New York State Department of Health Completes Review of High-volume Hydraulic Fracturing – A New NYSDEC Press Release
December 17, 2014
Gas Drilling Awareness for Cortland County
December 17, 2014
Cuomo concludes fracking is too risky for New York | Capital New York.
ALBANY—A long-awaited study released by the Cuomo administration on Wednesday determined several “red flags” about hydraulic fracturing that could pose “significant public health risks,” officials said at a public meeting of Governor Andrew Cuomo and his cabinet.
The governor’s announcement, articulated by his acting Department of Health commissioner Howard Zucker and Department of Environmental Conservation commissioner Joe Martens, delays any potential gas drilling in New York State for at least several more years as more data becomes available.
“The evidence in the studies we reviewed raised public health concerns,” Zucker said. “There are many red flags because there are questions that remain unanswered from lack of scientific analysis, specifically longitudinal studies of [fracking].”
“The science isn’t here,” Zucker continued. “But the cumulative concerns based on the information I have read … gives me reason to pause.”
Winding toward the conclusion of his presentation, Zucker said, “Would I live in a community with [fracking] based on the facts that I have now? Would I let my child play in a school field nearby? After looking at the plethora of reports behind me … my answer is no.”
He yielded to Cuomo, who thanked him for his “powerful” remarks.
The health study, requested two years ago by state environmental officials, provided the basis for an open-ended stall by the governor, who was loath to anger environmentalist opponents or pro-business supporters of fracking before his re-election. For the past six years the state has vexed both constituencies, without provoking an outright revolt by either, by observing a moratorium on fracking without actually banning it.
Zucker said the health review involved 4,500 staff hours reviewing anecdotal reports and a stack of existing studies. He spent 15 minutes offering his analysis of several peer-reviewed reports and making an analogy to earlier scientific thinking on second-hand smoking.
Martens, when he spokes, said that restrictions already on hydrofracking in the New York City watershed as well as local towns that have banned its development mean that “the prospects for [hydrofracking] development in New York State are uncertain at best.”
At numerous points during his first term, and especially during his campaign this year, Cuomo cited the ongoing study as of the health impacts of fracking in lieu of articulating a position on it. In the meantime, a moratorium put in place by then-Governor David Paterson in 2008 remained in place.
(The health study placed the political onus on the Cuomo administration’s health department for its never-ending timeline; respected former health commissioner Nirav Shah, placed in the awkward position of giving a series of non-answers to questions about the department’s progress on its fracking study, left without saying much at all.)
In September 2012, after years of study, Martens and the Department of Environmental Conservation formally asked the state Department of Health to review the human health risks of fracking, leading to further delays.
The state sits on one of the nation’s richest shale deposits, the Marcellus, and is the last state in the nation with a major shale play to authorize fracking.
Proponents say drilling will create tens of thousands of jobs in the most economically depressed parts of the state, where industry and jobs departed generations ago.
Environmental groups have cautioned that drilling for natural gas in New York will pollute water sources, increase reliance on fossil fuels and harm human health.
In June, the state Court of Appeals upheld local bans on fracking, which Cuomo said would limit drilling to areas that support the industry. More than 120 communities have banned fracking, while about 60 have passed resolutions that will allow the industry to expand.
For years, anti-fracking activists have been Cuomo’s most outspoken opponents, protesting nearly all his public appearances and rallying thousands in Albany for the annual State of the State address.
Cuomo lost a number of upstate communities in his primary to Democratic challenger Zephyr Teachout in September, a showing she attributed in large part to the turnout among anti-fracking activists.
Following Martens and Zucker at the cabinet meeting, Cuomo said, “I get very few people who say to me, I love the idea of fracking.”
Referring to the economically depressed areas of upstate that were candidates for fracking activity, Cuomo said the question now is, “What can we do in these areas to generate jobs, generate wealth … as an alternative to fracking?”
Answering a reporter’s question after the presentation, Cuomo predicted “a ton of lawsuits” in response to the decision.
December 14, 2014
www.osc.state.ny.us/reports/environmental/environmental_funding_nys_2014.pdf.
Environmental Funding in New York State
December 2014
Executive Summary
Created in 1970, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
(DEC) is responsible for most of the State’s programs to protect wildlife, natural
resources and environmental quality. DEC programs range widely from managing
fish and game populations and overseeing the extraction of natural resources to
monitoring the discharge of pollutants and hazardous materials and cleaning up
contaminated sites.
These services are integral to New Yorkers’ public health and general well-being,
and to the State’s economy. As part of the Office of the State Comptroller’s
commitment to promoting transparency, accountability and sound fiscal
management in State government, this report examines DEC funding from State
Fiscal Year (SFY) 2003-04, the year that the Brownfield Cleanup Program was
enacted, to the end of SFY 2013-14.
The scope of the DEC’s mandate has expanded considerably since its inception, and
has continued to grow during the period examined in this report. Recent initiatives
from the Legislature, the Executive and federal agencies that require DEC action
have included development of a climate action plan, regulation of shale gas
production, addressing threats associated with crude oil transportation,
implementation of new federal clean air standards and management of varied
programs aimed at mitigating specific types of pollution.
As this report details, the number of DEC Full-Time Equivalent staff declined by more
than 300 from SFY 2003-04 through SFY 2013-14. All Funds spending rose 27.8
percent over that same period. When adjusted for inflation, spending was nearly flat,
with a cumulative increase of 1.7 percent over the period examined. According to
the Division of the Budget (DOB), DEC All Funds spending is projected to decline
over the next several years.
During the period examined in this report, State Funds spending by the DEC reached
a peak in SFY 2007-08, and as of SFY 2013-14 was down 15.1 percent from that
level. Federal dollars, including funding through the federal stimulus program,
bolstered the DEC’s budget substantially during the period, but federal support is
expected to decline to around its pre-stimulus level this fiscal year. The State’s
current Financial Plan projects that State Funds disbursements by the DEC will
decline in each of the next three fiscal years.
New York has created a number of dedicated funds for environmental purposes in
an effort to provide a reliable flow of resources to address long-term needs. At times,
however, the State has resorted to sweeps from certain of these funds to provide
budget relief, undermining the purpose of the dedicated funds.
December 14, 2014
DiNapoli Releases Report on Environmental Funding in New York State, 12/10/14.
December 10, 2014, Contact: Press Office (518) 474-4015
The Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has experienced staff cuts and constrained funding since 2003 while its responsibilities have grown, according to a report released today by New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli.
“DEC’s staff has declined while funding has barely kept pace with inflation and now is projected to decline,”DiNapoli said. “Our natural resources are major assets for the state’s economy and New Yorkers’health and quality of life. We must continue to safeguard these assets.”
DiNapoli’s report, “Environmental Funding in New York State,”examines DEC funding and workforce in the context of its mission. The report also highlights receipts and spending in several of the state’s major dedicated funds for environmental purposes.
DEC is responsible for most of New York’s programs to protect wildlife, natural resources and environmental quality. DEC programs range widely from managing fish and game populations and overseeing the extraction of natural resources to monitoring the discharge of pollutants and hazardous materials and cleaning up contaminated sites.
Since 2003, several new programs have been added to the agency’s list of responsibilities. These include the Brownfield Cleanup Program; the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative; and the Waste Tire Recycling and Management Act.
DEC spending was $795.3 million in SFY 2003-04 and $1 billion in SFY 2013-14. After adjusting for inflation, DEC spending rose by a total of 1.7 percent over the period examined. Since 2008, funding from state sources is down 15.1 percent. While federal funding has helped fill the gap, those resources are now declining as well. The state Division of the Budget projects that total DEC spending will decline this year and in each of the next three years by a cumulative total of 25.9 percent from the SFY 2013-14 level.
The size of the DEC workforce declined 10.4 percent, from 3,256 full-time equivalents (FTEs) in SFY 2003-04 to 2,917 FTEs in SFY 2013-14. It reached a peak of 3,779 FTEs in SFY 2007-08. Staffing in programs such as enforcement, air and water quality management, and solid and hazardous waste management has experienced significant cuts.
DiNapoli’s report also notes that two of the state’s major funds dedicated to the environment –the Environmental Protection Fund and the Hazardous Waste Oversight and Assistance Account –combined have been subject to sweeps in excess of half a billion dollars to provide general state budget relief in the past.
For a copy of the report visit: http://www.osc.state.ny.us/reports/environmental/environmental_funding_nys_2014.pdf
###
December 13, 2014
Toward an understanding of the environmental and public health
impacts of shale gas development: an analysis of the peer-reviewed
scientific literature, 2009-2014. Dec. 10, 2014
Physicians Scientists & Engineers for Healthy Energy released a working paper analysis, statistical evaluation of the approximately 400 peer-reviewed studies to date on the impacts of shale gas development. In short, they examined what percentage of papers indicated risks/adverse impacts versus no indication of risk.
highlights:
December 13, 2014
CHPNY-Fracking-Compendium.pdf.
COMPENDIUM OF SCIENTIFIC, MEDICAL, AND MEDIA FINDINGS
DEMONSTRATING RISKS AND HARMS OF FRACKING
(UNCONVENTIONAL GAS AND OIL EXTRACTION)
2nd edition
December 11, 2014