Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – The New York Times
June 6, 2011
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – The New York Times.
Gas Drilling Awareness for Cortland County
June 5, 2011
A ‘Big Thumbs Up’ for Renewable Energy – NYTimes.com.
Wind turbines near the Donghai Bridge in Shanghai. Wind energy could supply up to 8.4 percent of global energy in 2050 from current levels of about 0.2 percent, according to a Intergovenmental Panel on Climate Change report.
BRUSSELS — Governments around the world have pledged emissions cuts aimed at keeping global warming below levels that could set off runaway climate change. So what proportion of the low-carbon energy needed to meet those goals will come from sources like the wind, sun and waves?
Most renewable sources are abundant, practically inexhaustible and far more climate friendly than fossil fuels. Some companies making equipment to harness these energies are growing rapidly.
Last month, experts advising the United Nations said renewable sources could deliver nearly 80 percent of world’s total energy demand by the middle of the century. That report, by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — the most authoritative body of experts, scientists and engineers specialized in climate change — was a welcome signal for an industry that has faltered in previous decades after government subsidies dried up and lower-cost fossil fuels made their technologies uncompetitive.
The report “is a big thumbs up for an industry that’s making huge advances in lowering costs and improving efficiency,” said Maja Wessels, global head of government affairs for First Solar, one of the largest makers of solar panels. “The experts have said that reaching high renewables targets will become very achievable.”
She said that the report should serve as basis for governments and lenders like the World Bank to plan investment in energy systems and infrastructure.
Governments staking out a low-carbon future also welcomed the findings.
Charles Hendry, the British minister for energy and climate change, said the report “makes it completely clear that this is a massively growing area” that could deliver “a turnaround moment for many parts of the economy.”
Even so, some financiers and environmental groups said the report underplayed the potential for renewable energy. The panel “wasn’t aggressive enough and the data were two years old,” said Gerard Reid, an analyst at Jefferies, an investment bank. “For solar panels, and offshore wind and concentrating solar power, we can get the costs down even quicker.”
WWF, an environmental group, emphasized that it had developed plans for generating 100 percent renewable energy by 2050.
Ottmar Edenhofer, co-chairman of the climate panel that wrote the report, said the findings were realistic. “Under no circumstances can we afford to omit or neglect renewables,” Mr. Edenhofer said by telephone. “But we must remember that there is more than one way to achieve a low greenhouse gas economy.” He was referring to alternatives to renewable sources like nuclear power and technologies under development to limit the damage of fossil fuel use by capturing and storing carbon dioxide before it reaches the atmosphere.
Some of the renewable sources with the greatest potential to deliver large amounts of energy, like certain kinds of solar power, remain expensive compared with burning fossil fuels, he said. And integrating a wide variety of renewable sources into existing power grids would be a huge technical and financial challenge, he added.
That caution was echoed by separate report released on May 24 by the International Energy Agency. While the agency found that biomass, geothermal and hydropower provide a steady stream of power and pose no greater challenge than conventional power to integrate into grids, other renewable sources — wind, solar, wave and tidal energy — fluctuate with the weather and are often in places that lack grids.
“When shares of variable renewables amount to just a few percent, a philosophy of ‘connect and manage’ will usually suffice,” said Nobua Tanaka, executive director of the I.E.A. Greater use of renewable sources means that “this will need to change,” he said.
A summary of the climate panel’s report was published on May 9, after 194 governments agreed to the text. The report was based on a comparison of 164 evaluations of the technology and provided the most comprehensive analysis to date of trends and perspectives for renewable energy. The panel was expected to publish a full report of more than 900 pages by mid-June, once scientists have completed final checks.
The report found that six sources — bioenergy, wind, solar, geothermal energy, hydropower and ocean energy — currently accounted for 13 percent of global energy supply. In one of the least optimistic outlooks for the sector examined by the panel, the world would generate 15 percent of its energy needs from those same six sources by 2050. But in one of the most optimistic projections, the world could generate 43 percent of its energy needs from those six sources by 2030 and 77 percent by 2050.
Renewable energy also would create jobs and help accelerate access to energy for 1.4 billion people without electricity.
June 2, 2011
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. – The Colbert Report – 6/1/11 – Video Clip | Comedy Central.
May 30, 2011
Chris Hedges: The Sky Really Is Falling – Chris Hedges’ Columns – Truthdig.
![]() |
| AP / Lori Mehmen |
| Global climate change has made for freak storms and more intense weather. The result is Hurricane Katrina, this month’s devastating tornadoes and floods, and routine forest fires in California. Here, a tornado touches down in Iowa in 2008. |
By Chris Hedges
The rapid and terrifying acceleration of global warming, which is disfiguring the ecosystem at a swifter pace than even the gloomiest scientific studies predicted a few years ago, has been confronted by the power elite with two kinds of self-delusion. There are those, many of whom hold elected office, who dismiss the science and empirical evidence as false. There are others who accept the science surrounding global warming but insist that the human species can adapt. Our only salvation—the rapid dismantling of the fossil fuel industry—is ignored by both groups. And we will be led, unless we build popular resistance movements and carry out sustained acts of civil disobedience, toward collective self-annihilation by dimwitted pied pipers and fools.
Those who concede that the planet is warming but insist we can learn to live with it are perhaps more dangerous than the buffoons who decide to shut their eyes. It is horrifying enough that the House of Representatives voted 240-184 this spring to defeat a resolution that said that “climate change is occurring, is caused largely by human activities, and poses significant risks for public health and welfare.” But it is not much of an alternative to trust those who insist we can cope with the effects while continuing to burn fossil fuels.
Horticulturalists are busy planting swamp oaks and sweet gum trees all over Chicago to prepare for weather that will soon resemble that of Baton Rouge. That would be fine if there was a limit to global warming in sight. But without plans to rapidly dismantle the fossil fuel industry, something no one in our corporate state is contemplating, the heat waves of Baton Rouge will be a starting point for a descent that will ultimately make cities like Chicago unlivable. The false promise of human adaptability to global warming is peddled by the polluters’ major front group, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which informed the Environmental Protection Agency that “populations can acclimatize to warmer climates via a range of behavioral, physiological, and technological adaptations.” This bizarre theory of adaptability has been embraced by the Obama administration as it prepares to exploit the natural resources in the Arctic. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced recently that melting of sea ice “will result in more shipping, fishing and tourism, and the possibility to develop newly accessible oil and gas reserves.” Now that’s something to look forward to.
“It is good that at least those guys are taking it seriously, far more seriously than the federal government is taking it,” said the author and environmental activist Bill McKibben of the efforts in cities such as Chicago to begin to adapt to warmer temperatures. “At least they understand that they have some kind of problem coming at them. But they are working off the science of five or six years ago, which is still kind of the official science that the International Climate Change negotiations are working off of. They haven’t begun to internalize the idea that the science has shifted sharply. We are no longer talking about a long, slow, gradual, linear warming, but something that is coming much more quickly and violently. Seven or eight years ago it made sense to talk about putting permeable concrete on the streets. Now what we are coming to realize is that the most important adaptation we can do is to stop putting carbon in the atmosphere. If we don’t, we are going to produce temperature rises so high that there is no adapting to them.”
The Earth has already begun to react to our hubris. Freak weather unleashed deadly tornados in Joplin, Mo., and Tuscaloosa, Ala. It has triggered wildfires that have engulfed large tracts in California, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Texas. It has brought severe droughts to the Southwest, parts of China and the Amazon. It has caused massive flooding along the Mississippi as well as in Australia, New Zealand, China and Pakistan. It is killing off the fish stocks in the oceans and obliterating the polar ice caps. Steadily rising sea levels will eventually submerge coastal cities, islands and some countries. These disturbing weather patterns presage a world where it will be harder and harder to sustain human life. Massive human migrations, which have already begun, will create chaos and violence. India is building a 4,000-kilometer fence along its border with Bangladesh to, in part, hold back the refugees who will flee if Bangladesh is submerged. There are mounting food shortages and sharp price increases in basic staples such as wheat as weather patterns disrupt crop production. The failed grain harvests in Russia, China and Australia, along with the death of the winter wheat crop in Texas, have, as McKibben points out, been exacerbated by the inability of Midwestern farmers to plant corn in water-logged fields. These portents of an angry Gaia are nothing compared to what will follow if we do not swiftly act.
Advertisement
“We are going to have to adapt a good deal,” said McKibben, with whom I spoke by phone from his home in Vermont. “It is going to be a century that calls for being resilient and durable. Most of that adaptation is going to take the form of economies getting smaller and lower to the ground, local food, local energy, things like that. But that alone won’t do it, because the scale of change we are now talking about is so great that no one can adapt to it. Temperatures have gone up one degree so far and that has been enough to melt the Arctic. If we let it go up three or four degrees, the rule of thumb the agronomists go by is every degree Celsius of temperature rise represents about a 10 percent reduction in grain yields. If we let it go up three or four degrees we are really not talking about a planet that can support a civilization anything like the one we’ve got. 1 2 3 NEXT PAGE >>>
May 24, 2011
Vote Solar – New York Solar Jobs Act of 2011.
![]()
Help New York go solar! Tell your state lawmakers that you support the Solar Jobs Act today — S.4178 & A.5713 (View bill text here)
With rising electricity needs, plenty of sunshine, and a local workforce primed for green jobs, New York has what it takes to lead the new solar economy. But the state has a policy structure that’s supported less than 54 MW of installed solar to date. That’s not even 0.1% of New York’s electricity mix. New Jersey installed more than twice that much solar in 2010 alone.
The Empire State is missing a tremendous opportunity to invest its energy dollars in local jobs, economic opportunity and a brighter future for the state. New York can and should use smart solar policies to go further.
The Solar Industry Development & Jobs Act of 2011 provides a much-needed blueprint for solar leadership by:
Setting a strong solar target of 5,000 MW – enough to power 500,000 average households and equivalent to 3% of the state’s total electric load.Altogether it’s a recipe for creating tens of thousands of new local jobs and billions in economic output – all while reducing harmful emissions and reliance on fossil-fuels.
Fact Sheets:
Press Highlights:
Press Releases:
Blogs to Watch:
Partner Resources:
Alliance for Clean Energy New York (ACE NY), the American Lung Association in New York, Citizens Campaign for the Environment, Environmental Advocates of New York, Environment New York, New York Interfaith Power and Light, New York League of Conservation Voters, New York Solar Energy Industries Association, Natural Resources Defense Council, Pace Climate and Energy Center, Physicians for Social Responsibility – New York Chapter, Renewable Energy Long Island, Solar Alliance, and the Vote Solar Initiative.
May 24, 2011
Biomass Power and Thermal | Biomassmagazine.com.

Plants that use extremely high temperatures to turn municipal solid waste (MSW) into electricity are springing from the soils of countries around the globe including Canada, Spain, the United States and Japan. Although the process technologies and temperature ranges employed at these facilities vary, the basic concept is the same: MSW goes in, electricity comes out. In addition, unlike incineration few, if any, emissions are produced and little, if any, of the remaining material needs to be landfilled.
As farfetched as it may sound, the technology for producing plasmas dates back nearly a century. Plasmas are gases that have been heated to the point of ionization-meaning they are composed of charged particles such as electrons that can conduct electricity and generate tremendous amounts of heat. Lightning is an example of naturally occurring plasma. Since the early 1900s, plasmas have been used to melt metals and to make acetylene fuel from natural gas. In the 1960s, NASA developed plasma technology to simulate the intense heat of re-entry for testing the durability of certain pieces of shuttle equipment. The technology continues to be used in the metal and chemical industries and has now begun to filter into waste management.
In the latter case, the scenario goes something like this: MSW is shredded into one- to two-inch waste strips, which are dumped into a steel cylinder. This cupola is typically equipped with two torches near the bottom or top, which protrude like perches in a canary cage. These torches house electrodes, and when a continuous flow of electricity is applied, an arc forms between them. The air in the torch pushes this extremely hot artificial bolt of lightning into a furnace, where the MSW enters. The torrid temperatures generated by this process, which can be hotter than the surface of the sun, rip apart compounds and convert inorganic solids into a glassy obsidian-like rock that can be used in road construction. The process also transforms organic materials into syngas that can be used to make electricity and liquid fuels. Since the entire process is closed to the atmosphere, no emissions are released during the conversion of MSW to syngas and slag. “Plasma processing of MSW has unique treatment capabilities unequaled by existing technologies,” says Lou Circeo, director of plasma applications research at Georgia Tech Research Institute. “Plasma gasification could revolutionize the whole field of waste management.”
That’s certainly the hope of city planners, county commissioners and their comrades worldwide who feel the crunch of ever diminishing landfill space. The city of Ottawa for instance, has partnered with Plasco Energy Group Inc., a private high-technology company based in Canada, to process 85 tons of MSW per day over the next two years. The company holds 19 patents for its process technologies including one for the overall plasma gasification system, explains Rod Bryden, president and CEO of the company. Bryden, who owned Ottawa’s National Hockey League team from the time it was an expansion franchise until about two years ago, has been building businesses since 1974. “Plasma-based technologies have been around for some time but I saw the opportunity to create a conversion business that would deliver environmental quality while creating net energy for sale,” he says.
Plasco broke ground for the new demonstration facility in September 2006. Construction was completed in June and the plant, which covers three acres of grassland across the road from the Trail Road Landfill southwest of Ottawa, started in July. The plant began receiving waste from city trucks in late September.
Process Variation
The Plasco plasma gasification process differs from the general scheme previously described. Instead of directly dumping the shredded MSW into a plasma torch chamber, Plasco’s process uses a separate gasification chamber to heat the strips of waste to about 700 degrees Celsius (1,292 degrees Fahrenheit). In this step, some components of the MSW such as water are converted into gas while everything else is transformed to ash. The gas rises to a vertical chamber that holds two plasma torches, which blast the gas into its basic elements. Some of these elements reform into syngas, a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Before the syngas can be scrubbed of heavy metals such as mercury, cadmium and lead as well as other undesirable chemicals like chlorine and sulfur, the syngas is cooled. Some of the heat released during this cooling is shuttled back to the initial chamber. This is the only process that recycles heat to convert waste into syngas, Bryden explains. “We don’t use these plasma torches to generate gas,” Bryden explains. “We use these plasma torches to refine the gases that have already been released from the waste.” Refining gases rather than whole MSW requires less heat from the torches, which saves energy. “This is one of the reasons our system produces so much more power than it consumes.”
The ash from that first gasification chamber is transferred to a separate plasma torch compartment where it is converted into syngas and a hard glass-like material that is broken into pieces and sold for use as a construction aggregate. All the syngas that’s produced is collected and piped to a bank of generators that converts it into electricity. In the end, out of 100 tons of MSW that enters the system, 4 megawatts (MW) of electricity are sold to the grid and used to power about 3,600 homes, 1 MW of electricity is used to power the plant, 15 tons of slag aggregate is produced and sold, and 500 kilograms (kg) of sulfur is sold as fertilizer. In addition, 1 kg of ash-made up of heavy metals-is landfilled. “You could fit a day’s disposal requirement in the glove compartment of your car,” Bryden says.
The plant in Ottawa will run for two years at which time the city will either dismantle the facility, continue to use it for MSW treatment or operate the plant as a development facility for the processing of other energetic materials that pose disposal challenges such as paper mill waste and the sludge from sewage treatment. In addition, Plasco has a memorandum of understanding with a waste management company in Spain to build a plant in Barcelona that will process 200 tons of MSW per day and two other contracts are in the works for plants in Canada. “We expect that by October we’ll be moving forward with commercial plants in a number of places,” Bryden says.
Growing in Popularity
Over the past several years, about 12 commercial plasma waste processing facilities have been operating in Europe and North America, and about 10 in Asia. The waste processed at these facilities varies and ranges from MSW to medical waste, catalytic converters, asbestos and ammunition.
The largest facility in the world to date is slated for start up in 2010. The plant will be built in St. Lucie County, a beach destination along Florida’s south-central Atlantic coast. On April 10, Geoplasma LLC, an energy developer based in Atlanta, Ga., signed an agreement with the county. The company will finance, permit, construct, own and operate the $425 million MSW-to-energy plant for 20 years.
The new plant will be constructed in two stages. The first will likely start up in the winter of 2010 and will process at least 1,000 tons of MSW each day and produce enough electricity to power about 25,000 homes. Each gasifier unit will house up to six plasma torches and will process between 500 to 750 tons of waste. Within five years, Geoplasma intends to scale-up the plant by adding more gasifier reactors. At this time, the plant, which will stand on about eight acres, will process 3,000 tons of MSW per day, two-thirds of which will come from the existing landfill. “We’ll be able to consume the landfill within our 20-year contract. This will be the first time that a landfill like this has been recovered to our knowledge,” explains Hilburn Hillestad, president of Geoplasma.
The plasma torches and gasification reactors for the modules will be supplied by Westinghouse Plasma Corp., the technology developer Geoplasma has teamed with. Westinghouse has been in the plasma gasification business since the 1960s. The company’s technology is being used in two waste processing facilities in Japan and in a General Motors Corp. plant in Definance, Ohio, for scrap metal melting. The torches in the latter plant have been in use for 17 years and the electrodes have been in use for more than 500,000 hours. Westinghouse was recently acquired by Alter Nrg Corp. of Canada and Geoplasma will be the exclusive marketer for the Westinghouse technology in Canada and the United States, Hillestad explains.
“The technology is proven and reliable,” says Shyam Dighe, president and chief technology officer for Westinghouse Plasma Corp. Although the technology has been around for a while, “now, several factors have come together to make plasma gasification like a perfect storm,” he adds.
Hillestad agrees with Dighe and adds that “over the past few years we’ve seen a steep increase in energy prices in this country and worldwide. Before those energy prices spiked the natural gas community generated a lot of power with natural gas and we couldn’t compete with that. Now, however, our syngas can compete with natural gas to generate electricity. It’s the most sustainable alternative technology for disposing of MSW that we know of at a time when we critically need alternative energy supplies.”
Jessica Ebert is a Biomass Magazine staff writer. She can be reached at jebert@bbibiofuels.com or (701) 746-8385.
Pier
1
I introduces plasma waste Italy,but many universities professor like inceneritors and petrol companies like conventional or pyrolisis gasification.For me landfills eliminator is only plasma waste 7°generation cool plasma modular systems. Cost:for me a plasma plant 4000 t/day cost 500 millions dollar. 40 plasma plant cost 20 billions to recycle 160.000 tons day and produce 40.000 MW or 7,6 billions plasmafuel via syngas. I search a Us-Canada Company to confirm and building this plasma gasification Italian project.Pier caffit@alice.it