Agricultural Impacts Webinar May 11

FYI:

http://www.cals.cornell.edu/cals/devsoc/outreach/cardi/news/index.cfm#cornell_events

Upcoming Cornell Events


Marcellus Shale Webinar: Agricultural Potential Impacts

Marcellus Shale Webinar: Agricultural Potential Impacts will be held on Wednesday, May 11, 2011, 1:00-3:30PM.  Presenters: George Frantz, Dept. of City & Regional Planning, Cornell University, Kenneth Smith, Executive Director, CCE Chenango County, Judy Wright, American Farmland Trust.  To pre-register for the webinar and attend, click on the following link:
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dEpFdXFJUVBlbVlLWjZQMDVKMkZVbEE6MQ

Rally for a Statewide Ban on Fracking – Albany NY – May 2 on Vimeo

Rally for a Statewide Ban on Fracking – Albany NY – May 2 on Vimeo on Vimeo

via Rally for a Statewide Ban on Fracking – Albany NY – May 2 on Vimeo.

Rally for a Statewide Ban on Fracking – Albany NY – May 2
22 hours ago
More
See allShow me

VeccVideography’s videos
95. Rally for a Statewide Ban on Fracking – Albany NY – May 2
This is a report of the Rally for a Statewide Ban on Fracking. There are excerpts from many speakers including Josh Fox, Senator Avella and many more. Also, there are personal appeals to Governor Cuomo to pass the Ban bill now.
Kudos to Frack Action and all the 60 sponsors for a great event. Let’s have many more!
22 hours ago

69. The Snow Chute

4 months ago

Gmail – Pa. well blowout tests industry on voluntary fracking disclosure – mary.beilby@gmail.com

 Pa. well blowout tests industry on voluntary fracking disclosure

NATURAL GAS: Pa. well blowout tests industry on voluntary fracking disclosure  (Wednesday, May 4, 2011)

Mike Soraghan, E&E reporter

Chesapeake Energy Corp., whose gas well blew out during hydraulic fracturing last month in northeastern Pennsylvania, hasn’t publicly disclosed chemicals that spilled, setting up the first test of an industry-backed voluntary disclosure program.

An official in charge of the disclosure registry said the chemicals should be disclosed in such a situation.

“You’d have to treat it like one that was completed,” Mike Paque, executive director of the Ground Water Protection Council (GWPC), said in an interview. “The chemicals were down the hole.”

Chesapeake has led the drive within the industry for disclosure and was among the first to join the FracFocus registry initiative. But company spokesman Jim Gipson said the company doesn’t plan to file a report until it is done with “completion,” the preparation of production after drilling.

“Information is uploaded on the site when well completion reports are filed with the state,” explained Gipson, citing the process in which a well is prepared for production after drilling. But it’s not clear when, or if, that process will ever take place.

“We won’t know for a while but it is entirely possible this well could be completed at some point in the future,” Gipson said.

Chesapeake’s Atgas 2H well in Bradford County’s LeRoy Township blew out April 19, spewing water for more than 12 hours.

U.S. EPA and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) have requested a list of the chemicals involved as part of their investigation of the spill. State and federal investigations and the threat of lawsuits may be making the company reluctant to publicly disclose the chemicals.

“We have fully and voluntarily complied with the DEP’s April 22 request for information, which includes chemical additives used in the hydraulic fracture stimulation of the Atgas 2H” well, Gipson said.

But if the accident had taken place in Wyoming, which has the strictest public disclosure rules in the country on fracturing, the public would already know at least what drillers planned to blast down the hole. Wyoming requires the list from well operators in advance to get a permit.

“We would have had prior approval and disclosure,” said Wyoming State Oil and Gas Supervisor Tom Doll.

But the FracFocus site doesn’t request information before a well is drilled or “fracked.” Paque said the chemical mix always changes from the original plans, and having two lists of ingredients would sow confusion. Paque said last week he had been told by Chesapeake officials that they would post the information, but as of this morning it was not posted.

GWPC administers the FracFocus registry along with another organization of state legislators, the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission.

They began working on the registry last fall to provide a central place for drilling companies to post fracturing fluids (Greenwire <http://www.eenews.net/Greenwire/2010/12/03/archive/9

> , Dec. 3, 2010). The site launched last month (Greenwire <http://www.eenews.net/Greenwire/2011/04/12/archive/16> , April 12).

The initiative, backed by industry and paid for with help from the U.S. Department of Energy, is part of a larger effort by industry and state regulators to head off federal regulation of fracturing.

Chesapeake’s Gipson didn’t respond directly to a request for a list of the chemicals that were being injected. He said they should be similar to those used in nearby wells.

“This well shouldn’t be much different,” Gipson said.

Industry assurances, Md. lawsuit

The lists of additives injected in other wells in Bradford County include formaldehyde, ethanol, hydrotreated light petroleum distillate (a class of solvents that includes kerosene) and 2-Butoxyethanol, or 2-Be, a hazardous chemical linked to long-term health problems experienced following the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill.

The chemicals make up a very small fraction of the millions of gallons of fluid injected into a Marcellus Shale gas well. But human exposure to some of them is measured in parts per million.

The name of other chemicals was withheld as “proprietary.”

Gipson sought to assure that whatever the chemicals were, most didn’t get sprayed out of the well and into creeks.

“When comparing completion records, you need to keep in mind that this well was undergoing only stage three of a dozen or more stages when the equipment started leaking,” he said. “Also, much of the chemical additives are engineered to bond with the steel casing and the shale, so it’s a faulty assumption that large volumes of these already highly diluted (0.5 percent of total volume) additives returned to the surface.”

He added, “The overwhelming majority of what flowed to the surface [last month] was naturally occurring brine that had been trapped in the shale for 300 million years or more.”

That ultra-salty brine is generally more dangerous than the fracturing fluid itself, and can include metals like barium and strontium and traces of radioactivity.

Chesapeake has said testing during the spill showed “limited and very localized environmental impact,” and that tests a short distance downstream in the Susquehanna River found “no effect whatsoever.”

Maryland Attorney General Douglas Gansle (D), announcing earlier this week that he intended to sue Chesapeake, countered that “tens of thousands of gallons” of fracturing fluid came out of the well, and the fluid leaked into a tributary of the Susquehanna, which flows into the Chesapeake Bay (Greenwire <http://www.eenews.net/Greenwire/2011/05/03/archive/8> , May 3).

The debate about what chemicals are in fracturing fluid has gotten louder since drilling started to ramp up in the more heavily populated Northeast. And an exemption from public disclosure and EPA regulation, granted by former President George W. Bush and a Republican Congress in 2005, has raised suspicions among drill-site neighbors. Voluntary disclosure is viewed as a way to alleviate some of that suspicion.

Chesapeake Chairman and CEO Aubrey McClendon was among the first gas executives to call for increased disclosure of fracturing chemicals (Greenwire <http://www.eenews.net/Greenwire/2009/10/01/archive/3> , Oct. 1, 2009). And the company joined in the launch of the FracFocus site with a press release <http://www.chk.com/news/articles/pressreleases/04-11-11%20gwpc%20registry.pdf>  announcing its participation.

Patchwork of state rules

State rules on disclosure of fracturing chemicals vary widely. Some have no requirements; some require disclosure only to regulators or medical personnel in an emergency.

Last year, Wyoming adopted the strictest public disclosure rules in the country.

The Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission requires drillers to post what they plan to inject in order to get a permit to drill. There are some exemptions for ingredients that are “trade secrets,” but they must be approved in advance. After the well is completed, they must come back and report what they actually injected. All of the information, including approval of trade secrets, is posted to the agency’s website <http://wogcc.state.wy.us/> .

The strict disclosure rules, requested by then-Gov. Dave Freudenthal (D), were also designed to head off federal regulation of fracturing.

“The governor felt if we did that, EPA would not need to step in and regulate fracking,” Doll said.

In the case of an accident like the blown-out well, all information about the chemicals in the fracturing fluid would be disclosed.

The accident in LeRoy Township will also test drillers’ claim that the fracturing process itself has not been proven to have contaminated water supplies. But industry representatives have generally made that assertion with regard to the underground escape of the fracturing chemicals, rather than surface spills.

Capitol Confidential » Demonstrators call for ‘fracking’ ban

Capitol Confidential » Demonstrators call for ‘fracking’ ban.

Frack Action Rally at NYS Capitol  May 2, 2011

Lease Termination Workshop May 17, Cortland

LANDOWNER’S  GAS LEASE WORKSHOP

 

EXPERT ADVICE

 

TERMINATING A GAS LEASE

Most gas leases will not terminate automatically at expiration date unless the landowner takes action.

 

RESPONDING TO FORCE MAJEURE

Landowners need to respond to Force Majeure letters being received from gas companies.


JOE HEATH, ESQ.

ENVIRONMENTAL ATTORNEY

 

MIKE BOSETTI

LANDOWNER

(TERMINATED LEASE SUCCESSFULLY)


Betsy Larkin

Cortland County Clerk

Tuesday  May 17, 2011  7 – 9 pm

 

Cortland County Office Building Auditorium

60 Central Ave., Cortland, NY

Organized by GDACC

(GAS DRILLING AWARENESS FOR CORTLAND COUNTY)

P.O. BOX 5151, CORTLAND, NY 13045

SEE  GDACC’S WEBSITE FOR LEASE TERMINATION AND FORCE MAJEURE PACKETS:

http://www.gdacc.wordpress.com

 

Co-sponsored by:

Office of the Cortland County Clerk

Cortland County Legislature’s Ag Planning & Environment Committee

Cortland County Farm Bureau

N.Y. registry to chart gas-drilling chemicals | Press & Sun-Bulletin | pressconnects.com

N.Y. registry to chart gas-drilling chemicals | Press & Sun-Bulletin | pressconnects.com.

Tiny Pennsylvania Land Trust Is Tempted by Marcellus Shale Gas Riches | SolveClimate News

Tiny Pennsylvania Land Trust Is Tempted by Marcellus Shale Gas Riches | SolveClimate News.

Chesapeake gets DEP notice of violation after well incident – News – The Times-Tribune

Chesapeake gets DEP notice of violation after well incident – News – The Times-Tribune.

Pennsylvania’s GOP Governor Lets Gas Industry Have Its Way With Public Parks | The Nation

Pennsylvania’s GOP Governor Lets Gas Industry Have Its Way With Public Parks | The Nation.

Pennsylvania’s GOP Governor Lets Gas Industry Have Its Way With Public Parks

Situated amidst the bucolic forests and Appalachian peaks of southwestern Pennsylvania, Ohiopyle State Park offers one of the best settings for outdoor recreation in the country. One and half million people visit the park each year to hike, hunt and fish, kayak and contribute millions of dollars to the regional economy.

Robert S. Eshelman is an independent journalist. His articles have appeared in Abu Dhabi’s the National, In These Times…

By coincidence of geology and biology, though, Ohiopyle also sits atop a highly coveted portion of one of the largest natural gas deposits in the world—the Marcellus Shale formation. All sorts of aspirations and mythologies have been bestowed upon the extraction of millions of years’ worth of decayed organic matter (i.e., natural gas) that lies a mile below ground, such as creating 200,000 new jobs in Pennsylvania and helping to wean the nation from oil imports.

Last October, outgoing Democratic Governor Ed Rendell sought to slow the pace of the natural gas industry’s scramble for Marcellus riches—and address growing concerns about the environmental and public health impacts of drilling—by signing an executive order prohibiting the issuance of any new drilling leases on public lands.

But newly elected Republican Governor Tom Corbett has pledged to overturn Rendell’s moratorium. Since taking office in January, Corbett has rolled back environmental oversight of natural gas drilling on public lands.

“The whole concept of a public commons is under threat,” says John Quigley, who was head of Pennsylvania’s Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) under Governor Rendell. DCNR is the agency tasked with overseeing the state’s public parks and forests, which is recognized as the best-managed in the country.

Think of it as an environmental counterpart to Wisconsin governor Scott Walker’s attack on public workers’ right to bargain collectively.

Corbett’s support for the natural gas industry comes as no surprise; the oil, natural gas and mining industries contributed $1.5 million to his 2010 gubernatorial campaign, according to the National Institute on Money in State Politics.

And with largesse comes rewards. Corbett’s first appointment came in December, a month before taking office. He selected a man named C. Alan Walker to head the state’s Department of Community and Economic Development. Walker, who has contributed nearly $200,000 to Corbett political campaigns, is president and CEO of Bradford Energy Company and served as a member and past chairman of the board of directors of both the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry and the Pennsylvania Coal Association.

In addition to the appointment, Corbett granted Walker special power to “expedite any permit or action pending in any agency where the creation of jobs may be impacted.” With a stroke of his pen, Walker could render environmental regulations meaningless.

Then, in February, Corbett rolled back a key environmental hurdle for the natural gas industry, ending state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) review of drilling activities on state-owned land. Where once DEP worked in tandem with DCNR to anticipate and propose mitigation measures for potentially harmful drilling activities, now a drill operator is required only to submit a checklist confirming that it has taken adequate steps toward avoiding certain environmental impacts.

DCNR’s budget has suffered, too. Corbett made funding of state parks contingent on the revenues they generate from leasing natural gas. Since the 1950s, says Jan Jarrett, president of PennFuture, a state conservation group, leasing revenues went into a fund used to buy up greater amounts of parkland, for instance, or promote conservation, rather than into DCNR itself. But with this year’s budget, Corbett has used those revenues to fund the department. In other words, rather than funding the DCNR through General Fund allocations, he is making it more dependent on revenue from resource extraction.

Jarrett is worried about this precedent. “If the department is running off of timber or natural gas lease sales, there becomes a motivation to increase the number of leases or boost revenues from resource extraction.”

Corbett has yet to lift the drilling moratorium, but there is no regulatory hurdle stopping him.

“To Corbett’s credit, he did not propose any additional leasing in his current budget,” says Quigley, “However, his spokespeople have indicated that the governor thinks that the moratorium should be lifted.”

PennFuture’s Jarrett speculates that a Corbett decision to lift the moratorium may come down to budget considerations after all. “There’s been a huge outcry over the cuts to public and higher education,” she says, describing the governor’s primary remedy for addressing the state’s $4 billion budget deficit. “I suspect that the General Assembly will balk at the level of cuts that Corbett wants and he’ll have to give some of that money back. So he may look again to the state forest land.”

Currently, about one-third of Pennsylvania’s public lands—700,000 acres—are leased to drilling companies. While Rendell’s moratorium put a stop to further leasing, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania does not own the subsurface mineral rights to 80 percent of state parks. About half of the state’s 117 parks, according to Quigley, lie above the Marcellus Shale formation. So even with Rendell’s moratorium in place, the natural gas industry has wide access to the public lands, including Ohiopyle. Further weakening the state’s regulatory authority, a 2009 state supreme court decision limited DCNR’s ability to impose use conditions on public lands to which it owns only the surface rights.

With the construction of a natural gas well pad on public land comes the need for miles of service roads and underground pipelines that fragment both critical wildlife habitat and areas of uninterrupted outdoor recreational space. Thousands of truck trips are required for each well due to the millions of gallons of chemical-infused water that is needed to fracture the subsurface geologic formations and release the gas trapped inside. “The question,” says Quigley, “is what are the limits of resource extraction on the public lands?”

Thanks to Quigley, though, this is no longer an open question. Under his direction, DCNR conducted a two-year study of the likely impacts of natural gas extraction on the public parks system. The study determined that “no additional leasing involving surface disturbance can occur without significantly altering the ecological integrity and wild character of our state forest system.” Rendell’s drilling moratorium was in response to this finding, along with peaking concerns over the environmental and public health impacts of natural gas drilling.

“There is a huge outdoor recreation culture and ethic in Pennsylvania,” Quigley continues. “The hunting and fishing opportunities that our public lands provide define to a significant degree the character of our state. This parks system was built so that every citizen of the state could have access to their natural inheritance. It’s grounded in the state constitution.”

In March, Corbett empanelled a Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission, which will deliver a final set of recommendations to the Governor this summer. The panel—remaining consistent with Corbett’s financial backing—is stacked in the industry’s favor, and conservationists speculate that the panel might provide political cover for the governor to reverse the moratorium in exchange for a nominal production tax or local impact fee.

In the meantime, Quigley appeals to the governor’s rational side: “I’m hoping that he will have an opportunity to review the analysis that DCNR did and he can be persuaded that we need to take a much more conservative approach to drilling on public lands.”

  • Share249
  • |
  • |
  • StumbleUpon.com
  • |
  • Recommended by 1
  • |
  • Text Size A | A | A

If you like this article, consider making a donation.

Reprint this article. Click here for rights and information.

Comments

[ Post Your Comment ]
Showing 6 comments of 6
Current Sort: last to first

1. posted by: Beethoven1 at 04/21/2011 @ 7:29am

When members of the GOP win elections, why don’t they just do the honest thing. Just come out and say, now that I am governor of this state, I am going to let the richest entities in this state control everything. If you don’t like this, move to another state.

2. posted by: kasesschwartz at 04/20/2011 @ 10:03pm

Seems more like a criminal than a governor.

3. posted by: safrancis2000 at 04/20/2011 @ 1:30pm

Yes, there are recall laws in PA. Republican lawmakers have introduced revisions to this law for the 2011 session. Not sure what the changes include, but my bet is they inlcude restrictions to the law to protect them from recalls.

4. posted by: tonytigerking at 04/20/2011 @ 12:51pm

The GOP doesn’t believe the government has a duty to uphold public trust. They believe that somehow a private corporation, with the goal to maximize its profit, would watch out for the interest for all of us. Why would a party that doesn’t believe in the good that a government can do be good at governing?

5. posted by: lnh at 04/19/2011 @ 11:28pm

I live in northcentral PA. I don’t think that anyone who hasn’t seen it would believe how much damage these frackers are doing and how fast they are doing it. They’re treating us like an occupied country.
Does anyone know if Pennsylvanians can recall a govenor?

6. posted by: DejaVu at 04/19/2011 @ 9:16pm

Maybe Satan just has a thing for guys named Walker.

Showing 6 comments of 6
Current Sort: last to first

Post Your Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment

Marcellus Shale gas industry pays taxes, but not many | PennLive.com

Marcellus Shale gas industry pays taxes, but not many | PennLive.com.