Energy in Depth Launches New Website, Major Grassroots Initiative for Northeast PA and Southern Tier of NY | Marcellus Drilling News

Energy in Depth Launches New Website, Major Grassroots Initiative for Northeast PA and Southern Tier of NY | Marcellus Drilling News.

Fracking gel: Canadian company presents a natural gas alternative | Press & Sun-Bulletin | pressconnects.com

Fracking gel: Canadian company presents a natural gas alternative | Press & Sun-Bulletin | pressconnects.com.

Fracking gel: Canadian company presents a natural gas alternative

5 Comments

Purchase Image

Binghamton University students, from left, Brendan Woodruff and Annie Garbowitz, both members of the New York Public Interest Research Group’s BU chapter, hold a “frack attack” exhibition during Binghamton University’s annual Earth Day celebration at Dickinson Amphitheater on Thursday in Vestal. The exhibition demonstrates the potential impacts that natural gas hydraulic fracturing has on the lives of students, said NYPIRG Campaign Coordinator Brendan Woodruff. The exhibition included a 15 foot mock drill rig and an interactive table on the impacts of increased truck traffic. / REBECCA CATLETT/ Staff Photo

• Twitter
• Facebook
• Share
• Email
• Print

• A
• A
• A

Written by

Jon Campbell
Staff Writer

• Filed Under
• Local News
• News

Related Links

• Report finds shale gas more damaging to environment than coal mining emissions

Binghamton — If all goes according to plan, a Canadian company could be using a petroleum-based gel to fracture the Marcellus Shale even before New York opens the gates for high-volume hydraulic fracturing.

Maybe.

In a presentation Thursday at the Broome County Office Building, a representative from GasFrac Energy Services Inc. said the firm, which has worked on natural gas and oil rigs in Canada and Texas, has had discussions with gas companies about contracting to tap into the state’s portion of the Marcellus. The company developed a patented fracturing method that uses Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) — plus three chemical additives — to break the shale and release natural gas, as opposed to conventional hydrofracking, which uses large amounts of water mixed with chemicals.

“We’ve done exploration-type work in an area of the Marcellus in Pennsylvania with an operator already, and our intent is to follow up again,” said Robert Lestz, chief technology officer for GasFrac. “It has to be economically viable, and it has to be good for us, the energy companies and the local communities. It’s going to depend on whether we have an operator willing to go forward with this process.”

The method would not be subject to the provisions of the state’s Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement, which is currently under review by the Department of Environmental Conservation and will only guide permitting for the type of hydrofracking being used by companies in Pennsylvania and other shale formations. But a DEC spokesman said it doesn’t have enough information to determine which set of rules would apply to the GasFrac process, and it would not be able to proceed until that is sorted out.

“DEC is aware of the LPG process but there have been no permit applications or other submissions, including scientific and technical studies, that would enable us to conduct an evaluation at this time,” spokesman Michael Bopp said.

Lestz gave a two-hour presentation to area lawmakers, municipal leaders and residents Thursday in both Binghamton and Owego. On Wednesday, he met privately with members of the Tioga County Landowners Group to push his company’s method as a more eco-friendly alternative to traditional hydrofracking, which has been on hold in New York since July 2008.

GasFrac claims its process can produce the same yield of natural gas — or even better — from the tight shale formation while using about 20 percent of the liquid used in water-based fracking. A traditional high-volume hydrofracking job can use upwards of eight million gallons of water.

Less fluid would mean less truck traffic, Lestz said. Most of the LPG turns into propane after the fracking process and returns to the surface, according to the company.

However, widespread implementation of the company’s method won’t happen overnight, if it happens at all. Currently, GasFrac has just four crews, with plans to expand to eight by the end of the year.

“We are incrementally increasing the volume of our crews,” Lestz said. “The way the industry adapts to new technology is not necessarily immediate. It takes a growth period. We’re trying to couple our technologies with companies that are more progressive and see the total value, because it is a challenge if you’ve always been doing it one way or a common way to understand how this thing is going to grow.”

It hasn’t been all smooth sailing for GasFrac, which began using its technology in 2008. In January, a propane leak and subsequent explosion at a well site in Alberta, Canada led to three workers suffering non-life-threatening burns and the company to temporarily suspend its operations. Lestz said the company has since learned from the incident and made adjustments at its work sites, including where its workers are positioned.

The method has its detractors, but Tioga landowners coalition members said it is on board.

“We have convinced ourselves that hydrofracking can be done safely if it has the right set of governance at the DEC, the right terms in the lease and some adult supervision,” said Nick Schoonover, chair of the Tioga group and the state chapter of the National Association of Royalty Owners. “This, because it doesn’t involve harmful chemicals and has considerably less environmental issues and truck traffic, offers a very interesting and appealing alternative.”

Owego gas project riles labor union | Press & Sun-Bulletin | pressconnects.com

Natural Gas Companies Send Workers to Hill to Make Case for Fracking – NYTimes.com

Natural Gas Companies Send Workers to Hill to Make Case for Fracking – NYTimes.com.

Natural Gas Companies Send Workers to Hill to Make Case for Fracking

By ANNE C. MULKERN of Greenwire

Published: March 8, 2011

• E-Mail

• Send To Phone
• Print

More News From Greenwire

• Supreme Court Declines to Take Puerto Rico Canal Case
• Interior to Assess Effects of Possible Arctic Oil Spill
• Bill to Handcuff EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Regs a Mixed Bag for Biofuels Industry
• Science Satellite’s Crash Leaves NASA ‘Devastated’ — and Flummoxed
• Don’t Treat Us Like Power Plants When Setting Greenhouse Gas Limits, Refineries Urge EPA

A blog about energy and the environment.

Go to Blog

Eighteen workers from six states will visit House and Senate members in an event organized by industry influence group American Petroleum Institute. It started yesterday and continues today. Workers yesterday talked to the White House’s Council on Environmental Quality.

“It’s critical for our elected officials to hear from their own constituents about the importance of natural gas to local communities, to jobs, and our energy security,” said Marty Durbin, API executive vice president for government affairs. “These employees represent job creation among the thousands of suppliers and service companies that benefit from America’s investment in this abundant, clean-burning domestic fuel.”

The natural gas workers come from Colorado, Illinois, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Texas and West Virginia. Those are among the states where controversy has erupted over the natural gas drilling technique known as hydraulic fracturing, where fluid is injected into the ground to break up rock formations.

The employees are technical experts with service, supply and drilling companies, Durbin said. They are focused on areas like water quality management, he said.

Environmental groups have raised concerns that the chemicals used in the practice leak into water. Additionally, they argue that methane travels into people’s homes, creating the kind of events seen in the Oscar-nominated documentary “Gasland,” where people can turn on their water faucets and ignite flames.

The Sierra Club and Environmental Defense Fund both have campaigns to underscore what they see as the risks of the natural gas boom (Greenwire, Feb. 15).

“If the natural gas industry is truly committed to the safe production of natural gas, they should be working with Congress to close the regulatory loopholes the industry currently enjoys,” said Deb Nardone, senior campaign representative for the Sierra Club. “Congress needs to put an end to the exemptions and exceptions given to the gas industry, privileges that no other industry receive.”

Congress, Nardone added, should require natural gas companies to disclose fully the chemicals they use for extraction.

“Given the significant number of violations across the country – for example, Marcellus gas drillers in PA commit an average of 1.5 violations a day – and recent findings of major flaws in safety regulations, we expect congressional leaders to push for better safeguards that protect Americans’ health and safety,” Nardone added.

Greenpeace has also raised concerns.

“Natural gas drillers can’t claim to represent any notion of ‘clean energy’ when they’re dumping toxic pollution into waterways, contaminating drinking water and getting a lobbying boost from the American Petroleum Institute against clean water protections,” said Kyle Ash, Greenpeace senior legislative representative.

API said that the industry “stands by its strong record over the past 60-plus years.

“We continue to work with engineers, geologists, and environmental and government experts to develop the best standards and practices,” Durbin said. “These standards address activities such as construction practices, the environment, and water use and management procedures to protect our drinking water and our communities.”

The lawmaker visits were planned about two months ago and were not motivated by any of the recent adverse publicity, Durbin said. The workers are not pushing for any particular bills, he said.

“It certainly is timely at a time when you have the issue” of hydraulic fracturing in the news, Durbin said. “This is a great opportunity for us to be in front of the policymakers who are going to have to make decisions on this.”

Natural gas is surging in use, pushed by record low prices for the fuel.

In 2010, natural gas constituted 24 percent of power generation, from 13 percent in 1996, according to U.S. Energy Information Administration.

EIA projects that by 2024, natural gas will drop back slightly to 21 percent because of growth in renewable power and because the price of natural gas will start to rise, making coal more competitive.

Copyright 2011 E&E Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

Critical Path Energy Summit | Aspen Science Center

Too Bad they left out those with a cautionary message to this ‘LOVEFEST’!  Totally based on false assumption that gas is the ‘cleaner’ fuel.

Critical Path Energy Summit | Aspen Science Center.

A Truly Multi-partisan Energy Summit

Convening such a broad spectrum of stakeholders in the Natural Gas arena was an innovative experiment in itself, and, hearing from all the participants included in this “odd bedfellows” gathering, made this a highly successful one.

It was immediately apparent that various groups were at odds not because of fundamental irreconcilable differences, but rather

• Some miscommunication, because of jargon, definitions that conflated several inconsistent meanings, preconceptions, attributed motives.
• Unfamiliarity with the other’s contexts, motives and point of view
• Lack of outreach, education, and multilateral gatherings like the Aspen Science Center’s  “Odd bedfellows “ Best Practices Summit in DC.
• Vulnerability to spin—because these groups don’t convene often (or ever) to discuss and jointly problem solve fundamental issues, they don’t have a common lexicon of language, understanding, or appreciation of each others goals, processes, philosophies, etc.—-so they are susceptible to red herrings, rumors, anecdotal evidence, and the point/counterpoint media format that exaggerates conflict.

Once the tables were set, each with a mulit-spectrum team tasked with SOLVING issues rather than bickering about them, the energy in the room immediately became collaborative and constructive–an alchemy that attests to individuals’ ability to rise above their group affiliation in pursuit of a higher common goal.

What follows is a brief Summary of the most actionable insights from the two days: solutions proposed by the group to what appeared to be the most critical issues and intractable problems facing the extraction of natural gas, followed by a highly detailed, table-by-table breakdown of the issues discussed.

This discussion is just the beginning; we are assured that these high-level collaborative gatherings will continue–to advance mutual understanding, common goals, inspired solutions, and the commitment to make them real in the world.

Agenda

Day 1 (May 6)

State and Federal Initiatives

8:00 to 10:00 Realizing a lower-carbon Energy Future: State-by-State
Leader: Governor Bill Ritter
State-by-State Goal: Explore critical paths to accelerate the replacement of carbon-intensive power plants
with less carbon-intensive ones through political, economic, environmental and social incentives. (Explore
recently-passed Colorado House Bill 1365 as an example)

10:00 – 12:00 Natural Gas in the Transportation sector
Leader: Boyden Gray
Transportation sector Goal: Explore critical paths to replacing current high-carbon fuel sources with low-
carbon ones—leading with mass transit buses, heavy-duty and fleet vehicles

13:00 – 15:00 Realizing a low-carbon Energy Future: Federal
Leader: Timothy Wirth
Goal: Develop well-considered, environmentally conscious, forward-thinking proposals to support and
augment the current spectrum of Federal energy policies, all designed to deliver a lower carbon energy
system.

15:00 – 17:00 Realizing a low-carbon Energy Future: EPA
Leader: Boyden Gray
Goal: Examine closely the EPA’s potential role as a major driver of this low-carbon energy transformation.
Based upon our group’s experience and expertise, develop well-considered recommendations as to how
to maximize the EPA’s potential as a force for a lower-carbon future.

DAY 2 (May 7

Elegant Solutions to Obtaining Low-Carbon Energy:
Best Practices below and above ground– creating collaborations that everyone can live (and thrive) with.

8:00-10:00 Natural Gas Production Best Practices: Subsurface
Leader: Paul Hagemeier

10:00-12:00 Natural Gas Production Best Practices: Surface
Leader: Chris Smith
Production Best Practices Goal: Develop critical paths– through best practices,
environmental/community/industry collaborations, new mechanisms and guidelines — to developing
natural gas in a collaborative intelligent, environmentally sound manner. Build in efficient compliance
mechanisms, dissemination of new technology, community education etc. to ensure continuous
improvement.

13:00-14:00 The Essential Role of Science: Where are the gaps?
Leader: Melanie Kenderdine
Goal: To take a comprehensive scientific look at the myriad components that get this resource from the
source to its optimal use (in a low-carbon, environmental context), and to highlight where additional
research is required to optimize the process.

14:00-17:00 Making It Real: Next Steps–

Prioritizing programs,goals/deliverables, metrics of success, commitment of resources,
timelines etc.
Goal: Determine which of the critical path goals/strategies that have emerged in the last 2 days have top
priority. Delineate critical paths for each, taking advantage of synergies: Outline programs, (goal, strategy,
team etc) commit resources, (human and funding) tangible results expected, measurement of success,
timeline.

Participants

Bios [Download PDF]

The Critical Path Energy Summit Out-brief

This  Executive Summary synthesizes the major insights and strategic plans that emanated out of the Summit:

During the highly successful strategic summit in Aspen, NGO, government and Industry leaders recognized that there is tremendous value in working together to fast track increased demand for natural gas in the power and transportation sectors through federal, EPA and state by state initiatives (4 TCF of increased demand offsetting 400 million tons of CO2).

It also became clear that the current social discord in the shale gas fields needs a new approach to change the frame.   Even with significant expenditures for advertising and public relations, the industry has not been successful in changing public opinion.  Only with the help of credible NGOs will a shift be possible.   Done right, new socially and environmentally acceptable production practices could actually speed up gas development at a lower cost while protecting the environment and helping the communities.

The assembled NGO, government and Industry leaders agreed that the only way to unleash the economic, social and environmental benefits of natural gas was to work much more closely together.  The Critical Path Energy Project will provide a program of projects to help enable the best environmental use for Natural Gas.  The Aspen Science Center will serve as a catalyst to help members to define and design the work program.

Execution of the work program

NGO and Energy Leaders set the vision, the strategy and agree on the work program and meet every six months to review and revise work.  Most importantly, commit resources to get things done.

Project Teams drive to the solution following an agreed-upon, optimized map of acivities that outlines what must be accomplished by whom and when.  Each team will define a set of deliverables, with a production schedule and metrics to chart success. These teams–composed of the top aides from our leadership–will leverage the enormous knowledge, experience and resources of our group to optimize, course-correct, and deliver meaningful solutions.

Objectives

Despite the clear benefits (energy, economic, and security) of natural gas, currently there is limited political will, policy, or urgency to expand its environmentally beneficial use. The Critical Path Energy Project proposes to attack this problem on two fronts to deliver on six objectives.

Realizing a secure, cleaner and lower-carbon energy future

1. State-by-State
   Goal: accelerate the replacement of carbon-intensive power plants with less carbon-intensive ones through political, economic, environmental and social incentives. Radically expand efficiency and renewable resources backed up by natural gas
2. Federal
   Goal: Develop well-considered, environmentally conscious, forward-thinking proposals to support and augment low carbon energy in the current spectrum of Federal energy policies.
3. EPA
   Goal: Activate well-considered recommendations and legal action to maximize the Clean Air Act as an instrument to substitute renewables and natural gas for oil and coal.

1. Low carbon and cleaner fuels in transportation sector
   Goal: Implement policies to replacing current polluting high-carbon fuel sources with cleaner low-carbon ones—leading with mass transit buses, heavy-duty and fleet vehicles.

Achieve clean and green natural gas production

1. Subsurface –
   Goal: Proactively mitigate the risks of groundwater contamination from well construction, hydraulic fracturing and production of natural gas.

1. Surface
   Goal: Proactively mitigate the impacts of natural gas production to community, landscape, biodiversity, surface water and air.

Significant Insights from the Summit

The Current Frame

As one of our more insightful participants pointed out – the current national meta-narrative (thanks to rogue operators, actual practices and incidents, anecdotal evidence, successful Coal Industry spin and Natural Gas Industry inaction) is that natural gas:

1. Is a secretive industry
2. Has enormous environmental impacts
3. Puts poisons/chemicals in the ground and water
4. Does not play well with others (ie the affected communities and States)
5. Avoids or co-opts any meaningful regulation
6. Has price volatility that makes it an unreliable energy source
7. Has huge infrastructural barriers making switching to gas cost prohibitive
8. Cannot extract new supply without environmental devastation (ie means limited suppy)
9. Uses up all the water in the world

The New Frame (Restoring Trust, Proving the Case for NG)

To create a social, legislative and regulatory environment that accelerates the adoption of Natural Gas and the switch to Natural Gas from coal, this “current”  frame has to be turned on its head. To do so, committed multilateral groups (like the one convened here in Aspen) must get out AHEAD of the meta-narrative, with

Local Action – Meaningful, high profile collaborative ACTIONS that NGOs, Nat Gas, politicians, regulators can note as a “sea change” in the current environment. As it was pointed out, for Nat Gas, playing “wait and see” is a disastrous choice—Big Coal is way out ahead, inflaming the current meta-narrative.

The critical goal is to establish a new level of TRUST through words and deeds with NGOs and industry standing shoulder-to-shoulder –which will enable the change in perception (and concomitant on-the-ground progress) to occur more rapidly. Collaborative good deeds and progress should be highlighted by NGOs to (get rid of the “we/them” frame.)

Examples of meaningful actions included the following:

1. Proactively developing Best Management Practices (BMPs). Working with regulators to develop optimal regulations, paying for the hiring and training of more regulators
2. Transparency—revealing the composition of frackwater, incident reports, etc.—be proactive! Don’t wait to be “forced to do the right thing”.  Publicize good behavior.
3. Proactive community engagement – Nat Gas has to be a “good neighbor” Taking the lead in NG/Community partnership : National and Local environmental NGOs have to be committed partners

• Hire a trusted local interlocutor
• Create community development board
• Involve all stakeholders
• Offer immediate benefits—jobs network (combat the “switching off coal kills jobs” argument
• Off-the-shelf Pooling/unitization templates (can be tailored to community)
• Surface use BMPs
• “Boom and Bust” primers
• Involve community in BMPs, generate goodwill

Aggressive Top-Down Conversion of Coal & Oil to Gas

State-by-State

Establish criteria for choosing/converting each state (ie friendly governor, old coal plants, receptive PUCs)

• Identify interlinked targets (PUCs industry, dispatch regulators, etc.)
• Make compelling case for change (economic, environmental, political, societal)
• Use non-compliance with healthy air standards to force urgency
• Create success  by deploying the right tactics at the right time through competent people
• Establish early wins, build on them.
• Use successful programs as templates to accelerate change in other areas

Transportation

• Use “prompt letter”
• Aromatic rules for fleets
• Narrative: National security, not climate
• Make case (ie 280K/ton benefits)

Fed/EPA

• Use EPA, Clean Air Act to encourage cleaner energy
• Petition EPA to exercise rule-making authority
• Use BETX (benzene, ethyl-benzene, toluene and xyleen) non-compliance as a forcing function for aromatic free fleet vehicles in cities
• Use the administration to influence EPA action
• Provide unbiased bullet-proof scientific and economic analysis to support fuel switching in stationary and transportation sources
• Sue for clarification/enforcement re CO2, etc

Education/Communication

The acts/deeds/successes must be communicated by NGOs, Nat Gas, politicians, academies in a broadband, multilateral national effort that is credible, reasoned, and compelling….and coordinated. Highlight proactive good practices like green fracking, transparency, innovative environmental solutions to create this new frame.

The benefit of multiple credible sources: People Must Trust the New Frame.  Hearing about encouraging developments/reasoned results from our highly credible “odd bedfellows” and numerous other respected groups (from all over the environmental spectrum) will open a new chapter of good faith, willingness to cooperate, and acknowledge each others contributions in the effort to transition out of the dirty coal and oil chapter of our country’s energy story. (PS We do not foresee a “Clean Coal” chapter in this book–after all, it’s a non-fiction book!-)

Earning Public Trust by On-the-Ground Actions

The license to operate is premised on the society’s acceptance that the operator will do the right thing in “exploiting the resources of the Commons”. Day 2 was all about restoring trust by ensuring enforcement that communities could believe in (as opposed to the current system, which elicits keen skepticism).  Earning community trust HAS TO BE LED BY THE NGOS!

So what can our group of NGOs, Operators, legislative leaders and academics do to drive this change? Following are some concrete tasks that would move the frame significantly:

Setting the Bar:

1. Delineate criteria for minimum “bar level”

• Have to be established by collaboration of Operators, NGOs, Regulatory Agencies, Community representatives.

1. Build in flexibility

• Acknowledge/account for regional geological differences
• Must represent all of the stakeholders-have to engage the Operators
• Be able to evolve criteria as technology evolves
• Design to enhance innovation/ don’t be static/proscriptive
• Don’t inadvertently become a hindrance to evolving best practices

1. Build in cross-communication/sharing of meaningful data between Operators, NGOs, Regulatory Agencies, and Communities.

1. The bar is for everyone – not just majors (who have a huge reputational incentive to perform flawlessly). “Mom and pops” must achieve the level of excellence, or lose permits or licenses.

Delivering Best Practices

Industry Enforcement-

Operators must commit to adhering to Best Practices, enact state/operator standards, should self-monitor with vigor and communicate efforts to NGOs, community

Certification for Operators

• BMP based on industry bar
• Includes community outreach
• Includes environmental input
• Includes safety training
• Must commit to continuous education
• Continuous technology improvement

Certification for Operator Subs

In the eyes of the community, the operator is fully responsible for the process A-Z. Can’t blame the subs. Therefore, must establish certification/enforcement process for subs.  Use buying power to force Operators to adopt standards that help the industry in general

Regulators/Inspectors Enforcement:

Inspectors– Inspectors need to have deeper knowledge, which has to evolve with tech/new practices. Need many more inspectors

Certification for Inspectors

• Require more rigorous certification criteria
• Ongoing education program required
• More transparent/meaningful data management required
• Fund program with dedicated permit fees

Bonding/Permitting

• Employ BMP cross-communication throughout Nat Gas Industry
• Build into permitting process—driller has to agree to minimum bar level
• Permitting fees should designate significant portion to pay for ongoing training/education
• Operator has to post bond to insure performance
• Permit requirements run with the land, responsibility can’t be traded away.

Communication/Community engagement—Rebuild trust by open, good faith  useful engagement

Operators must be “better neighbors” committing to continuous engagement with the community in a way that is proactive, transparent, jargon-free, and in good faith. NGOs have to be supportive collaborators in this effort.

1. Green Completion—industry can and should be proactive—start the program!
   • • Operator commits to green completion
     • Uses stipulated BMPs
     • Be proactive –invite community, exceed expectations, transport BMPs to other areas

1. Share more information (get electronic) and push that info out into the public—it helps the cause!
   • • Speak the same language: develop shared definitions
     • Create understanding (ie “abandoned” doesn’t mean abandoned, “flowback” doesn’t mean flowing back.)
2. Disclosure- Transparency is the key to credibility: All operator  should be proactive communicating what it is in frac fluid.
   • • Operators should compel vendors to reveal the composition of their frackwater as a pre-condition of getting the job
     • Subs have to reveal chemical/ material content of frac fluid as a pre-condition to getting the job
     • List chemicals/materials/portions per well, attach to well completion report
     • Communicate clearly to interested NGOs, communities
     • This would be a HUGE PR victory, and start fresh transformational thinking among NGOs and communities
3. Use best practices EVERYWHERE—not just high-media or high population areas. Create presumption of excellence/benefit of the doubt for NG among the general public.

The Summit through Pictures

Signing SB 100

Governor Bill Ritter, who kicked off the Critical Path Energy Summit the following day by delineating all of the elements that went into his New Energy Economy Initiative (including almost 50 bills, many initiated by our own Senator Gail Schwartz, known by friends and foes alike as “the Green Machine” in the Colorado Senate), made Aspen the location for signing SB 100 (backing low-cost loans for high-efficiency investments) as part of a suite of bills designed to make the transition to the New Energy Economy smoother for consumers.

Some of the ASC team (Colleen Doyle, Jackie Francis, Kevin Ward,  Mike Simmons, George Stranahan and  Steve Pinsky )  share paparazzi time with Senator Gail Schwartz

Senator Timothy E Wirth makes a point to ASC President Kevin Ward

as Gov. Bill Ritter prepares to pitch in