Residents: dozens of wells in Bradford County have been contaminated – News – Daily Review
April 8, 2011
Residents: dozens of wells in Bradford County have been contaminated – News – Daily Review.
Cooperstown Chamber Opposes Hydrofracking
February 15, 2011
http://www.cooperstownchamber.org/pdfs/hydrofracking.pdf
Hydrofracking for Shale Gas in Otsego County
Feb 11, 2011 Statement by Cooperstown Chamber of Commerce
1. WHEREAS…The gas industry has secured broad exemptions from Federal regulation under the Clean Water Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act in 2005 (the “Halliburton exemption”). Under New York State law, horizontal drilling is now stalled pending completion of a Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement (dSGEIS), which could be finalized at any time. In the interim, drilling of vertical wells with hydrofracking is proceeding in our County under an outdated 1992 Generic Environmental Impact Statement. Thus, gas companies are now drilling and fracking in our County without substantive local review and both state and federal regulatory investigations into the risks of the process are mired in political delays.
2. WHEREAS…Land-lease development in the region has already reached a high level without any meaningful regulatory control and with limited public awareness of the issues. Over 60,000 acres have already been leased by gas-drilling companies or their land agents and active drilling projects have started in Otsego County (principally by Gastem, a Canadian lease/exploration company).
3. WHEREAS…The relative contribution of natural gas from hydrofracking to either the economy or the energy needs of the region is minimal and development does not materially contribute to a sustainable national or regional energy policy.
4. WHEREAS…The number of documented spills, blowouts, leaking wells and other environmental accidents is significant and the environmental and human consequences have been serious in a number of states, including TX, PA, WY, and WV.
5. WHEREAS…The withdrawal of huge quantities of fresh water estimated at 2-5 million gallons of water per frack cycle and the heavy impact of thousands of truck trips per well hauling water and chemicals to and from the drill pads on loca infrastructure cannot be sustained in Otsego County. Effective technologies for the treatment of the millions of gallons of polluted processing waste do not exist and there are no locations for waste disposal in New York capable of supporting the proposed scale of drilling.
6. WHEREAS…The most critical threat to the local area is contamination of the aquifers and surface water resources found directly above the Marcellus shale. Current plans for drilling present a strategic risk to the entire Otsego County water supply and the Susquehanna watershed. The New York City watershed has already been protected, which represents the clearest evidence that NY State already understands a potential risk.
7. WHEREAS…On Jan 1, 2011, NY State Governor Andrew Cuomo continued 2010 Executive order 41 (issued by past Governor David Paterson) directing the NY DEC to publish a revised draft SGEIS, accept public comment on the revisions, and schedule public hearings on the revisions. The order says no horizontal hydrofracking permits may be issued prior to the completion of a final SGEIS. This is in effect a moratorium on any new horizontal hydrofracking drilling, but does not stop vertical hydrofracking drilling, nor does it stop further land leasing, seismic testing, or other actions that may lead to future drilling.
WE CONCLUDE THEREFORE, THAT:
The plans for drilling pose a direct and material threat to the interests of the Chamber membership. Industrial-scale hydrofracking in the upstate region will irreparably damage the essential qualities that make the Cooperstown area an excellent place to live, raise families, farm and work. It puts at risk much of the local economy, ranging from hotel and tourism to restaurant and retail businesses, most of which are driven by the hundreds of thousands of tourists who choose to visit the region every year.
—
NATURAL GAS: Investors press for ‘more responsible’ gas drilling
January 21, 2011
ClimateWire <http://www.climatewire.net>
An E&E Publishing Service
NATURAL GAS: Investors press for ‘more responsible’ gas drilling (Friday, January 21, 2011)
Mike Soraghan, E&E reporter
A coalition of investors today is announcing a campaign to press publicly traded oil and gas companies to disclose how they plan to handle the risks of hydraulic fracturing.
Led by the nonprofit investor group Ceres, they are filing nine resolutions with petroleum companies that they hope will lead to “more responsible” fracturing processes. Among the companies are Exxon Mobil Corp., Chevron Corp. and Cabot Oil & Gas, which has been accused of contaminating wells in Dimock, Pa.
The investors believe that petroleum companies have been too vague about the pollution, safety and regulatory risks created by the process, which is essential to developing the country’s vast shale gas reserves.
“This grows out of the work we’ve done with our investors in climate change,” Andrew Logan, director of the Oil and Gas Program at Ceres, said in an interview. “The vision is that gas is a bridge to a low-carbon future. That’s been a position of these investors for a long time. As they’ve learned about the fracturing process, they’ve seen the need to engage with industry to make sure it’s being done sustainably.”
The oil and gas industry says fracturing is a safe process and that existing state regulations are sufficient to protect drill site neighbors and the public. It has vigorously fought proposals in Congress to have U.S. EPA regulate the process.
Companies have also resisted similar shareholder resolutions on fracturing in the past.
But Ceres officials say that resolutions filed in 2010 spurred at least one company to begin disclosing the measures it takes to ensure well integrity, describe its recycling practices, and discuss “green completions” that reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Pressing for disclosure and ‘best practices’
An increase in gas supply, made possible by advancements in fracturing technology, has led to the idea that gas can serve as a bridge while cleaner sources of energy are developed. Burning gas emits about half as much carbon as burning coal.
But fracturing, and the drilling process itself, brings environmental risks. And the shale boom is bringing it to areas long unaccustomed to heavy petroleum development, such as Pennsylvania. Cabot is contesting the allegations in Dimock.
Fracturing involves injecting tankerloads of chemical-laced water into wells to crack apart rock formations and release oil and gas. The chemicals used can be as mundane as ice cream thickener and as toxic as benzene.
The shareholder proposals ask companies to disclose their policies and strategies for reducing environmental and financial risks from chemicals use, water impacts and a host of other issues. They also request that the companies adopt “best management practices,” such as reusing the waste water from fracturing, testing the cementing of wells and disclosure of the chemicals used in the process.
GDACC 
