Polling Shows Americans Support Environmental Enforcement And Clean Energy

Polling Shows Americans Support Environmental Enforcement And Clean Energy.

What’s REV and the CEF and Why Do They Matter? | AGREE

What’s REV and the CEF and Why Do They Matter? | AGREE.

Subsidy Phase-Out and Reform Catalyst Bonds | Center for American Progress

Subsidy Phase-Out and Reform Catalyst Bonds | Center for American Progress.

Germany Taps Universities in Its Push for Green Energy – NYTimes.com

Germany Taps Universities in Its Push for Green Energy – NYTimes.com.

Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States

Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States

Significance

Successful regulation of greenhouse gas emissions requires knowledge of current methane emission sources. Existing state regulations in California and Massachusetts require ∼15% greenhouse gas emissions reductions from current levels by 2020. However, government estimates for total US methane emissions may be biased by 50%, and estimates of individual source sectors are even more uncertain. This study uses atmospheric methane observations to reduce this level of uncertainty. We find greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture and fossil fuel extraction and processing (i.e., oil and/or natural gas) are likely a factor of two or greater than cited in existing studies. Effective national and state greenhouse gas reduction strategies may be difficult to develop without appropriate estimates of methane emissions from these source sectors.

Commentary on the study:

Bridge Out: Bombshell Study Finds Methane Emissions From Natural Gas Production Far Higher Than EPA Estimates | ThinkProgress.

Huffington Post coverage:

NY Times coverage:

Harvard University Press Release:

Link to Study:

Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/11/20/1314392110.abstract

▶ Collapse Cafe – Nicole Foss(Energy) by Doomstead Diner

▶ Collapse Cafe – Nicole Foss(Energy) by Doomstead Diner.

The shale-gas boom won’t do much for climate change. But it will make us richer.

The shale-gas boom won’t do much for climate change. But it will make us richer..

The business of a natural gas pipline in Vermont | Burlington Free Press | burlingtonfreepress.com

The business of a natural gas pipline in Vermont | Burlington Free Press | burlingtonfreepress.com.

Managing The Nation’s Electricity Needs | The Diane Rehm Show from WAMU and NPR

Managing The Nation’s Electricity Needs | The Diane Rehm Show from WAMU and NPR.

Quebec’s Lac-Mégantic oil train disaster not just tragedy, but corporate crime | Environment | guardian.co.uk

Quebec’s Lac-Mégantic oil train disaster not just tragedy, but corporate crime | Environment | guardian.co.uk.

The deeper evidence about this event won’t be found in the train’s black box, or by questioning the one engineer who left the train before it loosened and careened unmanned into the heart of this tiny town. For that you’ll have to look at how Lac-Mégantic was hit by a perfect storm of greed, deregulation and an extreme energy rush driving companies to ever greater gambles with the environment and human life.

The crude carried on the rail-line of US-based company Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railway – “fracked” shale oil from North Dakota – would not have passed through Lac-Mégantic five years ago. That’s because it’s part of a boom in dirty, unconventional energy, as fossil fuel companies seek to supplant the depletion of easy oil and gas with new sources – sources that are harder to find, nastier to extract, and more complicated to ship.

Like the Alberta tar sands, or the shale deposits of the United States, these energy sources are so destructive and carbon-intensive that leading scientists have made a straightforward judgment: to avert runaway climate change, they need to be kept in the ground. It’s a sad irony that Quebec is one of the few places to currently ban the “fracking” used to extract the Dakotan oil that devastated Lac-Mégantic.

But fossil fuel companies, spurred by record profits, have deployed a full-spectrum strategy to exploit and carry this oil to market. That’s one of the reasons for a massive, reckless increase in the amount of oil shipped by rail. In 2009, companies shipped a mere 500 carloads of crude oil by rail in Canada; this year, it will be 140,000.