With Unresolved Health Risks and Few Signs of an Economic Boon, Cuomo to Ban Gas Fracking – NYTimes.com

With Unresolved Health Risks and Few Signs of an Economic Boon, Cuomo to Ban Gas Fracking – NYTimes.com.

Cuomo concludes fracking is too risky for New York | Capital New York

Cuomo concludes fracking is too risky for New York | Capital New York.

Cuomo concludes fracking is too risky for New York

TweetShare on FacebookShare on TumblrPrint

ALBANY—A long-awaited study released by the Cuomo administration on Wednesday determined several “red flags” about hydraulic fracturing that could pose “significant public health risks,” officials said at a public meeting of Governor Andrew Cuomo and his cabinet.

The governor’s announcement, articulated by his acting Department of Health commissioner Howard Zucker and Department of Environmental Conservation commissioner Joe Martens, delays any potential gas drilling in New York State for at least several more years as more data becomes available.

“The evidence in the studies we reviewed raised public health concerns,” Zucker said. “There are many red flags because there are questions that remain unanswered from lack of scientific analysis, specifically longitudinal studies of [fracking].”

“The science isn’t here,” Zucker continued. “But the cumulative concerns based on the information I have read … gives me reason to pause.”

MORE ON CAPITAL

ADVERTISEMENT

Winding toward the conclusion of his presentation, Zucker said, “Would I live in a community with [fracking] based on the facts that I have now? Would I let my child play in a school field nearby? After looking at the plethora of reports behind me … my answer is no.”

He yielded to Cuomo, who thanked him for his “powerful” remarks.

The health study, requested two years ago by state environmental officials, provided the basis for an open-ended stall by the governor, who was loath to anger environmentalist opponents or pro-business supporters of fracking before his re-election. For the past six years the state has vexed both constituencies, without provoking an outright revolt by either, by observing a moratorium on fracking without actually banning it.

Zucker said the health review involved 4,500 staff hours reviewing anecdotal reports and a stack of existing studies. He spent 15 minutes offering his analysis of several peer-reviewed reports and making an analogy to earlier scientific thinking on second-hand smoking.

Martens, when he spokes, said that restrictions already on hydrofracking in the New York City watershed as well as local towns that have banned its development mean that “the prospects for [hydrofracking] development in New York State are uncertain at best.”

At numerous points during his first term, and especially during his campaign this year, Cuomo cited the ongoing study as of the health impacts of fracking in lieu of articulating a position on it. In the meantime, a moratorium put in place by then-Governor David Paterson in 2008 remained in place.

(The health study placed the political onus on the Cuomo administration’s health department for its never-ending timeline; respected former health commissioner Nirav Shah, placed in the awkward position of giving a series of non-answers to questions about the department’s progress on its fracking study, left without saying much at all.)

In September 2012, after years of study, Martens and the Department of Environmental Conservation formally asked the state Department of Health to review the human health risks of fracking, leading to further delays.

The state sits on one of the nation’s richest shale deposits, the Marcellus, and is the last state in the nation with a major shale play to authorize fracking.

Proponents say drilling will create tens of thousands of jobs in the most economically depressed parts of the state, where industry and jobs departed generations ago.

Environmental groups have cautioned that drilling for natural gas in New York will pollute water sources, increase reliance on fossil fuels and harm human health.

In June, the state Court of Appeals upheld local bans on fracking, which Cuomo said would limit drilling to areas that support the industry.  More than 120 communities have banned fracking, while about 60 have passed resolutions that will allow the industry to expand.

For years, anti-fracking activists have been Cuomo’s most outspoken opponents, protesting nearly all his public appearances and rallying thousands in Albany for the annual State of the State address.

Cuomo lost a number of upstate communities in his primary to Democratic challenger Zephyr Teachout in September, a showing she attributed in large part to the turnout among anti-fracking activists.

Following Martens and Zucker at the cabinet meeting, Cuomo said, “I get very few people who say to me, I love the idea of fracking.”

Referring to the economically depressed areas of upstate that were candidates for fracking activity, Cuomo said the question now is, “What can we do in these areas to generate jobs, generate wealth … as an alternative to fracking?”

Answering a reporter’s question after the presentation, Cuomo predicted “a ton of lawsuits” in response to the decision.

Watchdog report: Brine use on roads debated

Watchdog report: Brine use on roads debated.

Concerned Health Professionals of NY » Health Professionals, Scientists Release Analysis of 400 Peer-Reviewed Studies on Fracking along with Major Scientific Compendium Update

Concerned Health Professionals of NY » Health Professionals, Scientists Release Analysis of 400 Peer-Reviewed Studies on Fracking along with Major Scientific Compendium Update.

Physicians Scientists & Engineers for Healthy Energy released a working paper analysis,

Database_Analysis_12_10.pdf.

Toward an understanding of the environmental and public health

impacts of shale gas development: an analysis of the peer-reviewed

scientific literature, 2009-2014.  Dec. 10, 2014

 

Physicians Scientists & Engineers for Healthy Energy released a working paper analysis, statistical evaluation of the approximately 400 peer-reviewed studies to date on the impacts of shale gas development. In short, they examined what percentage of papers indicated risks/adverse impacts versus no indication of risk.

 highlights:

  • 96% of all papers on health indicate risks/adverse health outcomes;
  • 95% of all original research studies on air quality indicate elevated concentrations of air pollutants;
  • 72% of original research studies on water quality indicate contamination;
  • and there is a recent explosion in the number of peer-reviewed publications, with approximately 73% of all available peer-reviewed papers published in the past 24 months and a current average of one paper published each day.

Concerned Health Professionals of New York-Risks and Harms of Fracking-Compendium

CHPNY-Fracking-Compendium.pdf.

COMPENDIUM OF SCIENTIFIC, MEDICAL, AND MEDIA FINDINGS

DEMONSTRATING RISKS AND HARMS OF FRACKING

(UNCONVENTIONAL GAS AND OIL EXTRACTION)

2nd edition

December 11, 2014

 

 

Natural gas: The fracking fallacy : Nature News & Comment

Natural gas: The fracking fallacy : Nature News & Comment.

The United States is banking on decades of abundant natural gas to power its economic resurgence. That may be wishful thinking.

New York State Allows Water Grab – DC BureauDC Bureau

New York State Allows Water Grab – DC BureauDC Bureau.

Keeping Dirty Fuels in the Ground | Our Wild America

Keeping Dirty Fuels in the Ground | Our Wild America.

Concerned Health Professionals of NY » Compendium of Scientific, Medical, and Media Findings Demonstrating Risks and Harms Of Fracking (Unconventional Gas And Oil Extraction)

Concerned Health Professionals of NY » Compendium of Scientific, Medical, and Media Findings Demonstrating Risks and Harms Of Fracking (Unconventional Gas And Oil Extraction).