the “cuttings” — the soil, rock and other pieces of earth dislodged by drilling — to landfills.

The actual hydraulic fracturing of a well takes three or four days, but preparation can take up to two weeks because it’s such a technically precise operation. The water, sand and chemicals used in the fracturing process then have to be extracted from the well before companies can begin to harvest natural gas. Expelling what’s known as “flowback” lasts at least a week.

Those last two stages require millions of gallons of freshwater to be trucked in and “flowback” to be carted away when it can no longer be recycled for fracking. Plus, machinery is needed to install the underground pipelines to deliver the natural gas to its destination.

Once a well is “delivering” natural gas — and most are expected to do so for anywhere from five years to 30 years, or beyond — the site left behind can appear quite tame and unobtrusive to passersby.

Indeed, the roadways to the drilling pad are permanent fixtures. And, sets of meters and brine tanks poking up through the ground are the only other intruders visible for the long-term. Wells are monitored electronically from afar and well tenders also make regular rounds to physically check on them.

Drilling Sites Forever Changed

Cabot’s Pittsburgh offices hired George Stark as the company’s director of external affairs more than a year ago when tension over hydraulic fracturing began peaking. In Pennsylvania, his company opted to lease land for drilling solely in Susquehanna County because of its abundant natural gas supply in the Marcellus Shale and access to an existing transcontinental pipeline.

Cabot gas drilling site near Montrose, Pa.He wasn’t familiar with the particulars of the Aubrees’ situation but he is aware many county residents assume the somewhat foreboding drilling rigs are fixtures that will mar landscapes forever.

Cabot, he said, prides itself on partnering with a nonprofit sportsmen’s group, the Quality Deer Management Association, to rehabilitate acreage that was cleared and flattened to make way for drilling. The company doesn’t restore the original topography but it does put preserved topsoil back in place. As well, Cabot is collaborating with a local seed company to hasten the reclamation process and minimize erosion.

“Of course, the land will never be the same,” Stark explained to SolveClimate News as he pointed to a completed and functioning well site off a rural Pennsylvania road near Montrose. “But we’re not abandoning the site and letting whatever would grow there take over. What we don’t have is an attitude that we’re going to do whatever we want. We restore the site in a respectful manner.”

“This notion of a moonscape is wrong,” he continued. “I don’t think what people are left with in the long term can be called scarring. I think we leave the land much better afterward than most extractive industries.”

Executing an Exit Plan

Tucker’s sympathies and Stark’s restoration assurances, however, are of little consolation to Anna and Maurice Aubree. Their sense of security and serenity has dissipated into the ether.

“I see ourselves as the silent sufferers here,” Anna said. “Who can speak for me? Where can my voice be heard?”

Though she has tried to drown out the drone of diesel generators and 18-wheeler engines with Doris Day tapes rented from the library, sleep in any room of her house comes in fits and starts. That lack of rest exacerbates her challenges with asthma and a sore back.

“I moved up here to maintain my health,” said Anna, who cared for hospitalized veterans on Long Island. “But we’re stuck. You don’t know how we’re praying.”

At the end of January, the two opted to put their house on the market. Ironically, the “For Sale” sign that vibrates in the spring breeze is planted in their front yard just a short walk from a message painted on slate and propped on their front porch that cheerily declares: “A Day in the Country is Worth a Month in Town.”

The thought of uprooting themselves and packing up all of their worldly belongings at this juncture in their lives makes them heartsick.

Even though they don’t blame their neighbors for benefiting from the natural bounty beneath their own land, neither of them can envision continuing to endure a situation where they feel constantly on edge.

“When you’re getting older, it’s extremely stressful and it’s hard all around,” said Maurice, 75, a retired driver for the local school district who admits to “sneaking in a few cries about it.”

“If you don’t laugh, you cry,” he added. “So you better learn how to laugh.”

Their sons, two live in New York and the third in Florida, are helping them sort out their next destination.

“We don’t know where we’re going,” said Anna while giving her pet dog a loving pat on the head. “But you know what? We’re going.”

See Also:  Tiny Pennsylvania Land Trust Is Tempted by Marcellus Shale Gas Riches Fracking’s Environmental Footprint to Transform Pennsylvania Landscape Number-Crunching the Footprint of a Gas Fracking Boom, Forest by Forest MIT Web Tools Help Small Landowners Navigate Gas Leasing Frenzy

Environmental consortium sues DEC over hydrofracking in state forests

Environmental consortium sues DEC over hydrofracking in state forests.

Environmental consortium sues DEC over hydrofracking in state forests

BEDFORD – The Croton Watershed Clean Water Coalition, Inc. has filed a lawsuit against the State Department of Environmental Conservation seeking to declare hydrofracking in state forests contrary to the state Constitution and related environmental laws. Among those lands is the vast Stewart State Forest adjacent to Stewart Airport, three state forest areas in Ulster County plus forest lands in Delaware and Greene counties.

Organization attorney James Bacon said the suit is concerned with the forestlands that are on top of Marcellus Shale formations.
The suit was filed in State Supreme Court in Kingston.

Hydrofracking is the forcing of chemicals under extreme pressures horizontally in shale formations in an effort to force natural gas deposits to the surface to be collected.

Group President Fay Muir said the state has reforested its state forests after years of industrialization laid waste to hundreds of thousands of acres.

Hydrofracking in those lands “will reverse those gains allowing industry to profit over people,” she said, and that “radioactive discharges will threaten human health for centuries.”

Sierra Club Lower Hudson Valley Group Chairman George Klein said hydrofracking in state forests “would be an outrageous violation” of the DEC’s mission of protecting the state’s natural resources and environment and controlling water, land and air pollution.

Pa. DEP scraps gas drilling violation approval policy | Press & Sun-Bulletin | pressconnects.com

Pa. DEP scraps gas drilling violation approval policy | Press & Sun-Bulletin | pressconnects.com.

New York Climate Change Advisory Group :: Interim Report

New York Climate Change Advisory Group :: Interim Report. 11.8.2919

In gas drilling, science matters – Times Union

In gas drilling, science matters – Times Union.  Robert Howarth  Apr. 29, 2011

In gas drilling, science matters

Published 12:01 a.m., Friday, April 29, 2011

The fossil fuel industry does no good for its already badly damaged reputation when its spokesman tries to minimize the credentials and question the integrity of one of our country’s leading scientists, Robert Howarth of Cornell University.

Russell Jones of the American Petroleum Institute wrongly claims that Howarth is working outside his field (“Study: Shale gas dirty,” April 13). Howarth is, in fact, a biogeochemist, with a career of work assessing the flows of carbon, nitrogen and other elements in our environment.

He is chairman of the SCOPE Biofuels Project, an effort chartered by the International Council of Science to provide an objective, science-based analysis for policymakers on the environmental consequences of biofuels, including greenhouse gas emissions.

Howarth is also the co-chairman of the Committee on Energy and Environment of the Council of Scientific Society Presidents, an umbrella group of this country’s 1.4 million professional scientists. He is the David R. Atkinson Professor of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at Cornell, an endowed distinguished chair, awarded for his work on environmental chemistry.

When Robert Howarth publishes a peer-reviewed study on greenhouse gas emissions, thoughtful, well-informed people listen. The gas-drilling industry should listen, too. It is the science that matters. When you attack Howarth’s character and not his work, your behavior should alarm us all.

Howarth is an “activist” only in the way a scientist is supposed to be active — as an engaged citizen in the critical issues of our day.

WILLIAM H. SCHLESINGER

President

The Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies

Millbrook

Read more: http://www.timesunion.com/default/article/In-gas-drilling-science-matters-1357789.php#ixzz1LJcaqZgL

Capitol Confidential » Demonstrators call for ‘fracking’ ban

Capitol Confidential » Demonstrators call for ‘fracking’ ban.

Frack Action Rally at NYS Capitol  May 2, 2011

Maryland will sue in Susquehanna tributary “fracking” spill – baltimoresun.com

Maryland will sue in Susquehanna tributary “fracking” spill – baltimoresun.com.

Maryland‘s Attorney General has told a gas driller working in Pennsylvania that he plans to sue the company for violating federal anti-pollution laws after thousands of gallons of hydraulic fracturing fluid spilled into the Susquehanna River watershed last month.

In a “notice of intent to sue,” Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler said there was an equipment failure April 19 at a gas well being drilled by Chesapeake Energy Corp. in Leroy Township, in north central Pennsylvania. The failure resulted in “loss of control of the well.”

“Tens of thousands of gallons” of “fracking” fluid, used to fracture bedrock and release natural gas from the Marcellus Shale deep underground, leaked out and escaped the berm built to contain it, Gansler said. The fluid crossed neighboring farms, then flowed into Towanda Creek, a tributary of the Susquehanna River.

Gansler told the company the spill “may pose … an imminent and substantial endangerment to the health of the population adjacent to the well site, recreational users of Towanda Creek and the Susquehanna River and to the environment. …”

The fracking fluid contains hundreds of chemicals, some of them toxic, the attorney general argued, and the spill therefore constitutes a violation of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and the Clean Water Act.

The Susquehanna provides 45 percent of the fresh water entering the Chesapeake Bay, and supplies drinking water to 6.2 million people. It is a backup source of water to Baltimore City in times of drought.

Brian Grove, senior director for corporate development at Chesapeake Energy Corp., said testing during the spill revealed “limited and very localized environmental impact, with no adverse affects [sic] on aquatic wildlife in Towanda Creek.”

Testing in the Susquehanna a short distance downstream found “no effect whatsoever,” he said. “We are confident there will be zero impact hundreds of miles away. The Susquehanna River and the Chesapeake Bay face many environmental threats; this event is not one of them.”

Frank.roylance@baltsun.com

http://twitter.com/froylance

Fifteen (15) Oil & Gas in Geological Formations in NY Southern Tier:

Fifteen (15) Oil & Gas in Geological Formations in NY Southern Tier:

1) Two (2) videos to ponder:
2) Fifteen (15) Oil & Gas in Geological Formations in NY Southern Tier:
# Unit Lithology (a) Production (a) Depth (b) Thickness (a)
1 Tully Limestone Gas 2,284 0-50
2 Marcellus Shale Gas 3,483 200-600
3 Onondaga Limestone Oil & Gas 3,543 30-235
4 Oriskany Sandstone Gas 3,625 0-45
5 Akron Dolomite Gas 3,913 0-15
6 Vernon Shale Gas 4,915 450-1,850
7 Lockport Dolomite Gas 5,873 150-250
8 Rochester Shale Gas 6,136 125
9 Sodus Shale Gas 6,457 75
10 Grimsby      Shale & Sandstone Gas 6,527 75-150
11 Whirlpool Sandstone Gas 6,595 0-25
12 Queenston Shale Gas 6,837 1,100-1,500
13 Utica Shale Gas 8,952 900-1000
14 Trenton Limestone Gas 9,049 425-625
15 Black River Limestone Gas 9,637 225-550
           
(a)   NYS dSGEIS  30-Sep-209, table 4.2    
(b)  NYS DEC Searchable Data Base of 10  Van Etten wells   

Drought-Plagued Midland, Texas, Is Running Out of Water — Water Supply | The Texas Tribune

Drought-Plagued Midland, Texas, Is Running Out of Water — Water Supply | The Texas Tribune.