At Industry’s Urging, Engineer Reverses Position on LPG Cavern Storage « DC BureauDC Bureau

At Industry’s Urging, Engineer Reverses Position on LPG Cavern Storage « DC BureauDC Bureau.

Salt Production in Syracuse, New York (“The Salt City”) and the Hydrogeology of the Onondaga Creek Valley The Salt Industry, Tully Farms, N

pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2000/0139/report.pdf.

Prepared in cooperation with Onondaga Lake Cleanup Corporation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Region 2,

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Salt Production in Syracuse, New York (“The Salt City”)

and the Hydrogeology of the Onondaga Creek Valley

The Salt Industry, Tully Farms, N

Brine from springs in and around the southern end of Onondaga Lake, from former brine wells dug

or drilled at the lakes’ edge, and from wells that tapped halite (common salt) beds near Tully, N.Y., 15

miles south of Syracuse, were used commercially from the late 1700’s through the early 1900’s for salt

production. The rapid development of this industry in tie 18th and 19th centuries led to the nicknaming

of Syracuse as “The Salt City.”

The brine originates from halite bed

Solution Salt Mining in New York, with Emphasis on Operational, Regulatory and Plugging Innovations in the Tully Valley Brine Field Kathleen F. Sanford Division of Mineral Resources New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

www.dec.ny.gov/docs/materials_minerals_pdf/tullyvalley96.pdf.

Solution Salt Mining in New York, 

with Emphasis on Operational, 

Regulatory and Plugging Innovations 

in the Tully Valley Brine Field 

Kathleen F. Sanford 

Division of Mineral Resources 

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 

50 Wolf Road, Room 290 

Albany, New York 12233-6500 

USA

 

Registered Water Withdrawals in New York State

Registered Water Withdrawals in New York State

– JULY 14, 2013POSTED IN: ARTICLESDATA AND ANALYSIS

By Karen Edelstein, NY Program Coordinator, FracTracker Alliance

As of April 1, 2013, new regulations 6 NYCRR Parts 601 and 621 in New York State have been in effect that require users of large quantities of water to apply for withdrawal permits. The largest users of water—those with withdrawals of more than 100 million gallons per day—are the first group required to apply. The permit system then adds users on a yearly basis, targeting systems with decreasingly need. In 2014, the target group is users of 10-100 million gallons/day; in 2015, it is 2-10 million gallons/day, and so on. The full schedule is in Table 1, below. There are no fees associated with this permitting process.

In order to assess the geographic impacts of these varying uses, attorney Rachel Treichler submitted a Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. FracTracker Alliance assisted her in this effort by visualizing the data. Treichler believes that the new regulations make it virtually impossible for DEC to balance competing needs between large and small users.

In this interactive map, larger dots signify larger withdrawal. Click on each dot in the map to get more information.

Yellow: 0.0001-0.5 million gal/day
Light green: 0.5001-2 million gal/day
Dark green: 2.001-10 million gal/day
Medium blue: 10.001-100 million gal/day
Dark blue: >100 million gal/day

Until the adoption of these permitting requirements, water withdrawals in New York were governed by riparian rights determined by case law. Riparian rights are correlative–they fluctuate depending on the needs of other users and the amount of water available. Although the new regulations affirm that riparian rights will not be affected by the granting of permits, there is concern that users granted permits for stated amounts of water usage may be reluctant to adjust to the needs of other users in times of water scarcity. In New York State, both the Susquehanna River Basin Commission (SRBC) and the Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC) have strong regulatory authority over withdrawals, and the new New York regulations provide that withdrawals subject to permitting by these commissions are exempt from the permitting requirements of the regulations. Comparable commissions with authority to regulate water withdrawals do not exist in the Great Lakes watershed, which includes the Finger Lakes Region, or in the other watersheds in the state, and in these watersheds, the permitting requirements of the regulations are the only generally-applicable water permitting requirements.

Currently, New York State has an abundance of water—there is certainly enough to go around to meet domestic and commercial uses. However, with climate change, continued population growth, and the potential for an uptick in hydrofracking throughout the Marcellus and Utica Shale region, the possibility for New York State being asked to sell or export our water increases considerably.

Under the current system, even by 2017, withdrawal permits will not be required for daily use under 100,000 gallons. While cumbersome, it would not be difficult for a typical hydrofracked site to sidestep any withdrawal permitting process if the water were removed over the course of several days by several different private haulers, particularly if the water were hauled any distance. It is conceivable that the gas drilling industry could readily exploit this loophole in the regulations.

Table 1. Dates by which Application for Initial Permit Must Be Completed

June 1, 2013 Systems that withdraw or are designed to withdraw a volume of 100 million gallons per day (mgd) or more
Feb. 15, 2014 Systems that withdraw or are designed to withdraw a volume equal to or greater than 10 mgd but less than 100 mgd
Feb. 15, 2015 Systems that withdraw or are designed to withdraw a volume equal to or greater than 2 mgd but less than 10 mgd
Feb. 15, 2016 Systems that withdraw or are designed to withdraw a volume equal to or greater than 0.5 mgd but less than 2 mgd
Feb. 15, 2017 Systems that withdraw or are designed to withdraw a volume equal to or greater than 0.1 but less than 0.5 mgd

An Industrial Park in my Backyard – Similarities Between Coal Mining and Fracking – YouTube

An Industrial Park in my Backyard – Similarities Between Coal Mining and Fracking – YouTube.

DEC puts limits on pipeline construction » Local News » The Daily Star, Oneonta, NY – otsego county news, delaware county news, oneonta news, oneonta sports

DEC puts limits on pipeline construction » Local News » The Daily Star, Oneonta, NY – otsego county news, delaware county news, oneonta news, oneonta sports.

Hemlock-Canadice UMP – NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation

Hemlock-Canadice UMP – NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation.

New York Compulsory Integration

New York Compulsory Integration.

A Critical Review of the Compulsory Integration Requirement

in New York Environmental Conservation Law

Title 9 of Article 23

William C. Fischer

DEC Minerals Division 2010 Annual Report Part 1

2010 Annual Report Part 1.

DEC seeks input on management of land in Onondaga and Cortland counties | syracuse.com

DEC seeks input on management of land in Onondaga and Cortland counties | syracuse.com.

The following is a DEC press release:
Public comments are being accepted on two draft unit management plans (UMPs), Hill and Hollow and Taylor Valley,

The UMPs cover 17,613 acres on seven state forests, one unique area and one multiple-use area in Cortland and Onondaga counties.

The Hill and Hollow UMP (7,346 acres) consist of Morgan Hill State Forest, Kettlebail State Forest and Labrador Hollow Unique Area.   The Taylor Valley UMP (10,267 acres) includes: Taylor Valley State Forest, Hoxie Gorge State Forest, Baker School House State Forest, Donahue Woods State Forest, Gee Brook State Forest and Papish Pond Multiple-Use Area.

The Draft UMPs have been developed to address management activities on these state forests. It is DEC’s policy to manage State lands for multiple benefits to serve the people of New York State. The proposed UMPs will help maintain healthy, sustainable and biologically diverse ecosystems for fish and wildlife while providing continued opportunities for forest product sales, recreational use, environmental education and research.

The State lands covered by the proposed plans currently offer many recreational opportunities including: hiking, hang gliding, camping, picnicking, nature observation, boating, fishing, hunting, trapping, snowmobiling, snowshoeing, cross-country skiing, and all terrain vehicle (ATV) access for people with mobility impairments. New or major changes to existing recreational facilities proposed in the plans include:

Hill and Hollow UMP
• The construction of 10 to 15 miles of new single track mountain bike trails on Morgan Hill State Forest.

• The designation of the North Country National Scenic Trail on the unit as foot travel only (hiking, snowshoeing and skiing).

• The construction of a 1.7 mile ATV trail expansion for people with qualified accessibility needs on Morgan Hill State Forest.

• The construction of Tinker Falls sustainable trail project.

• The development of three universally designed campsites for people with accessibility needs.

• The designation of six to eight additional campsites on Morgan Hill State Forest.

• The installation of informational kiosks.

Taylor Valley UMP

• The construction of 5.3 miles of new hiking trail on Hoxie Gorge State Forest.

• The designation of the Finger Lakes Trail/North Country National Scenic Trail on the unit as foot travel only (hiking, snowshoeing and skiing).

• The construction of three parking areas with one each on: Taylor Valley State Forest; Hoxie Gorge State Forest; and Papish Pond Multiple-Use Area.

• The construction of a 0.5 mile ATV trail loop expansion for people with qualified accessibility needs on Hoxie Gorge State Forest.

• The construction of a lean-to on Taylor Valley State Forest.

• The designation six drive-up campsites, two of which will be upgraded to provide camping opportunities for people with disabilities on Taylor Valley State Forest and one drive-up site on Baker School House State Forest.

• The designation of four walk-in campsites, one at Papish Pond Multiple-Use Area and three on Gee Brook State Forest.

• The installation of informational kiosks.

The UMPs also contain proposed maintenance projects for roads and boundary lines. A detailed schedule of other activities such as natural resource inventories, mowing, forest product sales, and survey requests are included in the UMPs.

Those unable to attend the meeting may submit comments by mail to: DEC, Division of Lands and Forests, 1285 Fisher Avenue, Cortland, NY 13045 or by email to hcdedric@gw.dec.state.ny.us for the Taylor Valley UMP and tomlzubal@gw.dec.state.ny.us for the Hill and Hollow UMP.

Copies of the plans are posted on the DEC’s website .. The plans are also available, for public review, at the following locations:

• DEC Region 7 Headquarters, 615 Erie Blvd. West, Syracuse

• DEC Region 7 Sub-office, 1285 Fisher Ave., Cortland

• Peck Memorial Library, East Main St., Marathon

• Cortland Free Library, 32 Church St., Cortland

• Lamont Memorial Library, 5 East Main St., McGraw

• Kellogg Free Library, 5681 Telephone Rd., Cincinnatus

• DeRuyter Free Library, 735 Utica St., DeRuyter

• Tully Free Library, 12 State St., Tully

Copies are available in digital format on compact discs from the Cortland office and may be requested by calling (607)753-3095 ext. 217.

Comments on the plans will be accepted until April 11, 2013.

If Hartnett Elementary School is closed for adverse weather conditions the meeting will take place on Monday, April 8, 2013, from 6:30 to 9:00 p.m. at the Hartnett Gymnasium.

If the weather appears inclement, please check local TV and radio stations or the Homer Central School District’s website at www.homercentral.org.

Nature Conservancy Report on Pipelines in PA forest lands:

http://www.nature.org/ourinitiatives/regions/northamerica/unitedstates/pennsylvania/ng-pipelines.pdf

“Given that Bradford County is less forested than Pennsylvania’s Marcellus region as a whole, we anticipate that the statewide percentage of pipelines built in forest
areas will be higher. A conservative estimate would be that 50 percent of all future pipelines will be built in forest areas, or approximately 5,000 miles in the low Marcellus development scenario, 8,250 miles in the medium scenario, and 12,500
miles in the high scenario. Each mile of a 100‐foot right‐of‐way directly disturbs 528,000 square feet or approximately 12 acres and creates an additional 72 acres of new forest edges.

Therefore, we project that statewide forest area cleared from future
pipeline development could be approximately 60,000 acres in the low scenario, 100,000 acres in the medium scenario, and 150,000
acres in the high scenario over the next two decades. In addition to
these direct impacts, new gathering pipelines will create between 360,000 and 900,000 acres of new forest edges that deprive interior forest
species, such as black‐throated blue warblers, salamanders, and many
woodland flowers, of the shade, humidity, and tree canopy protection that only deep forest environments can provide. We were unable to find any comprehensive plans for new transport lines in Pennsylvania. In general, however, we believe that the length of new gathering lines will dwarf mileage of new transport lines, perhaps by an order of magnitude.”

-Kevin Heatley, Hammondsport 9-15-11

3-Kevin Heatley is a senior scientist at Biohabitats, Inc. and tech consultant for Responsible Drilling Alliance in Wiliamspot, Pa. DA is a grassroots, all-volunteer education and advocacy coalition that seeks to educate its members and the public about deep shale gas drilling and all of its ramifications. Kevin Heatley works as a habitat restorer. His presentation draws on the experience in Louisiana where environmental impacts by the gas and oil industry have been severe, and the cost of remediation externalized. A very animated and passionate speaker, Kevin Heatley discussion of our situation in the Northeast builds upon Bill Belitskus’s discussion of the impacts on the Allegheny National Forest and contiguous Allegheny State Forest in New York. He was the third speaker at the public forum “Fracking the Fingerlakes: The Rest of the Story” held in Hammondsport, NY on September 15, 2011.

N