Pickens Thinks New Yorkers Don’t Understand Fracking | Food & Water Watch

Pickens Thinks New Yorkers Don’t Understand Fracking | Food & Water Watch.  Video of National Press Club interview with Ted Turner and T.Boone Pickens

April 21st, 2011

Pickens Thinks New Yorkers Don’t Understand Fracking

By Rich Bindell and Emily Wurth

Yesterday, the nation saw another example of the cost of doing business with the natural gas industry when a natural gas well operated by Chesapeake Energy blew out in Canton, Pennsylvania.

According to T. Boone Pickens this week, New Yorkers need an enlightened, “intelligent” leader on energy … like T. Boone Pickens.

On the subject of fracking (about 39 minutes into the video), Pickens said…

“Western New York is concerned about it. They now have said, ‘You’re gonna frack these wells in the watershed? What? The Watershed! They don’t even know what the watershed is. That’s where it rains. It rains in the watershed and then runs into a lake. And you’re not gonna frack a lake or the watershed or whatever. You’re fracking down 10,000 feet, two miles under the surface. But my God you say that to people, in New York, they don’t know what’s gonna happen to their water. Well what they need is somebody intelligent, a leader to say this is what the deal is. Don’t worry. Just watch what I’m telling you, listen to what I’m saying and check the facts. That’s all you have to do. It’s not complicated It’s very simple.”

This “reassurance” from a representative of the natural gas industry came courtesy of Pickens while he and Ted Turner were guest speakers earlier this week at the National Press Club event promoting his Pickens Plan to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil and invest in alternative fuels and natural gas in particular. It sounds like Pickens wants residents of New York State and even President Obama to trust him and the rest of the natural gas industry and not concern themselves with any of the details of fracking.

Before implying New Yorkers were incapable of grasping what a watershed was, he glossed over the fact that vertical fracking is currently taking place in Western New York using dangerous chemicals and the state’s water supply to extract methane from shale and the industry is poised to expand drilling in New York when the current state moratorium on horizontal fracking expires. The toxic chemicals used in fracking are exempt from the Safe Drinking Water Act thanks to the artful politicking of Dick Cheney and the “Cheney Loophole.” Shale gas drilling has rapidly expanded across the state of Pennsylvania in recent years.

38:30 into the video…

“If you notice, all the complaints are coming from Pennsylvania. And that’s in the Marcellus. How long have you been developing the Marcellus? About three years. You’ve been…I drilled over 800,000 wells in Oklahoma, Kansas, Texas and fracked those wells. And I do not know of any lawsuit or any complaint or anything else about that.”

But there is a distinction in the type of natural gas drilling that’s going on in the Marcellus Shale. The hydraulic fracturing that’s used to extract methane in shale formations is a much more water intensive and dangerous process than in many of the conventional natural gas sources out west. Shale rock formations are much more dense so it takes much more water and pressure. Regardless of how many wells Pickens claims that he fracked safely, clearly there are problems right now in Pennsylvania and New York and that’s where much of the natural gas industry has turned to lately.

As Bryan Walsh at TIME wrote this morning in response to the unfolding disaster in Branford County, Pennsylvania, “You don’t have to fear the contamination of underground aquifers to worry about the impacts of shale gas drilling.” Accidents at the surface can release toxic fracking fluid into local streams and onto agricultural fields. Since the fracking wastewater cannot be treated by standard treatment plants, it could potentially make its ways into drinking water supplies.

The Pickens Plan is really a plan to frack America. The Food & Water Watch plan is to fight for a ban on fracking.

Meanwhile, we’re following these blogs for their good earlier coverage of the Pennsylvania disaster:

TASK FORCE ON ENSURING STABLE NATURAL GAS MARKETS

63704_BPC_web.pdf (application/pdf Object).

Bipartisan Policy Center and the American Clean Skies Foundation

TASK FORCE ON ENSURING STABLE NATURAl GAS MARKETS

Natural Gas as a Transportation Fuel Mar. 16, 2011 D.C.

Natural Gas as a Transportation Fuel: Prospects and Challenges

Here are the panelists

  • Danilo Santini, Technology Analysis Section Leader, Center for Transportation Research, Argonne National Laboratory
  • Mark Smith, Vehicle Technology Manager, Clean Cities Program, U.S. Department of Energy
  • Dana Aunkst, Chief, Division of Planning and Permits, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
  • Lynn Pittinger, Petroleum Engineer, Pittinger Consulting
  • Steven Hamburg, Chief Scientist, Environmental Defense Fund
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
3:00 – 4:30 p.m.
2318 Rayburn House Office Building
The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) invites you to a briefing on the prospects for increased use of natural gas as a transportation fuel. Natural gas has a current price advantage over diesel fuel and gasoline (per gallon equivalent), emits fewer greenhouse gases when burned (per unit energy), and comes from mostly domestic sources at present. However, increasing and sustaining U.S. gas production will rely heavily on unconventional sources (shale gas, coal-bed methane, and tight gas), which face potentially rising costs, require continuous and intensive drilling, and present significant water supply, water quality, wastewater, air quality, land use, and seismic risk issues. The deployment of new vehicle technology and fueling facilities would also face cost and environmental challenges of using a gaseous fuel, including climate change implications of leaking methane, a powerful greenhouse gas. Furthermore, other energy and non-energy uses of natural gas compete for this high value resource. This briefing will examine the economic, energy security, and environmental implications of a large-scale shift to natural gas trucks, buses, and cars, and related fueling infrastructure. Speakers for this event include:
  • Danilo Santini, Technology Analysis Section Leader, Center for Transportation Research, Argonne National Laboratory
  • Mark Smith, Vehicle Technology Manager, Clean Cities Program, U.S. Department of Energy
  • Dana Aunkst, Chief, Division of Planning and Permits, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
  • Lynn Pittinger, Petroleum Engineer, Pittinger Consulting
  • Steven Hamburg, Chief Scientist, Environmental Defense Fund
Numerous policies and programs have been proposed at the federal, state, and local levels to encourage development of natural gas resources and promote natural gas vehicles (including, in the 111th Congress, the Natural Gas Act, S.1408, H.R.1835, Promoting Natural Gas and Electric Vehicles Act, S.3815, and Fueling America Act, S.1350). These measures employ a combination of tax credits, financing support, research and development assistance, and other incentives. In California, a low-carbon fuel standard that is currently being implemented may also encourage more natural gas vehicles. At the same time, many states are developing regulations to address the impacts of new natural gas operations.
This briefing is free and open to the public. No RSVP required.
For more information, contact Jan Mueller at jmueller [at] eesi.org or (202) 628-1400.

The Oil Drum | Don’t count on natural gas to solve US energy problems

The Oil Drum | Don’t count on natural gas to solve US energy problems.

Don’t count on natural gas to solve US energy problems

Posted by Gail the Actuary on February 18, 2011 – 11:26am
Topic: Alternative energy
Tags: canadian natural gas, natural gas, shale gas [list all tags]

We often hear statements suggesting that by ramping up shale gas production, the US can raise total natural gas production and solve many of its energy problems, including adding quite a number of natural gas vehicles, and replacing a large share of coal fired electricity generation. While there is the possibility that shale gas will allow US natural gas supplies to increase for a few years (or even 10 or 15 years), natural gas is only about one-fourth of US fossil fuel use, so it would be very difficult to ramp it up enough to meet all of these needs.

One issue is whether a rise in shale gas will mostly offset other reductions in natural gas supply. In Annual Energy Outlook 2011, EIA forecasts that shale gas production will increase from 23% of US natural gas production in 2010 to 46% of US natural gas production by 2035, but that these increases will mostly offset decreases elsewhere. Even with this huge increase in shale gas production, the EIA only sees US natural gas production increasing by an average of 0.8% per year between 2011 and 2035, and US natural gas consumption increasing by an average of 0.6% per year per year to 2035–not enough to make a very big dent in our overall energy needs.

GHG Howarth update on footprint of gas vs coal — Jan 2011

GHG update for web — Jan 2011 (2).pdf (application/pdf Object).

Assessment of the Greenhouse Gas Footprint of Natural Gas from Shale Formations
Obtained by High-Volume, Slick-Water Hydraulic Fracturing

Robert W. Howarth
David R. Atkinson Professor of Ecology & Environmental Biology, Cornell University
(Revised January 26, 2011)
Natural gas is widely advertised and promoted as a clean burning fuel that produces less greenhouse gas
emissions than coal when burned. While it is true that less carbon dioxide is emitted from burning natural
gas than from burning coal per unit of energy generated, the combustion emissions are only part of story
and the comparison is quite misleading. With funding from the Park Foundation, my colleagues Renee
Santoro, Tony Ingraffea, and I have
assessed the likely footprint from
natural gas in comparison to coal.
We submitted a draft of our work
to a peer-reviewed journal in
November, and now have a revised
manuscript under consideration by
the journal. The revision is
improved with input from
reviewers and also uses new
information from a November 2010
report from the EPA. The EPA
report is the first significant update
by the agency on natural gas
emission factors since 1996, and
concludes that emissions –
particularly for shale gas – are
larger than previously believed.
Our research further supports this
conclusion.

Neighbor reported gas odor before Horseheads home explosion | pressconnects.com | Press & Sun-Bulletin

Neighbor reported gas odor before Horseheads home explosion | Jan 26, 2011  Press & Sun-Bulletin.