Lancaster City to test Susquehanna water for radioactivity – News

Lancaster City to test Susquehanna water for radioactivity – News.

MIT Web Tools Help Small Landowners Navigate Gas Leasing Frenzy | SolveClimate News

MIT Web Tools Help Small Landowners Navigate Gas Leasing Frenzy | SolveClimate News.

Seward shows support for home-rule bill The Daily Star, Oneonta, NY

Seward shows support for home-rule bill » Local News » The Daily Star, Oneonta, NY – otsego county news, delaware county news, oneonta news, oneonta sports.

May 26, 2011

Seward shows support for home-rule bill

State Sen. James Seward supports a bill that would make it easier for towns to say no to gas drilling and hydrofracking.

Seward, R-Milford, said Wednesday that he is cosponsoring Senate bill 3472 “to give local governments veto power over natural gas drilling.”

The measure would strengthen the home-rule authority of municipalities to use their land-use laws and zoning to restrict activities like drilling and hydrofracking — the injection of gas wells with millions of gallons of water, sand and chemicals to shatter rock deep underground and increase production.

In northern Otsego County, several towns have been working to strengthen their land-use laws and prevent gas drilling, he noted.

“When it comes to horizontal drilling and hydrofracking, these are very technical and emotional issues,” Seward said. “The DEC is going through its review, and we could see another version of their regulations in mid-to-late summer.

“In the meantime, I have been meeting with advocates on all sides of the issue, but I think it’s significant when a local government, a town board for example, takes action with their zoning and land-use authority. I think the state should respect these actions and the ethic of home rule.

“Here, we have Otsego, Middlefield, Cherry Valley, Springfield all taking steps to respond to their residents and I think the state should respect that.”

If the state strengthens home-rule authority, municipalities will have less risk of being sued and seeing their local laws overturned in court, he said.

“I’m taking a two-pronged approach: co-sponsoring the bill and I have written to the commissioner of the DEC, and met with the governor’s office, urging them to respect home rule.”

In his letter to DEC Commissioner Joe Martens, Seward wrote, “I take this opportunity … to recognize the prerogatives of local governments, the varied opinions on the merits and drawbacks of natural gas exploration and provide for local `opt-out’ provisions in the new regulations.

“This could be as simple as the department not considering applications where local law prohibits drilling.”

Reaction to Seward’s stance on home rule was divided Wednesday.

“I haven’t read the bill, so I can’t comment on that, but I support the concept,” Middlefield Town Supervisor David Bliss said.

With enhanced home-rule authority, municipalities will be freer to respond to their residents’ concerns, he said.

On the other hand, Worcester town board member and drilling proponent David Parker asked: “Is he up for re-election this year? (He isn’t.) Because he’s going to make a lot of people upset.”

Parker said the industry likes to have an organized approach to drilling, connecting wells with pipelines that cross municipal boundaries, “not dealing with every individual town government.”

Jim Smith, a spokesman for the Independent Oil & Gas Association of New York State, said state regulation has “worked well for 30 years, and I don’t see any reason to change that.”

If some towns opt out of drilling and hydrofracking, they may compromise other towns’ ability to extract the resource, he said.

Rob Robinson, president and chief executive officer of the Otsego Chamber, said: “I think gas drilling should be regulated by the state, not towns.”

Erik Miller, executive director of the Otsego County Conservation Association, hailed Seward’s leadership on the issue.

“Home rule is exactly what more progressive communities have asked for, a chance to make their own determinations,” Miller said. “I think it’s a great middle ground.”

Assembly Moratorium on Natural Gas Well Drilling Permits That Utilize Hydrofracking Reported Out of Committee

Assembly Moratorium on Natural Gas Well Drilling Permits That Utilize Hydrofracking Reported Out of Committee.

Notice of Public Hearing – Health Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing Techniques

Notice of Public Hearing – Health Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing Techniques.

Legislative panel questions industry on controversial hydrofracking as state forms new rules – Times Union

Legislative panel questions industry on controversial hydrofracking as state forms new rules – Times Union.

NYS Assembly Hearings on Health Effects of Hydrofracking

Assembly Public Hearing on Health Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing Techniques  Albany, NY May 26, 2011

Playlist: Sandra Steingrabber, PhD, distinguished scholar in Residence at Ithaca College; Adam Law, MD Endocrinology, Physicians, Scientists and Engineers for Healthy Energy; Kevin Chatham-Stephens, MD Pediatric & Environmental Health Fellow, Mt. Sinai School of Medicine; Uni Blake, MS environmental toxicologist, Independent Oil and Gas Association of NY; Scott Cline, PhD, geologist & petroleum engineer, Independent Oil and Gas Association of NY. Note: Includes 1st three hours only. Audio improves after 1st clip (Sandra Steingrabber).

This was a combined public hearing of the NYS Assembly Standing Committee on Environmental Conservation chaired by Robert K. Sweeney and Assembly Standing Committee on Health, chaired by Richard N. Gottfried. The panel includes (left to right) Assembly Members Thomas J. Abinanti (Environment); Richard N. Gottfried (chair, Health); Robert K. Sweeney (chair, Environment); Steve Englebright (Energy); and Michelle Schimel (Environment).

DVDs of the complete hearings are available from: Public Information, 202 L.O.B, Albany, NY 12248. Refer to: “Assembly Public Hearing on Health Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing Techniques from Thursday, May 26” and Include a check for . A transcript of the hearing will also be available from the Assembly Public Information Office.

“NY Assembly Hearing on Fracking & Health Impacts” (05-14-11, The Marcellus Effect)- http://marcelluseffect.blogspot.com/2011/05/ny-assembly-hearing-on-fracking-health.html


1-Sandra Steingrabber- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mhDFYUQdq0 & http://blip.tv/shaleshock-media/1-sandra-steingrabber-5217824

2-Sandra Steingrabber responds to panel- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3ZvOFSpyss & http://blip.tv/shaleshock-media/2-sandra-steingrabber-responds-to-panel-5217543

3-Adam Law– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBgmeGiCXvU & http://blip.tv/shaleshock-media/3-adam-law-5216851

4-Adam Law responds to panel– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRVeeJ7wPgg & http://blip.tv/shaleshock-media/4-adam-law-responds-to-panel-5216662

5-Kevin Chatham-Stephens– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KN_1zZbMwVE & http://blip.tv/shaleshock-media/5-kevin-chatham-stephens-5215959

6-Kevin Chatham-Stephens responds to panel– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzYCC8BZxJU & http://blip.tv/shaleshock-media/6-kevin-chatham-stephens-responds-to-panel-5215816

7-Uni Blake– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KzqBDYuZ-c & http://blip.tv/shaleshock-media/7-uni-blake-5215662

8-IOGA Scott Kline– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZl9Dp_m-1k & http://blip.tv/shaleshock-media/8-scott-kline-5215468

9-IOGA Scott Kline Uni Blake respond to panel– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9933iLt-k1c & http://blip.tv/shaleshock-media/9-ioga-scott-kline-uni-blake-respond-to-panel-5215366

10-IOGA Scott Kline Uni Blake respond to panel (con’d)– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kly5pcgif1M & http://blip.tv/shaleshock-media/10-ioga-scott-kline-uni-blake-respond-to-panel-con-d-5214831

You can order a DVD of the hearings for $10 check from the Assembly Public Information Office   http://assembly.state.ny.us/req/

Scott Kline Testimony–Comment/Questions

The notion of an hermetically sealed layer by virtue of capillary blockage is also one that I heard made by a proponent of propane fracking in answer to my question, what about old gas wells or vertical faults near the fracking operation?

Theoretical knowlege has a place.  Without it, we’d have no progress.  But it can be wrong, and in this case the consequences are so bad, the precautionary principle needs to be operative.

In any case, Kline’s explanations did not pass muster with Richard Gottfried, chair of the Assembly Health Committee.

As I was recording the exchange, I got a sense of how difficult it must be for politicians, at least good ones, to deal with technical testimony.

Has this issue of ‘capillary blocking’ been adequately addressed in a scientific debate or exchange?

We keep talking about the risk of old gas wells and vertical faults.  The industry’s experts keep talking about how safe and sequestered it is in the shale layer.

We continue to make the point that the industry narrowly focuses on the fracking operation at depth when it makes the claim, repeated I believe by Kline, that no drinking water aquifer has been contaminated by hydro-fracking.

I know that I am not alone in being concerned with the long term consequences –long after the gas has been extracted.  The integrity of the well casing is often cited.  But when I here from Kline that the fracturing actually does extends above and below the shale layer, I am concerned.

As is Richard Gottfried, chair of the Assembly Health Committee, who responds to Kline’s assertion of capillary blockage with a question of capillary action transporting the liquid.  To which Kline responds, it all would go toward the well bore regardless, because of the pressure gradient.

That is the problem the theoretical knowledge.  There are coherent views, but we really don’t know what processes may unfold over time.

Though maybe it is not productive for activists to get involve with this sort of question over all else we need to focus on, certainly, some more expert scientific opinion countering the industry claims articulated by Kline would help those who in the legislature who support, or are leaning toward, and extended moratorium.

Some might say this is already out there, but I have no as yet read anything that directly addresses the industry/technical assertion that capillary blockage makes everything safe and contained.

It was a long exchange between Kline and the panel.  The assertion that the thermogenic methane that has contaminated water wells near drilling operations comes from shallow layers apparently is disputed by the Duke study.

Early, Sandra Steingrabber made the point that there are really only two studies –the ecent Duke study and the Ingraffea/Howarth/Santoro study.

On 5/27/11 9:13 PM, KatyaBelousBoyle@aol.com wrote:

No doubt now that Scott Cline holds a BS in geological science.  His statements about fracking are pure BS.   RHB

 
Visit the Sustainable Otsego website:
http://sustainableotsego.org/—

message-footer.txt
1K   View   Download
Reply
Reply to all
Forward
Reply
James Northrup to mmsteinberg, NYGCG, ROUSE, averettr
show details 1:11 PM (11 hours ago)
Melanie

The telling point is highlighted below – 


Kline goes out of his way to discuss one of the least likely vectors of pollution – the frack going out-of-zone via vertical faulting. 

It happens – and companies have paid fines for it (Encana / Garfield County). 

Plus of course, surface casing blows out – which is in effect the frack going way out of zone. 

The problems start when the well is spudded -and prior to its being cased, much less fracked. 

The open hole during drilling (with a column of drilling mud to provide hydrostatic pressure on the gas) is a vector for methane migration 

And gas that gets into the drilling mud can get into the aquifer/ ground water – before the well is cased. 

And the cased well remains a pathway, with increasing probability of contamination into groundwater as the casing corrodes. 


Which is why the original driller will sell the well before it reaches its economic life expectancy 

To avoid the P&A (plug and abandonment) liabilities of a leaking well. Of which there are thousands already in NYS. 

Basically man-made open vectors from the formation into groundwater. 

Think of old wells as equivalent to  “man-made vertical faults” 

With no money at the DEC to properly plug them.




– Show quoted text –
– Show quoted text –

Visit the Sustainable Otsego website:
http://sustainableotsego.org/

Could Smog Shroud the Marcellus Shale’s Natural Gas Boom? – NYTimes.com

Could Smog Shroud the Marcellus Shale’s Natural Gas Boom? – NYTimes.com.

APNewsBreak: Cuomo expands ‘hydrofracking’ review – WSJ.com

APNewsBreak: Cuomo expands ‘hydrofracking’ review – WSJ.com.

ALBANY, N.Y. — Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s administration has ordered an expanded environmental review of proposed “hydrofracking” for natural gas in New York after an accident in Pennsylvania caused a well to gush salty, chemically tainted water for two days.

An internal memo obtained by The Associated Press directs the state Department of Environmental Conservation to review and learn any lessons from the April mishap in Pennsylvania’s Bradford County.

The memo dated Friday said the “blowout” raised issues about the controversial technology that need to be evaluated before New York decides whether to allow a major expansion of the potentially lucrative gas-extraction method, which has been assailed by some environmentalists as unsafe.

The memo was from Cuomo’s director of state operations, Howard Glaser, to Department of Environmental Conservation Commissioner Joseph Martens, a Cuomo appointee.

The April 19 accident in Pennsylvania briefly caused a handful of families living near the well to flee their homes as thousands of gallons of brine flooded across farm fields and entered a stream. Well cappers from Houston had to pump ground-up tires, plastic bits and other rubber material into the well to temporarily seal it.

Well operator Chesapeake Energy said the environmental damage from the spill was minimal, but temporarily suspended operations to investigate what went wrong.

New York’s review will include an on-site inspection by New York officials.

The findings will be part of New York’s environmental evaluation of using hydraulic fracturing to release natural gas from the Marcellus Shale deposit through much of New York’s Southern Tier. The final report is due July 1.

The gas drilling boom has been an economic engine in Pennsylvania, but it has been delayed in New York for the past three years as environmental groups have assailed hydraulic fracturing as a potential hazard to drinking water.

“Fracking” involves shooting huge volumes of water, laced with much smaller amounts of chemicals and sand, thousands of feet underground to release trapped gas. Some of the water then returns to the surface, tained by substances like barium and salt that it picks up underground. By law, this wastewater must be disposed of deep containment wells or treated before it is released back into the environment.

Industry groups say the process is well regulated and safe.

The Independent Oil & Gas Association of New York had asked Cuomo to expedite the state’s review of fracking and allow permitting for gas exploration to proceed.

—Copyright 2011 Associated Press

Finger Lakes Energy Challenge (formerly Marcellus Challenge) « Sustainable Tompkins

Finger Lakes Energy Challenge (formerly Marcellus Challenge) « Sustainable Tompkins.