April 16, 2014 Leave a comment
April 13, 2014 Leave a comment
The Medical Society of the State of New York passed a Resolution on Radon at their state-wide annual meeting yesterday, April 12, 2014 in Tarrytown, NY. It reads:
RESOLVED, That the Medical Society of the State of New York support policy that limits exposure to radon and its decay products which are known to cause primary lung cancer in non-smokers and to potentiate the likelihood of lung cancer in smokers; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the Medical Society of the State of New York support legislation the protects the public health by ensuring that New York State is committed to reducing sources of excess radon emission, and monitoring radon gas exposure levels to confirm that these radon gas levels do not exceed the recommended levels set by the Environmental Protection Agency.
In the past MSSNY has endorsed resolutions calling for moratoriums on gas drilling in tight shale deposits. This year the concern shifted to the radioactive elements found the gas itself. While the concern over radon is much broader then a concern over gas drilling, the physicians clearly had the radioactivity associated with gas drilling in tight sale deposits in mind when they passed their resolution. Some of the statements leading to the resolution proper make mention of the radon “inextricably linked” with the methane from the tight shale deposits, especially in the northeast. Others pointed to the potential exposure through the delivery systems, the decay products, and the shorter transit times.
WHEREAS, there is no safe exposure level of radon for public health protection
WHEREAS, Radon, which originates naturally in bedrock and shale, is inextricably combined with other natural gases sequestered in these subterranean reserves, and is therefore extracted in combination with natural gas
WHEREAS, due to geographic proximity of New York State to the Marcellus Shale region, there is significantly shorter transit time through local regional pipeline networks transporting radon-laced natural gas to NYS natural gas consumers thus resulting in the delivery of natural gas containing much higher concentrations of radon
As the threat of actual gas drilling subsides in the State, the public heath threats associated with the growing gas drilling infrastructure are now on the organization’s radar. Stay tuned.
Chris W. Burger
110 Walters Road
Whitney Point, NY 13862
March 25, 2014 Leave a comment
From: David Masur, PennEnvironment Director <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: jlacreevy <email@example.com>
Sent: Tue, Mar 25, 2014 12:34 pm
Subject: Biggest clean water news of the decade
Brandywine Creek. The Wissahickon. Neshaminy. Nine Mile Run.
What do all these streams have in common? Every single one of them is unprotected under the Clean Water Act.
Today, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed a rule to restore Clean Water Act protections to hundreds of Pennsylvania waterways and wetlands and the 8 million Pennsylvanians who get their drinking water from these sources.
Thank the EPA for taking this historic step forward and ask them to see it through to the finish line.
As big as this is, we haven’t won yet. In fact, the most important piece of the fight has just begun. The EPA is asking for public input on their plan in the next few months, and the nation’s biggest polluters are already lining up to stop it in its tracks.
Polluters who have benefited from these loopholes for years are fighting back. Big Ag is saying this rulemaking is cause for “battle,” and last time the EPA took a step half this big, ExxonMobil threatened “legal warfare.”
That’s why I’m contacting you now — to make sure we can send 30,000 messages from Pennsylvanians to the EPA so they hear loud and clear that we are serious about clean water.
Nobody should be allowed to treat our waterways like their personal sewer.
For more than a decade, PennEnvironment has worked to close loopholes in the Clean Water Act that have left nearly half of Pennsylvania’s’ streams and many acres of wetlands at risk of unchecked pollution. These waterways are critical–they feed and filter our drinking water sources and are some of our favorite places to swim, boat and fish.
Today’s announcement comes on the heels of hundreds of thousands of messages sent from people like you asking the Obama administration to act. Over the past three years, along with our sister organizations across the country, we’ve had more than 1 million conversations with everyday people about protecting our waterways, and we’ve built a coalition of more than 400 local elected officials, 300 small farmers, and 300 small business owners to stand with us and call on the EPA to act.
Let’s finish the job.
Tell the EPA: It’s gone on long enough. Restore Clean Water Act protections to the waterways we love and depend on.
Thanks for all you do,
PennEnvironment Research & Policy Center Director
P.S. A decade of work comes down to this. The EPA’s announcement today brings us closer than we’ve ever been to getting our waterways the protection they deserve. But it’s you who will help see it through to the end. Send your public comment in today to close Clean Water Act loopholes once and for all.
 “Leaked Draft of Water Jurisdiction Rule May Not Be Final EPA Position, Vilsack Says,” Amena H. Saiyid, Bloomberg BNA. 17 January 2014
March 4, 2014 Leave a comment
The person I spoke with answered the phone so likely knew not much.The HEADQUARTERS of env products and svcs are in Syracuse – they are a big outfit. They have facilities in PA, and from what I was told there are no storage facilities nor transport of PA waste from their outfit from PA to NY – they store it there in PA. Just opened another facility near Pittsburgh. the space they have here in syracuse is not large.warrants more looking into but their facilities in PA are huge so I do not doubt they are not bringing it to store here anyway. needs a looksee on how they have to report disposal…and where. likely is coming to NY but I sorta doubt Syracuse.MaryMarcellus gig link here http://www.epsofvermont.com/gas%20field%20services.htmlOn Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:34 PM, William Huston <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Thanks very much for calling, Mary.
That’s troubling. The person you spoke with either was mis-informed,
… or worse.
I used 2 Fractracker maps to begin my inquiry:
This map shows Syracuse received “Fracing Fluid Waste” = 37.96 BBLs
This map makes a connection to the waste facility and particular wells:
Wells are: HEPLER D 235 2H, 7H, 3H, 5H
From this I was able to grab the PA Waste data for 2013:
And sorted on facility Zip Code.
Sure enough, it’s all there. (see attached).
Each well contributed 9.49 BBLs x4 = 37.96 BBLs.37.96 BBLs * 43 gal/BBL = ~1632.3 gal.The big tanker trucks which haul brine are various sizes.A: 4,600 gal (106 BBLs) This triaxle vaccum trucks are extremely common around Susquehanna CountyB: 5,600 gal (130 BBLs) These trucks haul landfil leachate from Waterloo to EndicottC: 9,300 gal (216 BBLs) Larger trucks, like those that haul gasoline, also Waterloo to Endicott
So, ~38 BBLs is a relatively small amount of fluid,
one of the smaller vacuum trucks ~1/3 full.The largest 1,100 gal “water buffalos” in PA are ~26 BBLs.Still, interesting they didn’t give you the straight story…BHOn Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Mary Menapace <email@example.com> wrote:As for Syracuse -Vermont Env Products and Services headquarters are in Syracuse. On PA DEP site they are listed as taking “used frack fluid for storage and ultimate disposal.”I called their HQ here in Syracuse and was told no PA wastes are coming to Syracuse – they have a couple of large ‘storage’ facilities in PA, one east and one west I believe – where they store the “used frack fluid.” was assured none is coming to Onondaga county, who just passed a county wide waste ban.I asked about definition of used FF – the person did not know – and I asked about radioactivity, keeping workers and equipment safe etc. - and she said that Env. Products and Svcs are not licensed for two types of waste – explosive or radioactive so what they deal with in PA cannot be radioactive “or they would have to tell us.” yeah.Response to where “ultimately disposed of” – vague. Response to where “Reused?” – to frack.”So I wrote the company rep on the website and asked about same – composition of used FF, disposal, reuse destinations, radioactivity - never got an answer. Have not had time to circle back yet.MaryOn Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Mike Bernhard <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Have you asked the woman in New Hartford to check with her highway dept?—– Original Message —–From: William HustonSent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 9:23 PMSubject: [nygrass] Qs about PA drilling wastes coming into NYI have 5 specific questions which I hope you can help answer.1) Have PA drilling wastes been received at Watertown NY? (landfill or POTW)2) Have PA drilling wastes been received at Auburn NY? (landfill or POTW)
These claims were made here, but I’ve never seen this mentioned anywhere else:
3) Are PA drilling wastes being being spread on NY roads?
I have heard the above as rumors, however I have found no authoritative source.
This article suggests it, but offers no proof. A woman from New Hartford (Oneida Co.)
just contacted me reporting a orange-brown fluid spread on her roads.
Do you have direct knowledge of this? Published source?
Where we know the wastes are going:
The existing research I’ve seen lists the following sites as having accepted
drilling wastes from PA:
- Chemung Co. Landfill, Lowman (source: Fractracker, etc)
- C & D Hakes Landfill, Painted Post (souce: Fractracker, etc)
- Cuylerville desalinization plant (source: Livingston County News)
- Hyland Landfill, Angelica NY (Mantius, Fractracker)
- Seneca Meadows Landfill, Waterloo (Fractracker)
- Allied Landfill, Niagara Falls, NY (Fractracker)
- EPS of Vermont, Syracuse (Fractracker)
4) Do you know of other sites directly taking PA drilling wastes?
Here are places taking PA drilling wastes indirectly, via landfill leachate from direct sources:
- Huron Campus/EIT (now i3 Electronics), Endicott (from Seneca Meadows, DEC and other sources)
5) Do you know of other INDIRECT sites receiving landfill leachate from direct sources?
Toxics Targeting has archive of DEC approvals for spreading brine on roads: http://www.toxicstargeting. com/MarcellusShale/documents/2011/07/21/wastewater-spreading These were not included in the Riverkeeper FOIA request results.