Sandra Steingraber. Orion May-Jun 2010
September 12, 2010
Sandra Steingraber. Shale Game. Orion (May-Jun, 2010)
Gas Drilling Awareness for Cortland County
September 12, 2010
Sandra Steingraber. Shale Game. Orion (May-Jun, 2010)
September 9, 2010 1 Comment
EPA Study on Hydraulic Fracturing Peer Review Panel Selected: Jan 18, 2011. http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabpeople.nsf/WebCommitteesSubcommittees/Hydraulic%20Fracturing%20Study%20Plan%20Review%20Panel
EPA Drinking Water Study Powerpoint Outline of Study http://water.epa.gov/type/groundwater/uic/class2/hydraulicfracturing/upload/hftribalpresentation30aug2010.pdf
For additional questions or comments, please email hydraulic.fracturing@epa.gov or call 1-866-477-3635. Meeting information may be found on the EPA Hydraulic Fracturing Study website at http://water.epa.gov/type/groundwater/uic/class2/hydraulicfracturing/wells_hydroout.cfm.
September 6, 2010
From Cornell University’s Ornithology Lab publication, “Living Bird”, Summer, 2010
“The View From Sapsucker Woods” by John Fitzpatrick – in part-
“The Deepwater Horizon gusher was generated by 21st-century technology, but it symbolizes the 19th-century ethics we continue to apply when environmental protection contradicts energy exploitation. Although we cannot yet know the eventual scale of its biological and economic costs, we should for once agree that we must assemble, and never again forget, all the fundamental lessons of this disaster. The unthinkable is possible, and must be planned for in advance. As we assess risks versus rewards, as we fully audit the true costs of energy exploration and extraction, we need to incorporate and properly mitigate the enormous risks and costs of disasters like Deepwater Horizon. With just one planet to steward and only one chance at this game, all of us should ponder whether some natural systems are just too complex and valuable to risk losing, regardless of what temporary energy boost lied (lay)beneath them.”
The Whole Fracking Enchilada
Violating the bedrock, the atmosphere, and everything in between by Sandra Steingraber
Published in the September/October 2010 http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/mag/issue/5825/> issue of
/Orion/ magazine
I HAVE COME to believe that extracting natural gas from shale using the
newish technique called hydrofracking is /the/ environmental issue of
our time. And I think you should, too.
Saying so represents two points of departure for me. One: I primarily
study toxic chemicals, not energy issues. I have, heretofore, ceded that
topic to others, such as Bill McKibben, with whom I share this column
space in /Orion/.
Two: I’m on record averring that I never tell people what to do. If you
are a mother who wants to lead the charge against vinyl shower curtains,
then you should. If the most important thing to you is organic golf
courses, then they are. So said I. Read more of this post
September 5, 2010
Sept. 4, 2010.
A Burning Debate Over Natural Gas Drilling
Chemicals That Energy Companies Secretly Use in a Process Dubbed “Fracking” Are Fueling Concerns About Our Water Supplies
(CBS) The natural gas-producing shale that lies under 34 states is now being seen as a game-changer in helping meet the nation’s energy needs for decades to come. But the process of extracting that natural gas, dubbed “fracking,” is fueling environmental fears. CBS News chief investigative correspondent Armen Keteyian has more:
“You can’t live like this – it’s so stressful every single day………”
September 1, 2010
Don Siegel (SU) and Tony Ingraffea (Cornell). Sunday. February 20th, 2-4pm – place tba
August 28, 2010
Hydraulic fracturing — or fracking — is a process used by energy companies to get natural gas out of the ground. Fracking involves forcing water, sand and chemicals underground to fracture rocks and release the natural gas trapped within them.
But what happens to those chemicals once they’ve been injected into the ground? That depends upon whom you ask. In a joint effort with ProPublica, the non-profit investigative journalist organization, we sent correspondent John Larson to Wyoming, where some residents believe fracking is contaminating their water and risking their health.
August 23, 2010
Pittsburg City Paper Aug. 19, 2010 LINK
Somewhere beneath our feet — Pennsylvanians are told — lies a mile-deep layer of rock known as the Marcellus Shale, which contains more natural gas than Saudi Arabia has oil. And natural-gas companies are lining up to drill it all around the state.
Lately, though, they seem to be doing most of their prospecting in Harrisburg.
City Paper has acquired a document — titled “A Holistic Solution to Modernizing Pennsylvania Policies Impacting Marcellus Shale Development” — currently being circulated in Harrisburg. Credited to the Marcellus Shale Coalition, a trade group representing drillers, the proposed “solution” is a wide-ranging wish-list of industry priorities. Among its requests, for example, is that legislators “encourage” state and local governments to convert their vehicle fleets to natural gas.
The document — which is marked “DRAFT CONFIDENTIAL” — asserts that the coalition is “committed to participating in an honest, open dialogue.” But it includes positions the coalition has, at least in public, offered few specifics on. Among them:
— The coalition urges legislators to “oppose statutory and regulatory proposals that are not logically or scientifically based, or that would otherwise jeopardize capital investment with little or no benefit to the environment or consumers.”
— The coalition also asks legislators to “reinforce … the current preemption language” in state law, which bars local officials from passing their own environmental regulations. It also seeks to ensure that drilling is permitted “in all zoning districts.” (Since shale drilling can take place a mile below ground and a mile from the “well-head” visible on the surface, however, it’s possible this exemption would only apply to below-ground operations.)
— The coalition, which has long argued against imposing a “severance tax” on the value of gas drilled, will accept one — sort of. Gov. Ed Rendell has proposed a tax of 5 percent on the value of the gas; the coalition accepts that rate — but only after the well has been in operation for five years. Until that time, it urges charging only 1.5 percent on the value of the gas.
The coalition largely declined to comment on the document, and did not respond to a list of e-mailed questions. Instead, coalition president Kathryn Klaber issued a statement asserting the coalition is “fully committed to crafting commonsense legislative and regulatory policies.” Those policies, Klaber adds, “will help ensure that Marcellus development remains competitive with other shale gas-producing states,” which will ensure “that the economic and environmental benefits associated with responsible Marcellus Shale gas production reach all Pennsylvanians.”
“If this is a strategy for the industry, it’s unconscionable,” counters Pittsburgh City Councilor Patrick Dowd after reviewing the document. Read more of this post
August 21, 2010
Series Covering Various Impacts of Hydrofracking on the local infrastructure, economy, scientific will be presented every Friday for 13 weeks. All programs are archived for listening at any time. http://thecapitolpressroom.org.
August 20, 2010
http://shaleshockmedia.org/wp-admin/media-upload.php?post_id=80&type=image&TB_iframe=1Thursday, August 19, 2009. Gubernatorial candidate Andrew Cuomo visits Ithaca on a campaign stop. Hundreds rally outside and pack the auditorium of the Women’s Community Building, many concerned over hydro-fracking. No questions were taken on the inside. Here are what some would say to Andrew Cuomo if given a chance. . . . → Read More: No Frack! Is Andrew Cuomo listening?