Cortland clerk fights abusive gas leasing practices | Innovation Trail

Cortland clerk fights abusive gas leasing practices | Innovation Trail.

Marcellus Shale case appealed to Pa. Supreme Court could create ‘chaos’ by questioning ownership of gas rights | PennLive.com

Marcellus Shale case appealed to Pa. Supreme Court could create ‘chaos’ by questioning ownership of gas rights | PennLive.com.

Remorse Breeds Rebellion Against Fracking – NYTimes.com

Remorse Breeds Rebellion Against Fracking – NYTimes.com.

DRILLING IN THE CITIES AND TOWNS: RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF LESSEES, ROYALTY OWNERS, AND SURFACE OWNERS IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT – Petroleum Accounting and Financial Management Journal Articles | Find Articles at CBS MoneyWatch.com

DRILLING IN THE CITIES AND TOWNS: RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF LESSEES, ROYALTY OWNERS, AND SURFACE OWNERS IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT – Petroleum Accounting and Financial Management Journal Articles | Find Articles at CBS MoneyWatch.com.

Local bank officials: Chesapeake’s mortgaging of mineral rights won’t affect homeowners’ applications for mortgages – News – Daily Review

Local bank officials: Chesapeake’s mortgaging of mineral rights won’t affect homeowners’ applications for mortgages – News – Daily Review.

The Capitol Pressroom for July 29, 2011 | WCNY Blogs

The Capitol Pressroom for July 29, 2011 | WCNY Blogs.

The Capitol Pressroom for July 29, 2011

We continue to monitor the concerns of the tiny Tompkins County Council of Governments Task Force on Gas Drilling Assessment and Land Valuation Subcommittee.   Chair person Carol Chock joins us; she and other Tompkins County officials worry that even as the state is pouring over the 1000-plus page SGEIS, Tompkins County is unable to obtain information on properties with leased wells.  Chock and mortgage lender Greg May, Vice President, Residential Mortgage Lending, Tompkins Trust Company, both join us with the latest, and how they plan to move forward. 

 And… the reporter roundtable tackles the shake-up in public authorities and economic development. 

 

 

 

 

Re-cycling Drilling Waste in PA

In response to the barrage of criticism about frack waste disposal and/or treatment, the industry now says it will “recycle”  all water used in hydrofracking.  Recycling is a nice green word and sounds benign.  But the quote below shows otherwise.  It is taken from an interview with David Bohlander. a highly respected accountant and business consultant in Pennsylvania.  His farm has been in his family for 150 years.

The interview was posted on another list on July 19.  After the quoted section I have attached the entire interview.

Jim Weiss

The intention is to refrack over and over the same drilled wells.  They are now claiming there is 60 years of gas here.  Simultaneously, although not on all pads, they use the pads for other things such as equipment storage, frack water storage, and the worst:  frack water recycling which we have three in our neighborhood and 2 are 10 year permits (one is in the review process, 9 days to go).  These are REGIONAL frack water recycling operations bringing in dirty radioactive brine from 15 miles away or more, operating 24/7 with extensive noise, lights and traffic.  

RE: frack water recycling:  They power huge lights that light of the pads for the whole night.  They don’t use street electric but generators which contribute to the noise.  The trucks have large pumps that due to the volume of 5200 gallons per truck are large motors,  the trucks endlessly are using their backup safety beepers, horns for instructions to the ground crew, etc.  The three sites in our neighborhood will generate 800 trucks a day, 1600 with return trip passes.

 

Complete Interview:

 

 

1.       Pollution of your well (two wells?).  How did this show up?

[Bohlander] We have two wells on the farm (190 acres).  We had a detailed baseline water testing done on both before any of the gas activity happened in our area.  We subsequently have had another 6 or so tests done on these wells.  It is crucial to have certified baseline testing done prior to any activity by gas companies or they will claim there is no proof they are the cause and argue it was a pre-existing condition.  We also retained a very competent hydrologist (who has the gas company clients) who was the plaintiffs hydrologist in the Dimock, PA contamination (highlighted in the movie Gasland).  The well for the barn/and original farmhouse was so contaminated with methane they thought it would explode so the well pump was disconnected for six months and water was trucked in by the gas companies for the animals, and spring water for the humans!

2.       The operations end up being more extensive than anticipated.   The “pads” are large, and end up being used for other operations.

[Bohlander] Gas companies are major deceivers.  They do this many ways.  One is using land agents that are not their employees so that they can claim “we never said that ..they did”
Most all the neighbors were told that the gas wells would be drilled, it would take 3 months or so, and  then land would be restored to earlier state.  In reality this is what happens.  They excavate a pad obliterating the natural terrain, hauling in 100’s of trucks of stone, gravel, etc.  Once the pad is completed, they only drill 2-4 actual gas wells of what ultimately are likely going to be 12 or so on that pad.  They may not frack the drilled wells immediately, but wait sometimes a year.  The intention is to refrack over and over the same drilled wells.  They are now claiming there is 60 years of gas here.  Simultaneously, although not on all pads, they use the pads for other things such as equipment storage, frack water storage, and the worst:  frack water recycling which we have three in our neighborhood and 2 are 10 year permits (one is in the review process, 9 days to go).  These are REGIONAL frack water recycling operations bringing in dirty radioactive brine from 15 miles away or more, operating 24/7 with extensive noise, lights and traffic.  DEP is way behind on enforcement.  The neighbors are the enforcers, but it is David vs. Goliath (the gas companies).  After four years now, I have not seen one well pad restored back to the original state.  The stated plan by the gas companies is that there will be one well pad every 50 acres.  If the well pad is 10 acres, 20% of our surface land area will be a perpetual well pad.

3.       Extensive light pollution due to 24/7 operation.

[Bohlander] RE: frack water recycling:  They power huge lights that light of the pads for the whole night.  They don’t use street electric but generators which contribute to the noise.  The trucks have large pumps that due to the volume of 5200 gallons per truck are large motors,  the trucks endlessly are using their backup safety beepers, horns for instructions to the ground crew, etc.  The three sites in our neighborhood will generate 800 trucks a day, 1600 with return trip passes.
The gas drilling when it goes on makes it almost impossible to sleep.  24/7, 7 days a week. 

4.       Extensive trucking.

[Bohlander] The gas companies make new roads over smaller older roads to accommodate their extensive traffic.  The state allows them to exceed the weight limit of the road by paying some fee or posting a bond.  The small country road in front of our farm is now elevated 3 feet in the air from normal ground level.  Certain roads are used as main arterial roads after they have been rebuilt –this happened to ours.  The trucks are hauling huge amounts of gravel, fill, fresh water for fracking and the dirty brine water out, as well as all the equipment for the drilling process.  Each well on the pad uses 5 million gallons of water.  60% flows back and is recycled, but removed from the site.  Our road was destroyed initially and impassible.  The gas companies then closed 10 mile stretches of the road for months at a time as they began rebuilding it.  One landowner could only get to and from his property with a four wheeler.

5.       Feel free to add any other relevant details.

[Bohlander] The gas companies have a very systematic playbook from the years of operating and polluting Colorado, Wyoming, Texas, etc.  They have two sides:  a friendly neighborly “give $35K to the fire company” and then a ruthless no holds barred side.  3 times they threatened that in 24 hours they were going to stop trucking in water for the cows in our barn unless we agreed to things.  These things include non-disclosure agreements, consent not to sue, etc.  Read the book Collateral Damage.  A lot of good environmental activist groups with websites and a lot of info.  Many have been to our house.  We were one of the first contaminated sites in this region from the drilling.  
The public does not have any idea how bad the permanent environmental contamination is going to be.  There has been major barium and radiation poisoning with some already.  One not far from us is a 13 year old girl with barium poisoning.  One of our immediate neighbors’ daughters is having clumps of hair fall out and his dog got sick and parakeet died from drinking his well water.  He abuts one of the frack water recycling sites.
Air pollution is the sleeping giant.   Each well pad on an ongoing basis emits things into the air (like toluene) as the gas goes through a preliminary filtering process at the well pad.  The absolutely worst are the gas compression stations for both noise and air pollution.
As you may know, the gas drilling is exempt from the Clean Water Act  — we actually are more apt to be fined if manure is spread on the road, than these major infractions the gas company are doing.  The environmental enforcement agencies only slap their wrists with fines.  Cost of doing business to gas companies –easier to just pay the fine.

PEC Releases Conservation Lease Guide for Landowners | The Pennsylvania Environmental Council

PEC Releases Conservation Lease Guide for Landowners | The Pennsylvania Environmental Council.

Energy companies insist they can extend gas leases; landowners take them to court | syracuse.com

Energy companies insist they can extend gas leases; landowners take them to court | syracuse.com.

Energy companies insist they can extend gas leases; landowners take them to court

Published: Sunday, February 27, 2011, 10:10 AM     Updated: Sunday, February 27, 2011, 11:43 AM

2011-02-17-db-Hydrofracking.JPGMark Petitte crossed out a clause on his gas drilling lease with Chesapeake Energy that would have allowed the company to automatically renew the lease when it expired Feb. 11. The company says it is extending the lease on his Otisco property anyway.

The Marcellus Effect: NY Landowners Fed Up with Unfair Lease Extensions

The Marcellus Effect: NY Landowners Fed Up with Unfair Lease Extensions.