Companies that handle chemical-tainted water from fracking may be takeover targets – Business –

Companies that handle chemical-tainted water from fracking may be takeover targets – Business –

Endicott Interconnect linked to possible local wastewater facility | Press & Sun-Bulletin |

Endicott Interconnect linked to possible local wastewater facility | Press & Sun-Bulletin |

Niagara Falls Meeting on Hydrofracking Wastewater

Take Action » Food & Water Watch.

Niagara Falls Meeting on Hydrofracking Wastewater

Cortland bans fluids from fracking–Cortland Standard, 9/21/11

Cortland Environmental Committe Urges Ban on Drilling Waste Water

Oldies 101.5 – Local News.

Cortland Environmental Committe Urges Ban on Drilling Waste Water

Last Edited: 2011-08-17 11:09:30    Story ID: 4149

Cortland City lawmakers are considering a local law that would ban the City from accepting waste by products from natural gas drilling operations at the City’s wastewater treatment plant.

Last night the City council discussed a proposal form the City’s environmental advisory committee that would prohibit the wastewater from drilling at the treatment plant.

Frank Kelley of the Environmental committee says there are concerns over the facilities ability to treat the various chemicals and compounds that may be in the drilling waste, as well as the impact the discharge may have on the Tioughnioga river.

Members of the committee suggested that the law should be expanded to cover all waste including pretreated waste water from drilling, but City Waste Water plant operator Bruce Adams said he would refuse any material he didn’t feel was acceptable at the plant and the council should leave some flexibility in the law.

The law is subject to a public hearing on September 6th, the council would then have to vote on the measure.

Fracking Radiation Targeted By DOE, GE – Jeff McMahon – The Ingenuity of the Commons – Forbes

Fracking Radiation Targeted By DOE, GE – Jeff McMahon – The Ingenuity of the Commons – Forbes.

Auburn waste editorial

Tuesday’s letters: Auburn waste editorial, Breivik not a Christian, Gillibrand’s misguided bill, shabby Westcott Reservoir |

 Auburn waste editorial,

Published: Tuesday, August 02, 2011, 5:00 AM

Editorial overlooked facts on Auburn waste

To the Editor:
Is the erosion of the fourth estate at hand? One would expect hyperbole and condescension from cable news pundits, but newspapers, the last bastion of credibility, are they too caving into the economic pressures of the current news climate? My cause for concern is the July 25 editorial, “Money-Loser: Wastewater ban will cost Auburn’s ratepayers next year.”

The tone of the piece was drenched with derision and offered little to no facts. A fact that was glaringly overlooked was that Municipal Utilities Director Vicki Murphy asked the natural gas companies to stop delivering because pre-treatment testing showed that pollutant levels were out of compliance with the permits. So the fiscally responsible members of Auburn City Council, namely Mayor Michael Quill and Councilors Gilda Brower and Thomas McNabb, wanted to be prudent in not budgeting money from this tenuous revenue stream. They knew the money would not be there.

The $600,000 figure is an arbitrary figure used by Councilor Matt Smith for political gain. There is no sound, documented evidence that the 2011-2012 budget should have included that figure, given the fact that the companies were out of compliance in the previous fiscal quarter.

So that leaves us with the question: Why did the editorial board slam a small group of native Auburnians trying to protect their downstream neighbors from the contaminants in gas drilling wastewater? Perhaps it was easier to listen to an angry, uniformed, opportunistic politician than to research and look at the documented facts.

Terry Cuddy

Original Editorial

Jul 25, 2011 Auburn rocks! The council sure struck a blow against hydrofracking, from natural gas wells at the municipal sewage treatment plant?

Original July 7 report

Niagara Falls Reporter: Frack, Frack, Everywhere a Frack

Niagara Falls Reporter: Frack, Frack, Everywhere a Frack.

Fragments of these concerns are all over the internet.
Potential Nightmare in Niagara Falls
 This story by reporter James Hufnagel broke yesterday in  Niagara Falls.
The story claims to confirm long-rumored financial intentions of Senator Maziarz and Niagara Water Board Director Paul Drof to receive millions of gallons of hydro fracture waste at the small and decrepit Niagara Falls Treatment Plant.  There were also prior rumors of intention to truck the waste to Lewiston.   Beyond the general science incapability I have listed below, please consider the profoundly dilapidated infrastructure condition of the entire Niagara Falls region.  Collapsed and wide open storm sewers (lacking grates) are a common feature on city streets.  The entire industrial sector of the 1970’s Robert Moses Parkway including the Waste Treatment Plant is a collapsing corroded mess.  Concise scientific concerns related to Mr. Drof’s ambitions continue after we discuss ongoing concerns for Buffalo…..
Continuing Hydro Fracture Abuse in Buffalo?
I  remain concerned that Hydro Fracture waste is continuing to be recieved at the Buffalo Sewer Authority…..semantically re-labeled as “Flowback Water” or “Condensate Riser Water”  The BSA is abusing prior reception of these fluids for decades from conventional rotary drilled gas well sites.  Science has clearly identified that Flowback and Condensate Riser Water from vertical and horizontal hydro fractured wells is comprehensively different and horribly contaminated.  Please reference the ‘Comments’ section of this Artvoice article:
 The comments contains a Buffalo News digital soundbite from Mayor Brown specifically stating that the BSA is continuing to recieve these liquids from hydro fracture sites
The Impossibility of the Promised Science
Citing Conrad Voltz’ past study at the Josephine Treatment Plant on Blacklick Creek in Pennsylvania, and recalling that Walter Hang had researched contamination in the Niagara River years ago, I wrote to Walter last week.   Historically, Walter sampled the Niagara Falls treatment plant’s effluent discharge at the tailrace and conducted GC/MS analysis for priority pollutants.  Those findings were presented in his study of the Niagara River, past featured on CBS 60-Minutes.
The Mass Spectrometry Myth……Clumsy Identification of  Contaminants
Rumors are circulating that Paul Drof has stated he can identify all of the undisclosed ‘proprietary’ Haliburton chemistry using Mass Spectrometry (MS) which is essentially a technique for ‘weighing’ molecular structure based on the ionic mass-to-charge ratio of a particle.  This inherently creates a Chicken-And-Egg debacle as the ionic charge and/or molecular mass of the ‘proprietary unknowns’ must be guessed.  This is why you repeatedly hear the statement “We cannot test unless we know what we are attempting to identify and locate.”  This is also why the secret Haliburton mixture is not immediately reverse-engineered and duplicated.  Here is 28-pages of beginners tutorial on MS:
Walter Hang writes last week:
“You have to separate the pollutants before you can identify them using MS.  There are thousands of compounds that might be present.  Isolating them is extremely tricky work.”
The Carbon Myth….Cleaning the Mess
Paul Drof is also rumored to be stating that his Niagara Falls Treatment Plant is special because it is “GAC” or capable of implementing Activated Carbon treatment.
Walter writes again:
“GAC only removes pollutants that are insoluble in water.  Many of the gas drilling wastewater pollutants, notably the toxic metals, are soluble in water.  That is why they are called Total Dissolved Solids.  Those contaminants would pass through a GAC filter.”
A 2008 drinking water crisis is documented that affected more than 850,000 residents along the Monongahela River near Pittsburgh.  When New York imposed its de facto Marcellus Shale horizontal hydrofracturing moratorium, many firms went to drill in Pennsylvania.  Municipal treatment plants were accepting up to 40% of their influent as natural gas drilling wastewater even though they were not equipped to handle that type of waste.  So much Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) pollution was discharged in the Monongahela River that the water became unpotable.  A 70-mile stretch of the river was impacted.”
Walter’s response continues……
“GAC removes higher molecular weight compounds more effectively than certain common volatile compounds.  Those compounds can “break through” the GAC earlier than the higher molecular weight compounds.  When that happens, the GAC has to be “recharged.”  The more frequently the GAC has to be recharged, the higher the treatment cost.”

“For all these reasons, the three categories of pollutants in the gas drilling wastewater are extremely challenging to manage.  That is why PA has banned their discharge into POTWs.”  ……returning to the nightmare of the Josephine Plant at Blacklick Creek

Blacklick Creek

Here is a summary of the Blacklick Creek Study demonstrating comprehensive failure
Conrad Voltz, Tony Ingraffea, Penn State
Here is an excellent radio article in which Voltz describes pressure to remain silent.
Buffalo News and Sen. Maziarz speaking to the Niagara Falls treatment initiative

Larry Beahan: Hydrofracking conference glossed over pollution risks – Another Voice – The Buffalo News

Larry Beahan: Hydrofracking conference glossed over pollution risks – Another Voice – The Buffalo News.

Money-Loser: Wastewater ban will cost Auburn’s ratepayers next year |

Money-Loser: Wastewater ban will cost Auburn’s ratepayers next year |

Money-Loser: Wastewater ban will cost Auburn’s ratepayers next year

Published: Monday, July 25, 2011, 5:00 AM

Wow! Auburn rocks! The council sure struck a blow against hydrofracking, didn’t it, when it voted July 7 to ban accepting wastewater from natural gas wells at the municipal sewage treatment plant?

Well, not exactly. Not at all, in fact.

What do you mean? It voted to stop treating the polluted wastewater from those controversial wells, right?

Uh, no. The water isn’t coming from horizontal-well hydrofracking — which isn’t going on in New York. It’s from conventional, vertical gas wells that have been operating in Upstate New York for years.

But the Cayuga Anti-Fracking Alliance says the Auburn plant isn’t equipped to handle the high salt concentrations, the radioactive agents and cancer-causing chemicals in the wastewater.

The plant employs a certified laboratory to sample effluent during both high-flow and normal-flow days. Vicky L. Murphy, director of municipal utilities, wrote last month that sampling for 33 “volatiles” (including benzene and toluene) and 13 metals detected no traces of volatiles on a normal flow day. Traces of Radium-226 and the metal barium were detected — in concentrations well below permissible state levels. High-flow testing detected three volatiles, three metals and Radium-226 — all below DEC permissible levels, Murphy said. She also noted that the Auburn plant complies with all state and federal regulations.

How can you be so confident it’s safe?

Auburn has been treating the water for 10 years. The wastewater amounts to less than 1 percent of the plant’s total water flow.

Then why did the council members vote for the ban?

Ask them. Some speculation: Democratic Mayor Mike Quill, a voting member, is up for re-election this year, and anti-fracking advocates have raised quite a fuss. Plus, his opponent is for the ban.

Anyway, what harm can a ban do?

Well, there’s the small matter of the $600,000 or so the city earns each year from the drillers — about one-fifth of the sanitation department’s budget. City residents will have to make it up somehow.

Indeed, on Wednesday, Auburn property owners learned they will be getting an increase in sewer rates. City Manager John Rossi said the unspecified increase was included in next year’s budget because of the anticipated shortfall in revenue from natural gas drillers.

@#$%&*! Can we have a do-over, please?

Related topics: editorial


Sponsored Links



Comments Feed

View: Oldest first | Newest first

Taxpayer51 July 25, 2011 at 7:11AM

The Auburn Mayor and City Council caved to the enviro-wacko crowd. Their vote to ban wastewater had nothing to do with the facts or the impact on taxpayers, but instead with their fear of the (largely from Ithaca) protestors and other squeaky wheels. Its unfortunate for taxpayers and people looking for jobs, but not surprising — they are politicians after all.

Inappropriate? Alert us.

Reply Post new

romans 8:37 July 25, 2011 at 7:53AM

Exactly tax…they are politicians first and they will do ANYTHING to get reelected, it matters not if they are small hamlet politicians or Albany or DC they are all first and formost concerned ONLY with getting their sorry butts to stay in office and it doesnt matter what party they are from, vote them all out. As Will Buckley once said ( I’ll paraphrase) he’d rather be governed by the first 200 names in the phonebook than by the current thieving thugs. Politicians are overpaid ( mostly millioniare lawyers) maggots living off the common man.

Inappropriate? Alert us.

Reply Post new


and what Congel has done or has not done at the Carousel Center Mall expansion, AKA Destiny USA phase one, Brownfield Cleanup program participant, the The Post-Standard Editorial Board is OK with that?

I only ask because it seems that the The Post-Standard Editorial Board is more interested in the money side of stories than the public health issues side of the stories…

Here is a little hint for the The Post-Standard Editorial Board ‘it ain’t always about the money’…..

Inappropriate? Alert us.

Reply Post new

keepwaterclean July 25, 2011 at 8:27AM

The plant would still be dumping, not treating, the salt ultimately into the Seneca River. The plant, designed for treating biological waste, was essentially relying on dilution since running the water through the plant did little or nothing to the waste water. The Seneca is used by farmers for irrigation and by many others for various purposes. It also flows very near some important wells which provide drinking water to considerable numbers of people.

Inappropriate? Alert us.

Reply Post new

lattimoron July 25, 2011 at 6:14PM

I would have thought the editorial board of the post standard would have done a little more research into the issue. For example the total revenue this year from the waste water was $150k – much small than 600K. But hey why left the facts stand in the way of a good story?

Inappropriate? Alert us.

Reply Post new

artistandy7 July 25, 2011 at 6:44PM

@#$%&*! check your facts please. the gas companies left because they were out of compliance- before the city council had the chance to prohibit them, they were already gone because they broke regulations- the money was already gone- if auburn counted on that money being in the budget they would be screwed because they cannot count on the gas companies to be in compliance with regulations- how many ways do i have to say this? did an actual “reporter” write this editorial piece? because it failed the research test. there is VIDEOTAPE of vicki murphy explaining this to the city council in auburn. go check it out before you write again on this subject, please.

Inappropriate? Alert us.

Reply Post new

Harry_Brate_67 July 26, 2011 at 8:10AM

The misguided Auburn City council acted with total disregard to the consequences in their vote on an issue they did not understand and without regard to the recommendations of the city engineer. Instead they responded to the outside non taxpaying mob that invaded the city council meeting. Their lack of knowledge about what they voted on is deplorable. They have not acted in the best interest of Auburn’s taxpayers and they should be ashamed of their cavalier attitude to the taxpayers. Their actions will be remembered both for the added burden they have placed on the taxpayers and the jobs they have put at risk. Just my opinion.

Inappropriate? Alert us.

Reply Post new

nyswaterranger July 26, 2011 at 12:05PM

The three members of council cast their votes after recognizing that the city’s wastewater treatment plant was neither designed, maintained nor constructed to accept such water. They recognized that the natural gas drilling companies could not meet the rules and regulations of the plant. In April, the city cited six firms for failing to submit any monitoring reports for some of 2009 and all of 2010. During that time 16 million gallons of flowback fluid was discharged into the plant. Once the city workers started calling their attention to it (spurred on by an article in the NY Times), many stopped delivering–what does that say? The three remaining firms continued to be out of compliance either by continuing their practice of not submitting the required reports or that the wastewater contained pollutant levels that were unacceptable at the plant. All stopped bringing the wastewater before the ban–at Vicky Murphy’s insistence. By that time, the city was making $150,000 over a six-month period. The $600,000 figure is complete conjecture and not rooted in fact. I contend that the three councilors absolutely acted with the interests of their citizens in mind. This money could not be counted upon.
Also, I resent being referred to as a member of an outside non taxpaying mob. I brought my check to pay my city taxes to the comptroller’s office a month ago. In this case, common sense, reason and logic trumped tainted money and corporate greed. It’s about time someone stood up for the people. I commend Mayor Michael Quill and councilors Gilda Brower and Thomas McNabb for making their decisions based on facts and not emotion.