Debunking Industry Claims By Maura Stephens on Alternet Dec. 2010

http://www.alternet.org/story/149211/15_claims_the_natural_gas_industry_wants_you_to_believe_and_why_they

By Maura Stephens  on Alternet
15 Claims the Natural Gas Industry Wants You to Believe and Why They’re Wrong
Industry spends millions trying to convince the public and our lawmakers of the benefits of “natural” gas, but a quick look at the propaganda reveals some deep flaws.
 
 
15 Claims the Natural Gas Industry Wants You to Believe and Why They’re Wrong
 
Industry spends millions trying to convince the public and our lawmakers of the benefits of “natural” gas, but a quick look at the propaganda reveals some deep flaws.
December 15, 2010  |  
 
The gall of gas megacorporations is surpassed only by the preposterousness of their claims. They spend millions each year trying to convince the public and our lawmakers of the benefits of “natural” gas (NG), but a quick look at their propaganda reveals some deep flaws.
 Take this commercial by the Houston-headquartered trillion-dollar Spectra Energy as an example. In just a two-and-a-half minute attempt to woo people to NG, they actually make 15 claims that don’t hold water. In a world facing global climate woes, exploding population, dependence on foreign energy and inflation — what should we do? Turn to NG, according to Spectra. But here’s where their reasoning is just plain wrong.
1. Industry claim: “Natural gas is clean.”
TRUTH: Here the industry is carefully trying to pull the wool over our eyes. You can’t just talk about burning gas versus oil once it’s in the furnace in your house; you have to look at the entire lifecycle of gas. The lifecycle cost of NG in terms of carbon dioxide and methane emission during its exploration, extraction, processing, and transportation to point of use, is no better than that of oil or coal and may even be higher than that of coal, the dirtiest fossil fuel.
2. Industry claim: “Natural gas is the cleanest-burning conventional fuel.”
TRUTH: Nope. See 1 and 3.
3. Industry claim: “Natural gas produces less carbon dioxide than coal or oil (45 percent less than coal, 30 percent less than oil).”
TRUTH: See number 1. Also, methane is 20-25 times more potent a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, meaning it’s that much more effective in trapping heat in the atmosphere. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration:
Methane, carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and water vapor are the major greenhouse gases associated with the production, transmission, processing, storage, distribution, and use of natural gas. Emissions of these gases associated with natural gas, excluding water vapor, were about 20 percent of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in 2007 (in carbon dioxide equivalent). Methane, the main component of natural gas, is released directly to the atmosphere when it leaks from natural gas wells and pipelines and processing and storage facilities. These methane emissions in 2007 were the source of about 25% of total U.S. methane emissions, but only 2.7% of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.
And:
Carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and water vapor are produced when natural gas is burned. Some CO2 is also released when it is removed from natural gas. Carbon dioxide emissions associated with natural gas in 2007 were about 21% of total U.S. CO2 emissions and 17% of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions (excluding water vapor).
4. Industry claim: “Natural gas is domestically available.”
TRUTH: This is technically true, but at a very heavy cost domestically. And because it’s more lucrative in the current market to sell abroad, much of that domestic gas will end up being sold to other countries. Besides this, any gas that is added to the domestic market will not be replacing foreign oil or domestic coal or nuclear power; it will just be added to the energy grid.
Thirty-four states sit on gas; many of them have parts that have already been transformed into industrial wastelands. Do we want this for more states, such as New York, which is one of the next states on the chopping block? Or would we not be better off creating jobs in the renewable-energy sector and transitioning off fossil fuels now, while we still have a chance to slow (and, optimistically, maybe even halt) catastrophic global climate change?
Beyond this, nobody in the U.S. is going to get cheaper electricity or fuel because it’s “domestic.” Gas companies have pulled a bait-and-switch in coastal states, where gas pipelines were often originally permitted because the pipeline companies claimed to be putting them in place for import of NG. Yet once the permits were received and the pipelines laid, the industry revealed its true colors: much of this domestic NG will end up being exported because the price abroad is much better than the prices at home.
5. Industry claim: “Ninety-eight percent of all natural gas consumed in North America is produced within the continent.”
TRUTH: In 2009, net U.S. imports of NG were down, but they still represented 12 percent of total consumption. Canada and Trinidad and Tobago are the largest exporters of NG to the United States. Egypt almost tripled its exports to the U.S. in 2009 and remains the second largest source of liquid NG. At the same time, the U.S. exports NG mainly to Japan and Mexico, and in 2009 added South Korea to its list of NG export customers.
6. Industry claim: “Natural gas is abundant.”
TRUTH: It is abundant, but its presence hundreds and thousands of feet beneath the surface, trapped in tiny bubbles within naturally fractured shale, means its extraction is dangerous, dirty and foolhardy. Its high life-cycle greenhouse gas footprint means it will contribute mightily to further catastrophic global climate change, at a time when the universal consensus among the world’s leading scientists demonstrates that we must halt our greenhouse gas emissions before it’s too late.
7. Industry claim: “Enough natural gas has been discovered to supply North America for well beyond 100 years.”
TRUTH: No one really knows exactly how much natural gas exists until it is extracted. The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates there are “2,587 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of technically recoverable natural gas in the United States.” The Potential Gas Committee estimates “total U.S. natural gas resources at just over 1,836 Tcf.” Currently the U.S. uses 22,739 million cubic feet of natural gas per year. That means, if these rough estimates are right (and there is no way of knowing how right they are), the gas would last, at current consumption levels, between 80 and 113.76 years in the United States, but this excludes the other two countries that make up North America, Mexico and Canada.
8. Industry claim: “Natural gas usage is becoming even more efficient.”
TRUTH: Maybe so in its in-building use, but we’re decades away from technologies making it efficient enough; meanwhile, its usage is not attractive enough to warrant killing people and ecosystems, and poisoning our environment and landscapes, to get to it. And it is highly inefficient in its leakage of methane and other greenhouse gases during extraction and transportation.
9. Industry claim: “Natural gas is reliable.”
TRUTH: We can certainly rely on the fact that fracking will poison air, water, soil, food supplies and people; that there will be accidents that cause damage to property and kill people; and that its exploration, extraction, and related processes around the world will add untold amounts of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, hastening catastrophic global climate change.
10. Industry claim: “Natural gas can be counted on as a primary fuel as well as the most reliable backup to renewable energies. Natural gas is there when the wind doesn’t blow or the sun doesn’t shine.”
TRUTH: This is a moot point. Battery systems are available to store the energy produced by wind power when the wind isn’t blowing and by solar power when the sun isn’t shining (such as at night). And other renewable energy resources, such as geothermal, don’t have the environmental risks associated with gas; in fact, there are few if any risks associated with geothermal technologies.
11. Industry claim: “Natural gas is versatile” (heats, cools, provides electricity and transportation, is a main ingredient in a wide variety of products).
TRUTH: It’s not the only choice we have, and we don’t need to use it, and would be better off not using it, as an ingredient in textiles, cosmetics, home cleaning products, children’s toys, clothing, baby bottles, and food.
12. Industry claim: “Natural gas is safe.”
TRUTH: Tell that to the thousands of people around the country whose health has been adversely affected, and the many who have been killed in explosions and other accidents related to drilling for gas. (See number 13.)
13. Industry claim: “North America’s continental gas pipeline system is the safest mode of energy transportation in the world today.”
TRUTH: In a quick survey over the last decade alone there have been dozens and dozens of accidents with NG that have resulted in destroyed homes, catastrophic fires, and loss of life. On August 19, 2000 a natural gas pipeline rupture and fire near Carlsbad, New Mexico, killed 12 members of a family who were camping some 600 feet from the rupture. The pipeline, operated by El Paso Natural Gas Company, was found to be badly corroded; the company’s “corrosion control program failed to prevent, detect, or control internal corrosion within the company’s pipeline,” and government inspectors had not identified the deficiencies.
Most recently on September 9, 2010 in San Bruno, California, just south of San Francisco a 54-year-old high-pressure gas pipeline exploded at dinner time killing eight people and injuring many more, destroying 38 homes, damaging 120 homes and burning 10 acres of brush.
14. Industry claim: “Because NG is safe and efficient, it is used in [a high percentage of] restaurants, hospitals, offices, etc.”
TRUTH: It is used in restaurants, hospitals, etc., because it is cheaper than oil, has been considered cleaner than oil and coal (because of high investment by Big Gas in marketing and lobbying), and because there have been and are few options outside fossil fuels for these big institutions to use for electricity, heating and cooling.
Besides, “per-customer consumption [of NG] fell in 16 out of the past 19 years. On a weather-adjusted basis, U.S. residential consumption over the 19-year period (1990- 2009) fell from 95 thousand cubic feet (Mcf) per customer in 1990 to 74 Mcf in 2009, or 22 percent,” according to the U.S. Energy Administration’s Independent Statistics and Analysis report.
15. Industry claim: “Natural gas is needed now.”
TRUTH: What is needed are clean, renewable, non-fossil-fuel energy systems if we are to halt catastrophic global climate change, protect our ecosystems, protect our precious fresh water supplies, protect our health, and keep any more states, like New York, from becoming an industrial wasteland.

Texas Driller to Pay $4.1M Over Tainted Pa. water

http://www.pressconnects.com/article/20101215/NEWS11/12150424/Texas+driller+to+pay++4.1M+over+tainted+Pa.+water

Texas driller to pay $4.1M over tainted Pa. water.  The Associated Press • December 15, 2010

http://www.pressconnects.com/article/20101215/ANOCAT/12150424/Texas-driller-to-pay-4-1M-over-tainted-Pa-water

HARRISBURG, Pa. — The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection has abandoned its plan to force a Houston-based drilling company to pay nearly $12 million to extend a public water line to residents whose wells have been contaminated with methane gas, citing a lack of political support.
Environmental regulators say Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. instead will pay residents of Dimock a total of $4.1 million under a settlement with the company announced late Wednesday. Cabot also has agreed to pay to install whole-house gas mitigation systems in each of the 19 affected homes and to pay DEP $500,000.
The settlement infuriated some residents, who say DEP caved to political pressure.
“Pretty nice that Cabot can do whatever they want,” said Craig Sautner, a Dimock resident who is a plaintiff in a federal lawsuit against Cabot. “When Cabot pays all the bills, that’s what happens. It’s ridiculous. Now we’re stuck here.”
Environmental Secretary John Hanger had announced the water line plan in late September before cheering residents in Dimock, a small town in Susquehanna County where tainted wells have raised concerns nationwide about the environmental and health consequences of gas drilling.
Blaming the contamination of the residents’ aquifer on faulty Marcellus Shale gas wells drilled by Cabot, Hanger declared that DEP would sue the company unless it agreed to pay $11.8 million to extend municipal water service from Montrose, about six miles away, to the Dimock residents. A state financing authority voted last month to front the money for the project through a combination of grants and loans.
But the water line provoked significant opposition among local elected officials, who called it a boondoggle and threatened to sue to block it. Cabot also balked, calling it “wasteful and environmentally disruptive” and blasting Hanger and his agency for abuse of authority.
Hanger told The Associated Press late Wednesday that he dropped the water line plan because of the significant opposition it faced. Hanger, part of the administration of outgoing Democratic Gov. Ed Rendell, leaves office in January. He said incoming Republican Gov. Tom Corbett could have easily halted the project.
“I personally think the line would have done a lot of good for the community, but a lot of people disagreed with me. That’s absolutely something we took into account when arriving at this settlement,” Hanger said. “This line was not going to get built.”
Hanger said each family will receive an amount equal to twice the value of its home, with a minimum payment of $50,000.
Cabot said in a statement that the settlement will permit the company to resume drilling in Dimock and that it plans to do so in the second quarter of 2011.
“This agreement provides a reasonable and pragmatic way forward for all parties,” said Dan Dinges, Cabot’s chief executive officer.
DEP began investigating reports of stray gas in Dimock water wells in January 2009, when the presence of methane led to the explosion of one resident’s well. DEP said it has traced the gas to Cabot’s drilling operations. Cabot denies responsibility for the pollution.

Failures of State/Federal Government in Protecting Communities and Environment

  • 109th Congress Energy Policy Act 2005, Title III, Section 327 exempted the use of fracking fluids from Safe Drinking Water Act (SWDA).
  • The current 111th congress has let HR 2766 and S 1215 (bills that remove the fracking fluids exemption from the SDWA) stagnate in committee.  
  • NYS ECL Article 23, Title 3,  Section  23-0303 removed home rule from local communities.
  • NYS ECL Article 23, Title 9, Section 23-0901 specifies Compulsory Integration.  
  • NYS DEC issued dGEIS 30-Sep-09 containing several shortcomings/flaws that do not protect our environment.

Ban in Otisco Watershed Dec. 13, 2010

One more victory to add to this very exciting day!
Tonight the Otisco Town Board unanimously voted for a moratorium in our Otisco Lake watershed and the Town of Otisco!  This was after we all heard Don Siegel, SU Professor (pro-fracking) speak for well over an hour.  The Board was gracious enough to allow us to speak as well (we had our “day in the sun” twice before) and ask Dr. Siegel questions, sometimes disputing and challenging what he had said.  All in all it was a very cordial evening, everyone was very respectful.  We expressed our appreciation for his time and “knowledge” and he actually complimented us (all people/groups working against hydrofracking) for doing what we are doing.  He said, “If it is done in NY State, it will be done w/ strong regulatory standards and we all have the Advocates against hydrofracking to thank for that.”  But he did paint a very benign picture of hydrofracking and kept making reference to “scare tactics” and being offended by the untruths of what is being said about “his” science.
I want to thank everyone who was able to be there and who came out in this horrible weather, OLPA Members: Kristin and Marty Ryan, Peg Kronen, Margie and Tim Creamer, and Ken Liberman.  ShaleShockCNY Members:  Joe Flynn, John Sutton, Diane LoDolce , Kitty Burns, and Norm Stormes (Mary Menapace was stuck in Atlanta, Dave Kelly was stuck at work and Teri Lore threw her back out and had just come from the Chiropractor, but thanks for trying to make it!).  
THANK YOU to everyone who spoke up…we are being heard! 
Anita Williams, President
Otisco Lake Preservation Association

Paterson’s Executive Order #41 on 12/14/2010

You can read the Executive Order at: http://www.state.ny.us/governor/executive_orders/exeorders/EO41.html

 

Walter Hang’s Commentary:  Stunning Developments/Cuomo is Our Next Target 

Greetings, I write to bring you up to date on the stunning developments regarding the veto of the mini-moratorium bill and Governor David A. Paterson’s landmark Executive Order 41. When the Governor vetoed the mini-moratorium bill late last Saturday, it was reported that he would issue an Executive Order requiring that “…if approved, high-volume, horizontal hydraulic fracturing would not be permitted until July 1, 2011, at the earliest.”  Mini-moratorium supporters declared: “New York is the first state in the union to legally impose a statewide moratorium on high-volume hydraulic fracturing…”  They also called the Governor’s action an “historic victory for the citizens of New York State.”

In fact, the Executive Order does not impose any moratorium on horizontal hydrofracking.  According to “Executive Order No. 41: Requiring Further Environmental Review,” no horizontal hydrofracking permits can be issued until a Final SGEIS is adopted.  This is exactly the same de facto moratorium that has been in-place in New York for the last two and a half years. 

Nevertheless, the Governor’s order is SUPER IMPORTANT because it requires DEC to issue a “revised” draft SGEIS, accept public comment on the revisions and submit a report to the Governor regarding “the regulatory conditions that are necessary to include in oil and gas well permits to protect public health and the environment.”  The Executive Order specifically requires: “The Department shall complete its review of the public comments, make such revisions to the Draft SGEIS that are necessary to analyze comprehensively (emphasis added) the environmental impacts associated with high-volume hydraulic fracturing combined with horizontal drilling, ensure that such impacts are appropriately avoided or mitigated consistent with the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), other provisions of the Environmental Conservation Law and other laws, and ensures that adequate regulatory measures are identified to protect public health and the environment;”
DEC cannot possibly fulfill the Executive Order unless it expands the original scope of its SGEIS proceeding.  If you read between the lines of Acting DEC Commissioner Peter Iwanowicz’s quotes in today’s New York Times, that conclusion is perfectly clear:  “Peter M. Iwanowicz, the department’s acting commissioner, said many of the comments have criticized the proposed standards for failing to adequately address issues like the cumulative impact of multiple drill sites, disposal of wastewater from the drilling and the protection of drinking water. He said ‘it behooves’ the next administration to incorporate the range of different issues in the revised draft.”  The specific issues Peter references were excluded from the scope of the original SGEIS.  Wastewater management and drinking water protection are two of the critical issues spelled out in our coalition letter to Governor Paterson.  “The governor’s order said no drilling permits could be issued until completion of the final standards ‘subsequent to the conclusion of the public comment period,’ meaning July 1 at the earliest. Mr. Iwanowicz said drilling could theoretically begin in 2011, ‘but a lot of it depends on how the issues are addressed by this draft.'”
See: http://www.toxicstargeting.com/news/2010-12-14/new-round-comments-drilling        
        or http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/14/nyregion/14frack.html?ref=nyregion
We must take concerted action to make sure Governor-Elect Cuomo does not rescind the Executive Order.  That is highly unlikely because he would become the focus of intense criticism, to say the least.   We must also require the scope of the revised draft SGEIS to be expanded to include each and every single one of the major concerns identified in our coalition letter as well as by the thousands of other elected officials, environmental groups, business owners and concerned citizens.–Walter Hang

============================

“The Capitol Pressroom program for December 13, 2010: “…The comingling of Governor Paterson’s veto-of-moratorium-slash-executive-order-to-continue-studying-the-gas-drilling-issue has some environmentalists claiming victory, and some others protesting at his offices in New York City with movie stars. We hear from both perspectives, as well as from John Holko of IOGANY (phone). And we talk hydrofracking, partisanship in Albany, pensions & the 2010 elections, as well as his future political career with outgoing Assemblyman Michael Benjamin (studio) who is retiring from the state legislature at the end of the month, but not politics…” ” (The Capitol Pressroom/WCNY) (NY)- http://thecapitolpressroom.org/the-capitol-pressroom-program-for-december-13-2010/ (Download here- http://hotfile.com/dl/89496081/dbef518/TheCapitolPressroom12-13-10.mp3.html )

Governor Issues Executive Order on Moratorium

 

http://www.state.ny.us/governor/executive_orders/exeorders/EO41.html
Here is the text:
EXECUTIVE ORDER
No. 41: REQUIRING FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
WHEREAS, the 2009 New York State Energy Plan supports the development of in-State energy resources, including natural gas, to achieve the Plan’s multiple public policy objectives; and
WHEREAS, low-volume hydraulic fracturing, or conventional fracking, has been used successfully and safely in New York State for many years to extract natural gas consistent with the Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) for Oil, Gas and Solution Mining Regulatory Program promulgated by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (Department) in 1992; and

WHEREAS, new technologies have emerged, and are being deployed in other states, to extract natural gas more efficiently through a process known as high-volume hydraulic fracturing combined with horizontal drilling; and

WHEREAS, there is a need for further study of this new technology prior to deployment in New York State; and

WHEREAS, in 2008, I directed the Commissioner of Environmental Conservation to initiate a formal public process to update the 1992 GEIS to ensure that any new technologies deployed in New York State are first thoroughly analyzed and regulated to ensure that all environmental and public health impacts are mitigated or avoided; and

WHEREAS, the Department issued a draft scope for an updated GEIS on October 6, 2008, held public meetings in the Marcellus shale region, received more than 3,000 written comments, and issued a final scope for the Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement (SGEIS) on February 6, 2009.  The Department released the Draft SGEIS for public review and comment on September 30, 2009, held four public hearings in the region and New York City, and received more than 13,000 written comments during a public comment period that closed December 31, 2009; and

WHEREAS, tens of thousands of citizens, landowners, local governments, large and small businesses, non-governmental organizations, and other stakeholders have expressed their heartfelt support for or opposition to the new technology, but most agree that an objective, science-based analysis is the best approach to setting new policy.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, David A. Paterson, Governor of the State of New York, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the State of New York, do hereby order as follows:

   1. The Department shall complete its review of the public comments, make such revisions to the Draft SGEIS that are necessary to analyze comprehensively the environmental impacts associated with high-volume hydraulic fracturing combined with horizontal drilling, ensure that such impacts are appropriately avoided or mitigated consistent with the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), other provisions of the Environmental Conservation Law and other laws, and ensures that adequate regulatory measures are identified to protect public health and the environment; and
   2. On or about June 1, 2011, the Department shall publish a Revised Draft SGEIS, accept pubic comment on the revisions for a period of not less than thirty days, and may schedule public hearings on such revisions to be conducted in the Marcellus shale region and New York City; and
   3. Recognizing that, pursuant to SEQRA, no permits may be issued prior to the completion of a Final SGEIS, the Department, subsequent to the conclusion of the public comment period, shall report to the Governor on the status of the Final SGEIS and the regulatory conditions that are necessary to include in oil and gas well permits to protect public health and the environment.    

G I V E N   under my hand and the Privy Seal of the State in the City of Albany this thirteenth day of December in the year two thousand ten.
BY THE GOVERNOR 
     
Secretary to the Governor

=========================================================================================================================================

HISTORIC VICTORY FOR THE CITIZENS OF NEW YORK STATE
In an amazing victory for the citizens of New York State, Governor David A. Paterson has issued an Executive Order directing the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) to conduct further comprehensive review and analysis of high-volume hydraulic fracturing in the Marcellus Shale. The Executive Order requires that, if approved, high-volume, horizontal hydraulic fracturing would not be permitted until July 1, 2011, at the earliest.  New York State becomes the first state to have a formal prohibition on high volume horizontal hydrofacking because of concerns about environmental impacts.  Regretablly instead of signing the “Moratorium Bill” legislation sent to him that included a prohibition on vertical hyrdofracking that was passed by on overwhelming bi partisan majority in both houses of the State government he decided instead to succumb to industry pressure and issue the Executive Order that eliminates vertical wells from the prohibition. While the Executive Order is historic and proves that our concerns over hydrofracking are legitimate it is also a disappointment because vertical wells are also dangerous.

The gas and oil industry lobby deliberately misinterpreted a section of the Moratorium Bill claiming it would bring all gas drilling in New York State to a halt.  The bill only specified a moratorium on drilling for wells using hydrofracking, whether they are vertically or horizontally drilled.
A moratorium banning the fracking of vertical wells is very important for several reasons:
1.    Gas companies have been clear that they plan to drill vertical wells in the Utica and Marcellus shale with the intention of converting them to horizontal wells.
2.    While the State Senate was considering a two-year moratorium on horizontal wells the gas industry threatened to drill and frack 16 vertical wells every square mile in retribution if a moratorium on fracked horizontal wells was passed.
3.    Some of the worst water contamination problems, such as in Dimock, PA came from vertical wells drilled and fractured in the Marcellus Shale.
We now look to Governor Elect Andrew Cuomo to protect the Citizens of New York from the dangers of hydro fracking by any method including vertical drilling and horizontal drilling and including all shale formations.

BELOW IS THE GOVERNORS PRESS RELEASE

 

To embed this news release, copy the code below and paste it into your website or blog. Preview

Governor Paterson Issues Executive Order on Hydraulic Fracturing

ALBANY, NY (12/11/2010)(readMedia)– Governor David A. Paterson has issued an Executive Order directing the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) to conduct further comprehensive review and analysis of high-volume hydraulic fracturing in the Marcellus Shale. The Executive Order requires that, if approved, high-volume, horizontal hydraulic fracturing would not be permitted until July 1, 2011, at the earliest. This should allay any fears that high-volume hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling under study by DEC will commence without assurances of safety. “We in government must always focus on protecting the well-being of those whom we represent and serve, but we also have an obligation to look to the future and protect the long-term interests for our State and its residents,” Governor Paterson said. “Therefore, I am proud to issue this Executive Order, which will guarantee that before any high-volume, horizontal hydraulic fracturing is permitted, the Department of Environmental Conversation will complete its studies and certify that such operations are safe.” Permits for high-volume, horizontal hydraulic fracturing can not be issued until the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) completes a Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement (SGEIS), which is currently being developed. As a result, there is already in place a de-facto moratorium on such permits. The Governor issued the Executive Order contemporaneously with his veto of S.8129-B/A.11443-B, which would have suspended the issuance of new oil and gas drilling permits through May 15, 2011, including all conventional, low-volume, vertical oil and gas wells. “This legislation, which was well intentioned, would have a serious impact on our State if signed into law. Enacting this legislation would put people out of work – work that is permitted by the Department of Environmental Conservation and causes no demonstrated environmental harm, in order to effectuate a moratorium that is principally symbolic,” Governor Paterson said. “Symbols can have great importance, but particularly in our current terrible economic straits, I cannot agree to put individuals out of work for a symbolic act.” “I am sympathetic to the sponsors’ desire to protect the environment and public health, and I respect the concerns that produced this legislation,” the Governor continued. “But this legislation does not accomplish this purpose, since the activities at the heart of the moratorium are not currently taking place, and would not take place until well after the legislation’s proposed moratorium.” The bill goes well beyond high-volume, horizontal hydraulic fracturing and effectively would result in a moratorium on all new oil and gas well drilling in this State. The cessation of such new activity, even for a limited period, would have substantial negative financial consequences for the State, local governments, landowners and small businesses involved in conventional oil and gas production. The Division of the Budget estimates that the bill would cause a substantial reduction in State revenues from the loss of permit fees and tax revenue. With a $315 million budget gap in the current fiscal year, and a projected gap of over $9 billion in the 2011-12 State fiscal year, New York simply cannot afford to send hundreds and perhaps thousands of jobs, and millions of dollars in capital investment to Pennsylvania and other states to our south. ### Additional news available at www.ny.gov/governor | High resolution images available at www.ny.gov/governor/mediaimages | password: paterson | New York State | Executive Chamber | press.office@chamber.state.ny.us | 212.681.4640 | 518.474.8418 | Follow us on Facebook and Twitter

From: “governors.press.office@chamber.state.ny.us” <governors.press.office@chamber.state.ny.us>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:51:28 -0500
To: Katherine Nadeau<knadeau@eany.org>
Subject: Governor Paterson Issues Executive Order on Hydraulic Fracturing
News from New York State Office of the Governor
For more information contact: Jessica Bassett, 518-474-8418/212-681-4640
Governor Paterson Issues Executive Order on Hydraulic Fracturing
ALBANY, NY (12/11/2010)(readMedia)– Governor David A. Paterson has issued an Executive Order directing the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) to conduct further comprehensive review and analysis of high-volume hydraulic fracturing in the Marcellus Shale. The Executive Order requires that, if approved, high-volume, horizontal hydraulic fracturing would not be permitted until July 1, 2011, at the earliest. This should allay any fears that high-volume hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling under study by DEC will commence without assurances of safety.
“We in government must always focus on protecting the well-being of those whom we represent and serve, but we also have an obligation to look to the future and protect the long-term interests for our State and its residents,” Governor Paterson said. “Therefore, I am proud to issue this Executive Order, which will guarantee that before any high-volume, horizontal hydraulic fracturing is permitted, the Department of Environmental Conversation will complete its studies and certify that such operations are safe.”
Permits for high-volume, horizontal hydraulic fracturing can not be issued until the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) completes a Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement (SGEIS), which is currently being developed. As a result, there is already in place a de-facto moratorium on such permits.
The Governor issued the Executive Order contemporaneously with his veto of S.8129-B/A.11443-B, which would have suspended the issuance of new oil and gas drilling permits through May 15, 2011, including all conventional, low-volume, vertical oil and gas wells.
“This legislation, which was well intentioned, would have a serious impact on our State if signed into law. Enacting this legislation would put people out of work – work that is permitted by the Department of Environmental Conservation and causes no demonstrated environmental harm, in order to effectuate a moratorium that is principally symbolic,” Governor Paterson said. “Symbols can have great importance, but particularly in our current terrible economic straits, I cannot agree to put individuals out of work for a symbolic act.”
“I am sympathetic to the sponsors’ desire to protect the environment and public health, and I respect the concerns that produced this legislation,” the Governor continued. “But this legislation does not accomplish this purpose, since the activities at the heart of the moratorium are not currently taking place, and would not take place until well after the legislation’s proposed moratorium.”
The bill goes well beyond high-volume, horizontal hydraulic fracturing and effectively would result in a moratorium on all new oil and gas well drilling in this State. The cessation of such new activity, even for a limited period, would have substantial negative financial consequences for the State, local governments, landowners and small businesses involved in conventional oil and gas production.
The Division of the Budget estimates that the bill would cause a substantial reduction in State revenues from the loss of permit fees and tax revenue. With a $315 million budget gap in the current fiscal year, and a projected gap of over $9 billion in the 2011-12 State fiscal year, New York simply cannot afford to send hundreds and perhaps thousands of jobs, and millions of dollars in capital investment to Pennsylvania and other states to our south.
###
Additional news available at www.ny.gov/governor | High resolution images available at www.ny.gov/governor/mediaimages | password: paterson | New York State | Executive Chamber | press.office@chamber.state.ny.us | 212.681.4640 | 518.474.8418 | Follow us on Facebook and Twitter
Permalink: http://readme.readmedia.com/Governor-Paterson-Issues-Executive-Order-on-Hydraulic-Fracturing/1795007

Impacts of Oil and Gas Drilling

Night Before Christmas

Twas the Night Before Christmas, Revisited

New York State Medical Societies Call for Moratorium

It’s now official: the Medical Society of the State of New York has gone on record supporting a moratorium on gas drilling using high volume hydraulic fracturing.

Numerous county medical societies began supporting a moratorium. Most were content with waiting for the EPA to issue its findings before proceeding further even though it was unclear how wide a scope the study would cover or even if they would produce valid, reliable information to begin with. The thought was to wait, let the EPA prove itself and then reevaluate when the time came. Few thought the medical profession would be willing to leave a moratorium so open ended. Yet that is what was eventually passed at the state level: a call for a true moratorium until “valid information” is available. Given the fact that the process is only now coming under scrutiny of not only the state and federal government (where it should have been done in the first place), but academia, and now the medical community we might now begin to hope that the issue will get the attention and study it deserves. We might dare hope that the precautionary principle lives.
 
Here is the wording of the resolution passed by MSSNY:

RESOLVED, That the Medical Society of the State of New York supports a moratorium on natural gas extraction using high volume hydraulic fracturing in New York State until valid information is available to evaluate the process for its potential effects on human health and the environment.
 
 
Counties that passed their own calls for a moratorium are (might be incomplete):
Broome County Medical Society
Herkimer County Medical Society
Cayuga County Medical Society
Chemung County Medical Society
Chenango County Medical Society
Madison County Medical Society
Oneida County Medical Society
Onondaga County Medical Society
Oswego County Medical Society
Otsego County Medical Society
Tompkins County Medical Society
……literally all the southern tier
Delaware and Tioga Counties do not have separate Societies but fall under what is called the sixth District which also declared support for a moratorium.
 
Chris
Chris W. Burger
110 Walters Road
Whitney Point, NY 13862
(607) 692-3442
cwburger@frontiernet.net

See   for more information regarding medical professionals
=======================================

The model Resolution used with some variations:
 
Whereas, as physicians we believe in the principle of Primum, non, nocere, First, do no harm; and
 
Whereas, as physicians of [     ] County, we care first and foremost about the health of our community and believe that when an activity raises potential harm to human health, precautionary measures should be taken until cause and effect relationships are fully established scientifically, and
 
Whereas, the exploitation of natural gas in the Marcellus Shale Gas Field involves high-pressure injection of billions of gallons of water and millions of gallons of water-soluble chemicals into the shale formations to allow the release of natural gas, and
 
Whereas, backflow from this process contains heavy metals, radioactive materials and volatile organic compounds, and the effects of this process on human health have not been subject to rigorous medical research, and
 
Whereas, the review reported by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement contains no high quality medical data, now therefore be it
 
RESOLVED, that the [     ] County Medical Society supports a moratorium to natural gas extraction using high volume hydraulic fracturing in New York State until completion of the recently announced Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) study to evaluate its effects on human health and the environment, and be it further
 
RESOLVED, that this resolution be sent to the appropriate state elected representatives, local media and other interested parties.
 

Safety of Vertical/Exploratory Wells Challenged

Beyond Fracking: Experts Challenge Safety of Exploratory Wells, Vertical Drilling. by Marie C. Baca  ProPublica, Dec. 6, 2010.

 

Delaware River Basin Commission Rules to Address Exploratory Wells.