Exxon to Teach Russians to Frack in Exchange for Arctic Oil

Exxon to Teach Russians to Frack in Exchange for Arctic Oil.

Cooperstown Brewer Fights N.Y. Fracking Sought by EOG Resources uom

Cooperstown Brewer Fights N.Y. Fracking Sought by EOG Resources
2011-08-22 04:00:02.1 GMT

By Jim Efstathiou Jr.
Aug. 22 (Bloomberg) — Brewery Ommegang says Belgian ale
and natural gas don¹t mix.
That statement of the obvious matters, the maker of
Aphrodite Ale and Hennepin Farmhouse Saison says, because the
water it draws from aquifers beneath Cooperstown, New York, is
at risk of pollution from hydraulic fracturing.
³Even our strongest beer is 90 percent water, and all of
our water comes off the property,² Larry Bennett, a spokesman
for the brewery about 170 miles (274 kilometers) northwest of
Times Square, said in an interview. ³If you contaminate an
aquifer, it¹s done. There¹s nothing you can do about it.²
Ommegang, an Otsego County tourist attraction along with
the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, has joined a
growing grass-roots campaign in New York state to ban the
technology that has transformed U.S. gas production, Bloomberg
Government reported. The brewery, a unit of Belgium-based Duvel
Moortgat NV, says it would face a ³material threat² from a
leak of fluid used in hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, to free
natural gas from shale.
The state is poised to issue final drilling rules and
permits to tap into the Marcellus Shale formation sometime next
year, after a three-year review. In anticipation, drilling bans
have been put in place in 13 towns and are being debated in 19
more, according to Karen Edelstein, a geographic information-
systems consultant in Ithaca. Ommegang has chipped in $40,000 to
support the towns in Otsego County.

Cuomo¹s Role

³Governor Andrew Cuomo is pressuring regulators to finish
their review and to start issuing permits,² Helen Slottje, an
attorney with the Community Environmental Defense Council, Inc.
in Ithaca who has helped towns opposed to drilling, said in an
interview. Towns are ³increasingly aware of the great burden
gas drilling imposes on communities and are unwilling to bear
those costs,² she said.
Cuomo, a Democrat, said during his campaign last year that
fracking would create jobs, ³but only if it is safe.² Since
taking office in January, he has pushed regulators to complete
their environmental review.
Companies such as EOG Resources Inc., a Houston-based gas
and oil explorer, have leased property in towns that banned
drilling or are working to block it, according to documents on
file with the Otsego County clerk. EOG doesn¹t provide a
breakdown of its lease holdings by state or by county, company
spokeswoman K Leonard said in an e-mail.
Millions of gallons of chemically treated water are forced
underground in fracking to break up rock and let gas flow.
Technological advances led the Energy Department to more than
double its estimate of U.S. shale-gas reserves to 827 trillion
cubic feet and to project that the nation now has enough natural
gas to heat homes and run power stations for 110 years.

Schneiderman Subpoenas

Last week, Range Resources Corp., Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. and
Goodrich Petroleum Corp. were subpoenaed by New York Attorney
General Eric Schneiderman over whether they accurately
represented the profitability of their natural-gas wells,
according to a person familiar with the matter. The subpoenas,
sent Aug. 8, requested documents on formulas used to project how
long the wells can produce gas without new fracking.
In Pennsylvania¹s portion of the Marcellus Shale, which
stretches from Tennessee to New York, drilling has created
overnight millionaires from lease payments and gas royalties
paid by companies such as Chesapeake Energy Corp. and Talisman
Energy Inc.
³I have landowners already under lease,² Scott Kurkoski,
a Binghamton, New York-based lawyer who represents property
owners across the state who favor drilling, said in an
interview. ³They have a contract with a company prepared to
market their minerals, and now towns are taking it away.²

ŒPlenty of Places¹

No local initiatives to ban fracking have been offered in
Tioga, Broome and Chemung counties, which border Pennsylvania
and are potentially gas-rich areas, according to Kurkoski.
³My instinct is that there¹s still plenty of places that
are receptive to drilling and that they¹ll go to those places
first,² Joe Martens, commissioner of New York¹s state
Department of Environmental Conservation, which is drafting
drilling rules, said in an interview. ³That¹s kind of the
responsible approach.²
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is studying the
effects of fracking on drinking water. A committee advising U.S.
Energy Secretary Steven Chu said Aug. 11 that gas companies risk
causing serious environmental damage unless they commit to best
practices in engineering.

Produced Safely

Industry groups such as the Hamburg-based Independent Oil &
Gas Association of New York, say shale gas can be produced
safely while generating jobs and tax revenue.
Environmental groups are succeeding in some towns by
raising fears over the technology, according to Richard Downey
of Otego, 76, a retired official with New York City¹s schools.
Downey leads an Otsego County landowner¹s group that supports
fracking in the towns of Unadilla, Butternuts and Otego.
³They have the environmental religion,² Downey said in an
interview. ³They are protecting Gaea — Mother Earth — and
we¹re just protecting property rights, and some money to a
certain extent, and you don¹t get the same passion for that.²
The Marcellus Shale may contain 490 trillion cubic feet of
gas, making it the world¹s second-largest gas field after the
South Pars formation in Iran and Qatar, according to Terry
Engelder, a professor of geosciences at Pennsylvania State
University in State College. New York banned fracking until it
completes its environmental rules sometime next year, according
to Emily DeSantis, a spokeswoman with the Department of
Environmental Conservation.

Court Challenge

Landowners that have leased property for drilling will
challenge local drilling bans in court on grounds that only the
state can regulate oil and gas production, Kurkoski said.
Slottje said the bans will hold up because zoning rules
aren¹t considered regulation under New York law.
Both sides expect the issue to be decided in the New York
Court of Appeals, the state¹s highest court. Legal maneuvers may
delay drilling in parts of the state for at least a year, said
Eduardo Penalver, who teaches land-use law at Cornell Law School
in Ithaca.
³If a town draws up a generally worded zoning law that
restricts or prohibits categories of activities, and that
encompasses hydrofracking, there¹s a strong argument that that
is not prohibited under state law,² Penalver said in an
interview. ³The power of municipalities to control what you can
do on your land is now pretty deeply entrenched.²
In December, Montreal-based Gastem Inc. used low-volume
fracking, which is permitted in New York, to test a well in
Otsego County where the company has 22,000 acres under lease.
The results ³quite satisfied² the company, spokesman David
Vincent said.
³There¹s always opposition,² Vincent, who predicted the
local drilling bans won¹t succeed, said in an interview. ³If we
do it right, people will accept that.²

ŒThree Philosophers¹

That hasn¹t won over Ommegang, which says it uses about 1
million gallons of water a year to make ales such as ³Three
Philosophers Quadrupel,² described on its website as a blend of
cherries, roasted malts, and dark chocolate that will ³only
achieve more wisdom and coherence as it broods in the dark
recesses of your cellar.²
Ommegang employs 82 people and receives about 40,000
visitors a year for beer tastings and tours, Bennett said. He
said it is named for a festival held in Brussels in 1549 to
commemorate a visit by Charles the Fifth, the Holy Roman
Emperor, and his son Philip II.
The brewery adds prestige to the fight against fracking,
Slottje said.
³Ommegang is one of the largest employers in the area,²
Slottje said. ³They¹re a tourist draw. They sort of exemplify
everything that the Cooperstown area is trying to do.²

For Related News and Information:
Map of U.S. shale basins: BMAP 82555
News on U.S. utilities: TNI UTI US
Natural-gas trading hub prices: NGHB
News about fracturing: STNI FRACKING

–Editors: Larry Liebert, Joe Winski

To contact the reporter on this story:
Jim Efstathiou Jr. in New York at +1-212-617-1647 or
jefstathiou@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Larry Liebert at +1-202-624-1936 or
lliebert@bloomberg.net

—— End of Forwarded Message

Choosing economic development sides between dairy and hydrofracking drilling in New York’s Southern Tier

Choosing economic development sides between dairy and hydrofracking drilling in New York’s Southern Tier.

OpEdNews – Article: Rat Poop in the Pancakes

OpEdNews – Article: Rat Poop in the Pancakes.

DOE panel finds natural gas production presents serious risks to public health and the environment | Amy Mall’s Blog | Switchboard, from NRDC

DOE panel finds natural gas production presents serious risks to public health and the environment | Amy Mall’s Blog | Switchboard, from NRDC.

Corps worries that fracking gas wells might hurt dams

Corps worries that fracking gas wells might hurt dams

By RANDY LEE LOFTIS
Environmental Writer
Published 31 July 2011 10:50 PM
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers<http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/Army_Corps_of_Engineers> is concerned that hydraulic fracturing of natural-gas wells near its dams – such as the one at Joe Pool Lake in southwestern Dallas County – could threaten dam safety.
In most of Texas and several other states, the corps has declared a 3,000-foot buffer around its dams and water-control structures within which it will not allow new wells, drilling pads or pipelines.
The corps also has a national team studying potential risks to dam safety from minerals extraction.
“We want to feel confident that our projects are safe,” said Anita Branch, regional technical specialist in geotechnical engineering for the corps’ Fort Worth<http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/Fort_Worth%2C_Texas> office. “That’s always our No. 1 priority.”
Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, in which drillers inject millions of gallons of water at extreme pressures to fracture rock and release gas, tops the corps’ list of worries.
The corps wants to know whether increased geological pressures from fracking could cause differential movement, or shifts along natural faults, weakening dam foundations.
“That could precipitate a fairly quick failure if it was not detected in time,” Branch said.
Two less worrisome possibilities are also under review. One is whether extracting large volumes of gas beneath or near a dam might make rock and soil subside.
Another is whether huge amounts of liquid waste from drilling, pumped into disposal wells, can trigger earthquakes.
Questions about dam safety could add another potential complication to shale gas, which has become a major source of natural gas nationwide.
The combination of fracturing and horizontal drilling – running pipe a mile or more from the wellhead to reach the gas – has made possible tens of thousands of new wells, including in North Texas’ Barnett Shale<http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/Barnett_Shale> region.
At least in the case of dam safety, the corps’ questions suggest there might be little or no research supporting blanket assurances that the practice poses no public risk.
It also shows that the government has been slow to study the potential threat.
New wells have been drilled or permitted within the 3,000-foot zone around Joe Pool Lake’s dam, for example, but only recently has the corps responded to complaints that wells might harm dams.
Federal jurisdiction is limited by the corps’ incomplete ownership of surface title and mineral rights beneath its own reservoirs – decisions made decades ago to save money.
For that reason and others, including the nearly complete lack of scientific research to prove or disprove a risk, any national policy on wells near dams seems far off.
Caution advised
The Texas Railroad Commission<http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/Texas_Railroad_Commission>, the state’s oil and gas regulator, said the corps had not contacted it about dam safety concerns or told it about a 3,000-foot buffer around corps dams.
Spokeswoman Ramona Nye said in an email the agency was not aware of cases in which oil or gas wells harmed dams.
Texas has no general rule keeping wells a certain distance from dams but would consider a scientifically and factually valid request to do so from the corps, Nye said.
In 2009, the Railroad Commission set a no-drilling buffer zone around an underground gas-storage depot in Jack County, she said.
The American Petroleum Institute<http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/American_Petroleum_Institute>, the largest U.S. oil and gas trade group and a strong supporter of fracking in natural-gas production, did not respond to a request for comment on the corps’ inquiries.
The organization says on its website that “a comprehensive set of federal, state<http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/Arkansas_State_University>, and local laws addresses every aspect of exploration and production operations. These include well design, location, spacing, operation, water and waste management and disposal, air emissions, wildlife protection, surface impacts and health and safety.”
A check of institute publications on fracking did not turn up discussions of dam safety.
Two dam safety experts said they believe the corps is asking valid questions.
Bruce Tschantz, professor emeritus of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Tennessee<http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/The_University_of_Tennessee>, said the lack of scientific research or published studies on fracking’s potential effects on dams justified special care.
Tschantz is also a former White House<http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/White_House> adviser and the first chief of dam safety at the Federal Emergency Management Agency<http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/Federal_Emergency_Management_Agency>.
“Until the science involving any short- and long-term relationship between hydraulic fracturing and foundation destabilization, dam safety and reservoir stability is better understood,” he said in an email, “it is my general opinion as a hydraulic engineer that we should approach hydrofracturing in the vicinity of these structures very cautiously.
“This wisdom is especially important for hydrofracturing around high-hazard classes of dams.” A high-hazard dam is one with great potential for loss of life and property in case of a failure. It does not mean that a dam failure is likely.
Stephen Wright<http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/Stephen_Wright>, professor of civil, architectural and environmental engineering at the University of Texas<http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/University_of_Texas>, noted that problems with clay shales have led to at least two dam failures in Texas, although neither resulted in deaths. He said the corps was right to err on the side of safety.
“It seems reasonable that the corps is researching this issue,” Wright said, adding that the search for answers could be long and complex.
“I am pleased that the corps takes the position of placing public safety of paramount importance. I hope everyone would be as conscientious.”
Marc McCord of Dallas, an opponent of fracking, also welcomed the corps’ interest in possible threats to its dams.
However, after talking with corps officials for months about natural-gas wells near Joe Pool Lake’s dam, he said he’s seen little movement toward action by either federal or Texas agencies.
“We have multiple agencies failing to enforce the law and each blaming it on another so that nothing is done to protect the general public from commercial enterprises that seek to profit at citizen expense,” McCord said.
Most of the public dispute over the expansion of natural-gas drilling has been over fracking’s possible water-quality impacts.
The Texas Railroad Commission and the gas industry say there is no documented case of fracking polluting drinking water. Environmentalists dispute that.
In December, the Environmental Protection Agency<http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/Environmental_Protection_Agency> accused Range Production of polluting drinking-water wells in Parker County. Range denies that its wells are to blame. The company is contesting an EPA order before the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans<http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/New_Orleans%2C_LA>.
Increased pressures
The corps’ concern with gas wells isn’t over water quality.
“Ours is specifically associated with the safety and integrity of our projects,” said the corps’ Branch. “It’s a different way of looking at it than most folks have done in the past.”
Fracking usually takes place thousands of feet underground, so deep that many experts say it can have little or no effect near the surface.
But corps experts have envisioned a scenario in which naturally occurring faults might transfer the high-pressure force of fracking upward toward a dam’s foundation.
“They’re basically changing the stress state of the existing geology,” Branch said. “You’ve got the geology as it exists today, and they’re going in and changing that by increasing the pressures that are in that.
“And those increased pressures are associated with those high pressures used as part of the hydrofracturing process.”
The weight of a reservoir’s water also applies great pressure to the earth, but in a uniform load rather than the concentrated force of fracking, Branch said.
“The fracture pressures they’re using are in the neighborhood of 8,000 pounds per square inch, and that’s a much more significant load than you get from the weight of the pool,” she said.
Potential damage to a dam from differential movement of the earth shifting along a fault would probably be gradual, allowing repairs as it happens, Branch said. But it could be quick, posing immediate risks, she added.
“We know that based on experiences elsewhere, these are concerns that have been noted,” Branch said. “That’s why we want to make sure that we fully understand the mechanisms that are developed so we can develop appropriate policy to address those.”Finding those answers will be complicated because every dam has different local geology. The variations may be great enough to prevent the adoption of a national buffer zone to cover all federal dams.
The 3,000-foot buffer that Brig. Gen. Thomas Kula, commander of the corps’ Southwestern Division, ordered March 17 is not impermeable. It does not prevent wells on land where the corps did not obtain ownership or mineral rights when it built a dam and reservoir.
No current law or rule lets the corps ban all drilling on land it does not control through ownership or mineral rights, Kula noted in his order.
Kula ordered corps offices in his division to examine oil and gas projects within 3,000 feet of a corps dam or water-control structure. Regardless of ownership, if the agency determines that a well would endanger dam safety, it can take legal action.
Kula’s order covers corps operations in all or parts of Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana<http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/Louisiana>, Arkansas, Kansas and Missouri.
McCord, the Dallas environmentalist who has pressed the corps to take a tougher stance on wells near its dams, said corps officials told him some companies had complied voluntarily with the 3,000-foot buffer zone, but others had not.
“This leads me to wonder why no governmental agency is doing its job in regulating the oil and gas industry by forcing compliance with legal restrictions on their operations,” he said.

Perfectly safe? Apparently not – Times Union

Perfectly safe? Apparently not – Times Union.  Aug. 5, 2011

100+ Groups from 23 States File Petition for Drilling and Fracking Chemical Testing, Info

Click to access fracking_petition.pdf

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 4, 2011
CONTACT:
Kathleen Sutcliffe, Earthjustice, (202) 667-4500, ext.235
Richard Denison, Environmental Defense Fund, (202) 387-3500
Roberta Winters, League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania (610) 527-3706
John Fenton, Pavilion Area Concerned Citizens, (307) 856-7098
100+ Groups from 23 States File Petition for Drilling and Fracking Chemical Testing, Info
Concerned about health impacts of drilling boom, groups press for answers from Halliburton and others
WASHINGTON, DC – A large coalition of public health, environmental, and good government groups filed a petition (PDF) today demanding that full health and safety information be made available for all of the chemicals used in oil and gas development, including the controversial process known as hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking.”  Fracking is when oil and gas companies blast millions of gallons of water treated with chemicals into the ground to force oil and gas from hard-to-reach places deep inside the earth.  Along with a fracking-fueled gas rush have come troubling reports of poisoned drinking water, polluted air, mysterious animal deaths, and sick families.
“The more information we have about the chemicals used in fracking and drilling, the easier it will be to keep people safe and healthy,” said Earthjustice Associate Attorney Megan Klein. “But EPA needs to move quickly – we learn of new problems related to this industry almost daily.”
Earthjustice filed the petition on behalf of Environmental Defense Fund, The League of Women Voters and more than 100 other groups from across America including those with national membership and others with membership from among 23 states (list). The petition asks the EPA to draft rules that — for the first time — would require manufacturers and processors of drilling and fracking chemicals to conduct testing and produce health and safety data needed to evaluate the health and environmental risks of their substances and mixtures.
“The complications linked to the chemicals used in oil and gas development are emblematic of a larger problem in this country — in which we allow dangerous or untested chemicals to be used in everyday consumer products and, in this case, mixed with water and pumped underground,” said Richard Denison, Senior Scientist with Environmental Defense Fund. “Ultimately, the goal of this petition is to encourage companies to do the right thing. If health impacts associated with their products are widely known, it will serve as a powerful incentive for companies to act more responsibly.”
Little is known about many of the chemicals used in drilling and fracking. What information is available is sobering: 78 percent of known fracking chemicals are associated with serious short-term health effects such as burning eyes, rashes, asthma-like effects, nausea, vomiting, headaches, dizziness, tremors, and convulsions.  Between 22 and 47 percent of those chemicals also are associated with longer-term health effects, including cancer, organ damage, and harm to the endocrine system.
“People are understandably concerned about the potential health impacts posed by fracking. Here in Pennsylvania and across the region, as the pace of drilling has skyrocketed, so too have reports of illness and pollution,” said Roberta Winters of the League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania. “The League of Women Voters is deeply concerned about this national issue that threatens the environment and public health. The state Leagues of New York and Pennsylvania are working hard to educate the public about the environmental, public health, and economic impacts associated with fracking. As we continue to advocate for public participation and transparency, we encourage citizens to make their voices heard to regain necessary environmental protections. Our nation’s leaders are on notice that our organization, and more than a hundred others nationwide are pressing for swift action on this petition.”
The petition also asks the EPA to require Halliburton and 8 other fracking chemical companies to provide any documentation these companies have of environmental or health problems associated with the chemicals they manufacture, process, or distribute.
“Here in Pavilion, we’re surrounded by fracked gas wells. The EPA told us over a year ago not to use our well water anymore for drinking or cooking,” said John Fenton of Pavilion (WY) Area Concerned Citizens. “The way the rules work right now, it’s easy for companies to sidestep responsibility.  I don’t think we should stand for it any longer, which is why I’ve signed onto this petition.”
###
RESOURCES
__________________________________
Kathleen Sutcliffe
Campaign Manager
Earthjustice
1625 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Suite 702
Washington, DC 20036
T: 202-667-4500, ext 235
F: 202-667-2356
www.earthjustice.org
Because the earth needs a good lawyer

Dryden confirms ban on hydraulic fracturing | The Ithaca Journal | theithacajournal.com

Dryden confirms ban on hydraulic fracturing | The Ithaca Journal | theithacajournal.com.

Dryden confirms ban on hydraulic fracturing

Calls vote a zoning “clarification”

16 Comments
Ads by Pulse 360
Banks Forced to Forgive Credit Card Debt
Find Out How Much of Your Debt Can Be Settled!
New York: Refinance at 2.6%
$160,000 New York Mortgage $659/mo. 2.9% apr. Get a Free Quote!
Lendgo.com/mortgage
New York Drivers. July 2011.
If you live in New York, you need to learn about this loophole to get insurance for $9!
ConsumerAutoSource.com

DRYDEN — Applause erupted from most of the 50 or so residents in attendance when the town board unanimously voted to ban hydraulic fracturing in Dryden.

“I’m overjoyed (by the decision),” said resident Hilary Lambert, a member of the Dryden Resource Awareness Coalition, the group that gathered 1,700 residents’ signatures asking the board to ban hydraulic fracturing in town. “I’m hoping that the example set by the Town of Dryden will be paid attention to by other towns state-wide.”

By Tuesday night’s action, Dryden became the second town in Tompkins County after Ithaca to ban the gas drilling technique, and at meetings over the past several months, it appeared that at least three quarters of residents in attendance supported a ban. Ulysses, whose residents also circulated a petition asking for a ban, is widely expected to also vote into law its own drilling ban on Aug. 10.

Dryden Supervisor Mary Ann Sumner said that the heavy industry and pollution associated with hydraulic fracturing for naturalgas is at odds with the town’s comprehensive plan and many residents’ way of life.

“Sometimes we’re not able to do things that the majority wants, but this time we can,” she said.

The board’s decision, she said, was not a ban so much as a clarification of existing zoning, which “prohibits all uses which are not expressly permitted,” and does not permit extractive industry, she said.

“It removes any doubt that extractive activities are permitted,” said board member Jason Leifer, who co-authored the legislation.

In addition, the ban will be added only to the current zoning, not the proposed new zoning code that town officials have been working toward completing in coming months, though Leifer said they plan to add the ban to the proposed zoning as well. As with any legislation, board members said in the event that the town decides hydraulic fracturing has become safer, or if citizens elect a new town board, the ban can be overturned.

Sumner and each town board member explained their feelings on the vote, with all stating that they felt a ban was the only way to represent the electorate and keep their consciences clean.

While town officials have said previously that they could face legal action as a result of a blanket ban, Sumner said the recent Draft Generic Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement released by the state Department of Conservation regarding hydraulic fracturing proposes that drilling applications conform to local zoning, which she said reaffirms the town’s ban.

“It’s one more way of hearing from the state that local land use authority may be respected,” she said.

There were a few opponents in attendance, who were displeased by the board’s vote.

“The town board didn’t look at the economic risk of this,” said Henry Kramer, a resident and member of the newly created Dryden Safe Energy Coalition, which supports regulated gas drilling in the area. “They assumed power they didn’t have. This will not end here. There’s the possibility of an appeal, and litigation.”

Resident Ron Szymanski, who is opposed to a blanket ban on gas drilling, said he presented town board members with questions he wanted answered about how drilling would affect the town’s tax base and residents’ right to their mineral rights, and he hasn’t heard back.

“They said ‘we’ll get to it when we can,’ but that’s not acceptable,” he said.

New York State’s Fracking Lawsuit Barred by Law, U.S. Says – Bloomberg

New York State’s Fracking Lawsuit Barred by Law, U.S. Says – Bloomberg.