Assembly vote on 1 year moratorium A07400

An FYI. Note the ones that voted against even a one year moratorium.
Jeanne

·         A07400 Votes:

·         BILL: A07400  DATE: 06/06/2011  MOTION:      YEA/NAY: 96/46

·          

 
·         Abbate  Y  Castell Y  Galef   Y  Katz    NO McKevit NO Rabbitt NO Stevens Y

·         Abinant Y  Castro  Y  Gantt   Y  Kavanag Y  McLaugh NO Raia    NO Sweeney Y

·         Amedore NO Ceretto NO Gibson  Y  Kellner Y  Meng    Y  Ramos   Y  Tedisco NO

·         Arroyo  Y  Clark   Y  Giglio  NO Kirwan  ER Mill D  NO Reilich NO Tenney  NO

·         Aubry   Y  Colton  ER Glick   Y  Kolb    NO Mill JM NO Reilly  Y  Thiele  Y

·         Barclay NO Conte   NO Goodell NO Lancman Y  Mill MG Y  Rive J  Y  Titone  Y

·         Barron  Y  Cook    Y  Gottfri Y  Latimer Y  Millman Y  Rive N  Y  Titus   Y

·         Benedet Y  Corwin  NO Graf    NO Lavine  Y  Molinar Y  Rive PM Y  Tobacco NO

·         Bing    Y  Crespo  Y  Gunther Y  Lentol  Y  Montesa NO Roberts Y  Weinste Y

·         Blanken NO Crouch  NO Hanna   NO Lifton  Y  Morelle Y  Robinso Y  Weisenb Y

·         Boyland ER Curran  Y  Hawley  NO Linares Y  Moya    Y  Rodrigu Y  Weprin  Y

·         Boyle   NO Cusick  Y  Hayes   NO Lope PD Y  Murray  NO Rosenth Y  Wright  Y

·         Braunst Y  Cymbrow Y  Heastie Y  Lope VJ Y  Nolan   Y  Russell Y  Zebrows Y

·         Brennan Y  DenDekk Y  Hevesi  Y  Losquad NO Oaks    NO Saladin NO Mr Spkr Y

·         Bronson Y  Dinowit Y  Hikind  NO Lupardo NO O'Donne Y  Sayward NO

·         Brook-K Y  Duprey  NO Hooper  Y  Magee   Y  Ortiz   Y  Scarbor Y

·         Burling NO Englebr Y  Hoyt    Y  Magnare Y  Palmesa NO Schimel Y

·         Butler  Y  Farrell Y  Jacobs  Y  Maisel  Y  Paulin  Y  Schimmi NO

·         Cahill  Y  Finch   NO Jaffee  Y  Malliot Y  Peoples Y  Schroed NO

·         Calhoun NO Fitzpat NO Jeffrie Y  Markey  ER Perry   Y  Simotas Y

·         Camara  Y  Friend  NO Johns   Y  McDonou NO Pretlow Y  Smardz  NO

·         Canestr Y  Gabrysz Y  Jordan  NO McEneny Y  Ra      Y  Spano   Y

ExxonMobil Continues Expansion in the Marcellus, Buys Two More PA Drillers for $1.69 Billion, Adds Another 317K Acres of Leases | Marcellus Drilling News

ExxonMobil Continues Expansion in the Marcellus, Buys Two More PA Drillers for $1.69 Billion, Adds Another 317K Acres of Leases | Marcellus Drilling News.

Despair Not — In These Times- Sandra Steingraber

Despair Not — In These Times.

 

Features » May 25, 2011

Despair Not

We must confront ‘well-informed futility syndrome’ to overcome our fossil fuel addiction.

By Sandra Steingraber

Santiago lies under a layer of smog caused by local industries and the growing number of cars in the Chilean capital. (Martin Bernetti/AFP/Getty Images)

What will we say when our grandchildren ask us the names of the departed? Or, by then, will the loss of favorite animals be the least of our worries?

To Despair or Not to Despair, That Is the Question

What do you think? Is confronting climate change the moral issue of our time?

• Or should we make like a polar bear and adapt? After all, the planet may warm and seas may rise and crops may fail, but surely some humans–at least the fittest (and richest)–will survive.

• Or is such grim optimism too complacent–and complicit?

We invite you to share your thoughts. E-mail despairnot@inthesetimes.com. Please include your phone number and address. The In These Times Board of Editors will compile your contributions, which will be published in an upcoming issue of In These Times or at http://www.InTheseTimes.com.

In Alton, Ill., downstream from Peoria, the Illinois River town where I grew up, the abolitionist Elijah Lovejoy was pumped full of bullets on a dark November night by a mob intent on silencing the man once and for all. On this evening, they succeeded.

By dawn, Elijah was dead, and his printing press—the means by which he distributed his radical ideas—lay at the bottom of the Mississippi River. The year was 1837. The Rev. Lovejoy, a Presbyterian minister who attended Princeton Theological Seminary, was buried on this 35th birthday.

But the story doesn’t end there.

Almost immediately, membership in antislavery societies across the nation swelled. Vowing to carry on the work of his fallen friend, Edward Beecher, president of Illinois College in Jacksonville, threw himself into abolitionist efforts and, in so doing, inspired his sister, Harriet Beecher Stowe, who went on to write the most famous abolitionist treatise of all: Uncle Tom’s Cabin. Meanwhile, Elijah’s brother, Owen Lovejoy, turned his own house into a station along the Underground Railroad. Owen went on to win a seat in Congress and, along the way, befriended a young Illinois politician by the name of Abraham Lincoln.

These facts impressed me as a child.

When I read Reverend Lovejoy’s biography as a grown-up and mother, I found other things impressive. Such as the fact that, at the time of his assassination, Elijah had a young family. And yet, in the weeks before his death—when it became clear that the mob pursuing him was growing bolder by the hour—he did not desist from speaking out against slavery. So Elijah declared in one of his final speeches:

While all around me is violence and tumult, all is peace within…. I sleep sweetly and undisturbed, except when awakened by the brickbats of the mob.

Truly? With a pregnant wife in the bed next to him and a 1-year-old son in the next room? He wasn’t worried?

A letter to his mother in Maine tells a more nuanced story:

Still I cannot but feel that it is harder to “fight valiantly for the truth” when I risk not only my own comfort, ease, and reputation, and even life, but also that of another beloved one.

And then there’s this poignant aside:

I have a family who are dependent on me… And this is it that adds the bitterest ingredient to the cup of sorrow I am called to drink.

Here’s something else that I’ve noticed while reading his words. To the slave owners and murderous thugs, Elijah spoke calmly. He reserved his fierce language for the members of the community who gladly lived in the free state of Illinois but wished to remain above the fray: the ones who added their signatures to a resolution asking him to cease publication of his newspaper and leave town, but would not sign a resolution that urged protection of law against mob rule; the ones who agreed that slavery was a homicidal abomination but who feared that emancipation without recompense to slave owners for loss of property would be socially destabilizing; the ones who believed themselves upstandingly moral but who chose to remain silent about the great moral crisis of the day.

Two crises, one cause

In the spirit of Elijah Lovejoy—the man who is the namesake of my 9-year-old son—the time has come for outspoken, full-throated heroism in the face of the great moral issue of our own day: the environmental crisis—an unfolding calamity whose main victims are our own children and grandchildren.

In fact, the environmental crisis is actually two crises, although they share a common cause. You could view it as a tree with two main branches: One branch represents what is happening to our planet through the atmospheric accumulation of heat-trapping gases (most notably, carbon dioxide and methane). The second branch represents what is happening to us through the accumulation of inherently toxic chemical pollutants in our bodies.

Follow the first branch and you find droughts, floods, acidifying oceans, dissolving coral reefs and faltering plankton stocks (the oceans’ plankton provides half of our atmospheric oxygen supply). Follow the second branch and you find pesticides in children’s urine, lungs stunted by air pollutants, abbreviated pregnancies, altered hormone levels and lower scores on cognitive tests.

The trunk of this tree is an economic dependency on fossil fuels, primarily coal (plant fossils) and petroleum and natural gas (animal fossils). When we light them on fire, we threaten the global ecosystem. When we use them as feedstocks for making stuff, we create substances—pesticides, solvents, plastics—that can tinker with our subcellular machinery and various signaling pathways that make it run.

Biologist Rachel Carson first called our attention to these manifold dangers in her 1962 book, Silent Spring. She wrote, “Future generations are unlikely to condone our lack of prudent concern for the integrity of the natural world that supports all life.” Since then, the scientific evidence for the disintegration of our world has become irrefutable, and members of the future generations to whom she was referring are now occupying our homes.

They are our kids.

I mean this in the most basic ways. When my son Elijah, at age 4, asked to be a polar bear for Halloween, I sewed a polar bear costume—and I did so with the full knowledge that his costume might outlast the species. No other generation of mothers before mine has ever borne such knowledge—nor wondered if we should share this terrible news with our children. Or not. It’s a novel situation. Indeed, according to the most recent assessment, one in every four mammal species (and one in every three marine animals) is now threatened with extinction, including that icon of Halloween itself: the little brown bat. Thus, animal costumes whose real-life correspondents have been wiped from Earth may well become commonplace.

This leads me to wonder: What will we say when our grandchildren ask us the names of the departed? When bats, bees, butterflies, whales, polar bears and elephants disappear, will children still read books about them? Will they want to dress up as vanished species? Or, by then, will the loss of favorite animals be the least of their worries?

‘New morbidities of childhood’

Chronic childhood diseases linked to toxic chemical exposures are rising in prevalence. Here are a few of the current trends:

• 1 in 8 U.S. children is born prematurely. Preterm birth is the leading cause of death in the first months of life and the leading cause of disability. Its price tag is $26 billion per year in medical costs, special services and lost productivity. Preterm birth has demonstrable links to air pollution, especially maternal exposure to fine particles and combustion byproducts of the type released from coal-burning power plants.

• 1 in 11 U.S. children has asthma, the most common chronic childhood disease and a leading cause of school absenteeism. Asthma symptoms have been linked to certain ingredients in plastic (phthalates) as well as outdoor air pollution, including traffic exhaust. The annual cost of childhood asthma is estimated at $18 billion. Its incidence has doubled since 1980.

• 1 in 10 U.S. children has a learning disability, and nearly 1 in 10 has attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. All together, special education services now consume 22 percent of U.S. school spending—about $77.3 billion per year at last count. Neurodevelopmental disorders have significant associations with exposures to air pollution, organophosphate pesticides like diazinon, and the heavy metals lead, mercury, and arsenic, among others.

• 1 in 110 children has autism or is on the autism spectrum. Annual costs are $35 billion. Causes are unknown, but exposure to chemical agents in early pregnancy is one of several suspected contributors.

• 1 in 10 U.S. white girls and 1 in 5 U.S. black girls begin breast development before the age of eight. On average, breast development begins nearly two years earlier (age 9) than it did in the early 1960s (age 11). A risk factor for breast cancer in adulthood, early puberty in girls is associated with increasing body fat as well as exposure to some hormonally active chemical agents known as “estrogen mimickers.” We have no cost estimates for the shortened childhoods of girls.

All together, asthma, behavioral problems, intellectual impairments and preterm birth are among the “new morbidities of childhood.” So concludes a 2006 federally funded investigation of pediatric environmental health. Ironically, by becoming so familiar a presence among children, these disorders now appear almost normal or inevitable. And yet, with an entirely different chemical regulatory system, farm bill and energy policy, their prevalence might be much reduced.

The fact that we do not identify and abolish hormone-disrupting, brain-damaging chemicals to which children are routinely exposed raises profound ethical questions. The authors of the pediatric health investigation, published in Environmental Health Perspectives, put it this way:

In the absence of toxicity testing, we are inadvertently employing pregnant women and children as uninformed subjects to warn us of new environmental toxicants. … Paradoxically, because industry is not obligated to supply the data on developmental neurotoxicity, the costs of human disease, research, and prevention are socialized whereas the profits are privatized.

In the absence of federal policies that protect child development and the ecology of the planet on which our children’s lives depend, we parents have to serve as our own regulatory agencies and departments of interior.

Already manically busy, we are encouraged by popular media reports to read labels, consult websites, vet the contents of birthday party goody bags, shrink our carbon footprints, mix our own nontoxic cleaning products, challenge our school districts to embrace pesticide-free soccer fields and limit the number of ounces of mercury-laced tuna fish consumed by each child per week.

Next page »Page 1 of 2
  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!

06/09/2011: Owner and Operator of Wastewater Treatment Facilities Sentenced for Violating the Clean Water Act / Jeffrey Pruett to serve 21 months in prison

06/09/2011: Owner and Operator of Wastewater Treatment Facilities Sentenced for Violating the Clean Water Act / Jeffrey Pruett to serve 21 months in prison.

Owner and Operator of Wastewater Treatment Facilities Sentenced for Violating the Clean Water Act / Jeffrey Pruett to serve 21 months in prison

 

Release date: 06/09/2011

Contact Information: Stacy Kika, Kika.stacy@epa.gov, 202-564-0906, 202-564-4355

 

WASHINGTON — Jeffrey Pruett, 58, of West Monroe, La. was sentenced today in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana to a total of33 months incarceration. He received 21 months for seven felony counts and 12 months for one misdemeanor count, which will be served concurrently.Pruett and the two companies he owned and operated are also collectively responsible for paying a $310,000 criminal fine. The violations threatened local drinking water supplies and people’s health by failing to meet the required Clean Water Act standards.

“Mr. Pruett’s disregard for the law led to sewage backups in people’s homes and endangered public health,” said Cynthia Giles, assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. “Today’s sentence proves that those who knowingly break environmental laws will be held accountable for their criminal actions.”

Pruett was Chief Executive Officer of LWC Management Company, Inc. (LWC) and Principal Officer of Louisiana Land & Water Company (LLWC) and was responsible for overseeing the operations and finances of both companies. Testimony during the federal trial showed that beginning in April 1999, Pruett and his companies provided sewer and wastewater treatment plant services to the Bayou Galion, Charmingdale Estates, Daywood and Donovan Woods, Love Estates, and Pine Bayou subdivisions of Monroe, La. Homeowners in the Monroe subdivisions were required to pay a fee for sewage and wastewater treatment plant services based on rates set by the Louisiana Public Service Commission.

Pruett was convicted in January 2011 by a federal jury for multiple violations of the Clean Water Act, including the failure to provide and maintain records, illegal discharge of pollutants and improper operation and maintenance of a facility.

Facilities that discharge effluent from wastewater treatment plants are required to obtain state discharge permits, in this case, from the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality. These permits required LLWC and LWC to properly operate and maintain sewage systems and wastewater treatment and control facilities and provide adequate staff qualified to ensure that the company complied with pollutant limits. The state received numerous customer complaints about sewage backups at residences and cloudy, tainted water coming out of the taps. The state also received complaints about sewage discharges into roadside ditches near residences and improper termination of residents’ sewage and water services.

Pruett and LLWC were found guilty of six felony violations of failure to maintain and provide records pertaining to all of the Monroe subdivisions. Pruett and LLWC were also found guilty of one felony count of effluent violations pertaining to Love Estates subdivision. Pruett was found guilty of one misdemeanor/negligent count of failure to provide proper operation and maintenance pertaining to the Pine Bayou subdivision.

The case was investigated by the EPA and the state of Louisiana, and was prosecuted by the Office of the United States Attorney, Western District of Louisiana.

More information on EPA’s criminal enforcement program:http://www.epa.gov/compliance/criminal/index.html

 

Federal Fracking Panel Heavy With Industry Influence, Critics Charge

Federal Fracking Panel Heavy With Industry Influence, Critics Charge. 6/9/11

Finger Lakes Environment & Development Conf. July 21-22 Geneva

July 21-July 22, 2011 Hobart and William Smith Colleges, Geneva, NY
2011 Finger Lakes Environment and Development Conference:
Proactive Approaches to Managing Impacts of Marcellus Shale Development

Hosted by Hobart and William Smith Colleges

About the Conference
This 2-day conference will provide education, information resources, and practical knowledge regarding potential costs and benefits of shale gas development in NY, for the purpose of facilitating informed decision-making by individuals, non-profit organizations, municipalities, health professionals, planners and their counsel. Registration Fee includes meals, on campus parking and printed conference materials.

Keynote Speaker: John H. Quigley
Principal of John H. Quigley LLC, Strategic Advisor to Citizens for Pennsylvania’s Future (PennFuture), and former Acting Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources

Additional Speakers:
James Dunne Ph.D., Director of Property Tax Research, NYS Department of Taxation and Finance
Rachel Treichler, J.D.
Christopher Denton, J.D.
Richard Lippes, J.D. – Legal Advisor, Sierra Club Atlantic Chapter
Meghan Thoreau – Planner, Southern Tier Central Regional Planning and Development Board
Erica Levine Powers, Esq. (J.D., LL.M. Taxation); Adjunct Faculty, Planning Law and Environmental Law at University at Albany
Stuart Gruskin, J.D., former Executive Deputy Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Agenda Items:
Thursday, July 21
Introduction to Hydraulic Fracturing and Regulatory Background in NY State
-Implications of state and local tax structure for maximizing benefits of Marcellus Shale development

Economic Impacts of Unconventional Shale Gas Development
-Implications of state and local tax structure for maximizing benefits of Marcellus Shale development

Health Impacts of Hydrofracking

Shale Gas Development and Municipal/Regional Planning
-Protecting roads and Watersheds using home rule
-Municipal planning and preventing negative impacts of shale gas development

A Best Practices Approach to Managing Shale Gas Development

Friday, July 22
Proactive steps for landowners and their counsel

Primer on the revised Draft Supplementary Generic EIS/or what the EIS doesn’t regulate

Avoiding common pitfalls of the oil and gas lease

Local approaches to protecting watersheds, parks, and municipal interests

Discussion about response to DGEIS
-Protection of water sources (surface and ground)
-Protection of air quality
-Accident/spill reporting, response, and liability

Professional Credits
Conference coordinators are in the process of applying for approval for CLE credits for attorneys and CM credits for planners. Contact Sarah Meyer at smeyer@hws.edu to indicate interest and to obtain the status of credit availability and cost.

Overnight Accommodations
Limited campus housing is available to participants and can be added ($30 per person) to your registration fee at check out. Alternative overnight accommodations in Geneva, NY include the Hampton Inn, Ramada Inn, Belhurst Castle, Geneva On The Lake, Microtel Inn and Suites, Days Inn, and others.

Event Sponsors
Finger Lakes Institute
Hobart and William Smith Colleges
Finger Lakes-Lake Ontario Watershed Protection Alliance

REGISTER ONLINE!

Oneonta Common Council bans gas drilling » Local News » The Daily Star, Oneonta, NY –

Oneonta Common Council bans gas drilling » Local News » The Daily Star, Oneonta, NY  June 8, 2011

 

 

June 8, 2011

Oneonta Common Council bans gas drilling

 

By Jake Palmateer Staff Writer

 

ONEONTA _ The Common Council voted Tuesday to ban all forms of natural gas drilling in city limits.

One alderman said he will work to see the city takes even more steps.

The vote was not unanimous. With Third Ward Alderman Erik Miller absent, Seventh Ward Alderman Liz Shannon abstained.

After the meeting, she said she supports the concept of banning natural gas drilling, but said the draft ordinance was poorly written.

Several members of the public spoke out in favor of the measure, including Colleen Blacklock, who submitted a petition with 1,888 signatures.

The measure makes it unlawful for any person or corporation to drill for natural gas within the city. Under the proposed ordinance, violators are subject to a maximum fine of $250 for each day a violation occurs.

“I am fully supportive of the ordinance,” Eighth Ward Alderman Kevin Hodne said.

Hodne said hydraulic fracturing would be an economic disaster for the area because the high concentration of drilling rigs and equipment would affect tourism and the service industry.

“I think we are taking a good stand here,” he said.

No one spoke against it.

In response to call for further action from Hartwick College professor Mark Davies, Fourth Ward Alderman Mike Lynch, who worked with Alderman Miller on the draft, said he would be looking at additional steps the city may take. These include regulating the staging areas used to store chemicals used in the hydraulic fracturing process or equipment used in the drilling.

The Common Council also voted unanimously to approve an amendment to the zoning code overhaul they passed May 17.

An area near Silver Creek that under the draft zoning code was zoned for apartment complexes, was changed to a more restrictive zone.

A mayor’s public hearing on the amendment was set for June 21. Mayor Dick Miller said the zoning code overhaul passed May 17 will get his signature.

“I will be signing the new zoning code,” Miller said. “I suspect that comes as no surprise to anyone.”

 

Steuben Co Landfill and Drill Cuttings–June 13, 2011

Controversial drilling technique prompts CA bill – BusinessWeek

Controversial drilling technique prompts CA bill – BusinessWeek.

Report: Lift of fracking ban would generate $11.4B for N.Y. by 2020 | The Ithaca Journal | theithacajournal.com

Report: Lift of fracking ban would generate $11.4B for N.Y. by 2020 | The Ithaca Journal | theithacajournal.com.

Report: Lift of fracking ban would generate $11.4B for N.Y. by 2020

1 Comments

ALBANY — New York could see $11.4 billion in economic activity by 2020 and up to 18,000 new jobs by 2015 if the state allows gas companies to drill into the massive Marcellus Shale formation, according to a report released Tuesday by a conservative think tank.

The report, paid for by the business-backed Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, found that state and local governments would gain $1.4 billion in tax revenues alone over the next nine years.

The study’s authors — who also penned a report in 2009 that was partially commissioned by the natural-gas industry and released through Pennsylvania State University — also found that the typical Marcellus Shale gas well reaps about $4 million in economic benefits, while the environmental impacts come to about $14,000 per well.

Their study is based on a prediction of 330 horizontal wells in New York, which primary author Timothy Considine said is a conservative estimate. The number could expand five-fold, he said, if gas companies decide to tap into the Utica Shale — a much larger formation that lies below the Marcellus.

Both formations lie below large portions of New York, with the Marcellus region taking up much of the Southern Tier and part of the Hudson Valley.

“It could be much larger than the numbers projected in my report,” said Considine, a professor at the University of Wyoming. “The $11.4 billion number is based on a fairly limited development scenario in the Southern Tier of New York, like Broome and Chemung counties.”

The figures include both direct and indirect streams of economic activity, such as the spin off to other manufacturing, construction and retail industries. Considine said the financial estimates are based on activity that has taken place in Bradford, Tioga and Susquehanna counties in Pennsylvania, where high-volume fracking has been permitted since 2008.

Natural gas advocates hailed the report, which they said validates what they’ve said since the technique was first put on hold in New York in July 2008 so the Department of Environmental Conservation could review its environmental impact. That study continues, with a second draft due by July and high-volume fracking still on hold until a final review is complete.

“This study quantifies in real and remarkable terms the economic promise of natural-gas development in upstate New York,” said Brad Gill, executive director of the Independent Oil & Gas Association of New York.

The report’s authors, however, have faced criticism for their past work on hydrofracking, including the Penn State report.

A dean at Penn State said that report — which predicted a windfall of economic activity resulting from natural gas in Pennsylvania and spoke out against a proposed severance tax — should have been “more scholarly and less advocacy-minded.”

An initial version also did not disclose that it was partially funded by a gas-industry trade organization, but was later updated to include a disclaimer. The New York report was funded solely by the Manhattan Institute, Considine said.

David Gahl, policy director for Environmental Advocates of New York, said it’s important to look at the report’s source of funding, which he characterized as coming from “pro-gas people.” It’s not a coincidence that the report is favorable toward the gas industry’s intentions, he suggested.

“Just like Pennsylvania’s lax history of regulatory oversight for dirty gas drilling called hydraulic fracturing … you get what you pay for,” Gahl said.

Considine, however, said the funding had no impact on the results of the study, and that he has plans to submit it to several peer-reviewed journals for publication.

“I don’t see how it could have,” Considine said. “The work stands on its own.”

The Manhattan Institute report does make some policy observations, finding that New York’s “current shale gas drilling moratorium imposes a significant and needless burden on the New York State economy.”

The authors also found the risk of significant environmental damage is very low, and “in no way call into question the soundness of” hydrofracking.

The study found that 152 violations — such as spills, cases of stray gas and blowouts — have led to the contamination of 9.3 million gallons of water in Pennsylvania. That number is low, the authors said, if you take into account the state’s annual household use of more than 300 billion gallons.

“Our study finds the net economic and environmental benefits from shale gas development to be considerable, suggesting that the current moratorium is far costlier than its proponents, or even its opponents, realize,” the report reads.”

Gahl, however, said the report underestimates the concerns about hydrofracking.

“The pro-gas people paid for a report that claims natural gas is a fairy godmother that will save New York’s economy and — poof! — makes very real concerns about health and safety disappear,” Gahl said.