Working Families » Take Action!
April 25, 2011
Working Families » Take Action!. Petition
Gas Drilling Awareness for Cortland County
April 10, 2011
April 9, 2011
Anonymous By Art Siegel The Daily Star Sat Apr 09, 2011, 03:24 AM EDT
In Samuel Coleridge’s oft-quoted late 18th-century poem of the violation of nature and Christian redemption, “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner,” the title character laments, “water, water, everywhere, Nor any a drop to drink.”
An albatross, a good luck omen to sailors, had been pursuing the mariner’s ship for days. The mariner thoughtlessly kills the great seabird, invoking the wrath of the spirits of the sea.
The ship is tossed into the windless doldrums, where it remains until the ship’s water supply is exhausted and the crew severely dehydrated. The vengeful crew wrapped the seabird around the mariner’s neck as a kind of “Scarlet Letter.”
While the fantasy of this faraway mariner’s life-threatening dehydration may seem irrelevant to the risks posed by rural life in upstate New York or urban life in New York City, this fantasy may be a far more imminent possibility than most New York state residents can yet imagine.
Why?
Some of the nation’s richest reserves of natural gas are trapped in the tight, difficult-to-access shales of the Marcellus Formation, some of which lie several thousands of feet below the surface in a broad, 18,000-square-mile swath across New York state’s Southern Tier. The formation covers 95,000 square miles across several states, including Pennsylvania and West Virginia.
The oil and gas drilling industries have already leased tens of thousands of acres in the watersheds that supply 27 million consumers in five states _ New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware and Maryland _ with clean, potable and mostly unfiltered and affordable water.
Using a relatively new, aggressively intrusive method _ horizontal hydraulic fracturing _ well drillers penetrate the earth vertically to reach the tight shales, then extend horizontally for up to a mile.
The 3 to 8 million gallons of water for each individual well are drawn from local aquifers, streams and rivers to facilitate the drilling process. Eighty to 300 tons of “proprietary” chemicals, the identities of which are unknown to the public, are used with the drilling water.
The Federal Energy Policy Act of 2005 exempts the oil and gas industries from disclosing chemical drilling recipes, and exempts them from regulation under the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Water and Clean Drinking Water acts.
However, the EPA labels oil and gas drilling by-products as the most hazardous industrial wastes in the nation.
Approximately 1 million gallons of drilling wastewater laden with toxic chemicals, normally occurring radioactive materials (NORMS) and total dissolved solids (TDS) will be recovered from the well bore and stored on site until they can be removed and processed at an appropriate wastewater processing facility _ the type of which only exists in a few locations in the entire country.
After drilling, the gas is released from the shale by water and sand under explosively high pressures. Some of the recovered methane, a greenhouse gas 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide, along with a miasma of volatile organic compounds, will be “flared off” at the wellhead before the useable gas can be contained.
With an economy of scale throughout the full range of the Marcellus’ 95,000 square miles _ 6 to 10 wells per square mile _ the gas drilling industry claims it can provide enough gas to
See Frack on Page D2
meet the nation’s current gas consumption needs for 100 years. Yet the U.S. population of 310 million will reach 450 million by 2050, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. That implied increased consumption would considerably shorten that projected supply period, even if current per capita use remained stable.
Moreover, subsidizing the gas industry with costly tax exemptions and EPA exemptions that threaten public health and safety are tantamount to feeding the world’s most consumptive society’s insatiable fossil fuel addiction, instead of treating it with heavier subsidies for genuinely renewable energy sources such as wind and solar. The Rocky Mountain Institute asserts that if the 40 least electrically efficient states in the U.S. were to achieve the electrical efficiency of the 10 most efficient ones, national electricity use would be cut by one-third _ the equivalent of shutting down 372, or 62 percent, of the nation’s 600 coal-fired power plants.
Exclusive use of LED (light-emitting diode) lighting in the U.S. would reduce electrical energy use for lighting by 75 percent. Worldwide exclusive use would reduce global electrical energy consumption by 12 percent. And that’s only the beginning.
The New York City Department of Environmental Protection’s Final Impact Assessment Report (released in December 2009 by a hydrological civil engineering company) details a host of additional risks posed by hydraulic fracturing to the purity of the 1 million-acre New York City watershed in the Catskill region.
Many thousands of trucks laden with toxic wastewater would be simultaneously plying town, county and state roads adjacent to streams, rivers and reservoirs. Naturally occurring and hydraulic-fracturing-related fissures and fractures in rock formations would provide pathways through which highly toxic drilling chemicals and NORMS could migrate under pressure to aquifers and aqueducts.
The “ancient mariner” in Coleridge’s fantastical poem was ultimately redeemed by his own contrition and the forgiveness of Christ, even though all his crewmates perished by dehydration because he had violated the natural law of the sea. Our elected state officials may not benefit from that same kind of redemption and may be compelled to wear an albatross of shame if they fail to act at this decisive moment.
While the DEP report has been available since 2009, two governors, the state Legislature and the state Department of Environmental Conservation still have not acted decisively to ban hydraulic fracturing in New York state. They produce only moratoriums, fatally flawed drafts, and hearings in public auditoriums where concerned citizens speak to DEC stenographers who mechanically record their eloquent remonstrations on an otherwise vacant, unresponsive public platform.
When I interviewed state Assemblyman James Brennan of the 44th Assembly District, he characterized the proposed hydraulic fracturing in the New York City watershed as “the industrialization of the region.” Brennan courageously sponsored a bill in the Assembly that would cut the Gordian knot of disparate opposition and effectively ban hydraulic fracturing in anyone’s watershed. A similar bill, SO 1234, was sponsored by Sen. Tom Duane in January. The bill is now with the Senate’s Environmental Conservation Committee, with little or no support.
This is no time for quibbling over an industrial process that is inherently dangerous, regardless of the most restrictive regulations or oversight, which no state agency has the staff to implement. Budgeted to the bone, the DEC has 19 staff to supervise what could become tens of thousands of hydrofracking wells in the state. Let’s get real.
All that glitters may not be gold or oil or gas, but the sparkling surface of a pristine river or reservoir.
Art Siegel is a certified tree farmer with The National Tree Farm System and an independent filmmaker. His film “Parcelizing the Catskills and the Boiled Frog Syndrome,” which features interviews with local, New York City and state elected and agency officials on environmental issues affecting the Catskill Region, is being screened at the Frank W. Cyr Center in Stamford on Saturday.
March 30, 2011
https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=04f0445243&view=att&th=12f07bda734ed5da&attid=0.3&disp=attd&zw
Gregory FCA and GoMarcellusShale.com’s Online Analysis of Public
Opinion Pertaining to Marcellus Shale Development
March 30th, 2011
Includes all available Nielsen BuzzMetrics data culled from over 45,000 traditional
media sources and over 150 million social media sources, including blogs, blog
comments, message boards, forums, Facebook, and Twitter.
Sentiment Scores are based on a 10‐point scale, ranging from +5 to ‐5. Plus five is
the most positive score and ‐5 is the most negative score. Zero represents neutral
sentiment.
This analysis was conducted by Gregory FCA and GoMarcellusShale.com, using
data from Nielsen Online’s BuzzMetrics.
March 8, 2011
Shale Gas Needs to Allay Environmental Doubts – NYTimes.com.
A shale gas rig in Pennsylvania. Shale gas is removed by hydraulic fracturing.
Safe havens are the rarest commodity in the energy patch. So oil and gas companies have been drawn to the hydraulic fracturing revolution in the United States by the perception of low political hazard. They’ve committed more than $70 billion to shale deals over the last two years, the consultancy IHS reckons.
But an environmentalist backlash is gaining momentum. One disaster along the lines of BP’s Macondo spill in the Gulf of Mexico, and the whole investment thesis could crumble. Instead of stonewalling new regulations and calls for transparency, the industry — gathering this week in Houston for the annual conference of IHS’s Cambridge Energy Research Associates unit — may want to get out in front by voluntarily accepting some safeguards.
The drumbeat of public opinion against so-called fracking, which involves cracking rocks and injecting chemicals to release oil or gas, is growing louder — even though the polemical “Gasland” missed out on the Academy Award for best documentary last week. Footage of flammable faucets and pools of contaminated water have alarmed many.
Naturally occurring gas means that some people in Pennsylvania have been able to set their tap water on fire for generations. So charges that the mini-earthquakes used by gas drillers despoil the water supply directly are hard to swallow. In the Marcellus shale, a deposit in the Northeast roughly the size of Greece, up to 7,000 feet of solid rock separates the shale deposits from groundwater supplies. Most engineers agree that that buffer makes contamination unlikely.
Still, the concerns demand further study. Radioactive materials brought to the surface along with some toxic fluids used in drilling do constitute a realistic danger to drinking water. The storage and treatment of such fluids need to be unquestionably safe — and it’s not clear that they are.
Many operators are trying to minimize their environmental impact. Chesapeake Energy said it seeks to constantly recycle drilling fluids. Others, like Range Resources, voluntarily revealed the ingredients that make up their secret sauce — something BHP Billiton, which just acquired nearly $5 billion of shale gas assets, also intends to do. But not all players are exemplary corporate citizens.
A single egregious case of environmental damage — even one less severe than BP’s Gulf of Mexico spill — could undermine the assumptions underlying the billions of dollars invested. Last week the United States awarded the first deepwater drilling permit since BP’s debacle 10 months ago. The nuclear industry provides an even more vivid example of how public confidence, once broken, can take years to repair. No new nuclear plants have gotten off the drawing board since the relatively harmless Three Mile Island accident in 1979.
So companies like Chesapeake and Exxon Mobil, which spent $31 billion on the gas driller XTO Energy last year, ought to have an incentive to clamp down on rogue operators. Instead, they’ve formed a united front against regulation. This is myopic.
The industry contends it’s already well supervised by the states. But those standards are patchy. Moreover, the fiscally stretched states have much to gain financially by going soft on energy companies. It was this kind of conflict that reduced the effectiveness of the Minerals Management Service, the combination watchdog and tax collector that oversaw BP in the gulf.
The best solution is to allow the Environmental Protection Agency to draw up nationwide safety standards for the fracking industry. The geology of rocks may differ by state, as the industry points out, but the treatment of the fluids used can still be consistent. By submitting to uniform rules, the industry could lay many safety fears to rest.
In addition, the industry has little to gain from its hard-won exemption from the Safe Drinking Water Act. Environmental activists have made much of this. And if fracking does not contaminate the water supply, as the industry insists, then it has little to fear. The industry is also taking a big risk in fighting to remain exempt from federal laws governing hazardous materials.
Lifting the veil of secrecy surrounding fracking fluids would also help, something a bill proposed by a New York representative, Maurice Hinchey, tries to address. Some concerns would be allayed by knowing contamination could be easily traced to its source.
The energy industry is engaged in the most aggressive onshore drilling campaign in the United States in a generation. It would behoove forward-looking energy chiefs to recognize that their shareholders’ interests are best served by avoiding a Macondo moment. CHRISTOPHER SWANN
March 5, 2011
The Daily Item : Senator heckled.
LEWISBURG — What was billed as a severance tax discussion with state politicians Thursday night turned into a confrontation over gas industry interests, and public and environmental health.
State Sen. Gene Yaw, R-23, speaking with state Rep. Rick Mirabito, D-83, found himself in pointed exchanges with audience members almost from the beginning of his turn during “Community Impact: Severance Tax,” a discussion at Bucknell University.
Mirabito spoke first, telling the audience of nearly 100 that he favors a tax on extracting the natural gas out of Pennsylvania’s Marcellus Shale. That, he said, would accomplish what he sees as three major impacts: infrastructure costs, such as repairing roads and developing tools to manage the gas industry; environmental impact to soil, water and air; and societal needs, such as more police and human services for a growing population.
But the tenor of the audience changed almost immediately when Yaw took the podium. Asking the audience “Who here is concerned with our $4 billion budget deficit?” an audience member replied “Not as concerned as we are about the gas industry.” The exchanges between Yaw and some audience members continued throughout his time speaking. When Yaw noted “Pennsylvania, for the first time, is being called to compete in the global market. And what do some say? ‘Let’s just tax ’em to death’” — some audience members replied “Good.” “You obviously are a hostile group,” Yaw said to the crowd, particularly addressing some audience members in the front who refused to let up. “You don’t have to agree with me. … but you seem to have a pre-determined idea of what I’m going to say.”
The sharp remarks continued until Scott Meinke, a Bucknell professor and the event’s moderator, restored order.
During the question period, almost all queries were directed at Yaw, calling on him to divulge information about his dealing with gas companies and how he may have profited from it.
David Young, a Lewisburg environmental activist, told Yaw he had a “moral responsibility to disclose to your constituents” what contributions he may have received from gas companies and any business his law firm has done for them. “Until you do, you’re a mouthpiece and a traitor,” Young said, to which Yaw responded, “I didn’t come here for this.” Meinke again reminded the audience to keep a level of civility, to which another member shouted, “Maybe if your participant was civil in his heart…”
Yaw said all contributions made to his campaign are listed on his website, and that his law firm doesn’t work with gas companies. Yaw was able to get in that he’s proposed a bill to overturn a law the state Supreme Court set in 2002 that ended taxes on gas wells. With 71,000 active gas and oil wells in Pennsylvania, “If there has to be a tax, I prefer it be put into play and levied that way,” Yaw said. “It’s better than sending a lot of money to Harrisburg and getting little in return.”
Yaw also noted he has the support of the County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania in getting rid of the 2002 law. Bob Getz, a Sullivan County commissioner, gave Yaw rare praise during the event, saying CCAP has been working for eight years to overturn the law and get the taxes restored. Lost in the evening’s tension were both politicians’ views for how they would govern a severance tax and why they believe Pennsylvania needs one. “Every day we don’t have a fee, taxpayers lose money,” Mirabito said, adding that Pennsylvania has lost an estimated $145 million in untaxed profits, and that 60 percent and 70 percent of state residents are in favor of a fee.
“Coal wasn’t taxed, and we spend billions in cleanup today,” he said. Yaw said that other states that levied severance tax on natural gas drillers eliminated some other tax on the businesses. In Pennsylvania, the tax would be another fee. He is very much against any collected taxes going to Harrisburg and the “black hole” of the general fund, feeling the counties with active gas drilling should benefit first from such funds. Yaw also said the gas industry has paid $1 billion to date to do business in Pennsylvania.
Yaw said regarding the coal industry that, at the time, there were no regulation agencies or environmental laws governing it.
— E-mail comments to esocha@dailyitem.com
February 9, 2011
Research & Policy Brief Series. ISSUE NUMBER 39/JANUARY 2011
How much do residents feel they know about the potential impacts?
Department of Development Sociology
Cornell University