McDonough Informational Meeting on Gas Drilling- Part 1/3 -5/19/12-Steve Palmatier – YouTube

McDonough Informational Meeting on Gas Drilling- Part 1/3 -5/19/12-Steve Palmatier – YouTube.

Ithaca conservationist wins Audubon Fellowship and grant | syracuse.com

Ithaca conservationist wins Audubon Fellowship and grant | syracuse.com.

NREL: Energy Analysis – The Renewable Electricity Futures Study

NREL: Energy Analysis – The Renewable Electricity Futures Study.

Renewable Electricity Futures Study

 

RE Futures Visualizations

These visualizations are based on RE Futures modeling and represent the transformation of the U.S. electric system to a high renewable system from 2010 to 2050 and the hourly operation and transmission flow of that system in 2050.

Transformation of the Electric Sector

(Compare to Baseline Projections) Screen capture of a dynamic map that is animated to display the transformation of the electric sector in 2010 through 2050

Hourly Operation in 2050

(Compare to Baseline Projections) Screen capture of a dynamic map that is animated to display hourly operation in 2010 through 2050

Power Flow in 2050

(Compare to Baseline Projections) Screen capture of a dynamic map that is animated to display power flow in 2010 through 2050

 

A report published by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the Renewable Electricity Futures Study (RE Futures), is an initial investigation of the extent to which renewable energy supply can meet the electricity demands of the continental United States over the next several decades. This study explores the implications and challenges of very high renewable electricity generation levels—from 30% up to 90%, focusing on 80%, of all U.S. electricity generation from renewable technologies—in 2050. At such high levels of renewable electricity generation, the unique characteristics of some renewable resources, specifically geographical distribution and variability and uncertainty in output, pose challenges to the operability of the nation’s electric system.

 

Key Findings

 

  • Renewable electricity generation from technologies that are commercially available today, in combination with a more flexible electric system, is more than adequate to supply 80% of total U.S. electricity generation in 2050 while meeting electricity demand on an hourly basis in every region of the country.
  • Increased electric system flexibility, needed to enable electricity supply-demand balance with high levels of renewable generation, can come from a portfolio of supply- and demand-side options, including flexible conventional generation, grid storage, new transmission, more responsive loads, and changes in power system operations.
  • The abundance and diversity of U.S. renewable energy resources can support multiple combinations of renewable technologies that result in deep reductions in electric sector greenhouse gas emissions and water use.
  • The direct incremental cost associated with high renewable generation is comparable to published cost estimates of other clean energy scenarios. Improvement in the cost and performance of renewable technologies is the most impactful lever for reducing this incremental cost.

 

RE Futures provides initial answers to important questions about the integration of high penetrations of renewable electricity technologies from a national perspective, focusing on key technical implications. The study explores electricity grid integration using models with unprecedented geographic and time resolution for the contiguous United States to assess whether the U.S. power system can supply electricity to meet customer demand on an hourly basis with high levels of renewable electricity, including variable wind and solar generation.

 

RE Futures, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, is a collaboration with more than 110 contributors from 35 organizations including national laboratories, industry, universities, and non-governmental organizations.

 

As the most comprehensive analysis of high-penetration renewable electricity of the continental United States to date, the study can inform broader discussion of the evolution of the electric system and electricity markets towards clean systems. RE Futures results indicate that renewable generation could play a more significant role in the U.S. electricity system than previously thought and that further work is warranted to investigate this clean generation pathway.

 

Image of the cover to the Renewable Electricity Futures Study report.

 

Renewable Electricity Futures Report

 

 

Modeling and Cost Data

 

  • Energy models used in the study:
  • Technology cost and performance assumptions used in scenario analysis:
    • Black & Veatch report on Cost and Performance Data for Power Generation TechnologiesPDF – documents assumptions used for baseline and incremental technology improvement scenarios
    • Transparent Cost Database/Open Energy Information (pending public release) – includes cost (capital and operating) and capacity factor assumptions for renewable generation technologies used for baseline, incremental technology improvement, and evolutionary technology improvement scenarios, along with other published and DOE program estimates for these technologies.

Printable Version

Pacific Institute: Hydraulic Fracturing and Water Resources: Separating the Frack from the Fiction

Pacific Institute: Reports.

Hydraulic Fracturing and Water Resources: Separating the Frack from the Fiction

 

fracking_cover_small.jpgHydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” has generated growing controversy in the past few years. New research from the Pacific Institute finds the real issues around its impacts on water are shared by stakeholders from government to industry to environmental groups – and point to the need for better and more transparent information in order to clearly assess the key water-related risks and develop sound policies to minimize those risks.

Much of the public attention on hydraulic fracturing has centered on the use of chemicals in the fracturing fluids and the risk of groundwater contamination. But the new study finds that while chemical disclosure can be useful for tracking contamination, risks associated with fracking chemicals are not the only issues that must be addressed. The massive water requirements for fracking and the potential conflicts with other water needs, including for agriculture and for ecosystems, pose major challenges. Methane contamination of drinking water wells is also a concern according to some field studies, as are the serious challenges associated with storing, transporting, treating, and disposing of wastewater.

The report Hydraulic Fracturing and Water Resources: Separating the Frack from the Fiction is a detailed assessment and synthesis of existing research on fracking as well as the results of interviews with representatives from state and federal agencies, industry, academia, environmental groups, and community-based organizations from across the United States. Interviewees identified a broad set of social, economic, and environmental concerns, foremost among which are impacts of hydraulic fracturing on the availability and quality of water resources.

“Despite the diversity of viewpoints among the stakeholders interviewed, there was surprising agreement about the range of concerns associated with hydraulic fracturing. Among the most commonly cited were concerns about spills and leaks, wastewater management, and water withdrawals,” said Heather Cooley, co-director of the Pacific Institute Water Program. “In addition to concerns about impacts on water resources, social and economic concerns were identified as well, such as worker health and safety and community impacts associated with rapidly industrializing rural environments.”

Hydraulic fracturing refers to the process by which fluid is injected into wells under high pressure to create cracks and fissures in rock formations that improve the production of these wells. Energy analysts, including the Energy Information Administration (EIA), project that the United States will become increasingly reliant on natural gas, with production projected to increase by nearly 30% over the next 25 years.

The growth in natural gas production is driven by a dramatic increase in domestic shale gas production, and by 2021, the United States is projected to be a net exporter of natural gas ( U.S. EIA 2012). The rapid development of unconventional natural gas resources – such as shale – has been largely facilitated through the use of directional (horizontal) drilling and hydraulic fracturing.

Hailed by some as a game-changer that promises increased energy independence, job creation, and lower energy prices, fracking has led others to call for a temporary moratorium or a complete ban due to concern over potential environmental, social, and public health impacts. The research finds that the lack of credible and comprehensive data and information is a major impediment to a robust analysis of the real concerns associated with hydraulic fracturing.

“Much of what has been written about the interaction of hydraulic fracturing and water resources is either industry or advocacy reports that have not been peer-reviewed, and the discourse around the issue to date has been marked by opinion and obfuscation,” said Cooley. “More and better research is needed to clearly assess the key water-related risks associated with hydraulic fracturing and develop sound policies to minimize those risks.”

Based in Oakland, California, the Pacific Institute is a nonpartisan research institute that works to create a healthier planet and sustainable communities. Through interdisciplinary research and partnering with stakeholders, the Institute produces solutions that advance environmental protection, economic development, and social equity – in the West, nationally, and internationally. www.pacinst.org.

Download the full report.
Download the Executive Summary.
Download the press release.

Gas Industry Fracking Study So Biased It’s Useless « EcoWatch: Uniting the Voice of the Grassroots Environmental Movement

Gas Industry Fracking Study So Biased It’s Useless « EcoWatch: Uniting the Voice of the Grassroots Environmental Movement.

Fracking Disclosure: Colorado’s Compromise Is Pennsylvania’s Controversy | StateImpact Pennsylvania

Fracking Disclosure: Colorado’s Compromise Is Pennsylvania’s Controversy | StateImpact Pennsylvania.

As Shell Works To Stop Methane, Neighboring Farmer Worries About His Cows | StateImpact Pennsylvania

As Shell Works To Stop Methane, Neighboring Farmer Worries About His Cows | StateImpact Pennsylvania.

Chesapeake to Pay $1.6 Million for Contaminating Water Wells in Bradford County | StateImpact Pennsylvania

Chesapeake to Pay $1.6 Million for Contaminating Water Wells in Bradford County | StateImpact Pennsylvania.

After the fracking is done – chicagotribune.com

After the fracking is done – chicagotribune.com.

VAST MAJORITY OF NEW YORKERS WANT CUOMO TO WAIT FOR MORE RESEARCH BEFORE OPENING EMPIRE STATE TO FRACKING

Catskill Citizens for Safe Energy.

VAST MAJORITY OF NEW YORKERS WANT CUOMO TO WAIT FOR MORE RESEARCH BEFORE OPENING EMPIRE STATE TO FRACKING