10/12/2011: Oil Company Pleads Guilty to Clean Air Act and Obstruction Crimes in Louisiana

10/12/2011: Oil Company Pleads Guilty to Clean Air Act and Obstruction Crimes in Louisiana.

 

HARRISBURG — Department of Environmental Protection Secretary Mike Krancer announced today that DEP has submitted technical guidance for single source determinations for oil and gas operations, also known as “air aggregation” determinations, to the Pennsylvania Bulletin for public comment. The public comment period will close Nov. 21.

This guidance deals with the process of determining whether two or more stationary air emissions sources should be aggregated together and treated as a “single source” when it comes to air permitting programs.

“Natural gas holds great promise as a clean-burning fuel that could greatly reduce air emissions associated with electricity production and transportation,” Krancer said. “It has been recognized that the use of natural gas can have very beneficial impacts on air quality.”

This guidance, which is subject to public review and comment, involves three sets of regulations: the federal Prevention of Significant Deterioration regulations, which the state incorporates and implements in their entirety; the Pennsylvania nonattainment New Source Review regulations; and the Title V permitting program.

“This takes a practical, common-sense and legally required approach to air aggregation issues,” Krancer said. “DEP’s state Air Quality program already regulates this industry.”

New sources, including some natural gas processing operations, are required by state law to meet stringent air emissions control requirements, which prevent, reduce or control emissions with the use of the best available control techniques or equipment, Krancer said.

Krancer said that the program also regulates air emissions in the oil and gas industry via plan approvals along with both general and operating permits.

The test for determining whether or not to aggregate comes out of federal case law from 1979 and the federal regulations stemming from that case, along with the commonwealth’s regulations, which mirror the federal regulations.

The law states that to be aggregated, the different sources must belong to the same industrial grouping, must be located on one or more contiguous or adjacent properties and must be under the control of the same person. All three of these conditions must be met if the sources are going to be aggregated.

“Over time, there was a tendency by some regulators to morph the meaning of ‘contiguous’ or ‘adjacent’ properties to mean only that operations on the properties be ‘interdependent,’” Krancer said. “This view has been expressed in various federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommendation letters or policy statements in recent years after the court case on this topic in 1979 and after the EPA’s adoption of the regulations on this topic in 1980. That interpretation is not supported by the court decision, the EPA or state regulations.”

DEP’s technical guidance relies on the plain meaning of the words in the regulations and the plain meaning of the words “contiguous or adjacent,” which mean the distance or spatial relationship between locations.

A similar approach was recently affirmed by the West Virginia Air Quality Board whose analysis focused on the proximity of the properties. In addition, other natural gas-producing states, including Texas, Oklahoma and Louisiana, use a quarter-mile rule of thumb, meaning that sources located a quarter mile apart are considered contiguous or adjacent.

“Every case remains, as it always has, unique, with its own facts and circumstances,” Krancer said. “The single source determination test will continue to be applied on a case-by-case basis, depending on the facts of each particular case.”

DEP’s Air Quality permitting staff will begin implementing the technical guidance in permitting decisions on an interim basis immediately, while public comments are being received and considered.

For more information and to view the technical guidance in its entirety, visit www.dep.state.pa.us.

Media contact: Katy Gresh, 717-787-1323

In North Dakota, Wasted Natural Gas Flickers Against the Sky – NYTimes.com

In North Dakota, Wasted Natural Gas Flickers Against the Sky – NYTimes.com.

Smog v. Jobs: Is Obama Admin Endangering U.S. Environment, Public Health with Retreat on Smog Standards?

Smog v. Jobs: Is Obama Admin Endangering U.S. Environment, Public Health with Retreat on Smog Standards?.

CANADA’S EMISSIONS TRENDS July, 2011

E197D5E7-1AE3-4A06-B4FC-CB74EAAAA60F\CanadasEmissionsTrends.pdf (application/pdf Object).

CANADA’S EMISSIONS TRENDS

The Debate on Fracturing – NYTimes.editorial 8/21/11

The Debate on Fracturing – NYTimes.com.

Cortland County Not Ready For Hydro-Fracking

Oldies 101.5 – Local News.

 

Cortland County Not Ready For Hydro-Fracking

 

Last Edited: 2011-08-18 08:20:06    Story ID: 4151

 

Cortland County health officials say the county is woefully unprepared to handle the impacts of Hydro fracking.

On Tuesday night the county natural gas task force met to talk about the health issues that may arise as a result of increased natural gas drilling activities in New York.

While most of the concerns raised in connection with hydro fracking center around water, including protection of drinking water supplies and managing the waste water that is used in fracking. Local health officials say they are more concerned about impacts on air quality.

Deputy County public health director M.J Uttech says studies from other States including Texas and Colorado have shown residents are much more susceptible to changes in air quality before water becomes an issue, especially children.

Uttech says the county and the region are not equipped to conduct the air monitoring that will be required with the increased natural gas exploration.

Uttech says the county will likely have to add staff to the health department in order to respond to the wave of environmental complaints that will filed related to the gas drilling activities.

Among other health issues raised at the meeting are the expected impacts from the increased number of people that will come into the area as part of the drilling camps. Uttech says this presents a different set of problems including increased crime, new diseases, higher housing costs, and stress to the communities established way of life.

At this point the State is continuing to review the rules governing hydro fracking, the amended rules are expected out next year, when complete the state may begin issuing drilling permits.

 

The Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale Short-Term Ambient Air Sampling Project — Natural Gas — Penn State Cooperative Extension

The Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale Short-Term Ambient Air Sampling Project — Natural Gas — Penn State Cooperative Extension.

The Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale Short-Term Ambient Air Sampling Project

Nick Lazor, Chief, DEP Air Quality Monitoring Division

 

Sand mines create jobs, concerns – JSOnline

Sand mines create jobs, concerns – JSOnline.

Fracking: EPA Targets Air Pollution From Natural Gas Drilling Boom

Fracking: EPA Targets Air Pollution From Natural Gas Drilling Boom.

EPA targets air pollution from gas drilling boom

EPA targets air pollution from gas drilling boom.