Fracking hazardous to New Yorkers’ health – Times Union

Fracking hazardous to New Yorkers’ health – Times Union.

Fracking hazardous to New Yorkers’ health

Published 11:13 p.m., Tuesday, April 24, 2012

The state Senate Democrats are holding a forum today on the health effects and other consequences of hydrofracking. That’s important, because the science is clear. Fracking will cause serious health issues for New Yorkers.

Truck traffic is one reason. With each gas well requiring more than 1,000 truck trips, it is a certainty that our roads will be filled with 18-wheelers hauling water, hazardous materials, drill cuttings and toxic waste.

Indeed, the number of additional truck trips will be a digit with at least six zeroes after it.

Exhaust-spewing convoys will grind past homes where pregnant women sleep, school yards where children play, crosswalks where grandparents wait. New York is the third-most populous state in the union. Fill it with tailpipes, and you have big public health consequences.

In the last few months alone, multiple studies revealed the risks that come with air pollution.

First came a study in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health showing how exposure to smog in early pregnancy increases the risk of premature birth — just like cigarette smoking. (Pre-term birth is the leading cause of disability in the United States.)

Next, studies in Archives of Internal Medicine and Journal of the American Medical Association revealed that exposure to roadway pollutants triggers heart attack and stroke and accelerates memory loss among older women. In essence, breathing crummy air is the equivalent of aging your brain by two years.

Meanwhile, a team in California put an $18 million price tag on the medical costs of traffic-related asthma in children — in just two cities alone.

In short, the traffic pollution that fracking will bring is linked to some very expensive problems. These findings have relevance to the question of whether natural gas extraction via horizontal hydrofracturing should be permitted in New York.

Gas wells also emit smog-making fumes. A new University of Colorado study finds that people living near fracking operations can be exposed to air pollutants five times higher than the federal hazard standard. (One of these pollutants is benzene, a proven cause of birth defects and leukemia.)

But none of the above studies appears in the revised draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement that is the state’s planning document for fracking. Astonishingly enough, the revised draft does not assess fracking’s impact on health.

And while the Assembly added a $100,000 study on fracking’s health impacts to its version of the state budget, the oil and gas industry and their lobbyists were able to keep the study out of the final budget.

Recently, I made a big decision when I received a $100,000 Heinz Award for my work on environmental health.

Using the prize as seed money, I convened a coalition of citizens and businesses determined to blaze a sustainable trail. We call ourselves New Yorkers Against Fracking.

Now I would like the governor to make a big decision. Be as bold as the president of France, who halted fracking in his nation on the grounds that demonstration of safety does not yet exist. Be as sensible as U.S. economist Sylvia Brandt, who has asserted, “To have a healthy economy, we have to have a healthy population.”

Governor Cuomo, you have an opportunity to stand up for the health of New Yorkers. Please join us in saying that New York can’t afford the problems that fracking will bring.

Sandra Steingraber is a distinguished scholar in residence at Ithaca College.

Sen. Avella on Fracking Forum

Sen. Avella on Fracking Forum.  

Sen. Avella on Fracking Forum

Wednesday, Senate Democrats hosted a forum on hydrofracking and the possible risks. They wanted to host a full public hearing, but only the majority can do that. Still, Senator Tony Avella says it’s important to keep talking about fracking.  Apr. 25, 2012

Gas Drilling: A Community Forum Apr. 28th Homer

Gas Drilling: A Community Forum

 

Questions about gas drilling and its impacts on the local community?

Feel like you don’t know enough about this much-talked-about industry?

Would you like to learn more about gas drilling’s effect on other communities?

Join us for a community forum featuring:

  •  Mary Jane Uttech—Deputy Director of the Cortland County Health Department  who will speak about the potential impacts to drinking water, air quality, and public health.
  •  Joe Heath—General Counsel for the Onondaga Nation who will speak about the environmental impact of gas drilling as well as gas leases.
  •  Craig Stevens—a citizen of Silver Lake Township, PA who holds a gas lease on his land and will speak about his first-hand experience of the gas industry

 Saturday, April 28, 7 – 9 p.m.

Free and Open to the Public

St. Margaret’s Church Parish Hall, 14 Copeland Avenue, Homer

  SPONSORED BY:

Moving In Congregations Acting in Hope (MICAH)

Organizing People to Have a Voice in Their Community

Albany Residents, Business and Faith Leaders Join Albany Common Council Members In Rally Before Fracking Ban Vote

For Immediate Release

CONTACT: John Armstrong, Frack Action, 607-220-4632

Albany Residents, Business and Faith Leaders Join Albany Common Council Members In Rally Before Fracking Ban Vote

 

Albany Is 95th New York Municipality to Ban Fracking

 

1.2 Million New Yorkers Now Live In Towns and Cities With Bans

 

 

ALBANY – On Monday evening Albany residents including business and faith leaders joined members of the Common Council for a rally before the Albany Common Council votes on legislation to ban fracking in Albany. The ban is all but certain to pass, making Albany the 95th New York municipality to enact a ban on fracking. Those 95 municipalities represent 1.2 million New Yorkers.

“We applaud the Albany Common Council for joining almost a hundred other municipalities across New York in acting on the will and best interests of their residents by banning fracking. If Albany Mayor Jennings bows to gas industry pressure and vetoes Albany’s fracking ban, we believe we have enough support in the Common Council to override the veto,” said John Armstrong, Communications Director with Frack Action.

 

Local leaders in Syracuse and Buffalo, which have also passed fracking bans, expressed support for Albany joining the nearly one hundred cities with a ban in place.  Buffalo is the second largest city in New York State and is where the local ban movement started in 2011. Buffalo has banned fracking/wastewater in the city, and this March they also passed a resolution calling on Governor Cuomo to ban fracking statewide.

“I applaud the Albany Common Council’s vote to ban fracking within their city limits,” said Buffalo Councilmember Joseph Golombek Jr., sponsor of Buffalo’s fracking ban. “Many times, politicians are accused of putting their own interests before the community’s.  The Albany Common Council’s vote, along with the votes conducted by many other municipalities in New York State, show that the citizens of their communities come first, especially when it deals the dangerous impact fracking has on the environment.”

 “It’s good to hear that Albany may soon have a citywide ban on hydrofracking.  The Syracuse ban is strongly supported by local residents, even more so now that we know there’s a glut of natural gas

and the Marcellus and Utica shale gas, which comes with such environmental risk, is being exported to Europe!  Cities like Syracuse and Albany must invest in jobs with staying power, not transient jobs that could leave environmental hazards behind, said Jean Kessner, Syracuse Councilor-at-Large.

 

Participants in the rally also called on Governor Cuomo to follow the lead of municipalities across the state and ban fracking in New York.

“Governor Cuomo should heed the growing body of science that shows fracking cannot be done without sacrificing our health, environment, and economy,” said Julia Walsh, Campaign Director of Frack Action. “The decision on fracking rests with Governor Cuomo — if he breaks it, he owns it.”

“Banning fracking from the City of Albany and drilling wastes from our local treatment and disposal facilities is more than just a symbolic act — we are already finding the hazardous by-products of fracking discarded well outside the current zone of drilling, with little State oversight or concern,” said Roger Downs, Conservation Director for the Sierra Club Atlantic Chapter.  “We applaud the Albany Common Council for filling the leadership void on industrial gas development.  Governor Cuomo has offered only the assurances of a half-baked regulatory program to New Yorkers who stand to lose everything to this out-of-control industry.  We hope this stand in Albany does not go unnoticed.” 

BACKGROUND

High volume hydraulic fracturing, combined with horizontal drilling, involves pumping millions of gallons of water, chemicals and sand underground to extract natural gas from shale bedrock.  Multiple studies show how inherently dangerous it is. Most New Yorkers are wary of fracking. A recent Marist poll found a majority of New Yorkers oppose legalizing fracking due to its potential to contaminate New York’s watersheds with carcinogens and other toxicants.

With or without regulations in place, fracking is a menace to public health.  It lays down blankets of smog, fills roadway with trucks hauling hazardous materials, sends sediment into streams, and generates immense quantities of radioactive, carcinogen-laced waste for which no fail-safe disposal options exist.

Since fracking began in states outside of New York, there have been more than a thousand reports of water contamination. New studies link fracking-related activities to contaminated groundwater, air pollution, illness, death and reproductive problems in cows, horses and wildlife, and most recently human health problems. A recent study from the Colorado School of Public Health found that those living within a half-mile of a natural gas drilling site faced greater health risks than those who live farther away.

New York has seen a surge of local fracking bans enacted across the state Overall, 94 towns and 6 counties have enacted bans or moratoria in New York State.  Sixty-eight municipalities are also considering or staging a ban or moratorium. In the past month,Buffalo, the second largest city in New York, and Niagara Falls both passed resolutions calling for Governor Cuomo and the state legislature to pass a statewide ban on fracking.

The Buffalo Common Council also recently passed a resolution of support for bills S4220/A7218 a fracking ban in New York, stating that a law to prohibit natural gas drilling in New York will protect residents and neighbors from the harmful effects of drilling, as well as safe-guarding air, land, and local waterways. The DEC, while prohibiting fracking in certain watersheds in Syracuse and New York City, has not prohibited drilling in any Western NY watersheds.

###

John Armstrong
Albany, NY
607-220-4632

Quebec bans any fracking pending studies

Quebec bans any fracking pending studies.

Statewide Call-In Day to Ban Fracking Wednesday, March 28, 2012 Send a message to Governor Cuomo:

Statewide Call-In Day to Ban Fracking 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Send a message to Governor Cuomo:

Protect our water, air, and food.

Ban fracking in New York!

On March 28, pro-fracking forces will descend on the State Capitol spreading their illusions about the so-called economic benefits of fracking.

We must send a powerful response about the fracking industry’s false promises and hidden costs.  We need to demand that Governor Cuomo support a ban on fracking!

Join New Yorkers Against Fracking and organizations across the state in this important day of action!

Let your call be counted by using this phone number!  866-584-6799
 
New Yorkers Against Fracking  http://www.nyagainstfracking.org/

For more information or to get involved, contact David Braun: db@nowlookup.com; 917-514-0700

Gas Drilling Considerations for Municipalities

Considerations on Gas Drilling in the Town of Union

 

1.       Now is the time to make an informed decision on gas hydrofracking within the Town’s borders.

If the town waits too long and the DEC begins to issue drilling permits, it may be too late to limit unlimited drilling, because once drilling starts on one property within the town it may be considered arbitrary or prejudicial to ban it on other parcels. By being undecided or waiting too long about the advisability of a fracking ban may forever eliminate the Town’s discretion.

2.        Hydrofracking should not be permitted adjacent to or within high density populations

The population density of Susquehanna and Bradford Counties in Pennsylvania is 51 and 54 people per square mile, and we have witnessed the impact that drilling has had in these areas. The population density of the Town of Union is 1600 people per square mile, over 30 times as dense. Impacts if they occur due to improper installations, violations, or accidents will be amplified by 30 times in the Town of Union!

3.       Because the Board does not know where drilling might occur within the Town, there is no way to adequately assess the impact to local roads, traffic patterns, congestion, potential pollutions or any other factor.

The Town will forever be in reactive mode if drilling is permitted.

4.        Hydrofracking is a very new process and not yet proven safe.

Regardless of the best intentions of the DEC and State regulatory agencies, hydrofracking has been shown to be prone to accidents, violations of regulations, and improper installation of casings. Over 2000 violations by the gas drilling industry were recorded in PA from 2008-2010. The vast majority were beyond simple administrative issues. Improper casings and failed casings (un-welded pipe, poor cementing in cold weather and vibrations/cracking from fracking explosions) have been blamed for pollution of ground water supplies in Dimock. The most recent case occurred as recently as December 2011. Issues are not limited to the few households frequently cited in the news. This is a continuing problem.  Casings can be improperly installed, the cementing process can be faulty, casings can fail over time as they age, casings can fail due to the high pressures involved, and they can fail when the explosive charges are detonated to open fissures in the deep well.

 

 

5.       Methane gas could intrude into homes .

The same improper casing installation or casing damage that allows gas to enter the water supply can induce methane into homes as is the case in a recent incident in Dimock PA.

6.       The town’s water supply could be polluted with limited or no alternative source available.

While the drilling companies would have us believe that pollution of water supplies is impossible due to the casings installed below the water table, pollution has occurred in Pennsylvania due to failed or improperly installed casing that allows gas and other pollutants to enter the water supply. Once this occurs there is no going back and few communities like Union may not have any good alternative water supply.

7.       Multiple drilling companies will be involved.

Dozens of drilling concerns might be involved within the Town, each with its own set of policies, approaches, sense of public responsibility, employees, rules, and history of compliance with established regulations. If issues occur the Town will find itself dealing with many entities not just one. 

8.       Heavy truck traffic on town roads and residential streets is dangerous.

Many of us chose to live on quiet residential streets that would be horribly changed with heavy truck traffic (up to 800-900 trucks per well with as many as sixteen wells per pad). Many streets leading to leased land (Western Heights Blvd for example) are currently quiet dead end streets. Many were not built for high volume heavy truck traffic and many are in vulnerable to further damage due to recent floods that scoured the surface and undermined the subsurface.  Accident rates will increase, and snarled traffic in the town will result. Dust air pollution, noxious odors, noise and light pollution will increase in quiet, clean residential and rural areas.

9.       No good solution readily exists for disposal and/or storage of dangerous “produced water”.

There is a lack of facilities for proper treatment of the waste water associated with hydrofracking.  Many communities in New York State have banned use of their water treatment facilities for the “produced water” from fracking wells. Underground storage is not readily available in the State due to geologic incompatibility. The produced water contains residue from drilling, chemicals used in the fracking process, high salinity (5x sea water) and some degree of radioactivity, making it difficult to purify. It is unclear whether NY will allow spreading of waste water on local roads, but some states do, resulting in a slick, slippery coating. Some gas companies have been forced to store produced water at the pad site in holding ponds due to the difficulty in finding disposal solutions. This increases the chance of accidental release of the dangerous substances. 

10.   Fracking fluid is dangerous.

Drilling proponents say that the fracking fluid is 99% water with a very dilute amount of various chemicals. Every well (up to 16 per pad) requires on the order of 7,500 gallons of chemicals. According to experts, 93% of these have adverse health effects, 60% are known carcinogens, and more than 40% are endocrine disruptors. Both people and wildlife are exposed through accidental release or thorough exposure to produced water disposed on local roads, or through contact with holding ponds containing the waste.

 

11.   Revenue from gas drilling leases is uncertain and short-term.

There is no guarantee that the State might not take portions of the revenue expected and needed by the town to maintain infrastructure, fund emergency equipment, maintain roads, deal with accidents, fight increased crime etc. New York might even establish a state controlled tax and share only part of it with the county (not town). This creates tremendous pressure on the town to perform added responsibilities. The revenue is high only in the short term (a few years) but the town’s responsibilities will last forever.  

12.    Increase of jobs for local residents is uncertain, but undoubtedly short term.

Experience in Susquehanna County in PA indicates that up to 70% of the jobs created are from out of town (not the other way around as some would suggest). These are short term jobs as well.  Evidence points to increased crime rates associated with transient drilling teams. The Town will need to address the need for additional law enforcement.

13.   Economic benefit to the Town is uncertain and may not be sufficient for long term needs.

Economic benefit to the town is uncertain, but based on experience in PA the town should be very skeptical. Revenues may not even equal expenses. Expenses will be long term commitments and revenue will decline rapidly in the first few years.  Income will benefit a select few, the rest of the town’s residents will pay forever. Towns may not benefit at all from leased property that is currently tax free (for example, the Binghamton University Foundation at 423 Western Heights Blvd.) However the Town will be responsible for all repairs, accidents, pollution, associated with drilling on tax free property.

14.   Values of drilled land and property adjacent to drilled land decreases and future mortgages may be impacted.

There is wide evidence of decreased property values associated with drilling. Some properties in PA have declined more than a whopping 80%. Banks may refuse to insure property on drilled land and may refuse mortgages on land adjacent to leased property for fear of falling values or liabilities.  The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) has issued an advisory to appraisers that homes within 300 ft of a leased property are no longer appropriate collateral for residential mortgages! This may impact thousands of properties in the Town of Union.

15.    Current State drilling regulations date to 1972 and are not sufficient to protect the town from new processes such as those used to obtain gas from Marcellus or Utica shales.

The town has no control of this issue, but will be left to deal with any and all ramifications of lack of good, meaningful and absolutely safe regulations.   The town, not the drilling companies will be left to deal with the ramifications of any accidents, violations, or improper drilling techniques which through experience in PA, are certain to occur. 

16.   The Town of Union needs to immediately commission a baseline of its water supply.

It is nearly impossible to find gas companies liable for anything and expensive litigation is necessary even to begin to obtain any restitution from accidents, violations, or improper drilling techniques. Small State fines are not usually sufficient to pay for repair or remediation.  It is impossible to find the gas companies (and there will be many, not just one) responsible for water supply pollution. The town should establish its own baseline for the common elements and compounds used in drilling in its current water supply. Lab results from gas industry tests will not necessarily be released or available to the town. Tests must be from labs certified by the NY State Department of Health to be admissible in legal proceedings. Attention must be paid to the chain of custody of samples as well. The baseline needs to be updated to be current within 5 years of any new drilling.

17.   The Town will experience many increased long term expenses.

New expenses will include new emergency response equipment, disaster relief, training of emergency response teams, increase in the number of emergency response personnel, road equipment and repair material and equipment, code enforcement, and law enforcement. Many of these expenses are long term in nature, while the drilling revenue may be short term.

18.   The gas industry is exempt from many pure water and environmental protection laws.

Amazingly because of the nation’s thirst for fossil fuels, it has exempted the gas industry from:

  • ·         The Clean Water Act
  • ·         The Clean Air Act
  • ·         The Safe Drinking Water Act
  • ·         The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

The Town will have to pay for any environmental issue arising from drilling and gas production operations, not the gas companies. This extends to the haulers or any waste materials from the drilling and fracking processes.

19.    Gathering pipelines and Compressor Stations will be required within the Town as well.

Once production begins additional pipelines known as Gathering Pipelines are required to collect the production from a series of local wells to deliver it to a Compressor Station where the gas is processed and pressurized for injection into long haul pipelines.  Eminent Domain laws are used to obtain land for these pipelines and compressor stations. They are not part of the permit application. Gathering pipelines crisscrossing our town will create long term safety and road and construction impacts. Compressor stations are extremely noisy and emit noxious fumes.  They operate 24/7. One estimate is 3-5% of gas escapes from pipelines and compressors and fugitive emissions, polluting the Town’s air.  Steuben County’s Woodhill compressor station in not only the greatest source of pollutants in the county, it is approximately 3 times greater polluter than the Corning glass manufacturing plant, and emits nearly 3 times the number of different pollutants as Corning Glass.

20.   There is no evidence that the quality of life improves in communities that have permitted Marcellus shale gas production.

While a few individuals may benefit financially from selling gas rights on their property, these benefits are relatively short term and the vast majority of the town residents will never see any benefit, including any significant long term increase in jobs, except those involved in cleaning up the results of unbridled drilling  

21.    Drilling pads, and production well pads will be unsightly.

We live in a hilly area. Hundreds of 5 acre drilling pads and resulting vegetation-less fields on our local hills will be visible for miles around the area. Take a look at the pads in Susquehanna and Bradford counties on Goggle Earth just to see how objectionable these are. Hopefully the Town of Vestal will ban drilling, because we in the Town of Union will have to gaze upon these pads for the rest of our lives, decreasing the desirability of residing in the town or general area, and decreasing home prices and values. Wells have been drilled near suburban homes, churches, schools, parks and even in city centers.

22.   Local residents may be priced out of the rental market.

Experience in Bradford County indicates that rental rates increase rapidly (as much as 4X) with the influx of temporary drilling employees who are willing and able to pay much more than the current fair value for suitable housing, leaving local residents without housing.

23.    The State is advocating “300 demonstration sites”.

Once a community crosses this bridge there is no going back. The damage will be done and nothing will stop further drilling. NY doesn’t need a 300 well demonstration project. Certainly the Town of Union doesn’t. We have a much larger demonstration project a few miles across the state border, and it hasn’t gone well. What more evidence do we need to ban it in Union? Who is to say that a NY demonstration project won’t be conducted in a “model” manner by gas companies who desire approval, who return to their usual, less compliant practices as demonstrated in Susquehanna and Bradford Counties.   

24.   Drilling causes increased noise, dust, and light pollution

Objectionable noise is created by the drilling process and truck traffic. Dust is generated from the dirt roads leading into the drilling site and from the barren pad itself. Drilling is 24/7 and intense lights are used for nighttime operations. These will impact neighborhoods surrounding the drilling site for years, decreasing house values and affecting the quality of life.

25.    Drilling has been prohibited in The New York City and Syracuse areas, but encouraged here in the Southern Tier.   

The reason for banning drilling in these areas is related to the cost of installing water filtration should silt or other pollutants enter the water supply for these areas. Apparently this is too expensive for these areas to afford, but evidently the assumption is the Town of Union can afford to handle any pollution its water supply.

26.   Current setbacks or buffers are inadequate.  

Setbacks of 500 to 1000 feet from residences, streams, wells, or waterways seems to be inadequate in high density population areas like the Town of Union, where with 1600 people per square mile, is over 30X that of Susquehanna and Bradford Counties. We can’t change the setback regulations, but we can ban drilling altogether to protect our high density area from experiencing 30X the issues we are witnessing in Pennsylvania.

27.   Millions and millions of gallons of water will be required .  

Millions of gallons of water are used in the hydrofracturing process. No one can be sure where this water is going to come from or what the impact will be from its removal.

28.   More information is available, check out these websites.

o   This is a repository for dozens of video, audio, and photographic recordings of relevant speeches, forums, and rallies.

 

Can the shale gas boom save Ohio? – The Washington Post

Can the shale gas boom save Ohio? – The Washington Post.

Time is on our side in hydrofracking fight – Times Union

Time is on our side in hydrofracking fight – Times Union.

How One Town Beat a Bully

maura: How One Town Beat a Bully.