EARTHWORKS | Public health and gas development

EARTHWORKS | Public health and gas development.

Public health and gas development

Health-Report-Full-FINAL-cover-250x324

Where oil and gas development goes, health problems often follow.

Yet industry representatives and policymakers seeking to expand drilling often dismiss claims of health impacts as “personal anecdotes” and isolated incidents.

The primary reasons that public health risks posed by increasing gas development can be disputed:

  • A lack of established science. Widespread scientific investigation has only recently begun to investigate the relationship between gas development and public health impacts.
  • State governments, which are largely responsible for protecting the public from irresponsible oil and gas development, have until recently refused to consider the issue.
  • Even as they have become widespread, individual reports of health problems in the gas patch have been continually dismissed as anecdotal by industry and government.

To investigate the connection, between August 2011 and July 2012 Earthworks’ Oil & Gas Accountability Project (OGAP) researched the extent, types, and possible causes of health symptoms experienced by people living in the gas patches of Pennsylvania.

The main conclusions of the project — Gas Patch Roulette: How Shale Gas Development Risks Public Health in Pennsylvania:

  1. Contaminants associated with oil and gas development are present in air and water in many communities where development is occurring.
  2. Many residents have developed health symptoms that they did not have before—indicating the strong possibility that they are occurring because of gas development.
  3. By permitting widespread gas development without fully understanding its impacts to public health—and using that lack of knowledge to justify regulatory inaction—Pennsylvania and other states are risking the public’s health.

Gas Patch Roulette documents:


For more information:

The health survey form through which residents reported health symptoms.

Additional information and data tables to support some of the analysis and charts found in the report.

Tagged with: toxics, regulation, public health, pennsylvania, marcellus shale, health and toxics, gas patch roulette

Gas Patch Roulette: Differences in symptoms based on respondents with air and water tests

 

Publication »

 

Gas Patch Roulette: Summary Report

How Shale Gas Development Risks Public Health in Pennsy

Website compiles research on Marcellus Shale boom impact – Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Website compiles research on Marcellus Shale boom impact – Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.

http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/org/marcellus-biblio/

Study Examines Ownership, Control of Land with Marcellus Shale Gas – damascus citizens for sustainability

Study Examines Ownership, Control of Land with Marcellus Shale Gas – damascus citizens for sustainability.

The_Costs_of_Fracking_vNC.pdf (application/pdf Object)

The_Costs_of_Fracking_vNC.pdf (application/pdf Object).

“Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States” – Report Overview (Part 1 of a series) | Climate Science Watch

“Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States” – Report Overview (Part 1 of a series) | Climate Science Watch.

Contaminated Inquiry: How a University of Texas Fracking Study Led by a Gas Industry Insider Spun the Facts and Misled the Public July

ContaminatedInquiry.pdf

 

Contaminated  Inquiry How a University of Texas Fracking Study Led by a Gas Industry Insider Spun the Facts and Misled the Public July, 2012 IPublic Accountability Initiative

IEA – Golden Rules for a Golden Age of Gas (Released 29 May 2012)

IEA – Goldenrules.

Golden Rules for a Golden Age of Gas (Released 29 May 2012)

Pipeline Safety Trust–Integrity Management

Briefing_Paper10IM.pdf (application/pdf Object).

Pipeline Safety Trust–Integrity Management

Pipeline Safety Trust-Pipeline Safety New Voices Project

BriefingPaper11.pdf (application/pdf Object).

Cost/Benefit Analysis of Pipeline Safety

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DURING MARCELLUS SHALE GAS DRILLING: CAUSES, IMPACTS, AND REMEDIES REPORT 2012 – 1

UBSRSI-Environmental Impact.pdf (application/pdf Object).

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
DURING MARCELLUS SHALE GAS DRILLING:
CAUSES, IMPACTS, AND REMEDIES
REPORT 2012 – 1
TIMOTHY CONSIDINE
CENTER FOR ENERGY ECONOMICS AND PUBLIC POLICY
SCHOOL OF ENERGY RESOURCES | THE UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING
ROBERT WATSON
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
NICHOLAS CONSIDINE
CENTER FOR ENERGY ECONOMICS AND PUBLIC POLICY
JOHN MARTIN
SHALE RESOURCES AND SOCIETY INSTITUTE
STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO
* The authors gratefully acknowledge comments from Scott Anderson of the Environmental Defense Fund, Andrew Hunter of Cornell
University, Robert Jacobi of the State University of New York at Buffalo, Brigham McCown of United Transportation Advisors, LLC,
and George Rusk of Ecology and Environment, Inc. with the usual disclaimer that the authors accept full responsibility for any remaining errors and omissions. The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the University at Buffalo. University at Buffalo does not make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe upon privately owned rights. Trademarks and copyrights mentioned with this report are the ownership of their respective companies.

Critiques and News Coverage:

Some sources are reporting that the site is locked; this URL works just fine.
http://www.srsi.buffalo.edu/