dSGEIS economic/social section well build-out scenario

Here are some figures you may want to use as you comment on the
revised dSGEIS, testify at hearings, speak to your neighbors, etc.

The “average” (i.e. not low and not high) development scenario
explored in the socioeconomic section of the revised dSGEIS for Region
A (Broome, Chemung, & Tioga Counties) assumes that over the course of
30 years, 21,067 (18,923 horizontal wells and 2,144 vertical wells)
would be drilled in Region A.

This would mean that an average of 702 gas wells would be added to the
region each year, for 30 years. (In reality, some years would see
fewer wells than 702 added, some would see more.)

If 21,067 wells were drilled in Region A, the final well density would
be about 13 wells per square mile. That’s about one gas well for every
16 current residents of Region A. (References & calculations shown
below.)

On p. 4-6 of the socioeconomic section of the rdSGEIS, there is a
chart (Table 4-2) showing the major development scenario assumptions
for each representative region. Region A includes Broome, Tioga, and
Chemung Counties and is expected to be the most heavily drilled region
in the state. (See p. 4-5 of the rdSGEIS for discussion of drilling in
the various regions.)According to Table 4-2, in an “average” (i.e. not low and not high)
drilling scenario, over the course of 30 years, 21,067 (18,923
horizontal wells & 2,144 vertical wells) gas wells would be drilled in
Region A.I obtained the following figures from the U.S. Census Bureau. The
population figures are from the 2010 census; the land area figures are
from the 2000 census. (See http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/36000.html)Broome County:  population  200,600;  area  706.82 square milesTioga County:  population 51,125; area 518.69 square miles

Chemung County: population 88,830; area 408.17 square miles

Adding those up, we have, for the three-county region:  population
340,555; area 1633.68 square miles

Using the above three-county population and land area figures and
assuming the “average” development level given in Table 4-2 as 21,067
wells, it turns out that in 30 years, the three-county area would have
about 12.9 gas wells per square mile. That’s one gas well for every
16.17 current residents of the region. Since some areas (e.g. urban
cores) probably would not be drilled, an even higher well density in
the drilled areas would be needed to reach the estimated
_____________________

The 81,000-well figure is in the same general ballpark as the “high”
development model in the rdSGEIS, which assumes 62,781 shale gas wells
statewide with 31,395 of those wells being in Region A (the counties
of Broome, Chemung, & Tioga). Chances seem fairly certain that Region
A will see a higher density of wells than most regions. The revised
rdSGEIS assumes that the Broome/Chemung/Tioga area will be the
location of about half the shale gas wells in the state, so if the
81,000-well figure is correct, perhaps our area will see something
like 40,000 wells (i.e. about twice the density I discussed in my
original post in this thread).While no one knows for certain how many wells there will be, it’s
important to communicate the ballpark figures to the public. I think
the number of wells being contemplated–whether it’s 20,000 wells in
the three-county area or 30,000 or 40,000–is almost certainly far
higher than what most people living in those counties are
envisioning.Large numbers are difficult to visualize, so I think it is critical to
state these numbers in ways that will allow us all to visualize the
impact. As I said above, using the DEC’s own “average” development
scenario, we would end up with a number of wells equivalent to having
about 13 wells per square mile in every single square mile of Broome,
Chemung, & Tioga Counties. Since there will almost certainly be some
parts of the three-county area that will not be drilled (e.g. urban
cores), the areas that are drilled would have to end up with a higher
density than 13 wells per square mile in order to reach the 21,067
well figure. Another way to say it is that there would be about one
gas well for every 16 current residents (men, women, & children) of
the three counties. Even with multiple wells clustered on each pad,
that is obviously an enormous level of industrialization, particularly
when one considers the access roads, pipelines, compressor stations,
truck traffic, noise, etc that will accompany the wells. (I am
wondering, as I type this, just how much more prone to flooding our
area will be when a lot of the trees have been cut to make way for
well pads, roads, and pipelines. That’s what we all need–more
flooding, right?)

The high profits being projected are based on drilling a huge number
of wells with an accompanying high degree of industrialization (i.e.
pipelines, access roads, compressors, etc). So when people hear how
much money there is to be made, they need to understand that in order
to get the money wells will have to be drilled at a tremendous rate.
Again, we’re talking, ballpark, 13 wells per square mile, one gas well
for every 16 residents. The wells would be constructed over 30 years,
with an average of 700 wells drilled each year in the Broome/Chemung/
Tioga area. That’s 700 new chances for industrial accidents, every
year, year after year, for 30 years, and if they hope to reach that
21,067-well number, they will not just be drilling in remote areas.

Remember: 13 wells per square mile, one well for every 16 residents–
and that’s the DEC’s “average” development scenario, NOT the high-
development scenario. How many people would want to live with that? We
need to get the word out–a lot of people probably have no idea what
these numbers are.

——————–

The 81,000-well figure is in the same general ballpark as the “high”
development model in the rdSGEIS, which assumes 62,781 shale gas wells
statewide with 31,395 of those wells being in Region A (the counties
of Broome, Chemung, & Tioga). Chances seem fairly certain that Region
A will see a higher density of wells than most regions. The revised
rdSGEIS assumes that the Broome/Chemung/Tioga area will be the
location of about half the shale gas wells in the state, so if the
81,000-well figure is correct, perhaps our area will see something
like 40,000 wells (i.e. about twice the density I discussed in my
original post in this thread).

While no one knows for certain how many wells there will be, it’s
important to communicate the ballpark figures to the public. I think
the number of wells being contemplated–whether it’s 20,000 wells in
the three-county area or 30,000 or 40,000–is almost certainly far
higher than what most people living in those counties are
envisioning.

Large numbers are difficult to visualize, so I think it is critical to
state these numbers in ways that will allow us all to visualize the
impact. As I said above, using the DEC’s own “average” development
scenario, we would end up with a number of wells equivalent to having
about 13 wells per square mile in every single square mile of Broome,
Chemung, & Tioga Counties. Since there will almost certainly be some
parts of the three-county area that will not be drilled (e.g. urban
cores), the areas that are drilled would have to end up with a higher
density than 13 wells per square mile in order to reach the 21,067
well figure. Another way to say it is that there would be about one
gas well for every 16 current residents (men, women, & children) of
the three counties. Even with multiple wells clustered on each pad,
that is obviously an enormous level of industrialization, particularly
when one considers the access roads, pipelines, compressor stations,
truck traffic, noise, etc that will accompany the wells. (I am
wondering, as I type this, just how much more prone to flooding our
area will be when a lot of the trees have been cut to make way for
well pads, roads, and pipelines. That’s what we all need–more
flooding, right?)

The high profits being projected are based on drilling a huge number
of wells with an accompanying high degree of industrialization (i.e.
pipelines, access roads, compressors, etc). So when people hear how
much money there is to be made, they need to understand that in order
to get the money wells will have to be drilled at a tremendous rate.
Again, we’re talking, ballpark, 13 wells per square mile, one gas well
for every 16 residents. The wells would be constructed over 30 years,
with an average of 700 wells drilled each year in the Broome/Chemung/
Tioga area. That’s 700 new chances for industrial accidents, every
year, year after year, for 30 years, and if they hope to reach that
21,067-well number, they will not just be drilling in remote areas.

Remember: 13 wells per square mile, one well for every 16 residents–
and that’s the DEC’s “average” development scenario, NOT the high-
development scenario. How many people would want to live with that? We
need to get the word out–a lot of people probably have no idea what
these numbers are.

Drilling and the DEC: Responding to Economic Impacts Oct. 15, Ithaca, 1-3:30

Drilling and the DEC: Responding to Economic Impacts
Free, public forum 

Saturday, October 15, 2011
1:00 – 3:30 p.m., Women’s Community Building
100 W. State Street, Ithaca, NY
Grassroots activists, experts, and local officials concerned about protecting our local agriculture and tourism economies, community character, roads and infrastructure, will offer information on the revised Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement (SGEIS).  Speakers will address the portion of proposed drilling guidelines that intends to mitigate adverse social and economic impacts such as truck traffic, threats to food crops, and demand on local services.
Panel Moderator:
Martha Robertson, Chair of the Tompkins County Legislature
Panelists: 
Ed Marx, Tompkins County Commissioner of Planning
Jannette Barth, Ph.D., Economist, Pepacton Institute
Barbara Lifton, NY State Assemblywoman for Tompkins and Cortland Counties
James (Chip) Northrup, Partner and investor in oil and gas projects, served on Governor of Texas’ Energy Advisory Council
Wes Gillingham (invited, not confirmed), Program Director, Catskill Mountainkeeper
The NY DEC hired a consulting firm, Ecology and Environment, to assist in analyzing social and economic impacts.  Join us for this event to learn what’s better about the new sGEIS, what concerns remain, and what are some recommendations for the DEC.
Attendees will be encouraged to submit comments on the newly revised SGEIS to the DEC.  Instruction on how to use online formatting and informational links will be provided and made available widely afterwards.
This event will be videotaped and available through the internet at www.shaleshockmedia.org several days following the meeting.
The forum is sponsored by numerous local organizations including:
Shaleshock Action Alliance  *  ROUSE (Residents Opposing Unsafe Shale-gas Extraction)  *  DRAC (Dryden Resource Awareness Coalition)  *  Cayuga Lake Watershed Network  *  Social Justice Committee, First Unitarian Church of Ithaca  *  ENSAW (Enfield Neighbors for Safe Air and Water)  *  NYRAD  *  Groton Resource Awareness Coalition  *  Sustainable Tompkins  *  Committee on Justice, Peace, and the Integrity of Creation, Ithaca First Presbyterian Church  *  Concerned Citizens of Ulysses  *  FLEASED  *  Neighbors of the Onondaga Nation  *  GDACC (Gas Drilling Awareness for Cortland County)  *  People for a Healthy Environment  *
For more information contact Martha Robertson: mrob@twcny.rr.com,
Hilary Lambert: hilary_lambert@yahoo.com, Sara Hess: sarahess63@yahoo.com.

CU_KeystoneXL–Employment Facts

CU_KeystoneXL_Employment Facts FIN_090811_v2.pdf (application/pdf Object).

SGEIS Community Impacts

SGEIS Community Impacts.

Jobs vs environment Keystone XL pipeline

CU_KeystoneXL_090711_FIN2.pdf (application/pdf Object).

EMPLOYMENT FACTS: THE KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE

FT.com / FT Magazine – The Iraqi who saved Norway from oil

FT.com / FT Magazine – The Iraqi who saved Norway from oil.

The Iraqi who saved Norway from oil

By Martin Sandbu

Published: August 29 2009 02:26 | Last updated: August 29 2009 02:26

Cooperstown Brewer Fights N.Y. Fracking Sought by EOG Resources uom

Cooperstown Brewer Fights N.Y. Fracking Sought by EOG Resources
2011-08-22 04:00:02.1 GMT

By Jim Efstathiou Jr.
Aug. 22 (Bloomberg) — Brewery Ommegang says Belgian ale
and natural gas don¹t mix.
That statement of the obvious matters, the maker of
Aphrodite Ale and Hennepin Farmhouse Saison says, because the
water it draws from aquifers beneath Cooperstown, New York, is
at risk of pollution from hydraulic fracturing.
³Even our strongest beer is 90 percent water, and all of
our water comes off the property,² Larry Bennett, a spokesman
for the brewery about 170 miles (274 kilometers) northwest of
Times Square, said in an interview. ³If you contaminate an
aquifer, it¹s done. There¹s nothing you can do about it.²
Ommegang, an Otsego County tourist attraction along with
the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, has joined a
growing grass-roots campaign in New York state to ban the
technology that has transformed U.S. gas production, Bloomberg
Government reported. The brewery, a unit of Belgium-based Duvel
Moortgat NV, says it would face a ³material threat² from a
leak of fluid used in hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, to free
natural gas from shale.
The state is poised to issue final drilling rules and
permits to tap into the Marcellus Shale formation sometime next
year, after a three-year review. In anticipation, drilling bans
have been put in place in 13 towns and are being debated in 19
more, according to Karen Edelstein, a geographic information-
systems consultant in Ithaca. Ommegang has chipped in $40,000 to
support the towns in Otsego County.

Cuomo¹s Role

³Governor Andrew Cuomo is pressuring regulators to finish
their review and to start issuing permits,² Helen Slottje, an
attorney with the Community Environmental Defense Council, Inc.
in Ithaca who has helped towns opposed to drilling, said in an
interview. Towns are ³increasingly aware of the great burden
gas drilling imposes on communities and are unwilling to bear
those costs,² she said.
Cuomo, a Democrat, said during his campaign last year that
fracking would create jobs, ³but only if it is safe.² Since
taking office in January, he has pushed regulators to complete
their environmental review.
Companies such as EOG Resources Inc., a Houston-based gas
and oil explorer, have leased property in towns that banned
drilling or are working to block it, according to documents on
file with the Otsego County clerk. EOG doesn¹t provide a
breakdown of its lease holdings by state or by county, company
spokeswoman K Leonard said in an e-mail.
Millions of gallons of chemically treated water are forced
underground in fracking to break up rock and let gas flow.
Technological advances led the Energy Department to more than
double its estimate of U.S. shale-gas reserves to 827 trillion
cubic feet and to project that the nation now has enough natural
gas to heat homes and run power stations for 110 years.

Schneiderman Subpoenas

Last week, Range Resources Corp., Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. and
Goodrich Petroleum Corp. were subpoenaed by New York Attorney
General Eric Schneiderman over whether they accurately
represented the profitability of their natural-gas wells,
according to a person familiar with the matter. The subpoenas,
sent Aug. 8, requested documents on formulas used to project how
long the wells can produce gas without new fracking.
In Pennsylvania¹s portion of the Marcellus Shale, which
stretches from Tennessee to New York, drilling has created
overnight millionaires from lease payments and gas royalties
paid by companies such as Chesapeake Energy Corp. and Talisman
Energy Inc.
³I have landowners already under lease,² Scott Kurkoski,
a Binghamton, New York-based lawyer who represents property
owners across the state who favor drilling, said in an
interview. ³They have a contract with a company prepared to
market their minerals, and now towns are taking it away.²

ŒPlenty of Places¹

No local initiatives to ban fracking have been offered in
Tioga, Broome and Chemung counties, which border Pennsylvania
and are potentially gas-rich areas, according to Kurkoski.
³My instinct is that there¹s still plenty of places that
are receptive to drilling and that they¹ll go to those places
first,² Joe Martens, commissioner of New York¹s state
Department of Environmental Conservation, which is drafting
drilling rules, said in an interview. ³That¹s kind of the
responsible approach.²
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is studying the
effects of fracking on drinking water. A committee advising U.S.
Energy Secretary Steven Chu said Aug. 11 that gas companies risk
causing serious environmental damage unless they commit to best
practices in engineering.

Produced Safely

Industry groups such as the Hamburg-based Independent Oil &
Gas Association of New York, say shale gas can be produced
safely while generating jobs and tax revenue.
Environmental groups are succeeding in some towns by
raising fears over the technology, according to Richard Downey
of Otego, 76, a retired official with New York City¹s schools.
Downey leads an Otsego County landowner¹s group that supports
fracking in the towns of Unadilla, Butternuts and Otego.
³They have the environmental religion,² Downey said in an
interview. ³They are protecting Gaea — Mother Earth — and
we¹re just protecting property rights, and some money to a
certain extent, and you don¹t get the same passion for that.²
The Marcellus Shale may contain 490 trillion cubic feet of
gas, making it the world¹s second-largest gas field after the
South Pars formation in Iran and Qatar, according to Terry
Engelder, a professor of geosciences at Pennsylvania State
University in State College. New York banned fracking until it
completes its environmental rules sometime next year, according
to Emily DeSantis, a spokeswoman with the Department of
Environmental Conservation.

Court Challenge

Landowners that have leased property for drilling will
challenge local drilling bans in court on grounds that only the
state can regulate oil and gas production, Kurkoski said.
Slottje said the bans will hold up because zoning rules
aren¹t considered regulation under New York law.
Both sides expect the issue to be decided in the New York
Court of Appeals, the state¹s highest court. Legal maneuvers may
delay drilling in parts of the state for at least a year, said
Eduardo Penalver, who teaches land-use law at Cornell Law School
in Ithaca.
³If a town draws up a generally worded zoning law that
restricts or prohibits categories of activities, and that
encompasses hydrofracking, there¹s a strong argument that that
is not prohibited under state law,² Penalver said in an
interview. ³The power of municipalities to control what you can
do on your land is now pretty deeply entrenched.²
In December, Montreal-based Gastem Inc. used low-volume
fracking, which is permitted in New York, to test a well in
Otsego County where the company has 22,000 acres under lease.
The results ³quite satisfied² the company, spokesman David
Vincent said.
³There¹s always opposition,² Vincent, who predicted the
local drilling bans won¹t succeed, said in an interview. ³If we
do it right, people will accept that.²

ŒThree Philosophers¹

That hasn¹t won over Ommegang, which says it uses about 1
million gallons of water a year to make ales such as ³Three
Philosophers Quadrupel,² described on its website as a blend of
cherries, roasted malts, and dark chocolate that will ³only
achieve more wisdom and coherence as it broods in the dark
recesses of your cellar.²
Ommegang employs 82 people and receives about 40,000
visitors a year for beer tastings and tours, Bennett said. He
said it is named for a festival held in Brussels in 1549 to
commemorate a visit by Charles the Fifth, the Holy Roman
Emperor, and his son Philip II.
The brewery adds prestige to the fight against fracking,
Slottje said.
³Ommegang is one of the largest employers in the area,²
Slottje said. ³They¹re a tourist draw. They sort of exemplify
everything that the Cooperstown area is trying to do.²

For Related News and Information:
Map of U.S. shale basins: BMAP 82555
News on U.S. utilities: TNI UTI US
Natural-gas trading hub prices: NGHB
News about fracturing: STNI FRACKING

–Editors: Larry Liebert, Joe Winski

To contact the reporter on this story:
Jim Efstathiou Jr. in New York at +1-212-617-1647 or
jefstathiou@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Larry Liebert at +1-202-624-1936 or
lliebert@bloomberg.net

—— End of Forwarded Message

Report: Drilling providing little help to Susquehanna County economy | Press & Sun-Bulletin | pressconnects.com

Report: Drilling providing little help to Susquehanna County economy | Press & Sun-Bulletin | pressconnects.com.

asahi.com(朝日新聞社):Negative publicity overseas pummels agricultural exports – English

asahi.com(朝日新聞社):Negative publicity overseas pummels agricultural exports – English.

Hydrofracking a boom-bust endeavor – Times Union

Hydrofracking a boom-bust endeavor – Times Union.