Methane: Good Gas, Bad Gas – Pictures, More From National Geographic Magazine

Methane: Good Gas, Bad Gas – Pictures, More From National Geographic Magazine.

U.S. GAO – Energy-Water Nexus: Coordinated Federal Approach Needed to Better Manage Energy and Water Tradeoffs

U.S. GAO – Energy-Water Nexus: Coordinated Federal Approach Needed to Better Manage Energy and Water Tradeoffs.

Impact_of_Shale_Gas_on_US_Energy_Emissions

http://www.tyndall.manchester.ac.uk/public/Broderick_Anderson_2012_Impact_of_Shale_Gas_on_US_Energy_Emissions.pdf

Climate of Doubt | FRONTLINE | PBS

Climate of Doubt | FRONTLINE | PBS.

Shale Gas – The Bridge to Global Warming?

12_mar_apr.pdf (application/pdf Object).

Shale Gas – The Bridge to Global Warming?

 

The Costs of Fracking: PennEnvironment Documents the Dollars Drained by Dirty Drilling | PennEnvironment Research and Policy Center

The Costs of Fracking: PennEnvironment Documents the Dollars Drained by Dirty Drilling | PennEnvironment Research and Policy Center.

Link to full pdf report: http://pennenvironmentcenter.org/sites/environment/files/reports/The%20Costs%20of%20Fracking%20vPA_0.pdf

Shale Climate Impact debate: Don Siegel vs. Robert Howarth

Shale Climate Impact debate: Don Siegel vs. Robert Howarth

 Finally got ESF to post a debate from last December 2nd between Don Siegel and Robert Howarth, moderated by long-time ‘energy guru’ Charlie Hall. The video’s posted on Prof. Hall’s website:

http://www.esf.edu/EFB/hall/
(Right side, top: “Marcellus Shale Debate: Don Siegel & Robert W. Howarth”)

…An hour & 1/2 long video, worth watching entire.
Charlie is a top-notch moderator, and his students asked superb questions. Though the debaters start out addressing different concerns (Siegel ~ water & Howarth ~ climate impacts), they cover enough of same ground to widen the discussion.

Unlike some newscasts, you can stop & reposition video by time.
At ~ 40:15 minutes, Don says he’s come to like Bob’s paper.
Regarding the climate case for the next 20 years, Don basically admits Bob is likely right.

I think everyone, even the non-scientifically inclined, can learn much by watching this. No one was insulted or degraded, except maybe industry. What do you think, are the content and broader implications clear? Maybe R.Howarth could use some feedback.

Pete King

Climate impact of potential shale gas production in the EU Final Report

120815_final_report_en.pdf (application/pdf Object).

Climate impact of potential shale gas production in the EU
Final Report

The study on climate impacts shows that shale gas produced in the EU causes more GHG emissions than conventional natural gas produced in the EU, but – if well managed – less than imported gas from outside the EU, be it via pipeline or by LNG due to the impacts on emissions from long-distance gas transport.

The Fracking of Rachel Carson, Sandra Steingraber, Orion Magazine

Orion Magazine | Audio Slide Show: The Fracking of Rachel Carson.

Meet Paul Ryan: Climate Denier, Conspiracy Theorist, Koch Acolyte

Meet Paul Ryan: Climate Denier, Conspiracy Theorist, Koch Acolyte.