Hill and Hollow Unit Management Plan

Hill and Hollow Unit Management Plan.

Draft Unit Management Plan for Taylor Valley

  • I just received notification of a March  public meeting in Truxton to discuss the Draft Unit Management Plan for Taylor Valley.  I think it will be important to flood that meeting with concerned citizens from the area.

    Dear Taylor Valley Unit Management Area Stakeholder,

    A draft Unit Management Plan (UMP) has been developed for the Taylor Valley Unit Management Area, which includes Baker School House, Donahue Woods, Gee Brook, Hoxie Gorge, and Taylor Valley State Forests along with Papish Pond Multiple-Use Area. The UMP process, for this Unit began with a public meeting at the McGraw Central School’s cafeteria in February 2010. This meeting was used to gather input from the public with regards to the future management of the Unit.  Input from this meeting along with a long-range vision, the principles of ecosystem management, and the current use were used to develop management activities in the UMP.

    There is a meeting scheduled to gather feedback from the public on two draft UMPs (Taylor Valley and Hill and Hollow). I look forward to receiving feedback from you at the upcoming meeting. The following announcement contains details about the meeting:

      DEC Seeks Public Feedback on Two Draft Unit Management Plans (UMPs): Hill & Hollow and Taylor Valley

    WHEN: Monday, March 11, 2013, from 6:30 to 9:00 p.m.

    WHERE: Homer Central School District’s Hartnet Elementary School Gymnasium located on Academy Street in Truxton, NY.

    WHAT: To receive public feedback on the Draft Hill & Hollow and Draft Taylor Valley UMPs.  Copies of the plans are posted on the DEC’s website at: http://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/4979.html .The plans are also available, for public review, at local libraries and DEC offices. Copies of the UMPs are available on compact discs from the Cortland DEC office and may be requested by calling (607)753-3095 ext. 217.

    The meeting will begin with an open house format, to allow the public to meet informally with staff, discuss their concerns and provide written comments. Beginning at 7 p.m., staff will briefly present highlights of the two UMPs.  Following the presentation, the public will be able to provide verbal comments about the UMPs. Those unable to attend the meeting may submit comments (until April 11, 2013) by mail to: DEC, Division of Lands and Forests, 1285 Fisher Avenue, Cortland, NY  13045 or  by email to hcdedric@gw.dec.state.ny.us  for the Taylor Valley UMP and  to mlzubal@gw.dec.state.ny.us forthe Hill and Hollow UMP.

     

    WHY: The Draft UMPs have been developed to address management activities on State lands. The Hill & Hollow UMP contains Morgan Hill and Kettlebail State Forests as well as Labrador Hollow Unique Area. The Taylor Valley UMP includes: Taylor Valley, Hoxie Gorge, Baker School House, Donahue Woods and Gee Brook State Forests as well as Papish Pond Multiple-Use Area.

    Henry C. Dedrick Jr.
    Senior Forester, Region 7
    NYS DEC, Division of Lands & Forests
    1285 Fisher Ave.
    Cortland, NY 13045
    Phone: (607)753-3095 ext. 218
    1-800-388-8244 ext. 218
    Fax:      (607)753-8532
    e-mail:   hcdedric@gw.dec.state.ny.us

     

    The following   action by the DEC  is proposed in  the January  2013 Draft Taylor Valley Unit Management Plan (http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/regions_pdf/tayvy1.pdf ).   Is the DEC anticipating a reversal of the decision not to allow surface activity associated with drilling in our state forests?     The final paragraph of page 60 says the following:

     

    “This prohibition is subject to change if the Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Statements regarding Well Permit Issuance for Horizontal Drilling and High-Volume Fracturing to Develop the Marcellus Shale and Other Low-Permeability Gas Reservoirs is amended during finalization processes.”

    Here’s a more extended quote from the Draft Unit Management Plan:

    b. Consider future requests for oil and gas leasing using an open public process while protecting natural and recreational resources. Prior to leasing lands in this Unit, an open public process must be followed. This process includes coordination with the Division of Mineral Resources to determine: areas that can be leased with full rights granted (100% surface entry and no special conditions required); areas that may require special environmental and safety conditions; and areas that may be leased with no surface-disturbance/entry conditions (non-drilling clause). The following is a summary of the leasing process of State Forest lands:

    Receive requests to nominate specific lands within the Unit for leasing of mineral rights, from interested parties.

    Conduct tract assessments of nominated properties to determine where lands are able to support or accommodate related surface disturbance associated with oil and gas exploration, development, and extraction. Factors considered during the tract assessment process include the proximity to sensitive resources of the Unit. These resources include, but are not limited to certain management strategies, wetland, riparian zones, steep slopes, recreational trails and areas, unique ecological communities, habitat of rare and endangered species, archeological and cultural sites and scenic vistas and view sheds.

    o Apply a hierarchical approach that classifies areas of each State Forest into four categories as part of a tract assessment to be conducted prior to leasing.

    § Category A ‐ Compatible with well pad, road, and utility development. These areas can be considered the least sensitive to surface disturbance and should be considered first for well pad development to limit the overall impact of development. Examples of Category A areas include open fields, conifer plantations, and even-aged management areas.

    § Category B ‐ Uneven-age Management Areas with one well pad per State Forest. These areas are being managed for species that require large blocks of un-fragmented (diameters of temporary openings in the canopy shall be no larger than 2.5 times the height of surrounding trees) forests.

    § Category C ‐ 250-foot stream and designated recreational trail buffers. Not compatible with well pad development; may be compatible with road and utility development.

    § Category D – Infrastructure Exclusion areas. Not compatible with well pad, road, or utility development. These include: ponds, wetlands, spring seeps, and vernal pools with appropriate 250-foot buffers; slopes greater than 15 percent; archeological and cultural concerns; and areas being managed as Natural Areas.

    o Prohibit surface disturbance associated with high-volume hydraulic fracturing. This prohibition is subject to change if the Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Statements regarding Well Permit Issuance for Horizontal Drilling and High-Volume Fracturing to Develop the Marcellus Shale and Other Low-Permeability Gas Reservoirs is amended during finalization processes.

    Is it a coincidence that there has been heavy logging in the state forest next to my home for the past two summers? Well-pad sized sections have been clear-cut or significantly thinned in Kennedy State Forest, and pipeline-width corridors have been cleared of debris.   It could be coincidence,  but this logging activity was well ahead of scheduled logging in the management plan for Kennedy State Forest  (according to conversations I had with the forester).    The clearing areas are congruent with the Department’s 2008(?) published maps of “Areas compatible with drilling. ”  Now the Draft Unit Management Plan  for Taylor Valley  shows that the DEC is planning for a possible reversal of the prohibition against surface activity associated with hvhf.  Has the DEC planned to allow drilling in the state forests all along  -despite claims to the contrary in the revised SGEIS?

    STATE FORESTS IN PA UNDER HYDROFRACKING

    U.S. Geological Survey: Natural Gas Fracking Is Destroying Pennsylvania Forests – Natural Gas Watch.org.

  • Full Report:  https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.naturalgaswatch.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F10%2FUSGS-fracking-landuse-report.pdf

Taylor Valley Unit Management Plan

Taylor Valley Unit Management Plan.

I just received notification of a March  public meeting in Truxton to discuss the Draft Unit Management Plan for Taylor Valley.  I think it will be important to flood that meeting with concerned citizens from the area.

 

The following   action by the DEC  is proposed in  the January  2013 Draft Taylor Valley Unit Management Plan (http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/regions_pdf/tayvy1.pdf ).   Is the DEC anticipating a reversal of the decision not to allow surface activity associated with drilling in our state forests?     The final paragraph of page 60 says the following:

 

“This prohibition is subject to change if the Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Statements regarding Well Permit Issuance for Horizontal Drilling and High-Volume Fracturing to Develop the Marcellus Shale and Other Low-Permeability Gas Reservoirs is amended during finalization processes.”

 

Here’s a more extended quote from the Draft Unit Management Plan:

 

b. Consider future requests for oil and gas leasing using an open public process while protecting natural and recreational resources. Prior to leasing lands in this Unit, an open public process must be followed. This process includes coordination with the Division of Mineral Resources to determine: areas that can be leased with full rights granted (100% surface entry and no special conditions required); areas that may require special environmental and safety conditions; and areas that may be leased with no surface-disturbance/entry conditions (non-drilling clause). The following is a summary of the leasing process of State Forest lands:

Receive requests to nominate specific lands within the Unit for leasing of mineral rights, from interested parties.

Conduct tract assessments of nominated properties to determine where lands are able to support or accommodate related surface disturbance associated with oil and gas exploration, development, and extraction. Factors considered during the tract assessment process include the proximity to sensitive resources of the Unit. These resources include, but are not limited to certain management strategies, wetland, riparian zones, steep slopes, recreational trails and areas, unique ecological communities, habitat of rare and endangered species, archeological and cultural sites and scenic vistas and view sheds.

o Apply a hierarchical approach that classifies areas of each State Forest into four categories as part of a tract assessment to be conducted prior to leasing.

§ Category A ‐ Compatible with well pad, road, and utility development. These areas can be considered the least sensitive to surface disturbance and should be considered first for well pad development to limit the overall impact of development. Examples of Category A areas include open fields, conifer plantations, and even-aged management areas.

§ Category B ‐ Uneven-age Management Areas with one well pad per State Forest. These areas are being managed for species that require large blocks of un-fragmented (diameters of temporary openings in the canopy shall be no larger than 2.5 times the height of surrounding trees) forests.

§ Category C ‐ 250-foot stream and designated recreational trail buffers. Not compatible with well pad development; may be compatible with road and utility development.

§ Category D – Infrastructure Exclusion areas. Not compatible with well pad, road, or utility development. These include: ponds, wetlands, spring seeps, and vernal pools with appropriate 250-foot buffers; slopes greater than 15 percent; archeological and cultural concerns; and areas being managed as Natural Areas.

o Prohibit surface disturbance associated with high-volume hydraulic fracturing. This prohibition is subject to change if the Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Statements regarding Well Permit Issuance for Horizontal Drilling and High-Volume Fracturing to Develop the Marcellus Shale and Other Low-Permeability Gas Reservoirs is amended during finalization processes.

 

 

Is it a coincidence that there has been heavy logging in the state forest next to my home for the past two summers? Well-pad sized sections have been clear-cut or significantly thinned in Kennedy State Forest, and pipeline-width corridors have been cleared of debris.   It could be coincidence,  but this logging activity was well ahead of scheduled logging in the management plan for Kennedy State Forest  (according to conversations I had with the forester).    The clearing areas are congruent with the Department’s 2008(?) published maps of “Areas compatible with drilling. ”  Now the Draft Unit Management Plan  for Taylor Valley  shows that the DEC is planning for a possible reversal of the prohibition against surface activity associated with hvhf.  Has the DEC planned to allow drilling in the state forests all along  -despite claims to the contrary in the revised SGEIS?

BA

Strategic Plan for State Forest Management – NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation

Strategic Plan for State Forest Management – NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation.

The plan has been edited based on public input and is now considered final, and will be used to guide the management of all State Forests and for the development of State Forest unit management plans. A responsiveness document has been incorporated as an appendix to the plan, and includes DEC’s responses to the many comments received. Revision of the plan is scheduled to occur every 10 years.

Documents

Complete plan. This is a very large document and may take a long time to download.
Complete Plan (PDF)
 (14.4 MB)

This is a large file and may take a long time to download.

Cover — Chapter 1 (PDF) (5.5 MB)
Chapter 2 — Chapter 4 (PDF) (4.3 MB)
Chapters 5 — 7 and Appendices (PDF) (4.2 MB)

Executive Summary (PDF) (3 MB)
A brief 11 page overview of the plan.

SPSFM Additional Resources

The following additional resources have been referenced in the strategic plan and are listed according to Chapter and Section of reference.

Chapter 1 – New York State Forests

Management Planning Overview

Statewide Map of Units and UMP Completion Schedule (PDF, 203 K)
A statewide schedule, organized by year of first draft completion, and map delineating the new UMP boundaries

Chapter 2 – Ecosystem Management

Landscape Assessment

TNC Ecoregions – full size map (PDF, 1.09 MB)
Map of The Nature Conservancy Ecoregions and State Forest ecoregional distribution

Active Forest Management

Forest Matrix Blocks and Connectivity – full size map (PDF, 872 K)
Map of matrix blocks and “least cost path” LCP corridors showing potential State Forest contributions to habitat connectivity across New York’s landscape

Program Policy: Retention on State Forests (PDF, 139 K)
Policy for retention of forest habitat structure and biodiversity on State Forests during forest management activities

Program Policy: Clearcutting on State Forests (PDF, 142 K)
Policy for clearcutting or conducting other regeneration cuttings on State Forests

Chapter 3 – Resource Protection

Soil and Water Protection

Rules for Establishment of Special Management Zones on State Forests (PDF, 58 K)
Establishes the Bureau of State Land Management’s buffer guidelines to protect water resources and ecological features

Rutting Guidelines for Timber Harvests and TRPs (PDF, 49 K)
Guidelines to minimize surface impacts during harvesting and TRP activity

At-Risk Species and Communities

List of SGCN that Rely on Forested Habitat (PDF, 132 K)
A list created for the SPSFM, noting forest-dependent Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) by ecoregion, as identified in the NYS Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy

Chapter 4 – Real Property and Infrastructure

Infrastructure

DEC Unpaved Forest Road Handbook (PDF, 618 K)
Establishes standards for the establishment and maintenance of public forest access roads and haul roads on State Forests

Chapter 5 – Public/Permitted Use

Mineral Resources

Current Oil and Gas Leases on State Forests (PDF, 29 K)
Listing of current leases by DEC region

Management of Mineral Resources (PDF, 92 K)
Memorandum of Understanding between Mineral Resources and Lands & Forests, along with collected law and regulations pertaining to minerals management

DRAFT Guidelines for Pipeline Construction on DEC Administered State Lands (PDF, 41 K)
Guidelines for construction of oil and natural gas pipelines

Guidelines for Seismic Testing on DEC Administered State Land (PDF, 23 K)
Guidelines for the use of seismic exploration to discover natural gas reserves and optimally site the drill location

What is Carbon Capture and Sequestration? (PDF, 2.12 MB)
Pamphlet explaining the technology

Chapter 6 – Forest Management and Health

Plantation Management

Program Policy: Plantation Management on State Forests (PDF, 68 K)
Policy providing guidance and procedures for managing plantations on State Forests

Forest Health

Invasive Plant Control Methods (PDF, 174 K)
Suggested methods for controlling select invasive plant species on State Forests

 

Croton Watershed Clean Water Coalition Newsletter Jan. Feb. 2013

newyorkwater.org/content/newsletters/13_jan_feb.pdf.

Croton Watershed Clean Water Coallition Newsletter

newyorkwater.org/content/newsletters/13_jan_feb.pdf.

Sienna poll on hydrofracking in NY 1/2013

www.siena.edu/uploadedfiles/home/parents_and_community/community_page/sri/sny_poll/SNY213 Crosstabs.pdf.

New York still has much work to do on fracking | Kate Sinding’s Blog | Switchboard, from NRDC

New York still has much work to do on fracking | Kate Sinding’s Blog | Switchboard, from NRDC.

Find NRDC’s full comments on the state’s proposed fracking rules here.

Assembly Hearing on NYS Fracking Regulations Jan. 10, 2013

http://TinyURL.com/NY10Jan2013FrackingRegsHearing
http://WilliamAHuston.blogspot.com/2013/01/1-10-2013-ny-assembly-hearing-on.html

Presently the first nine panels are (mostly) all online of fifteen panels total.

Panel five was 2.5 hours and is posted in 3 parts.
Part 2 is not on Youtube yet, but you can watch it on our Blip Channel
http://blip.tv/shaleshock-media/ Look for “Panel 5 (2/3)”

Of 17 clips total, 10 clips are online.
I’m hoping to have everything online by Tuesday @ noon-ish.

You can also check this youtube playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLo1TDxDrIRYpAcsgGWrfdkc6TwvH3n1bW

Cris McConkey has developed an incredible tabbed interface for browsing all of these panels:
http://shaleshockmedia.org/2013/01/14/nys-assembly-hearing-on-fracking-regs/

Everything should be online approximately Tuesday at noon.

You can stream the entire session online here:
http://nystateassembly.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=141
You need to use Internet Explorer, and have Silverlight installed.

DEP’s Position on Drilling in the New York City Watershed

DEP’s Position on Drilling in the New York City Watershed.

Comments on DEC Proposed Drilling Regulations