GDACC

Gas Drilling Awareness for Cortland County

  • Welcome
  • Contact Us
  • Cortland News
  • Town Bans/Planning
  • Leasing Issues
  • Comment on DEC Regs 2012
  • WHAT YOU CAN DO
  • Website Help
Posts Comments
  • Shale Gas Development-Hydrofracking
  • events
  • Water
  • Environment
  • Economics
  • Official Actions–Legislation, judgments,regulation
  • Pipelines
  • Health
  • Regulation
  • DEC

Working Families » Take Action!

April 25, 2011

Working Families » Take Action!.  Petition

Filed under public opinion

10,000 Students Take to DC Streets, Calling for Action on Climate & BP Spill

April 20, 2011

10,000 Students Take to DC Streets, Calling for Action on Climate & BP Spill.

Filed under public opinion

Neighborhood vs. neighbor: In towns 1,500 miles apart, gas rush causing a ruckus | Star-Gazette | stargazette.com

April 17, 2011

Neighborhood vs. neighbor: In towns 1,500 miles apart, gas rush causing a ruckus | Star-Gazette | stargazette.com.  Apr. 16, 2011

Filed under Leasing Issues, public opinion

The rime of the upstate anti-fracker Daily Star 4/9/11

April 10, 2011

April 9, 2011

The rime of the upstate anti-fracker

Anonymous By Art Siegel The Daily Star Sat Apr 09, 2011, 03:24 AM EDT

In Samuel Coleridge’s oft-quoted late 18th-century poem of the violation of nature and Christian redemption, “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner,” the title character laments, “water, water, everywhere, Nor any a drop to drink.”

An albatross, a good luck omen to sailors, had been pursuing the mariner’s ship for days. The mariner thoughtlessly kills the great seabird, invoking the wrath of the spirits of the sea.

The ship is tossed into the windless doldrums, where it remains until the ship’s water supply is exhausted and the crew severely dehydrated. The vengeful crew wrapped the seabird around the mariner’s neck as a kind of “Scarlet Letter.”

While the fantasy of this faraway mariner’s life-threatening dehydration may seem irrelevant to the risks posed by rural life in upstate New York or urban life in New York City, this fantasy may be a far more imminent possibility than most New York state residents can yet imagine.

Why?

Some of the nation’s richest reserves of natural gas are trapped in the tight, difficult-to-access shales of the Marcellus Formation, some of which lie several thousands of feet below the surface in a broad, 18,000-square-mile swath across New York state’s Southern Tier. The formation covers 95,000 square miles across several states, including Pennsylvania and West Virginia.

The oil and gas drilling industries have already leased tens of thousands of acres in the watersheds that supply 27 million consumers in five states _ New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware and Maryland _ with clean, potable and mostly unfiltered and affordable water.

Using a relatively new, aggressively intrusive method _ horizontal hydraulic fracturing _ well drillers penetrate the earth vertically to reach the tight shales, then extend horizontally for up to a mile.

The 3 to 8 million gallons of water for each individual well are drawn from local aquifers, streams and rivers to facilitate the drilling process. Eighty to 300 tons of “proprietary” chemicals, the identities of which are unknown to the public, are used with the drilling water.

The Federal Energy Policy Act of 2005 exempts the oil and gas industries from disclosing chemical drilling recipes, and exempts them from regulation under the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Water and Clean Drinking Water acts.

However, the EPA labels oil and gas drilling by-products as the most hazardous industrial wastes in the nation.

Approximately 1 million gallons of drilling wastewater laden with toxic chemicals, normally occurring radioactive materials (NORMS) and total dissolved solids (TDS) will be recovered from the well bore and stored on site until they can be removed and processed at an appropriate wastewater processing facility _ the type of which only exists in a few locations in the entire country.

After drilling, the gas is released from the shale by water and sand under explosively high pressures. Some of the recovered methane, a greenhouse gas 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide, along with a miasma of volatile organic compounds, will be “flared off” at the wellhead before the useable gas can be contained.

With an economy of scale throughout the full range of the Marcellus’ 95,000 square miles _ 6 to 10 wells per square mile _ the gas drilling industry claims it can provide enough gas to

See Frack on Page D2

meet the nation’s current gas consumption needs for 100 years. Yet the U.S. population of 310 million will reach 450 million by 2050, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. That implied increased consumption would considerably shorten that projected supply period, even if current per capita use remained stable.

Moreover, subsidizing the gas industry with costly tax exemptions and EPA exemptions that threaten public health and safety are tantamount to feeding the world’s most consumptive society’s insatiable fossil fuel addiction, instead of treating it with heavier subsidies for genuinely renewable energy sources such as wind and solar. The Rocky Mountain Institute asserts that if the 40 least electrically efficient states in the U.S. were to achieve the electrical efficiency of the 10 most efficient ones, national electricity use would be cut by one-third _ the equivalent of shutting down 372, or 62 percent, of the nation’s 600 coal-fired power plants.

Exclusive use of LED (light-emitting diode) lighting in the U.S. would reduce electrical energy use for lighting by 75 percent. Worldwide exclusive use would reduce global electrical energy consumption by 12 percent. And that’s only the beginning.

The New York City Department of Environmental Protection’s Final Impact Assessment Report (released in December 2009 by a hydrological civil engineering company) details a host of additional risks posed by hydraulic fracturing to the purity of the 1 million-acre New York City watershed in the Catskill region.

Many thousands of trucks laden with toxic wastewater would be simultaneously plying town, county and state roads adjacent to streams, rivers and reservoirs. Naturally occurring and hydraulic-fracturing-related fissures and fractures in rock formations would provide pathways through which highly toxic drilling chemicals and NORMS could migrate under pressure to aquifers and aqueducts.

The “ancient mariner” in Coleridge’s fantastical poem was ultimately redeemed by his own contrition and the forgiveness of Christ, even though all his crewmates perished by dehydration because he had violated the natural law of the sea. Our elected state officials may not benefit from that same kind of redemption and may be compelled to wear an albatross of shame if they fail to act at this decisive moment.

While the DEP report has been available since 2009, two governors, the state Legislature and the state Department of Environmental Conservation still have not acted decisively to ban hydraulic fracturing in New York state. They produce only moratoriums, fatally flawed drafts, and hearings in public auditoriums where concerned citizens speak to DEC stenographers who mechanically record their eloquent remonstrations on an otherwise vacant, unresponsive public platform.

When I interviewed state Assemblyman James Brennan of the 44th Assembly District, he characterized the proposed hydraulic fracturing in the New York City watershed as “the industrialization of the region.” Brennan courageously sponsored a bill in the Assembly that would cut the Gordian knot of disparate opposition and effectively ban hydraulic fracturing in anyone’s watershed. A similar bill, SO 1234, was sponsored by Sen. Tom Duane in January. The bill is now with the Senate’s Environmental Conservation Committee, with little or no support.

This is no time for quibbling over an industrial process that is inherently dangerous, regardless of the most restrictive regulations or oversight, which no state agency has the staff to implement. Budgeted to the bone, the DEC has 19 staff to supervise what could become tens of thousands of hydrofracking wells in the state. Let’s get real.

All that glitters may not be gold or oil or gas, but the sparkling surface of a pristine river or reservoir.

Art Siegel is a certified tree farmer with The National Tree Farm System and an independent filmmaker. His film “Parcelizing the Catskills and the Boiled Frog Syndrome,” which features interviews with local, New York City and state elected and agency officials on environmental issues affecting the Catskill Region, is being screened at the Frank W. Cyr Center in Stamford on Saturday.

Filed under public opinion Tagged with NY, opinion

Defending the Mound | Denton Record Chronicle | News for Denton County, Texas | Local News

March 30, 2011

Defending the Mound | Denton Record Chronicle | News for Denton County, Texas | Local News.

Filed under public opinion

Gregory FCA and GoMarcellusShale.com’s Online Analysis of Public Opinion Pertaining to Marcellus Shale Development March 30th, 2011

March 30, 2011

https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=04f0445243&view=att&th=12f07bda734ed5da&attid=0.3&disp=attd&zw

Gregory FCA and GoMarcellusShale.com’s Online Analysis of Public
Opinion Pertaining to Marcellus Shale Development
March 30th, 2011
Includes all available Nielsen BuzzMetrics data culled from over 45,000 traditional
media sources and over 150 million social media sources, including blogs, blog
comments, message boards, forums, Facebook, and Twitter.
Sentiment Scores are based on a 10‐point scale, ranging from +5 to ‐5. Plus five is
the most positive score and ‐5 is the most negative score. Zero represents neutral
sentiment.
This analysis was conducted by Gregory FCA and GoMarcellusShale.com, using
data from Nielsen Online’s BuzzMetrics.

Filed under public opinion Tagged with gas industry, public opinion, selling the public

Shale Gas Needs to Allay Environmental Doubts – NYTimes.com

March 8, 2011

Shale Gas Needs to Allay Environmental Doubts – NYTimes.com.

 

Shale Gas Needs to Allay Environmental Doubts

By CHRISTOPHER SWANN
Published: March 6, 2011
  • Recommend
  • Twitter
  • E-Mail

  • Print
  • Reprints

  • ShareClose
    • Linkedin
    • Digg
    • Mixx
    • MySpace
    • Permalink

 

Enlarge This Image

Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg News

A shale gas rig in Pennsylvania. Shale gas is removed by hydraulic fracturing.

Add to Portfolio

  • Range Resources Corporation
  • Chesapeake Energy Corp
  • BHP Billiton PLC
  • Exxon Mobil Corp
  • BP Plc

Go to your Portfolio »

Safe havens are the rarest commodity in the energy patch. So oil and gas companies have been drawn to the hydraulic fracturing revolution in the United States by the perception of low political hazard. They’ve committed more than $70 billion to shale deals over the last two years, the consultancy IHS reckons.

But an environmentalist backlash is gaining momentum. One disaster along the lines of BP’s Macondo spill in the Gulf of Mexico, and the whole investment thesis could crumble. Instead of stonewalling new regulations and calls for transparency, the industry — gathering this week in Houston for the annual conference of IHS’s Cambridge Energy Research Associates unit — may want to get out in front by voluntarily accepting some safeguards.

The drumbeat of public opinion against so-called fracking, which involves cracking rocks and injecting chemicals to release oil or gas, is growing louder — even though the polemical “Gasland” missed out on the Academy Award for best documentary last week. Footage of flammable faucets and pools of contaminated water have alarmed many.

Naturally occurring gas means that some people in Pennsylvania have been able to set their tap water on fire for generations. So charges that the mini-earthquakes used by gas drillers despoil the water supply directly are hard to swallow. In the Marcellus shale, a deposit in the Northeast roughly the size of Greece, up to 7,000 feet of solid rock separates the shale deposits from groundwater supplies. Most engineers agree that that buffer makes contamination unlikely.

Still, the concerns demand further study. Radioactive materials brought to the surface along with some toxic fluids used in drilling do constitute a realistic danger to drinking water. The storage and treatment of such fluids need to be unquestionably safe — and it’s not clear that they are.

Many operators are trying to minimize their environmental impact. Chesapeake Energy said it seeks to constantly recycle drilling fluids. Others, like Range Resources, voluntarily revealed the ingredients that make up their secret sauce — something BHP Billiton, which just acquired nearly $5 billion of shale gas assets, also intends to do. But not all players are exemplary corporate citizens.

A single egregious case of environmental damage — even one less severe than BP’s Gulf of Mexico spill — could undermine the assumptions underlying the billions of dollars invested. Last week the United States awarded the first deepwater drilling permit since BP’s debacle 10 months ago. The nuclear industry provides an even more vivid example of how public confidence, once broken, can take years to repair. No new nuclear plants have gotten off the drawing board since the relatively harmless Three Mile Island accident in 1979.

So companies like Chesapeake and Exxon Mobil, which spent $31 billion on the gas driller XTO Energy last year, ought to have an incentive to clamp down on rogue operators. Instead, they’ve formed a united front against regulation. This is myopic.

The industry contends it’s already well supervised by the states. But those standards are patchy. Moreover, the fiscally stretched states have much to gain financially by going soft on energy companies. It was this kind of conflict that reduced the effectiveness of the Minerals Management Service, the combination watchdog and tax collector that oversaw BP in the gulf.

The best solution is to allow the Environmental Protection Agency to draw up nationwide safety standards for the fracking industry. The geology of rocks may differ by state, as the industry points out, but the treatment of the fluids used can still be consistent. By submitting to uniform rules, the industry could lay many safety fears to rest.

In addition, the industry has little to gain from its hard-won exemption from the Safe Drinking Water Act. Environmental activists have made much of this. And if fracking does not contaminate the water supply, as the industry insists, then it has little to fear. The industry is also taking a big risk in fighting to remain exempt from federal laws governing hazardous materials.

Lifting the veil of secrecy surrounding fracking fluids would also help, something a bill proposed by a New York representative, Maurice Hinchey, tries to address. Some concerns would be allayed by knowing contamination could be easily traced to its source.

The energy industry is engaged in the most aggressive onshore drilling campaign in the United States in a generation. It would behoove forward-looking energy chiefs to recognize that their shareholders’ interests are best served by avoiding a Macondo moment. CHRISTOPHER SWANN

For more independent financial commentary and analysis, visit http://www.breakingviews.com.

Filed under public opinion

The Daily Item : Senator heckled

March 5, 2011

The Daily Item : Senator heckled.

Senator heckled
By Evamarie Socha
Posted:  03/05/2011 8:07 AM

More images >>

More News >>
\ Next >>

LEWISBURG — What was billed as a severance tax discussion with state politicians Thursday night turned into a confrontation over gas industry interests, and public and environmental health.
State Sen. Gene Yaw, R-23, speaking with state Rep. Rick Mirabito, D-83, found himself in pointed exchanges with audience members almost from the beginning of his turn during “Community Impact: Severance Tax,” a discussion at Bucknell University.
Mirabito spoke first, telling the audience of nearly 100 that he favors a tax on extracting the natural gas out of Pennsylvania’s Marcellus Shale. That, he said, would accomplish what he sees as three major impacts: infrastructure costs, such as repairing roads and developing tools to manage the gas industry; environmental impact to soil, water and air; and societal needs, such as more police and human services for a growing population.
But the tenor of the audience changed almost immediately when Yaw took the podium.  Asking the audience “Who here is concerned with our $4 billion budget deficit?” an audience member replied “Not as concerned as we are about the gas industry.”  The exchanges between Yaw and some audience members continued throughout his time speaking.  When Yaw noted “Pennsylvania, for the first time, is being called to compete in the global market. And what do some say? ‘Let’s just tax ’em to death’” — some audience members replied “Good.”  “You obviously are a hostile group,” Yaw said to the crowd, particularly addressing some audience members in the front who refused to let up. “You don’t have to agree with me. … but you seem to have a pre-determined idea of what I’m going to say.”
The sharp remarks continued until Scott Meinke, a Bucknell professor and the event’s moderator, restored order.
During the question period, almost all queries were directed at Yaw, calling on him to divulge information about his dealing with gas companies and how he may have profited from it.
David Young, a Lewisburg environmental activist, told Yaw he had a “moral responsibility to disclose to your constituents” what contributions he may have received from gas companies and any business his law firm has done for them.  “Until you do, you’re a mouthpiece and a traitor,” Young said, to which Yaw responded, “I didn’t come here for this.”  Meinke again reminded the audience to keep a level of civility, to which another member shouted, “Maybe if your participant was civil in his heart…”
Yaw said all contributions made to his campaign are listed on his website, and that his law firm doesn’t work with gas companies.  Yaw was able to get in that he’s proposed a bill to overturn a law the state Supreme Court set in 2002 that ended taxes on gas wells. With 71,000 active gas and oil wells in Pennsylvania, “If there has to be a tax, I prefer it be put into play and levied that way,” Yaw said. “It’s better than sending a lot of money to Harrisburg and getting little in return.”
Yaw also noted he has the support of the County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania in getting rid of the 2002 law.  Bob Getz, a Sullivan County commissioner, gave Yaw rare praise during the event, saying CCAP has been working for eight years to overturn the law and get the taxes restored.  Lost in the evening’s tension were both politicians’ views for how they would govern a severance tax and why they believe Pennsylvania needs one.  “Every day we don’t have a fee, taxpayers lose money,” Mirabito said, adding that Pennsylvania has lost an estimated $145 million in untaxed profits, and that 60 percent and 70 percent of state residents are in favor of a fee.
“Coal wasn’t taxed, and we spend billions in cleanup today,” he said.   Yaw said that other states that levied severance tax on natural gas drillers eliminated some other tax on the businesses. In Pennsylvania, the tax would be another fee.  He is very much against any collected taxes going to Harrisburg and the “black hole” of the general fund, feeling the counties with active gas drilling should benefit first from such funds.  Yaw also said the gas industry has paid $1 billion to date to do business in Pennsylvania.
Yaw said regarding the coal industry that, at the time, there were no regulation agencies or environmental laws governing it.
— E-mail comments to esocha@dailyitem.com

Filed under public opinion

Policy Brief on Gas Development in NY and PA

February 9, 2011

http://devsoc.cals.cornell.edu/cals/devsoc/outreach/cardi/publications/upload/Policy_Brief_Jan11-draft08.pdf

Research & Policy Brief Series. ISSUE NUMBER 39/JANUARY 2011

Natural Gas Development:

Views of New York and Pennsylvania Residents in the Marcellus Shale Region

By

Richard Stedman, Cornell University, Fern Willits, Kathryn Brasier, Matthew Filteau, and Diane McLaughlin, The Pennsylvania State University, andJeffrey Jacquet

, Cornell University.

 

 

How much do residents feel they know about the potential impacts?

Department of Development Sociology

Cornell University

 

 

Filed under public opinion Tagged with community impact, economic impact, environmental effects, gas drilling, Health effects, hydrofracking, water contamination

fracking | Survey: Red State or Blue, Most People Are Concerned about Fracking’s Effect on H2O | Rodale News

January 3, 2011

fracking | Survey: Red State or Blue, Most People Are Concerned about Fracking’s Effect on H2O | Rodale News.

Filed under public opinion

← Older posts

Newer posts →

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 264 other subscribers

Shaleshock Media

<div class="care2PetitionEmbed"

2

Recent Posts

  • Opinion | What an analysis of 377 Americans arrested or charged in the Capitol insurrection tells us – The Washington Post April 7, 2021
  • Understanding the Fossil Fuel Industry’s Legacy of White Supremacy | DeSmog April 3, 2021
  • Divestment Fever Spreads as ‘Eco Radicals at Goldman Sachs’ Downgrade Exxon Stock to ‘Sell’ Status | Common Dreams News February 8, 2020
  • ‘Bridge to Climate Chaos’: New Report Details Urgent Need for Total US Fracking Ban | Common Dreams News February 8, 2020
  • (no title) September 28, 2019
  • The Best Technology for Fighting Climate Change Isn’t a Technology – Scientific American Blog Network December 5, 2018
  • How Americans Think About Climate Change, in Six Maps – The New York Times March 21, 2017
  • Donald Trump’s “carbon bubble” economy is bound to pop — the only question is how bad it will be – Salon.com January 3, 2017
  • Methane: New York’s Dirty Addiction to Shale Gas – YouTube December 18, 2016
  • Scientists are frantically copying U.S. climate data, fearing it might vanish under Trump – The Washington Post December 13, 2016
  • State deploys response trailers along crude oil transportation corridor – Capitol Confidential December 6, 2016
  • A Wrenching Choice for Alaska Towns in the Path of Climate Change – The New York Times November 29, 2016
  • An Updated Anaylsis of Pipeline Incidents November 27, 2016
  • FracTracker Alliance Home – insights empowering action November 27, 2016
  • Perils of Climate Change Could Swamp Coastal Real Estate – The New York Times November 24, 2016
  • David MacKay FRS: Sustainable Energy – without the hot air: Contents November 1, 2016
  • Partnership with Exxon Puts MIT’s Climate Action Vow to the Test | InsideClimate News November 1, 2016
  • Breaking: 15 Arrested Protesting Spectra Pipeline Scheduled to Go Online Nov. 1 October 26, 2016
  • What If … Energy Production Was Banned on Federal Lands & Waters? | U.S. Chamber of Commerce October 24, 2016
  • Flawed NY Renews Bill: An Open Letter | Coalition to Protect New York October 20, 2016

Pages

  • Accidents & Injuries-Gas/Oil Related Injuries
  • Brine Spreading and Disposal on Roads–NY Bans and Legislation
  • Contact Us
  • Cortland News
  • Current Legal Cases on Mineral Leases and Landowner Information
  • Data Sources & Statistics
    • Drilling Permits, Regulation, Waste, Violations
    • Health & Environmental Data
    • Industry Data
    • Leasing Data/Maps
    • Money and Politics
    • State Agencies
    • Water Quality/Release Data
  • Developing Road Preservation Local Law and Road Use Agreements: A Half-Day Forum
  • Election 2010
  • Energy Research/Funding
  • Gasland Josh Fox
  • Help Using this Site
  • Hydro-fracking 101
  • Information for Medical Professionals
    • Case Studies
    • Case Studies
    • Chemical Hazards
    • Health Surveys
    • Impact on Community Health Facilities
    • New York State Assembly Hearings on Health Effects of Shale Gas Extraction
    • Presentations, hearings, conferences on Health Effects of Hydrofracking
    • Psychological Impacts
  • Judicial decisions
  • LINKS
  • NYS and Federal Regulation
    • DEC SGEIS/Fracking Regulations 2011
      • DEC names hydrofracking advisory panel 7/11
      • Recommendations on Commenting on Health issues in SGEIS 2011
    • EPA Study on Hydrofracking
    • NYS Energy Policy & Climate Change
  • NYS Fracking Regulations 2012–How to Comment to DEC
  • Pipeline Background Information
  • RESOURCES
    • Agricultural Impact
    • Air Pollution
    • Citizen Monitoring of Drilling and Environment
    • Climate Change
    • Databases
      • Best Practices
    • Election 2010
    • Emergency Response
    • Energy
    • Energy Independence?
    • Environmental Justice
    • Environmental Monitoring
    • Environmental/Recreational Issues
    • Gas Infrastructure-Pipelines-Compressor
    • Geology
    • Government Promotion of Shale Drilling
    • Health Aspects of Gas Drilling
    • Impact on Property Values, Mortgages, Insurance
    • Influence of Gas Industry on Politics/Conflict of Interest
    • International Concern
    • Intro to High Volume Slick-water Drilling for Natural Gas
    • Investor Concerns
    • Leasing Issues
    • Legal Representation for Water Contamination
    • Legislative/Regulatory/Industry Standards
    • NYS State Forest Management Plan
    • Oil/Gas Industry Accidents/Leaks/Spills
    • Peak Oil/Sustainability
    • Public Awareness & Opinion
    • Public Infrastructure Protection
    • Public Safety
    • Resources: Books Films
    • Selling the Public on Gas Drilling
    • Socio-Economic-Historical/Quality of Life Aspects of Gas Drilling
    • Taxation of Oil/Gas Production and Resources
    • Technical Aspects
    • Threats to Democracy
    • Tools for County-Municipal Planning for Industrial Gas Production
      • County-Municipal Taskforces
      • Legal Basis for Municipal Planning, Laws, Zoning
      • Local Organizing to Ban or Control Fracking in Your Town. –
        • Resource sheet on Local Laws
      • Model Laws/Policies/Planning for Local Control
      • Municipal Bans, Resolutions, Moratoria
    • Waste Disposal
      • Landfills
    • Water Resources
    • Worker Safety
  • Welcome
  • WHAT YOU CAN DO
    • AN ACT to amend the environmental conservation law, in relation to prohibiting the use of hydraulic fracturing
    • Allows local governments to enact or enforce certain laws and ordinances
    • Allows local governments to enact or enforce certain laws and ordinances. A03245
    • Legal Steps
    • NY Proposed Legislation 2011
    • Suggestions from the Green Umbrella.
    • Uniform Treatment of Waste

Posts by category

  • Accidents (56)
  • Activism (26)
  • agriculture (69)
  • Air Pollution (133)
  • Bans (137)
  • bomb trains (6)
  • climate chqne (83)
    • Climate Change (1)
  • Community Impacts (137)
  • Constitutional Rights (7)
  • Cortland Data (24)
  • DEC (221)
  • Drilling Permits (17)
  • Economics (366)
  • Energy Independence? (79)
  • Environment (408)
  • EPA (123)
  • events (497)
  • exports (8)
  • frackademia (4)
  • Geology (49)
  • Governmental impacts (51)
  • Health (236)
  • HELP (2)
  • How to Use (2)
  • Industry claims (142)
  • Industry Research (3)
  • Infrastructure (68)
  • Insurance (7)
  • Leasing Issues (94)
  • LNG/CNG (20)
  • Local Control (147)
  • Maps (35)
  • Mineral Rights-separation (3)
  • Municipal tools (14)
  • NY Energy Plan (16)
  • Official Actions–Legislation, judgments,regulation (356)
  • Parks & Recreation (17)
  • Pipelines (240)
  • Propane storage (8)
  • public opinion (105)
  • Regulation (222)
  • Religion (1)
  • Renewable Energy (102)
  • Right vs Wrong (34)
  • Risk (44)
  • Risk Assessment (38)
  • Route 81 Pipeline (12)
  • Save the Planet (142)
  • Shale Gas Development-Hydrofracking (936)
    • Propane fracking (1)
    • Taxation (6)
  • Spills-Accidents-Suits (107)
  • state (2)
  • Stop the I81 Pipeline (16)
  • Suits (29)
  • Transportation (27)
  • Uncategorized (7)
  • Video (65)
  • Waste (185)
  • Water (451)

Archives

Audio

  • Capitol Pressroom, Economic Impact of Gas-Nov. 18, 2010
  • Capitol Pressroom, Nov. 12, 2010
  • Frack Alert NEPA Radio
  • Michigan Radio Series on Gas Drilling
  • National Radio Project–No Fracking Way

Blogroll

  • America's Great Outdoors
  • Cammuso Hydrofracking
  • Clean Water Not Dirty Drilling
  • Dallas PA School compressor station.
  • Dot 111 Reader

Educational events

  • Educational Webinars

Elected Officials

  • NYS Assembly
  • NYS Assemby
  • NYS Senate Committee on Environmental Conservation
  • NYS Senators

Election 2010

  • Contact Andrew Cuomo

Eminent Domain

  • Spectra Energy – Eminent Domain

EPA Hotline

  • EPA Eyes On Drilling (report dumping, spill, etc.

EPA Hydrofracking Study

  • EPA Hearings on Water Study Aug. 12 in Binghamton
  • GDACC Comments on EPA Study

EVENTS CALENDAR

  • Bill Huston's Blog
  • Pipeline Marcellus Shale Events PA
  • State-wide Events Calendar

Global Concern

  • Australian Farmers Protest Loss of Agriculture to Drilling
  • Exploration for natural gas causes consternation in Quebec
  • Hunter Valley Protection Alliance (Australia)
  • In Quebec, it's drill bebe drill
  • Peruvian Victims of Oil Drilling

Humor

  • Awesome parody of ANGA
  • Cammuso Hydrofracking
  • Environmentalist Grannis
  • Half Polluted
  • Hydrofracking Explained

Incident Reporting

  • EPA Eyes On Drilling (report dumping, spill, etc.
  • FracTracker Reporting Form
  • http://www.depweb.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/report_an_incident/6010
  • MIT WellWatch
  • WellWiki

Informational Brochures

  • Air Pollution Brochure
  • Exemptions are Subsidies
  • Frack.mixplex
  • Meredith brochure
  • Natural Gas Leasing Brochure

Injection Wells

  • Injection Wells–Local Control
  • Injection Wells–Regulation

Local Events

  • Bill Huston's Blog

Local Govt Actions

  • Cortland Co. Legislature Adopts Moratorium Resolution
  • Cortlandville Adopts Town Moratorium
  • Local Control Powerpoints
  • Tompkins Co. Legislature Adopts Anti-fracking Resolution
  • Tompkins Co. Legislature Resolution 5/18/10

Maps

  • Explosive Crude by Rail interactive map
  • Fraccidents Map – Google Maps. Earth Justice
  • You are Here–Map of fossil fuel infrastructure

Media

  • Capitol Pressroom – Daily radio program covers NYS issues
  • CNN Report on Hydrofracking
  • Northeast Driller
  • PBS Need to Know-Hydrofracking

Medical Professionals

  • Collaborative on Health and the Environment Webcasts
  • Resources for Medical Professionals

Other organizations

  • American Water Works Assoc.
  • Bill Huston's Blog
  • Catskill Citizens
  • Catskill Citizens for Safe Energy
  • Cayuga Anti-fracking Alliance

Pending Legislation

  • Citizens Campaign for the Environment
  • DIVISION B–REDUCING OIL CONSUMPTION AND IMPROVING ENERGY SECURITY TITLE XX–NATURAL GAS VEHICLE AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT is the offending section of the bill and is attached and can also be found in the Clean Energy Jobs and Oil Company Accountabil
  • Engelbright Moratorium on Hydrofracking A10490
  • Lifton bill clarifying role of municipalities in governing oil, gas, solution mining development
  • Lifton bill to clarify role of municipalities in governing mining development

Petitions

  • Ban on Gas Drilling Action Otsego
  • Ban-Groton Ban Petition Please – only Groton residents are asked to sign. If you know someone in Groton please pass this message along.
  • Bill to ban fracking NYS A07400
  • Concerned Citizens Opposed to Seneca Lake LPG Storage
  • Contact Andrew Cuomo

Press reports

  • Broome Co. Attorney reveals dangers of drilling
  • Buffalo News, Part 2
  • Daily News Items
  • Drilling Transforms PA
  • DWI PA driver for BJ Services flees accident scene

Research

  • Bill Huston's Blog
  • Catskill Citizens
  • Catskill Citizens Resource List
  • Citizens Campaign for the Environment
  • Cortland Co. Gas Leases (Document Group=Real Property; Document Type=Lease)

Video

  • A little holiday cheer (Livin' in a Frackin' Wonderland)
  • Albany Rally 1-25-10 video
  • bill-moyers-money-fights-hard-and-it-fights-dirty
  • BP Deepwater Horizons Explosion/spill 4/10
  • CNY Central Cortland Leases

What you Can Do

  • Damascus Citizens Help Street

Top Rated

accidents/spills air pollution ban bans canada chesapeake Climate Change CO community impact corruption Cuomo database DEC DEP drilling waste drinking water contamination Dryden earthquakes economic impact economic impacts energy policy environmental effects EPA FERC fossil fuels gas drilling gas exports gas industry gas prices gas reserves Health effects health impacts home rule hydrofracking injection wells Keystone XL lawsuit leasing leasing issues legislation LNG local control maps Marcellus shale Methane methane leaks natural gas NY OH PA pipelines political influence property values public opinion radioactivity regulation regulations renewable energy research research report Research reports safety selling the public SGEIS Shale gas shale gas development TX video waste waste disposal waste treatment water contamination water supply water testing zoning

Blog Stats

  • 215,732 hits

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • GDACC
    • Join 264 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • GDACC
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...