Fracking, water issues take center stage at oil conference – Mar. 11, 2011
March 12, 2011
Fracking, water issues take center stage at oil conference – Mar. 11, 2011.
Gas Drilling Awareness for Cortland County
March 11, 2011
Environmental Health News: Archives.
|
While all links worked when entries were posted to the database, different publishers have different policies about retaining articles and providing access to archived material. Thus some of the links, particularly older ones, may no longer be functional. For links no longer working, you may be able to gain paid access to text via the publisher’s site.
Rich with natural gas, Texas eyes more oversight. In Texas, environmental concerns have led lawmakers, particularly those from the Barnett Shale region, to file a number of bills to increase oversight of the natural gas industry, spanning issues from well emissions to the safety of gas pipelines. Austin Texas Tribune, Texas. 11 March 2011.
U.S. shale-drilling technologies finding new homes abroad. The United States is starting to see its shale gas revolution spread around the globe, but drilling technologies that allowed U.S. production to soar are likely to remain a North American phenomenon for some time. Greenwire. 11 March 2011.
Lawmakers declare New Jersey a no-fracking zone. New Jersey lawmakers yesterday unanimously approved a bill to ban the practice of drilling for natural gas by hydraulic fracturing. For practical purposes, the bill will have little impact since no drilling is occurring in New Jersey. Montclair NJ Spotlight, New Jersey. 11 March 2011.
Gas prices change Senate energy politics. Votes on halting EPA climate regulations, offshore drilling and even opening Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas development are all within a hair of going the Republicans’ way, and several rank-and-file Democrats up for reelection hold crucial votes. Politico. 11 March 2011.
US Republicans assail Obama as gas prices rise. US President Barack Obama’s Republican foes on Thursday blamed his energy policies and efforts to combat climate change for soaring oil and gasoline prices and called for boosting domestic production. Agence France-Presse. 11 March 2011.
Republicans promise full House vote on EPA climate rules within weeks. Republican efforts to strip the US Environmental Protection Agency of the authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions completed their first legislative step yesterday, when a key House subcommittee approved the controversial Energy Tax Prevention Bill. London Business Green, United Kingdom. 11 March 2011.
Norway Socialists hold firm on no Arctic drilling. Norway’s Socialist Left party vowed on Thursday to reject any compromise that could lead to drilling off a pristine Arctic archipelago, setting the stage for talks that risk fracturing the Labour-led cabinet. Reuters. 11 March 2011.
Groups say facilities wrongly discharging drilling wastewater. Two municipal sewage treatment facilities that together discharge 150,000 gallons a day of Marcellus Shale wastewater into the Monongahela River watershed don’t have federal permits for such pollution discharges and should, according to environmental organizations. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Pennsylvania. 11 March 2011.
Water authorities step up radiation testing. Concerns over the impact of Marcellus shale gas drilling on water supplies is resulting in more testing of water for radioactive contamination. Pittsburgh Valley News Dispatch, Pennsylvania. 11 March 2011.
River basin forum: Fracking and other big challenges ahead. Is natural gas drilling the elephant in the room when it comes to the Delaware River Basin? Or the gorilla? Philadelphia Inquirer, Pennsylvania. 11 March 2011.
Delaware river faces threats. Threats ranging from global warming to natural gas drilling could threaten the water quality in the Delaware River, scientists and environmental advocates said Thursday. Associated Press. 11 March 2011.
Pennsylvania tries to track fracking wastewater. The natural gas industry’s claim that it is making great strides in reducing how much polluted wastewater it discharges to Pennsylvania rivers is proving difficult to assess, because of inconsistent reporting by energy companies and data entry errors in the state’s system for tracking the contaminated fluids. Associated Press. 11 March 2011.
Gas wells’ fans, foes join debate. With the Allegheny County Council mulling bills to prohibit gas wells within either 500 feet or 2,000 feet of residential structures, more than 400 people turned out on Thursday for a public hearing on the issue, with dozens outside council chambers listening to stereo speakers. Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Pennsylvania. 11 March 2011.
Retooled Marcellus is moving forward. A bill to regulate development of the Marcellus shale is back on the floor of the House Friday morning for a second reading after surviving scrutiny in the House Finance Committee. Beckley Register-Herald, West Virginia. 11 March 2011.
Gas inspectors: Bill will give DEP full hiring power. Delegates added more teeth to a Marcellus shale regulatory bill Wednesday, handing the Department of Environmental Protection the power to hire inspectors. Beckley Register-Herald, West Virginia. 11 March 2011.
U.S. offshore drillers still reeling from spill. Oil drilling in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico is still stuck in neutral even after U.S. regulators last month issued the first new drilling permit since the deadly 2010 Macondo well blowout. Reuters. 11 March 2011.
Pass the best law. As Lawmakers formulate a Marcellus shale regulatory bill with less than two days left in the legislative session, West Virginia has a chance to step forward and be a leader when it comes to properly managing its massive gas resource. We can be No. 1 in something good by being meticulous right now. Beckley Register-Herald, West Virginia. Editorial, 11 March 2011.
Ease restrictions on drilling to avoid future oil shortages. We can’t allow politics and wishful thinking to threaten the prosperity and economic well being of the nation. It’s time to start creating the energy we need here at home, including development of nuclear energy. Denver Post, Colorado. Editorial, 11 March 2011.
Does natural gas drilling make people sick? When an energy company announced plans to start drilling inside a sprawling housing development in a Western Colorado subdivision, residents became concerned. In their minds, industry representatives have long downplayed the health risks of emissions from natural gas operations. High Country News. Opinion, 11 March 2011.
Aerosol chemistry and the Deepwater Horizon spill. Human activities can alter aerosols, thereby affecting climate and air quality. Our inability to accurately predict the composition and mass of atmospheric aerosols, however, is inhibiting progress in both areas. Science. Opinion, 11 March 2011.
Wind energy works for Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania has been in the forefront of this nation’s energy industry since coal mining began in the mid 1700s. It’s been home to the world’s first commercial oil well and nuclear power plant. It was also home to the first utility scale wind project east of the Mississippi River. Erie Times-News, Pennsylvania. Opinion, 11 March 2011.
Texas legislation could give gas companies an even bigger edge. Frustrating Fact No. 1 about Barnett Shale urban natural gas drilling: The table is tilted in favor of the companies that are doing the drilling. Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Texas. Opinion, 11 March 2011.
Pennsylvania governor gives authority over environmental permitting to energy exec. Pennsylvania has come under fire as pollution from drilling in the Marcellus Shale threatens water resources across the state. But instead of ratcheting up oversight, Gov. Tom Corbett wants to hand authority over some of the state’s most critical environmental decisions to an energy executive. ProPublica. 10 March 2011.
Pennsylvania’s Marcellus wastewater stats flawed. The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection’s statistics on Marcellus Shale natural gas activity contain serious flaws and inconsistencies, and do not accurately report the volume of wastewater being reused in the industry’s much-touted recycling efforts. Philadelphia Inquirer, Pennsylvania. 10 March 2011.
Pressure rises on shale gas. Concerned about environmental damage, a pair of Canadian provinces have stepped up scrutiny of two unconventional means of extracting fossil fuels from the ground. Wall Street Journal. 10 March 2011.
EPA chief has science on his side. Is that enough? A little over a year ago, Dr. Al Armendariz brought hope to hope-starved generations of Texas greens, folks who’d spent years confronting skeptical Texas legislators and growing accustomed to the sense the state was selling its environmental policy down a hazy, toxic river. Dallas Observer, Texas. 10 March 2011.
Panelists cite potential, hurdles for natural gas. Natural gas could be a major source of low-cost electricity nationwide, as an upsurge in domestic production drives costs down and looming environmental mandates encourage utilities to retire power plants that run on dirtier-burning coal. San Antonio Express-News, Texas. 10 March 2011.
Petrochemicals. Cheap raw materials and a muted industry downturn are adding up to good times for U.S. companies. Chemical & Engineering News. 10 March 2011.
Plan to test for gas gets backing. Energy giant Shell should be allowed to drill a small number of exploration wells to test whether natural gas can be extracted from deep under the Karoo through hydraulic fracturing, or fracking. Cape Town Cape Times, South Africa. 10 March 2011.
Shell Ningaloo drilling faces tough rules. Energy giant Shell faces increasingly rigorous environmental regulatory requirements to win approval for oil and gas exploration near Western Australia’s Ningaloo Reef. Shell has applied for federal approval for 60 days’ exploration drilling in an area about 50km west of the Ningaloo marine park’s boundary. Australian Associated Press. 10 March 2011.
|
||
March 11, 2011
Fracking will cause ‘irreversible harm’.
QUEBEC – A geological engineering professor whose specialty is rock mechanics and hydrogeology says hydraulic fracturing to free natural gas from shale rock formations will cause “irreversible harm” lasting thousands of years.
And the gas companies will be long gone, leaving behind costly remediation, Marc Durand said in an interview, suggesting the gas producers should be forced to establish a reserve fund.
“The billions required would be much more than all the profits beckoning now,” said the retired Université du Québec à Montréal professor.
The circulating gas left behind will threaten the water Quebecers drink and could jeopardize agriculture, he said. The Utica shale field gas deposits between Montreal and Quebec City lie under some of the best farmland in the province.
“Fracking” is the technique of pumping a mixture of water, sand and a cocktail of toxic chemicals under pressure into wells drilled horizontally to liberate the gas from the shale.
But Durand noted that fracking gets out only 20 per cent of the gas, a figure confirmed by Canada’s National Energy Board.
After maybe eight years of production, the gas companies will seal – and forget – the wells, Durand said.
The rock formations shattered by fracking will be “thousands of times more permeable,” allowing the remaining 80 per cent of shale gas and underground water, 10 times more salty than sea water, to continue circulating, bubbling to the surface through the disused gas wells.
Over time, methane could leak into the groundwater and gas leaks could gush, uncontrolled, into the air.
“Because this happens deep below, it is not visible on the surface,” Durand wrote in a paper raising questions about shale gas.
Durand wanted to present his scientific findings to the Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement panel looking into on the impact of shale gas but could not meet the BAPE’s Nov. 25 deadline for briefs.
“It took me several months to do my research,” Durand said from his home in Shefford. “The environmentalists were already mobilized to testify, but scientific studies take several months to do.”
The BAPE had six months, starting last September, to hear about 200 briefs then travel to other jurisdictions where shale gas is being developed, before writing its report, which was handed to Environment Minister Pierre Arcand Feb. 28.
Arcand has not made public the report, which the government says it will use to write a new law raising royalties charged to the companies and regulating the shale-gas development.
The National Energy Board estimates there are 1,000 trillion cubic feet – or more – of shale gas in Canada, with about 200 trillion cubic feet in the Quebec Lowlands field.
“It was always there,” Durand said, though it was not possible to extract before the fracking process was developed.
Durand said he was surprised when he read the terms of the BAPE mandate – to reconcile sustainable development with shale-gas production.
“Shale gas is not renewable energy,” he said. “You burn it, and it is gone. “It is the antithesis of sustainable development,” he added. “It takes politicians to give a mandate to a commission to study how to have sustainable development with shale gas.
“The first question – should we do it or not? – was not given to the BAPE panel,” Durand said. “The government had already decided to go ahead with it when the panel was formed.”
Premier Jean Charest and Natural Resources Minister Nathalie Normandeau do not hide their enthusiasm for shale gas, seeing jobs, billions of dollars in new investments and the end of $2 billion a year in natural-gas imports from Alberta.
Normandeau let slip this week that, thanks to shale gas, the controversial Rabaska liquefied natural gas port in Lévis, across the St. Lawrence River from Quebec City, has been shelved.
And Parti Québécois leader Pauline Marois, while stressing that shale-gas development should respect the environment and not endanger the health of Quebecers, has called for a moratorium until the safety of shale gas is clear.
But Marois is not opposed to developing Quebec’s shale-gas potential.
Former PQ premier Lucien Bouchard has entered the fray, as spokesman for the Association pétrolière et gazière du Québec, representing the shale-gas companies.
“They don’t know,” Durand said, adding that while he respects Marois and Bouchard, they lack the expertise to understand what is at stake.
“It’s geology,” he explained. “It is very technical, and the companies have sold them the idea that there is $15 billion to $20 billion of resources sleeping under our feet.”
Durand noted that gas companies are scrambling worldwide to stake their claims and trying to rush the process along, sometimes leaning on politicians.
They promote shale gas as a cleaner alternative to coal and oil.
But the companies’ assurances that shale-gas production is as safe as conventional gas production do not stand up, Durand says.
Conventional natural gas can be extracted without fracking and 95 per cent and more is recovered. Fracking leaves behind a chemical soup that includes radiation, the New York Times revealed this week, and 80 per cent of the gas stays in the ground.
Even though abandoned wells will be capped with concrete, Durand points to Quebec’s experience with crumbling bridges and overpasses.
“Each of the wells will still be there for a thousand years as the concrete degrades or the steel corrodes,” he said, adding, “I would say the lifespan of a well will be between 10 and 30 years.
“So in 10 years, we will have the first wells that collapse. What will we do then?”
kdougherty@montrealgazette.com


Bio
Your bio is currently empty. Now is a great time to fill in your profile.
This profile is private.
This profile is only shared with friends.
This profile is under review.

Email This
You may send this to 5 e-mail addresses. Please separate each address with a space.
Score
vote upvotes up
vote downvotes down
March 10, 2011
PA Governor Gives Energy Executive Supreme Authority Over Environmental Permitting – ProPublica.
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett (AP Photo/Daniel Shaknen)
Pennsylvania has come under fire lately as pollution from drilling in the Marcellus Shale threatens water resources across the state. But instead of ratcheting up oversight, Gov. Tom Corbett wants to hand authority over some of the state’s most critical environmental decisions to C. Alan Walker, a Pennsylvania energy executive with his own track record of running up against the state’s environmental regulations.
Walker, who has contributed $184,000 to Corbett’s campaign efforts since 2004, is CEO and owner of Bradford Energy Company and Bradford Coal, which was once among Pennsylvania’s largest coal mining companies. He also owns or has an interest in 12 other companies, including a trucking business and a central Pennsylvania oil and gas company.
Walker was Corbett’s first appointee—he chose him to lead the Department of Community and Economic Development in December, before taking office. Now, as Corbett stakes much of the state’s economy on Marcellus Shale gas drilling, a paragraph tucked into the 1,184-page budget gives Walker unprecedented authority to “expedite any permit or action pending in any agency where the creation of jobs may be impacted.” That includes, presumably, coal, oil, gas and trucking.
C. Alan Walker
It’s not clear how Corbett can delegate such sweeping authority to the economic development office, which would be reorganized to focus on coordinating with corporate interests and creating job growth. It also isn’t clear how the state would address the legal conflicts that could arise if, for example, Walker pushed for approval of a permit that conflicted with the Clean Water Act or other federal laws. The governor’s office did not respond to repeated requests to clarify Walker’s role, and other state agencies deferred to the governor.Environmental groups think Corbett will need to issue an executive order or some other legal clarification to allow Walker’s office to wield so much influence over regulations.
“I have never seen anybody give an economic development director the authority to tell every other agency in the state what to do with regard to its statutory responsibilities,” said Deborah Goldberg, an attorney with Earthjustice, an environmental group active on drilling issues. “The law requires that you not pollute the waters of Pennsylvania, and if he tries to speed up an application that makes it possible that that is going to happen then I think he is clearly operating outside of his authority.”
A spokesman for the economic development office said Walker will not speak publicly until his confirmation. But Walker did post a statement on the department’s website.
“The budget introduced today represents a completely new way of doing business for DCED and its economic development partners,” the statement said. “In a tough economic climate, we need to send a powerful message to the Pennsylvania Business Community that Pennsylvania is open for business.”
Walker’s ties to the energy industry are deep. He is listed on state disclosure forms as an executive of the Pennsylvania Coal Association and he has served as chairman of the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry. He also has firsthand experience with the state’s environmental regulations, because his companies would likely have applied for permits similar to those the oil and gas industry is now pursuing in the Marcellus. And like many energy companies, his, too, have run into problems with the state.
In 2002, three of Walker’s coal companies notified Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Protection that they had run out of money and were going to stop treating the 173 million gallons of polluted water they produced each year and released into tributaries of the Susquehanna River. The state eventually got a court injunction to force them to continue treating the wastewater as required by state and federal law.
Corbett’s budget, which was introduced Tuesday, emphasizes job creation and proposes eliminating economic development hurdles by streamlining permitting processes in the DEP and the Department of Transportation.
“To address the length of time agencies take to act on permits and eliminate permit backlogs, PennDOT and DEP have begun auditing and assessing all of their permit processes to make them more responsive to the needs of job creators,” the budget says.
In the budget Corbett says drilling will bring Pennsylvania 200,000 jobs and $18 billion in economic benefit by the end of the decade. But the drilling industry’s explosive growth has also caused environmental problems and the budget raises questions about whether the DEP—which could lose nearly 20 percent of its funding—will be able to address them.
Private water wells have been contaminated with methane gas and other pollutants across the state, and in many cases the DEP has found that hasty or insufficient gas well construction was to blame. Several drilling site accidents have led to spills where wastewater, including from hydraulic fracturing, contaminated streams.
A 2009 ProPublica investigation [1] revealed that Pennsylvania’s sewage treatment plants were accepting millions of gallons of drilling wastewater, but lacked the technology to remove or treat many of the chemicals and pollutants the water contained. In 2008 people along one stretch of the Monongahela River were advised [2] to drink bottled water because the level of dissolved minerals and salts in the river was almost twice as high as the DEP considers safe.
The state has since more than doubled its workforce of inspectors and strengthened regulations for how gas wells are drilled, permitted and constructed. The DEP has installed additional water-quality monitors along the Monongahela and required drillers to report where they will take their wastewater after a well has been hydraulically fractured. The agency has also required that wastewater treatment plants be equipped to remove the minerals and salts. And it has received proposals for 24 new waste treatment plants that are now in permitting or review processes—the type of projects Walker could conceivably influence.
In January, the Associated Press found [3] that about 150 million gallons of Marcellus Shale wastewater—the majority of the wastewater for the period examined—had been dumped into rivers and streams after only partial treatment. A subsequent story [4] from the New York Times revealed that much of that wastewater was dangerously radioactive, and that drinking water facilities have not been testing their intake for this radioactivity.
On Monday the EPA leaned on Pennsylvania’s DEP to tighten its oversight of drilling waste disposal. The next day, Gov. Corbett released his budget, reducing DEP funding and stating that job creation should trump lengthy permitting delays.
“It’s an expression of a philosophy that doesn’t value environmental regulation,” said Jan Jarrett, president of PennFuture. “It seems to be the desire of the governor to have this guy be able to pick up the phone and expedite any program that might impact jobs.”
The Governor’s office did not respond to repeated requests for comment about the policy shift, the role of the economic development office, or funding for the DEP. Spokespeople for both the DEP and the state Attorney General’s office also declined to comment, saying that only the Governor’s office could speak to the issue.
ProPublica Director of Research Lisa Schwartz and researcher Liz Day contributed to this report.
March 10, 2011
The Philadelphia Inquirer Digital Edition.
The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection’s statistics on Marcellus Shale naturalgas activity contain serious flaws and inconsistencies, and do not accurately report the volume of wastewater being reused in the industry’s much-touted recycling efforts.
JOHN TIERNO / Staff Artist Liquid Waste Recycling OverreportedAn Inquirer analysis of a Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection report on liquid waste generated by natural-gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale between July and December of 2010 has revealed an error that led to a significant overstatement of the percentage of liquid waste that was recycled. SOURCE: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental ProtectionThe DEP’s most recent statewide statistics on wastewater production overstate by nearly two times the amount of wastewater produced during the last six months of 2010 largely because one of the 39 operators who filed reports last month inadvertently entered the wrong data in its forms.
Seneca Resources Corp. says it mistakenly reported the number of gallons of wastewater it generated as barrels. A barrel contains 42 gallons, so Sene ca’s numbers were hugely inflated. And so was the amount of water that it reportedly recycled.
As a result, the 5.2 million barrels of waste that Seneca misstated in the reports accounted for half the entire state’s volume of 10.6 million barrels, though Seneca produced only about 3 percent of the Marcellus Shale natural gas extracted during that sixmonth period.
“It was in fact stated as barrels when it was actually gallons,” said Nancy J. Taylor, a spokeswoman for the company, a subsidiary of National Fuel Gas Co. of Houston. She said the employee who misstated the number was “mortified” to learn of the error.
Seneca’s actual wastewater numbers amounted to about 125,000 barrels. The statewide total has been revised down to about 5.5 million barrels of wastewater.
The miscue couldn’t have come at a worse time for the industry and the Pennsylvania DEP. On Monday, the federal Environmental Protection Agency put Harrisburg on notice that the EPA would increase its scrutiny of how Pennsylvania managed shaledrilling wastewater after news media reported that inadequately treated Marcellus wastewater may be polluting the state’s rivers.
“Obviously we’re under the microscope whatever we do now,” said Kathryn Z. Klaber, president of the Marcellus Shale Coalition, an industry trade group.
The episode also raises questions about the DEP’s ability to process the data generated by the fast-growing industry, since Seneca’s reporting errors should have been obvious to any knowledgeable analyst who waded through a 5,000-line spreadsheet that the agency posted on its website two weeks ago.
DEP officials did not respond Wednesday to questions about how the agency failed to notice the bad numbers. Seneca reported one of its wells produced more than 500,000 barrels of wastewater — 22 million gallons — an amount that would typically be generated by dozens of Marcellus wells.
“It is too early to draw any definitive conclusions or interpretations about the data being filed,” said Kevin Sunday, an agency spokesman. “We are still in the process of receiving and reviewing production data.”
John Hanger, who stepped down as DEP secretary in January when Gov. Corbett took office, said the agency was overwhelmed with data in November when he authorized the DEP to hire six new administrative employees to help address weaknesses in the agency.
“There’s just an enormous amount of data being submitted, and it would be fair to say that DEP data processing is not where it should be,” he said.
Industry officials said the problem was compounded because the detailed production and waste reports were mandated by a law that went into effect last year, and both the regulators and the industry are struggling to adapt.
There seem to be many inconsistencies in how operators report the wastewater — some is listed as brine, some as drilling fluid, and some as “frac fluid,” the liquids that flow back after hydraulic fracturing, the process for extracting gas from tight rock layers such as shale.
The reports have been closely reviewed by the public and the media partly to gauge how the massive volumes of toxic wastewater generated by Marcellus drilling is being managed.
Marcellus wastewater contains corrosive salts and some radioactive isotopes and metals that naturally occur in the deep formation where the gas resides. It also contains some chemicals used during the fracturing process.
While the industry initially sent much of the fluid to public sewage-treatment plants that are not designed to treat drilling wastes, the state has responded by restricting discharges. The industry has ramped up efforts to recycle the wastewater, reducing the need for treatment and discharge.
Before the Seneca error was discovered, the industry reported recycling about 6 million of 10.6 million barrels of wastewater during the last half of 2010 — about 57 percent of the total.
But Seneca’s inflated numbers represented about 5.2 million barrels of the recycled water. So when its numbers are revised downward, the total volume of wastewater reported recycled falls to 17 percent.
The DEP and the industry still maintain that at least 70 percent of all wastewater is being recycled by blending it into new hydraulic fracturing operations.
They say the waste reports are not comprehensive accounts of recycling, but of waste disposal. But there are inconsistencies — some operators report waste that is reused; others say their recycling efforts are not counted in the reports.
“The system was intended to track wastewater and not recycled water,” said Matt Pitzarella, a spokesman for Range Resources Corp., one of the largest Marcellus producers, which says it recycles nearly 90 percent of its wastewater, though those numbers are not reflected in the reports.
Considering the scrutiny the industry faces, Pitzarella said Wednesday that Range was calling for a new reporting system that accounts for recycled wastewater.
“The current system was developed at a time prior to widespread recycling and reuse,” he said. He said the company was calling on the DEP and the Marcellus Shale Coalition to “develop a transparent and accessible system that tracks water that is recycled and reused.” Contact staff writer Andrew Maykuth at 215-854-2947 or amaykuth@phillynews.com.
Printed and distributed by NewpaperDirect | http://www.newspaperdirect.com, US/Can: 1.877.980.4040, Intern: 800.6364.6364 | Copyright and protected by applicable law.
10 March 2011
12:08
Report abuse