State pushes for legal end to shale wastewater discharges – News – The Times-Tribune

State pushes for legal end to shale wastewater discharges – News – The Times-Tribune.

Texas plant will turn sewage into drinking water ANGELA K. BROWN,

STLtoday – Associated Press.

AAA  Aug. 10, 2011 6:20 PM ET
Texas plant will turn sewage into drinking water
ANGELA K. BROWN, Associated Press THE ASSOCIATED PRESS STATEMENT OF NEWS VALUES AND PRINCIPLES 

FILE – In this Aug. 7, 2011 file photo, Eddie Ray Roberts, superintendent of the city’s waste and water department walks on the dried bed of Lake E.V. Spence in Robert Lee, Texas. After years of diminishing water supplies made even worse by the second most severe drought in state history, some communities are resorting to a plan that might have seemed absurd a generation ago: turning sewage into drinking water. (AP Photo/Tony Gutierrez, File)


(AP) — In parched West Texas, it’s often easier to drill for oil than to find new sources of water. So after years of diminishing water supplies made even worse by the second-most severe drought in state history, some communities are resorting to a plan that might have seemed absurd a generation ago: turning sewage into drinking water.

Construction recently began on a $13 million water-reclamation plant believed to be the first of its kind in Texas. And officials have worked to dispel any fears that people will be drinking their neighbors’ urine, promising the system will yield clean, safe water. Some residents are prepared to put aside any squeamishness if it means having an abundant water supply.

“Any water is good water, as far as I’m concerned,” said Gary Fuqua, city manager in Big Spring, which will join the cities of Midland, Odessa and Stanton in using the water.

When the water finally reaches the tap, Fuqua said, its origin is “something I wouldn’t think about at all.”

Similar plants have been operating for years in Tucson, Ariz., parts of California and in other countries. Water experts predict other American cities will follow suit as they confront growing populations, drought and other issues.

“It’s happening all over the world,” said Wade Miller, executive director of the WateReuse Association based outside Washington. “In some places … resources are down to very low levels, and this is one of the few resources available.”

The Colorado River Municipal Water District in West Texas began considering a wastewater recycling plant back in 2000 and broke ground last month on the facility in Big Spring, about 100 miles southeast of Lubbock. When finished late next year, it should supply 2 million gallons of water a day.

The timing couldn’t be better. This year’s drought has made a bone-dry region even drier, causing crops to wither and animals and fish to die off by the thousands.

At least one of the three reservoirs in West Texas may dry up if the drought persists through next year, as climatologists have predicted could happen. That means the district’s water supply could be reduced from 65 million gallons a day to 45 million, said John Grant, the water district’s general manager.

“We have limited water supplies in Texas, and you have to turn to other sources of water,” Grant said.

The new system could actually improve the taste of the region’s water by removing the minerals and salt that give it a distinctive briny flavor, he added.

The idea to recycle sewage isn’t new. Fort Worth and other cities across the nation have long used treated wastewater to water grass and trees and irrigate crops. But the new treatment plant in West Texas will be the first in the state to provide drinking water.

Astronauts aboard the International Space Station have been drinking recycled urine and sweat since 2009 — and consistently given the water good reviews.

For years, NASA had been working on equipment that would enable astronauts to recycle their wastewater for drinking, cooking and bathing. The system was launched to the space station in late 2008, and it took several months to conduct enough tests — in orbit and on the ground — to ensure the water was safe to consume.

Since the space shuttle fleet was retired last month, the space station’s recycling system is needed more than ever. Shuttles can’t deliver fresh water, and the agency says astronauts will need such recycling systems on future missions to an asteroid and Mars.

But some earth-bound people still need a little convincing.

“It just doesn’t sound very right, does it?” asked Liz Faught of Odessa. “I don’t want to drink it.”

Still, she had confidence that any public health concerns would be addressed long before the water arrives in the cities.

“I feel they would not do this and it be an unsafe practice,” she said.

The slightest suggestion of urine in drinking water can make people uneasy.

In June, officials in Portland, Ore., sent 8 million gallons of treated drinking water down the drain after a man was caught on a security camera urinating into a reservoir. City leaders said they didn’t want to distribute water laced, however infinitesimally, with urine.

The wastewater recycling process is long and complex. The first steps remove salt and impurities such as viruses and even traces of medicine. Then the wastewater is channeled into a lake or reservoir, where it’s blended with fresh water and eventually gets pumped into a water-treatment facility. There, it undergoes several more rounds of cleaning, disinfection and testing before finally reaching home faucets.

When the project was presented several years ago, there were no major protests during public hearings, Grant said. Most people don’t mind the idea once they understand that the treated water is safe to drink, he said.

“Folks out here have accepted it because they understand what the value of water is,” Grant said.

In California, the West Basin Municipal Water District in southwest Los Angeles County started treating wastewater in the 1990s because it had been importing 80 percent of its water. Using recycled water has not only cut down on importing costs but also helped the environment by eliminating the need to dump sewage in the ocean, officials said.

In Orange County, Calif., a similar project started several years ago now provides 70 million gallons a day, water that is considered nearly as pure as distilled, Miller said.

San Diego is also studying the idea.

___

Associated Press writers Betsy Blaney in Lubbock and Marcia Dunn at Cape Canaveral, Fla., contributed to this report.

___

Follow Angela K. Brown at http://twitter.com/AngelaKBrownAP

Follow Betsy Blaney at http://twitter.com/betsyblaney

Associated Press

Fracking Radiation Targeted By DOE, GE – Jeff McMahon – The Ingenuity of the Commons – Forbes

Fracking Radiation Targeted By DOE, GE – Jeff McMahon – The Ingenuity of the Commons – Forbes.

Hickenlooper Tells Colorado Oil and Gas Association To Expect Fracking Fluid Regulations Soon

Hickenlooper Tells Colorado Oil and Gas Association To Expect Fracking Fluid Regulations Soon.

Auburn waste editorial

Tuesday’s letters: Auburn waste editorial, Breivik not a Christian, Gillibrand’s misguided bill, shabby Westcott Reservoir | syracuse.com.

 Auburn waste editorial,

Published: Tuesday, August 02, 2011, 5:00 AM

Editorial overlooked facts on Auburn waste

To the Editor:
Is the erosion of the fourth estate at hand? One would expect hyperbole and condescension from cable news pundits, but newspapers, the last bastion of credibility, are they too caving into the economic pressures of the current news climate? My cause for concern is the July 25 editorial, “Money-Loser: Wastewater ban will cost Auburn’s ratepayers next year.”

The tone of the piece was drenched with derision and offered little to no facts. A fact that was glaringly overlooked was that Municipal Utilities Director Vicki Murphy asked the natural gas companies to stop delivering because pre-treatment testing showed that pollutant levels were out of compliance with the permits. So the fiscally responsible members of Auburn City Council, namely Mayor Michael Quill and Councilors Gilda Brower and Thomas McNabb, wanted to be prudent in not budgeting money from this tenuous revenue stream. They knew the money would not be there.

The $600,000 figure is an arbitrary figure used by Councilor Matt Smith for political gain. There is no sound, documented evidence that the 2011-2012 budget should have included that figure, given the fact that the companies were out of compliance in the previous fiscal quarter.

So that leaves us with the question: Why did the editorial board slam a small group of native Auburnians trying to protect their downstream neighbors from the contaminants in gas drilling wastewater? Perhaps it was easier to listen to an angry, uniformed, opportunistic politician than to research and look at the documented facts.

Terry Cuddy
Auburn

Original Editorial

Jul 25, 2011 Auburn rocks! The council sure struck a blow against hydrofracking, from natural gas wells at the municipal sewage treatment plant?

http://blog.syracuse.com/opinion/2011/07/money-loser_wastewater_ban_wil.html

Original July 7 report http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2011/07/auburn_votes_to_ban_accepting.html

Niagara Falls Reporter: Frack, Frack, Everywhere a Frack

Niagara Falls Reporter: Frack, Frack, Everywhere a Frack.

Fragments of these concerns are all over the internet.
Potential Nightmare in Niagara Falls
 This story by reporter James Hufnagel broke yesterday in  Niagara Falls.
The story claims to confirm long-rumored financial intentions of Senator Maziarz and Niagara Water Board Director Paul Drof to receive millions of gallons of hydro fracture waste at the small and decrepit Niagara Falls Treatment Plant.  There were also prior rumors of intention to truck the waste to Lewiston.   Beyond the general science incapability I have listed below, please consider the profoundly dilapidated infrastructure condition of the entire Niagara Falls region.  Collapsed and wide open storm sewers (lacking grates) are a common feature on city streets.  The entire industrial sector of the 1970’s Robert Moses Parkway including the Waste Treatment Plant is a collapsing corroded mess.  Concise scientific concerns related to Mr. Drof’s ambitions continue after we discuss ongoing concerns for Buffalo…..
Continuing Hydro Fracture Abuse in Buffalo?
I  remain concerned that Hydro Fracture waste is continuing to be recieved at the Buffalo Sewer Authority…..semantically re-labeled as “Flowback Water” or “Condensate Riser Water”  The BSA is abusing prior reception of these fluids for decades from conventional rotary drilled gas well sites.  Science has clearly identified that Flowback and Condensate Riser Water from vertical and horizontal hydro fractured wells is comprehensively different and horribly contaminated.  Please reference the ‘Comments’ section of this Artvoice article: http://artvoice.com/issues/v10n11/week_in_review/comforting_comerford
 The comments contains a Buffalo News digital soundbite from Mayor Brown specifically stating that the BSA is continuing to recieve these liquids from hydro fracture sites
The Impossibility of the Promised Science
Citing Conrad Voltz’ past study at the Josephine Treatment Plant on Blacklick Creek in Pennsylvania, and recalling that Walter Hang had researched contamination in the Niagara River years ago, I wrote to Walter last week.   Historically, Walter sampled the Niagara Falls treatment plant’s effluent discharge at the tailrace and conducted GC/MS analysis for priority pollutants.  Those findings were presented in his study of the Niagara River, past featured on CBS 60-Minutes.
The Mass Spectrometry Myth……Clumsy Identification of  Contaminants
Rumors are circulating that Paul Drof has stated he can identify all of the undisclosed ‘proprietary’ Haliburton chemistry using Mass Spectrometry (MS) which is essentially a technique for ‘weighing’ molecular structure based on the ionic mass-to-charge ratio of a particle.  This inherently creates a Chicken-And-Egg debacle as the ionic charge and/or molecular mass of the ‘proprietary unknowns’ must be guessed.  This is why you repeatedly hear the statement “We cannot test unless we know what we are attempting to identify and locate.”  This is also why the secret Haliburton mixture is not immediately reverse-engineered and duplicated.  Here is 28-pages of beginners tutorial on MS: http://science.widener.edu/svb/massspec/massspec.pdf
Walter Hang writes last week:
“You have to separate the pollutants before you can identify them using MS.  There are thousands of compounds that might be present.  Isolating them is extremely tricky work.”
The Carbon Myth….Cleaning the Mess
Paul Drof is also rumored to be stating that his Niagara Falls Treatment Plant is special because it is “GAC” or capable of implementing Activated Carbon treatment.
Walter writes again:
“GAC only removes pollutants that are insoluble in water.  Many of the gas drilling wastewater pollutants, notably the toxic metals, are soluble in water.  That is why they are called Total Dissolved Solids.  Those contaminants would pass through a GAC filter.”
A 2008 drinking water crisis is documented that affected more than 850,000 residents along the Monongahela River near Pittsburgh.  When New York imposed its de facto Marcellus Shale horizontal hydrofracturing moratorium, many firms went to drill in Pennsylvania.  Municipal treatment plants were accepting up to 40% of their influent as natural gas drilling wastewater even though they were not equipped to handle that type of waste.  So much Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) pollution was discharged in the Monongahela River that the water became unpotable.  A 70-mile stretch of the river was impacted.”
Walter’s response continues……
“GAC removes higher molecular weight compounds more effectively than certain common volatile compounds.  Those compounds can “break through” the GAC earlier than the higher molecular weight compounds.  When that happens, the GAC has to be “recharged.”  The more frequently the GAC has to be recharged, the higher the treatment cost.”

“For all these reasons, the three categories of pollutants in the gas drilling wastewater are extremely challenging to manage.  That is why PA has banned their discharge into POTWs.”  ……returning to the nightmare of the Josephine Plant at Blacklick Creek

Blacklick Creek

Here is a summary of the Blacklick Creek Study demonstrating comprehensive failure
Conrad Voltz, Tony Ingraffea, Penn State
Here is an excellent radio article in which Voltz describes pressure to remain silent.
Buffalo News and Sen. Maziarz speaking to the Niagara Falls treatment initiative

Larry Beahan: Hydrofracking conference glossed over pollution risks – Another Voice – The Buffalo News

Larry Beahan: Hydrofracking conference glossed over pollution risks – Another Voice – The Buffalo News.

Money-Loser: Wastewater ban will cost Auburn’s ratepayers next year | syracuse.com

Money-Loser: Wastewater ban will cost Auburn’s ratepayers next year | syracuse.com.

Money-Loser: Wastewater ban will cost Auburn’s ratepayers next year

Published: Monday, July 25, 2011, 5:00 AM

Wow! Auburn rocks! The council sure struck a blow against hydrofracking, didn’t it, when it voted July 7 to ban accepting wastewater from natural gas wells at the municipal sewage treatment plant?

Well, not exactly. Not at all, in fact.

What do you mean? It voted to stop treating the polluted wastewater from those controversial wells, right?

Uh, no. The water isn’t coming from horizontal-well hydrofracking — which isn’t going on in New York. It’s from conventional, vertical gas wells that have been operating in Upstate New York for years.

But the Cayuga Anti-Fracking Alliance says the Auburn plant isn’t equipped to handle the high salt concentrations, the radioactive agents and cancer-causing chemicals in the wastewater.

The plant employs a certified laboratory to sample effluent during both high-flow and normal-flow days. Vicky L. Murphy, director of municipal utilities, wrote last month that sampling for 33 “volatiles” (including benzene and toluene) and 13 metals detected no traces of volatiles on a normal flow day. Traces of Radium-226 and the metal barium were detected — in concentrations well below permissible state levels. High-flow testing detected three volatiles, three metals and Radium-226 — all below DEC permissible levels, Murphy said. She also noted that the Auburn plant complies with all state and federal regulations.

How can you be so confident it’s safe?

Auburn has been treating the water for 10 years. The wastewater amounts to less than 1 percent of the plant’s total water flow.

Then why did the council members vote for the ban?

Ask them. Some speculation: Democratic Mayor Mike Quill, a voting member, is up for re-election this year, and anti-fracking advocates have raised quite a fuss. Plus, his opponent is for the ban.

Anyway, what harm can a ban do?

Well, there’s the small matter of the $600,000 or so the city earns each year from the drillers — about one-fifth of the sanitation department’s budget. City residents will have to make it up somehow.

Indeed, on Wednesday, Auburn property owners learned they will be getting an increase in sewer rates. City Manager John Rossi said the unspecified increase was included in next year’s budget because of the anticipated shortfall in revenue from natural gas drillers.

@#$%&*! Can we have a do-over, please?

Related topics: editorial

 

Sponsored Links

 

 

Comments Feed

View: Oldest first | Newest first

Taxpayer51 July 25, 2011 at 7:11AM

The Auburn Mayor and City Council caved to the enviro-wacko crowd. Their vote to ban wastewater had nothing to do with the facts or the impact on taxpayers, but instead with their fear of the (largely from Ithaca) protestors and other squeaky wheels. Its unfortunate for taxpayers and people looking for jobs, but not surprising — they are politicians after all.

Inappropriate? Alert us.

Reply Post new

romans 8:37 July 25, 2011 at 7:53AM

Exactly tax…they are politicians first and they will do ANYTHING to get reelected, it matters not if they are small hamlet politicians or Albany or DC they are all first and formost concerned ONLY with getting their sorry butts to stay in office and it doesnt matter what party they are from, vote them all out. As Will Buckley once said ( I’ll paraphrase) he’d rather be governed by the first 200 names in the phonebook than by the current thieving thugs. Politicians are overpaid ( mostly millioniare lawyers) maggots living off the common man.

Inappropriate? Alert us.

Reply Post new

4ENTERTAINMENTPURPOSESONLY July 25, 2011 at 8:13AM

and what Congel has done or has not done at the Carousel Center Mall expansion, AKA Destiny USA phase one, Brownfield Cleanup program participant, the The Post-Standard Editorial Board is OK with that?

I only ask because it seems that the The Post-Standard Editorial Board is more interested in the money side of stories than the public health issues side of the stories…

Here is a little hint for the The Post-Standard Editorial Board ‘it ain’t always about the money’…..

Inappropriate? Alert us.

Reply Post new

keepwaterclean July 25, 2011 at 8:27AM

The plant would still be dumping, not treating, the salt ultimately into the Seneca River. The plant, designed for treating biological waste, was essentially relying on dilution since running the water through the plant did little or nothing to the waste water. The Seneca is used by farmers for irrigation and by many others for various purposes. It also flows very near some important wells which provide drinking water to considerable numbers of people.

Inappropriate? Alert us.

Reply Post new

lattimoron July 25, 2011 at 6:14PM

I would have thought the editorial board of the post standard would have done a little more research into the issue. For example the total revenue this year from the waste water was $150k – much small than 600K. But hey why left the facts stand in the way of a good story?

Inappropriate? Alert us.

Reply Post new

artistandy7 July 25, 2011 at 6:44PM

@#$%&*! check your facts please. the gas companies left because they were out of compliance- before the city council had the chance to prohibit them, they were already gone because they broke regulations- the money was already gone- if auburn counted on that money being in the budget they would be screwed because they cannot count on the gas companies to be in compliance with regulations- how many ways do i have to say this? did an actual “reporter” write this editorial piece? because it failed the research test. there is VIDEOTAPE of vicki murphy explaining this to the city council in auburn. go check it out before you write again on this subject, please.

Inappropriate? Alert us.

Reply Post new

Harry_Brate_67 July 26, 2011 at 8:10AM

The misguided Auburn City council acted with total disregard to the consequences in their vote on an issue they did not understand and without regard to the recommendations of the city engineer. Instead they responded to the outside non taxpaying mob that invaded the city council meeting. Their lack of knowledge about what they voted on is deplorable. They have not acted in the best interest of Auburn’s taxpayers and they should be ashamed of their cavalier attitude to the taxpayers. Their actions will be remembered both for the added burden they have placed on the taxpayers and the jobs they have put at risk. Just my opinion.

Inappropriate? Alert us.

Reply Post new

nyswaterranger July 26, 2011 at 12:05PM

The three members of council cast their votes after recognizing that the city’s wastewater treatment plant was neither designed, maintained nor constructed to accept such water. They recognized that the natural gas drilling companies could not meet the rules and regulations of the plant. In April, the city cited six firms for failing to submit any monitoring reports for some of 2009 and all of 2010. During that time 16 million gallons of flowback fluid was discharged into the plant. Once the city workers started calling their attention to it (spurred on by an article in the NY Times), many stopped delivering–what does that say? The three remaining firms continued to be out of compliance either by continuing their practice of not submitting the required reports or that the wastewater contained pollutant levels that were unacceptable at the plant. All stopped bringing the wastewater before the ban–at Vicky Murphy’s insistence. By that time, the city was making $150,000 over a six-month period. The $600,000 figure is complete conjecture and not rooted in fact. I contend that the three councilors absolutely acted with the interests of their citizens in mind. This money could not be counted upon.
Also, I resent being referred to as a member of an outside non taxpaying mob. I brought my check to pay my city taxes to the comptroller’s office a month ago. In this case, common sense, reason and logic trumped tainted money and corporate greed. It’s about time someone stood up for the people. I commend Mayor Michael Quill and councilors Gilda Brower and Thomas McNabb for making their decisions based on facts and not emotion.

Niagara Falls Reporter: Frack

Niagara Falls Reporter: Frack.

 

NIAGARA FALLS WATER AUTHORITY HIRES PR FIRM TO HELP SELL DUMPING ‘FRACK’

 

Re-cycling Drilling Waste in PA

In response to the barrage of criticism about frack waste disposal and/or treatment, the industry now says it will “recycle”  all water used in hydrofracking.  Recycling is a nice green word and sounds benign.  But the quote below shows otherwise.  It is taken from an interview with David Bohlander. a highly respected accountant and business consultant in Pennsylvania.  His farm has been in his family for 150 years.

The interview was posted on another list on July 19.  After the quoted section I have attached the entire interview.

Jim Weiss

The intention is to refrack over and over the same drilled wells.  They are now claiming there is 60 years of gas here.  Simultaneously, although not on all pads, they use the pads for other things such as equipment storage, frack water storage, and the worst:  frack water recycling which we have three in our neighborhood and 2 are 10 year permits (one is in the review process, 9 days to go).  These are REGIONAL frack water recycling operations bringing in dirty radioactive brine from 15 miles away or more, operating 24/7 with extensive noise, lights and traffic.  

RE: frack water recycling:  They power huge lights that light of the pads for the whole night.  They don’t use street electric but generators which contribute to the noise.  The trucks have large pumps that due to the volume of 5200 gallons per truck are large motors,  the trucks endlessly are using their backup safety beepers, horns for instructions to the ground crew, etc.  The three sites in our neighborhood will generate 800 trucks a day, 1600 with return trip passes.

 

Complete Interview:

 

 

1.       Pollution of your well (two wells?).  How did this show up?

[Bohlander] We have two wells on the farm (190 acres).  We had a detailed baseline water testing done on both before any of the gas activity happened in our area.  We subsequently have had another 6 or so tests done on these wells.  It is crucial to have certified baseline testing done prior to any activity by gas companies or they will claim there is no proof they are the cause and argue it was a pre-existing condition.  We also retained a very competent hydrologist (who has the gas company clients) who was the plaintiffs hydrologist in the Dimock, PA contamination (highlighted in the movie Gasland).  The well for the barn/and original farmhouse was so contaminated with methane they thought it would explode so the well pump was disconnected for six months and water was trucked in by the gas companies for the animals, and spring water for the humans!

2.       The operations end up being more extensive than anticipated.   The “pads” are large, and end up being used for other operations.

[Bohlander] Gas companies are major deceivers.  They do this many ways.  One is using land agents that are not their employees so that they can claim “we never said that ..they did”
Most all the neighbors were told that the gas wells would be drilled, it would take 3 months or so, and  then land would be restored to earlier state.  In reality this is what happens.  They excavate a pad obliterating the natural terrain, hauling in 100’s of trucks of stone, gravel, etc.  Once the pad is completed, they only drill 2-4 actual gas wells of what ultimately are likely going to be 12 or so on that pad.  They may not frack the drilled wells immediately, but wait sometimes a year.  The intention is to refrack over and over the same drilled wells.  They are now claiming there is 60 years of gas here.  Simultaneously, although not on all pads, they use the pads for other things such as equipment storage, frack water storage, and the worst:  frack water recycling which we have three in our neighborhood and 2 are 10 year permits (one is in the review process, 9 days to go).  These are REGIONAL frack water recycling operations bringing in dirty radioactive brine from 15 miles away or more, operating 24/7 with extensive noise, lights and traffic.  DEP is way behind on enforcement.  The neighbors are the enforcers, but it is David vs. Goliath (the gas companies).  After four years now, I have not seen one well pad restored back to the original state.  The stated plan by the gas companies is that there will be one well pad every 50 acres.  If the well pad is 10 acres, 20% of our surface land area will be a perpetual well pad.

3.       Extensive light pollution due to 24/7 operation.

[Bohlander] RE: frack water recycling:  They power huge lights that light of the pads for the whole night.  They don’t use street electric but generators which contribute to the noise.  The trucks have large pumps that due to the volume of 5200 gallons per truck are large motors,  the trucks endlessly are using their backup safety beepers, horns for instructions to the ground crew, etc.  The three sites in our neighborhood will generate 800 trucks a day, 1600 with return trip passes.
The gas drilling when it goes on makes it almost impossible to sleep.  24/7, 7 days a week. 

4.       Extensive trucking.

[Bohlander] The gas companies make new roads over smaller older roads to accommodate their extensive traffic.  The state allows them to exceed the weight limit of the road by paying some fee or posting a bond.  The small country road in front of our farm is now elevated 3 feet in the air from normal ground level.  Certain roads are used as main arterial roads after they have been rebuilt –this happened to ours.  The trucks are hauling huge amounts of gravel, fill, fresh water for fracking and the dirty brine water out, as well as all the equipment for the drilling process.  Each well on the pad uses 5 million gallons of water.  60% flows back and is recycled, but removed from the site.  Our road was destroyed initially and impassible.  The gas companies then closed 10 mile stretches of the road for months at a time as they began rebuilding it.  One landowner could only get to and from his property with a four wheeler.

5.       Feel free to add any other relevant details.

[Bohlander] The gas companies have a very systematic playbook from the years of operating and polluting Colorado, Wyoming, Texas, etc.  They have two sides:  a friendly neighborly “give $35K to the fire company” and then a ruthless no holds barred side.  3 times they threatened that in 24 hours they were going to stop trucking in water for the cows in our barn unless we agreed to things.  These things include non-disclosure agreements, consent not to sue, etc.  Read the book Collateral Damage.  A lot of good environmental activist groups with websites and a lot of info.  Many have been to our house.  We were one of the first contaminated sites in this region from the drilling.  
The public does not have any idea how bad the permanent environmental contamination is going to be.  There has been major barium and radiation poisoning with some already.  One not far from us is a 13 year old girl with barium poisoning.  One of our immediate neighbors’ daughters is having clumps of hair fall out and his dog got sick and parakeet died from drinking his well water.  He abuts one of the frack water recycling sites.
Air pollution is the sleeping giant.   Each well pad on an ongoing basis emits things into the air (like toluene) as the gas goes through a preliminary filtering process at the well pad.  The absolutely worst are the gas compression stations for both noise and air pollution.
As you may know, the gas drilling is exempt from the Clean Water Act  — we actually are more apt to be fined if manure is spread on the road, than these major infractions the gas company are doing.  The environmental enforcement agencies only slap their wrists with fines.  Cost of doing business to gas companies –easier to just pay the fine.