Marc McCord on How Dallas Was Saved From Frac’ing

Marc McCord on How Dallas Was Saved From Frac’ing.

American Public Health Association – The Importance of Public Health Agency Independence: Marcellus Shale Gas Drilling in Pennsylvania

American Public Health Association – The Importance of Public Health Agency Independence: Marcellus Shale Gas Drilling in Pennsylvania.

EARTHWORKS | What happened at NPR

EARTHWORKS | What happened at NPR.

States urged to ‘step up’ and fund new gas pipelines

States urged to ‘step up’ and fund new gas pipelines.

NY Shale Gas Now!: NYS Pressure Groups with Fracking Positions Spend > $5M/Yr. In On-the-Record Lobbying

NY Shale Gas Now!: NYS Pressure Groups with Fracking Positions Spend > $5M/Yr. In On-the-Record Lobbying.

Shale Gas Review: 10% or 90% – How much fracking waste is recycled? Loose definitions give industry lots of leeway

Shale Gas Review: 10% or 90% – How much fracking waste is recycled? Loose definitions give industry lots of leeway.

Fracking waste fills WV landfills under new rule » Today’s Front Page » The Register-Herald, Beckley, West Virginia

Fracking waste fills WV landfills under new rule » Today’s Front Page » The Register-Herald, Beckley, West Virginia.

Six-State Study Confirms Job Numbers Exaggerated by Fracking Industry | EcoWatch

Six-State Study Confirms Job Numbers Exaggerated by Fracking Industry | EcoWatch.

Jannette Barth on Economics of Fracking, renewables and fossil fuels

NYPIRG and VeRSE present Dr. Jannette Barth speaking on the economics of *fracking* and renewables and fossil fuels.

The presentation will be on November 21st at the Binghamton University campus, 6 pm in Science Building 1, room 149 (S1 149).

Recently, various reports have confirmed the analyses of various independent economists, including Jannette Barth, Ph.D., which have suggested that the economic gains from fracking are industry-contrived and short-lived.  Letter to Governor Cuomo from Three Concerned Economists, Dr. Barth, a Catskill homeowner and former chief economist for the M.T.A. has criticized the overly-optimistic forecasts, contending that the models are flawed and the data incomplete, at best.  Critique of PPI Study on Shale Gas Job Creation,  Unanswered Questions About The Economic Impact of Gas Drilling in the Marcellus Shale: Don’t Jump to Conclusions, Moreover, Dr. Barth, in one of the very few peer-reviewed articles on shale gas economics, concludes that job gains are minor, money flows out of extraction states and that any booms tend to be followed by pronounced and extended busts, as pre-existing industries are irreparably destroyed by fracking THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF SHALE GAS DEVELOPMENT ON STATE AND LOCAL ECONOMIES: BENEFITS, COSTS, AND UNCERTAINTIES,

Over the last week, a clutch of reports has laid bare the exaggerated job claims in Pennsylvania and Arkansas and the inevitable bust which has followed shale gas extraction in the Marcellus and Fayetteville shales.  Both reports confirm Dr. Barth’s conclusions and should be recognized by policymakers who contemplate whether to allow fracking in New York state.  In Arkansas, local business owners have recognized that workers must follow the rigs from state-to-state—now to North Dakota and Montana–and that the motel business, which surged briefly, has crashed.  Economy slows with Fayetteville Shale drilling lag

Meanwhile, next door in Pennsylvania, the Pro-Fracking Corbett administration’s much ballyhooed job claims have been shown to be merely “[r]obust and aggressive statements about job creation which overstate dramatically the effects of one specific area of economic activity.”  Pennsylvania Marcellus shale job creation claims being overstated? In fact, “According to a grimmer-than-expected report from the Keystone Research Group, the workforce outlook for Pennsylvanians is the bleakest it has been since 2010.”  Report: Pa. outlook on jobs worst in three years

 ____________________

Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States

Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States

Significance

Successful regulation of greenhouse gas emissions requires knowledge of current methane emission sources. Existing state regulations in California and Massachusetts require ∼15% greenhouse gas emissions reductions from current levels by 2020. However, government estimates for total US methane emissions may be biased by 50%, and estimates of individual source sectors are even more uncertain. This study uses atmospheric methane observations to reduce this level of uncertainty. We find greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture and fossil fuel extraction and processing (i.e., oil and/or natural gas) are likely a factor of two or greater than cited in existing studies. Effective national and state greenhouse gas reduction strategies may be difficult to develop without appropriate estimates of methane emissions from these source sectors.

Commentary on the study:

Bridge Out: Bombshell Study Finds Methane Emissions From Natural Gas Production Far Higher Than EPA Estimates | ThinkProgress.

Huffington Post coverage:

NY Times coverage:

Harvard University Press Release:

Link to Study:

Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/11/20/1314392110.abstract